On Wed, Jan 25, 2006, Ez-Aton wrote about Re: Looking for Backup solutions for
Linux:
12 / 2 (=half a dozen) * 20GB (per volume) = 120GB
I can't see any resonable priced internet line which supports such
online backup. USB IDE disks I do not recommend, for their low
performance, and low
Folks -
We are looking for some backup solutions for a Linux based file server.
Up until now we have been burning DVD's, but as the volume of files
grows that is becoming a less manageable solution. In general we are
talking about amounts of up to 20Gb per backed up volume with about half
deploy RAIDs so you'll need more than two 400GB
hard disks).
--- Omer
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 16:33 +0200, Yaacov Fenster - System Engineering
Troubleshooting and other stuff wrote:
Folks -
We are looking for some backup solutions for a Linux based file
are looking for some backup solutions for a Linux based file server.
Up until now we have been burning DVD's, but as the volume of files
grows that is becoming a less manageable solution. In general we are
talking about amounts of up to 20Gb per backed up volume with about
half a dozen volumes
Troubleshooting and other stuff wrote:
Folks -
We are looking for some backup solutions for a Linux based file
server. Up until now we have been burning DVD's, but as the volume of
files grows that is becoming a less manageable solution. In general we
are talking about amounts of up to 20Gb per backed
Yaacov Fenster - System Engineering Troubleshooting and other stuff wrote:
Folks -
In general we are talking about amounts of up to 20Gb per backed up
volume with about half a dozen volumes.
This is not a significant volume of data.
Ideally we should be able to backup multiple full copies
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Yaacov Fenster - System Engineering Troubleshooting and other stuff wrote:
Folks -
In general we are talking about amounts of up to 20Gb per backed up
volume with about half a dozen volumes.
This is not a significant
Yaacov Fenster - System Engineering Troubleshooting and other stuff wrote:
Folks -
In general we are talking about amounts of up to 20Gb per backed up
volume with about half a dozen volumes.
This is not a significant volume of data.
Ideally we should be able to backup multiple full copies
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 09:35:07PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
2. Use IDE drives inside a USB 2.0 adapter. Buy a few removable IDE
adapters and mount one case inside an external USB IDE adapter. This
allows you to easilly (no screwdrivers) replace the disks. If your
storage volume is as you
Ez-Aton wrote:
12 / 2 (=half a dozen) * 20GB (per volume) = 120GB
You are right. I misread the original post. Don't forget that these
120GB will likely only take about 60GB (on average, YMMV, yada yada
yada) of actual space on the backup medium, but I agree that it's a
bigger monthly cost.
I
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
Got a URI for the patch?
Cheers,
Muli
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/
I got it from the smartmontools home page.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
Have you backed up today's work?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:09:22PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/
I got it from the smartmontools home page.
That's not a single patch, that's a whole on-going development
tree parts of which are included in various kernels. Thanks
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:08:14PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I agree that 120GB (as opposed to 20GB, as I thought before) suggest a
tape solution. Still, the large up-front cost of the tape drive, coupled
with the cost of each tape, make a hard disk solution seem appealing.
I like a
dustry
hate to spend (you never need backup! You only need the ability to
restore. Remember that. Your boss hates to pay for backup solutions,
but he'll be all over you when data is missing, and you have no way to
restore it). You see it where it has proven itself to be cost-effective
enough
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:34:29PM +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:08:14PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I agree that 120GB (as opposed to 20GB, as I thought before) suggest a
tape solution. Still, the large up-front cost of the tape drive, coupled
with the
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:34:29PM +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:08:14PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I agree that 120GB (as opposed to 20GB, as I thought before) suggest a
tape solution. Still, the large
Gavrie Philipson wrote:
Schlomo Schapiro wrote:
Hi list,
I would like to hear comments about commercial Linux Backup Solutions (for
a mixed Linux/Windows network).
Today, I found a very nice backup solution that works with Linux. It's
called TapeWare (www.tapeware.com
Schlomo Schapiro wrote:
Hi list,
I would like to hear comments about commercial Linux Backup Solutions (for
a mixed Linux/Windows network).
Today, I found a very nice backup solution that works with Linux. It's
called TapeWare (www.tapeware.com). It supports Linux and Microsoft both
netvision wrote:
Hi Schlomo,
I wonder you didn't mention NetWorker product from Legato - www.legato.com ,
that has the biggest installed base Worldwide, as well as above 250
installations
in Israel. The distributer of this product is "MBI, Advanced Computer
solutions"
and we
Henry Ficher wrote:You should also consider ARCserveIT for Linux:
http://www.cai.com/arcserveit/arc_linux_ae.htm
I don't have any experience with the Linux version, but if it's half as
good as the Windows NT or Novell versions, I would go for it.
