On 03/09/2012 03:41 PM, Omer Zak wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:31 +0200, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
>
>> Note that /opt is intended for software (and data) that is not a part
>> of the system/distro, is installed in a non-standard way, etc. This is
>> something you may want to keep intact, e.g., wh
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:31 +0200, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Note that /opt is intended for software (and data) that is not a part
> of the system/distro, is installed in a non-standard way, etc. This is
> something you may want to keep intact, e.g., when you upgrade the base
> system.
What, then,
On Thursday, 8 בMarch 2012 14:04:37 Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Reference:
> http://projects.gnome.org/NetworkManager/developers/api/09/ref-settings.html
>
> Sadly I did not see any progress in http://bugs.debian.org/637769
Thanks for the pointer. Let's see how long does it take:
https://bugzilla.re
On 03/09/2012 10:31 AM, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Omer Zak writes:
My current Linux system has a 15GB root partition, which has 6GB files.
Turns out that that about 5.5GB are in the /opt directory.
My /usr partition is 206GB, of which about 33GB are used.
This led me to wonder why is it not reco
Omer Zak writes:
> My current Linux system has a 15GB root partition, which has 6GB files.
> Turns out that that about 5.5GB are in the /opt directory.
> My /usr partition is 206GB, of which about 33GB are used.
>
> This led me to wonder why is it not recommended in the FSSTND[1] to
> deprecate /
