Sure, it's here:
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/pipermail/linux-il/2009-October/002945.html
Hetz
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Elazar Leibovich elaz...@gmail.com wrote:
I apologize for double posting then.
I didn't find the relevant thread in the
Dear Interested,
Please note that slides will NOT be available soon, as this work is to
be submitted as a paper.
Orna
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Orna Agmon Ben-Yehuda
ladyp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, December 21st (TOMORROW) at 18:30, Haifux will gather to
hear Muli Ben-Yehuda of
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 09:44:15AM +0200, Orna Agmon Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Monday, December 21st (TOMORROW) at 18:30, Haifux will gather to
hear Muli Ben-Yehuda of IBM Research - Haifa talk about
Nested x86 Virtualization
Just to remain completely off-topic, some extra non-virtual
fyi, according to this:
http://gs.statcounter.com/?nomore=ie6#browser_version-ww-weekly-200827-200951
ff 3.5 is the most popular browser in the world right now (per version).
tom.
2009/12/20 Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il
Hi Uri!
Just a note - please break your E-mails into paragraphs
Hi all,
I'm trying, without success, to disable loop unrolling when compiling a
program with -O3 with gcc (4.4, but I see the same problem with 4.3).
The program is the following one:
volatile int v;
void func()
{
int i;
for( i=0; i8; ++i ) {
v=0;
}
}
I compile it with the
Just out of curiousity: why do you care about the resulting assembly?
It's a strong indication that you are doing something wrong :)
I would try to set i to volatile or to an extern to trick the compiler
to drop the optimization (if the flags don't work).
--Aviv
2009/12/21 Shachar Shemesh
Aviv Greenberg wrote:
Just out of curiousity: why do you care about the resulting assembly?
It's a strong indication that you are doing something wrong :)
First, we have found several bugs in GCC as a result of caring about
the assembly. Lets agree that it's an indication that someone is
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 09:03 +0200, Elazar Leibovich wrote:
Can anyone recommend a combined scanner and printer (so that the
photocopying and the faxing capabiities can be used autonomously, even
when the computer is off) which works reasonably well with linux?
Going through the exhaustive
This is what i get if i set i to be volatile in gcc 4.3.1 with -O3:
0: 55 push %ebp
1: 89 e5 mov%esp,%ebp
3: 83 ec 10sub$0x10,%esp
6: c7 45 fc 00 00 00 00movl $0x0,-0x4(%ebp)
d: 8b 45 fc
On Monday 21 December 2009 14:00:39 Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Where it gets worrying is when I try to cancel loop unrolling. I tried
-fno-unroll-loops and -fno-peel-loops, to no effect. I even tried
messing with the --param option (max-unrolled-insns, max-unroll-times,
max-peel-times) to no
Also, i tried grepping for loop and then negate all loop related params:
linux-gec2:~/projects/lu # gcc -c -O3 -fno-align-loops
-fno-move-loop-invariants -fno-peel-loops -fno-prefetch-loop-arrays
-fno-rerun-cse-after-loop -fno-reschedule-modulo-scheduled-loops
-fno-tree-loop-im
2009/12/21 Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz:
Hi all,
I'm trying, without success, to disable loop unrolling when compiling a
program with -O3 with gcc (4.4, but I see the same problem with 4.3).
I am actually very surprized that -O3 unrolls loops. It is not
supposed to. The idea to include
Dotan Shavit wrote:
On Monday 21 December 2009 14:00:39 Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Where it gets worrying is when I try to cancel loop unrolling. I tried
-fno-unroll-loops and -fno-peel-loops, to no effect. I even tried
messing with the --param option (max-unrolled-insns, max-unroll-times,
2009/12/21 Elazar Leibovich elaz...@gmail.com:
Can anyone recommend a combined scanner and printer (so that the
photocopying and the faxing capabiities can be used autonomously, even when
the computer is off) which works reasonably well with linux?
Going through the exhaustive scanners list in
If you have problems with the fonts, you can easily change them in Firefox
using Edit - Preferences. But please stop using Internet Explorer.
He may need to turn on font anti-aliasing for non-MS programs. By
default, Windows XP does not anti-alias Firefox fonts, and they do
look terrible.
2009/12/20 Uri Even-Chen u...@speedy.net:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
I also have a problem with Bank Hapoalim on Firefox. The numbers are
switched, instead of (1) דואר נכנס I get דואר נכנס )1( (the number
is on the right) and instead of (25) סל
I tested all 3 browsers (Google Chrome, Firefox and Internet Explorer)
with Gmail, and the fonts look best with Internet Explorer! The fonts
in Google Chrome and Firefox don't look good, I can't explain it but
the fonts in Internet Explorer look better!
Turn on anti-aliasing for all
By the way, I tried to report to the bank, they gave me a captcha, (I
hate captchas), I made a mistake and they deleted my feedback. I
didn't have time to type it again... the banks such, they are really
bad when it comes to supporting computer technologies, and their
business depends on
Hello,
frankly I don't understand why do you need ssh to the router
Apart from tunnels and tc, a real need is for running tethereal
(wireshark ) on it and sniffing the wireless (and non wireless)
traffic. This is a real need
in many development projects.
I would appreciate if anybody who knows
Howdy ,
I'm working on creating Mobile to SIP solution that can be used both on
Windows and Linux.
I'm talking about Asterisk level of solution ( I talked breifly with one
developer about connecting mobile phones as AT devices) but rather on an
application that can be used as a SIP client.
Mobile
20 matches
Mail list logo