Don't even THINK of using ArcSERVE
Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote:
I have used Arkeia successfully at a number of sites and unsuccessfully
once with the evaluation version. The problem with Arkeia IMHO is that
when it doesn't work it is very difficult to debug. However *when* it
works it works very well. It's compression and
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 4:23 PM
Subject: RFC: Backup Solutions
Hi list,
I would like to hear comments about commercial Linux Backup Solutions (for
a mixed Linux/Windows network).
After a quick search of the web I found three main candidates:
- Arkeia (by Know) www.arkeia.com
-
Linux as
NetWorker clients:
Hebrew University, Weizmann Institute,
Mellanox and lastly Sphera.
Thanks,
Avi Koski
-äåãòä î÷åøéú-
îàú: Ira Abramov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
àì: FLiCK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
úàøéê: éåí ùðé 24 éåìé 2000 23:09
ðåùà: Re: Backup Solutions
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000
Hi list,
I would like to hear comments about commercial Linux Backup Solutions (for
a mixed Linux/Windows network).
After a quick search of the web I found three main candidates:
- Arkeia (by Know) www.arkeia.com
- Backup Professional (by Unitrends) www.unitrends.com
- NovaNet 8 (by NovaStor
iro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
àì: Linux-IL Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
úàøéê: éåí ùðé 24 éåìé 2000 16:26
ðåùà: RFC: Backup Solutions
Hi list,
I would like to hear comments about commercial Linux Backup Solutions (for
a mixed Linux/Windows network).
After a quick search of the web I found three main
n I wonder you didn't mention NetWorker product from Legato -
n www.legato.com , that has the biggest installed base Worldwide, as
n well as above 250 installations in Israel. The distributer of this
Was I looking very bad or Legato solutions doesn't support Linux?
At least, Networker has no
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, netvision wrote:
Hi list,
I would like to hear comments about commercial Linux Backup Solutions (for
a mixed Linux/Windows network).
After a quick search of the web I found three main candidates:
- Arkeia (by Know) www.arkeia.com
- Backup Professional (by Unitrends
6.0
distribution CD (ncurses3-1.9.9e-9.i386.rpm). This solution is valid
for Mandrake 2.2.14-15 too.
3. In the upper left corner of the home page, use the 'search' option for
the word 'linux' and you'll find interesting papers regarding Linux
backup
solutions. One of them, #39
for
the word 'linux' and you'll find interesting papers regarding
Linux backup solutions. One of them, #39 - "The Linux Challenge
Product literature" is very interesting.
again, URL?
4. You can also try Linux for Legato Cluster and download it. This
is an High Availabili
n 2. Quick Link - Compatability Guides - Software Compatability Guide.
Well, not too obvious path... Also, word "client" hints that server on
Linux is non-existant? Then, it's not support. It's half-support. If I
have Linux server, I want to backup it on Linux, not install another NT
server.
n
: netvision [EMAIL PROTECTED]
òåú÷: Schlomo Schapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Linux-IL Mailing List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
úàøéê: éåí ùìéùé 25 éåìé 2000 00:03
ðåùà: Re: áòðééï: áòðééï: Backup Solutions
n 2. Quick Link - Compatability Guides - Software Compatability Guide
' and you'll find interesting papers regarding Linux
backup
solutions. One of them, #39 - "The Linux Challenge Product literature"
is very interesting.
4. You can also try Linux for Legato Cluster and download it. This is an
High
Availability product that is running also on Solaris
are especially good.
Regards,
- yba
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Schlomo Schapiro wrote:
Hi list,
I would like to hear comments about commercial Linux Backup Solutions (for
a mixed Linux/Windows network).
After a quick search of the web I found three main candidates:
- Arkeia (by Know) www.arkeia.com
.
Thanks,
Avi Koski
-äåãòä î÷åøéú-
îàú: Ira Abramov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
àì: FLiCK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
úàøéê: éåí ùðé 24 éåìé 2000 23:09
ðåùà: Re: Backup Solutions
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, netvision wrote:
1. Sitemap - Related links - Current Products - NetWorker for Linux
Client
2. Quick Link
34 matches
Mail list logo
