Re: Home made NAS

2013-10-25 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
2012/12/5 Geoffrey S. Mendelson geoffreymendel...@gmail.com:
 Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:


 All of the above is probably negligible compared to two important
 arguments that have already been mentioned: 1) as a home appliance
 there are better, more economical, and - most importantly! - quieter
 solutions for a modest price; 2) tinkering with such a heterogeneous
 system will yield invaluable experience, especially in terms of never
 trying anything like this for anything important.



 I want to point out that disk failure statistics may be less useful than one
 would think. The majority of hard disks came from a factory in Thailand
 which was wiped out by a flood about 2-3 years ago.

 This caused a large rise in the price of disks, and the reamining
 manufacturers scrambling to produce more disks from existing factories at
 lower prices.

 The price of hard disks has yet to be as low as it was.

 Since those new disks have not been around long enough for long term
 failure statistics, I would be careful using the old ones.

 BTW, in an unrelated discussion somewhere else two days ago, several
 professional sysadmins I know recommended OpenIndiana (an open source fork
 of Solaris) and ZFS for home NAS's.
If we're going off on fs tangents, has anyone here started playing
with btrfs yet? As far as I understand it supposed to be pretty stable
by now but so far I am still sticking to ext4
Regards,
Eliyahu - אליהו

 Geoff.

 --
 Geoffrey S. Mendelson,  N3OWJ/4X1GM/KBUH7245/KBUW5379
 Owning a smartphone: Technology's equivalent to learning to play
 chopsticks on the piano as a child and thinking you're a musician.
 (sent to me by a friend)






 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread Dan Shimshoni
Hello, Nadav,
 Instead, I decided to buy a 2-terabyte WD My Book Live for $160.
For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM- based server in 
one package.

What do you mean by ARM-based server here ? I don't sure
I understand. Does this product include some tiny ARM server?
Do you have access to this server by telnet/ssh, and is there a BSP
open source package ? I see you have ethernet connection there.
I look in WD site, and I don't see that they mention an ARM
based server there:

http://wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=280


Can you please give a link/elaborate about the product you are talking about ?

rgs
DS

For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM-based)
server in one package.

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.il wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 04, 2012, David Suna wrote about Home made NAS:
 I have a bunch of old machines lying around which are currently just
 collecting dust.nbsp; I would like to collect the disks from all of
 them, put them together into a single server to act as a file server

 A couple of years I started doing something similar to what you are planning.
 I took an old computer, and stuck in it a bunch of hard disks I had from
 previous years - one was 1 terabyte, another 300 gigabyte, and a third
 80 gigabytes. The computer ran Linux, and served files (mostly CDs and DVDs)
 on my home network with NFS and Samba.

 But then I realized how annoying this setup was: the computer was very big,
 noisy, and had to be on all the time. The old disks (especially the 80
 gigabytes) were a joke, and I all three disks summed together were
 smaller than a just new disk I could buy.

 Instead, I decided to buy a 2-terabyte WD My Book Live for $160.

 For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM-based)
 server in one package. The package is 10 times smaller than my old computer,
 nearly silent, and uses up less electricity, and came preconfigured with
 the server software (it runs Linux, but you don't have direct access to
 it).

 So in my opinion, unless you're completely broke, and/or treating this
 as nothing more than an educational experience, building a NAS out of
 old equipment is waste of your energy.

 --
 Nadav Har'El|  Tuesday, Dec 4 2012, 20 Kislev 5773
 n...@math.technion.ac.il 
 |-
 Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |If you notice this notice, you'll notice
 http://nadav.harel.org.il   |it's not worth noticing but is noticable.

 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
2012/12/5 Dan Shimshoni danshi...@gmail.com:
 Hello, Nadav,
 Instead, I decided to buy a 2-terabyte WD My Book Live for $160.
For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM- based server 
in one package.

 What do you mean by ARM-based server here ? I don't sure
 I understand. Does this product include some tiny ARM server?
 Do you have access to this server by telnet/ssh, and is there a BSP
 open source package ? I see you have ethernet connection there.
 I look in WD site, and I don't see that they mention an ARM
 based server there:

 http://wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=280


 Can you please give a link/elaborate about the product you are talking about ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WD_TV
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=wd+live+debian

Basically it's a disk + server to handle cifs/nfs
Regards,
Eliyahu - אליהו

 rgs
 DS

 For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM-based)
 server in one package.

 On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.il wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 04, 2012, David Suna wrote about Home made NAS:
 I have a bunch of old machines lying around which are currently just
 collecting dust.nbsp; I would like to collect the disks from all of
 them, put them together into a single server to act as a file server

 A couple of years I started doing something similar to what you are planning.
 I took an old computer, and stuck in it a bunch of hard disks I had from
 previous years - one was 1 terabyte, another 300 gigabyte, and a third
 80 gigabytes. The computer ran Linux, and served files (mostly CDs and DVDs)
 on my home network with NFS and Samba.

 But then I realized how annoying this setup was: the computer was very big,
 noisy, and had to be on all the time. The old disks (especially the 80
 gigabytes) were a joke, and I all three disks summed together were
 smaller than a just new disk I could buy.

 Instead, I decided to buy a 2-terabyte WD My Book Live for $160.

 For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM-based)
 server in one package. The package is 10 times smaller than my old computer,
 nearly silent, and uses up less electricity, and came preconfigured with
 the server software (it runs Linux, but you don't have direct access to
 it).

 So in my opinion, unless you're completely broke, and/or treating this
 as nothing more than an educational experience, building a NAS out of
 old equipment is waste of your energy.

 --
 Nadav Har'El|  Tuesday, Dec 4 2012, 20 Kislev 
 5773
 n...@math.technion.ac.il 
 |-
 Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |If you notice this notice, you'll notice
 http://nadav.harel.org.il   |it's not worth noticing but is 
 noticable.

