Hi, guy!
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 01:42:03AM +0300, you wrote the following:
> > I'm trying to set a server machine to send it's syslog messages to my machine.
>
> just for general info: remote syslog is done by sending messages using
> UDP, without any packet received acknowledgement or retrans
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Emmanuel Lanzmann wrote:
>
> I have Red Hat linux (6.1). I recently decided to upgrade rpm to
> 3.0.5-9. Instead to do it with rpm, I decided to download the
> SOURCE (of rpm) and to compile it (I really like to see my computer
> compiling !!). So far, evrything went great.
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Boaz Rymland wrote:
> I'm trying to set a server machine to send it's syslog messages to my machine.
just for general info: remote syslog is done by sending messages using
UDP, without any packet received acknowledgement or retransmission. thus,
if a logging packet is lost
Omer Efraim wrote:
>
> Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> >
> > Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > > Let me know when it is OK so I can add php support to Apache, and get the
> > > Links manager to run again.
> >
> > For some weird reason, both PHP3 and PHP4 keep segfaulting Apache on
> > start.
> > The gdb backtrac
Emmanuel Lanzmann wrote:
>
> I have Red Hat linux (6.1). I recently decided to upgrade rpm to
> 3.0.5-9. Instead to do it with rpm, I decided to download the
> SOURCE (of rpm) and to compile it (I really like to see my computer
> compiling !!). So far, evrything went great.
>
> Now, since then,
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Boaz Rymland wrote:
syslogd -r
RTFM.
--Ariel
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm trying to set a server machine to send it's syslog messages to my machine.
> For that I already managed to send all messages with :
> *.* @my_machine
>
> I've verified that indeed I get this on my
I have Red Hat linux (6.1). I recently decided to upgrade rpm to
3.0.5-9. Instead to do it with rpm, I decided to download the
SOURCE (of rpm) and to compile it (I really like to see my computer
compiling !!). So far, evrything went great.
Now, since then, when I try to install some package w
hello !!
i am looking for some one to debug ASP pages for my company
also just got linux mandrake ver 7.1 and looking for some one who installed
it and met any -if at all-problems on the way
thanks
Lam,Yochai
System administration,
development dep.
Kla - tencor corp.
Migdal haemek
israel
ph +972
Boaz Rymland wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm trying to set a server machine to send it's syslog messages to my machine.
> For that I already managed to send all messages with :
> *.* @my_machine
>
> I've verified that indeed I get this on my machine with "tcpdump port 514" . I
> can se
Hi folks,
I'm trying to set a server machine to send it's syslog messages to my machine.
For that I already managed to send all messages with :
*.* @my_machine
I've verified that indeed I get this on my machine with "tcpdump port 514" . I
can see messages poring in.
But, I cant seem
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>
> Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
>
> > And once again I must say: "Don't think so 3rd layer, JeanLuke".
>
> I am not, number 1.
hehehe... I think in the moviwe it was the Borg Queen that said that ;-)
> > I was about to explain how to build a 2d level (OSI) bridiging proxy b
guy keren wrote:
> _if_ at all one needs NAT for that... or NAT in _any_ classical sense of
> the word (according to your broad definitions, any using of a proxy server
> is actually an introduction of NAT, since not the original machine's
> addres is being shown in the FROM address of the pack
Hi,
I am using kernel 2.2.16 (plus patches to ResierFS and IDE). Recently
the kernel crashed while trying to rip audio track from a CD. Now,
If I remember correctly, 2.2.16 was issued after a serious security
bug was found, and I think that a short time after issuing 2.2.16,
Alan Cox issued a 2.2
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> > maybe you should start thinking then ;) . if a "regular router" = cisco -
> > then, yes, it can do that, and much more (depending on the version of its
> > IOS).
>
> Maybe, but not as explained in your email.
actually, _exactly_ as explained in m
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> And once again I must say: "Don't think so 3rd layer, JeanLuke".
I am not, number 1.
>
> I was about to explain how to build a 2d level (OSI) bridiging proxy but
> someone already did:
> http://perso.wanadoo.fr/magpie/EtherDivert.html
>
> No extra hop, no need for an
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> You will find that your solution forwards ALL outbound packets to the proxy
> machine. Not just those aimed at port 80. You are then left with my original
> problem - I don't want to penalise the entire office traffic with an extra hop
> (actually - extra two hops and a
16 matches
Mail list logo