 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Moish mo...@mln.co.il wrote:
 On 04/12/2012 21:27, E.S. Rosenberg wrote:

 According to research done by google and also in my experience a
 normal harddisk (spinner) that has functioned without failures for 3
 years will generally last for a very long time

 Better read this article first (from 2007)
 http://storagemojo.com/2007/02/19/googles-disk-failure-experience/

As a word of warning, it is usually better to link to the actual paper
(quite a famous one in this case),
http://research.google.com/archive/disk_failures.pdf, and not to a
blog about it by someone who mixes up mean and median (he is honest
enough to acknowledge it after it was pointed out to him, but the text
was not changed).

To the point, there is very little that this particular paper says on
the topic of how much more likely old disks are to die. There is a
wealth of research papers on the subject, and the notion of bathtube
curve (new disks failing often - the so-called infant mortality -
then flat life expectancy and then old disks failing more often again)
is encountered commonly. If one assumes that the OPs old disks are
operational then it well may be that they have survived the infancy
and have some life in them.

One thing that the Google paper shows is that temperature
(overheating) affects older disks more than newer ones. One may assume
that a home setup in old boxes, with faulty fans, etc., this may
affect reliability adversely.

All of the above is probably negligible compared to two important
arguments that have already been mentioned: 1) as a home appliance
there are better, more economical, and - most importantly! - quieter
solutions for a modest price; 2) tinkering with such a heterogeneous
system will yield invaluable experience, especially in terms of never
trying anything like this for anything important.

-- 
Oleg Goldshmidt | p...@goldshmidt.org

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread Geoffrey S. Mendelson

Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:



All of the above is probably negligible compared to two important
arguments that have already been mentioned: 1) as a home appliance
there are better, more economical, and - most importantly! - quieter
solutions for a modest price; 2) tinkering with such a heterogeneous
system will yield invaluable experience, especially in terms of never
trying anything like this for anything important.




I want to point out that disk failure statistics may be less useful than 
one would think. The majority of hard disks came from a factory in 
Thailand which was wiped out by a flood about 2-3 years ago.


This caused a large rise in the price of disks, and the reamining 
manufacturers scrambling to produce more disks from existing factories 
at lower prices.


The price of hard disks has yet to be as low as it was.

Since those new disks have not been around long enough for long term 
failure statistics, I would be careful using the old ones.


BTW, in an unrelated discussion somewhere else two days ago, several 
professional sysadmins I know recommended OpenIndiana (an open source 
fork of Solaris) and ZFS for home NAS's.


Geoff.

--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson,  N3OWJ/4X1GM/KBUH7245/KBUW5379
Owning a smartphone: Technology's equivalent to learning to play
chopsticks on the piano as a child and thinking you're a musician.
(sent to me by a friend)





___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread vordoo

  
  

On 2012-12-05 12:48, Geoffrey S.
  Mendelson wrote:

BTW,
  in an unrelated discussion somewhere else two days ago, several
  professional sysadmins I know recommended OpenIndiana (an open
  source fork of Solaris) and ZFS for home NAS's.
  
  
  Geoff
Yep, I like OpenIndiana/ZFS. But, the recommended 64-bit sys  a
lot of RAM, kind of kills the "give the old HW new life" thing :-)
 new HW for that setup may be an overkill for home usage.


  


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread Udi Finkelstein
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/nas/nas-reviews/31314-wd-my-book-live-reviewed
http://mybookworld.wikidot.com/mybook-live

It has a 1GHz ARM and 256MB of RAM (No USB though).

Udi

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Dan Shimshoni danshi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello, Nadav,
  Instead, I decided to buy a 2-terabyte WD My Book Live for $160.
 For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM- based
 server in one package.

 What do you mean by ARM-based server here ? I don't sure
 I understand. Does this product include some tiny ARM server?
 Do you have access to this server by telnet/ssh, and is there a BSP
 open source package ? I see you have ethernet connection there.
 I look in WD site, and I don't see that they mention an ARM
 based server there:

 http://wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=280


 Can you please give a link/elaborate about the product you are talking
 about ?

 rgs
 DS

 For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM-based)
 server in one package.

 On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.il
 wrote:
  On Tue, Dec 04, 2012, David Suna wrote about Home made NAS:
  I have a bunch of old machines lying around which are currently just
  collecting dust.nbsp; I would like to collect the disks from all of
  them, put them together into a single server to act as a file server
 
  A couple of years I started doing something similar to what you are
 planning.
  I took an old computer, and stuck in it a bunch of hard disks I had from
  previous years - one was 1 terabyte, another 300 gigabyte, and a third
  80 gigabytes. The computer ran Linux, and served files (mostly CDs and
 DVDs)
  on my home network with NFS and Samba.
 
  But then I realized how annoying this setup was: the computer was very
 big,
  noisy, and had to be on all the time. The old disks (especially the 80
  gigabytes) were a joke, and I all three disks summed together were
  smaller than a just new disk I could buy.
 
  Instead, I decided to buy a 2-terabyte WD My Book Live for $160.
 
  For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM-based)
  server in one package. The package is 10 times smaller than my old
 computer,
  nearly silent, and uses up less electricity, and came preconfigured with
  the server software (it runs Linux, but you don't have direct access to
  it).
 
  So in my opinion, unless you're completely broke, and/or treating this
  as nothing more than an educational experience, building a NAS out of
  old equipment is waste of your energy.
 
  --
  Nadav Har'El|  Tuesday, Dec 4 2012, 20
 Kislev 5773
  n...@math.technion.ac.il
 |-
  Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |If you notice this notice, you'll
 notice
  http://nadav.harel.org.il   |it's not worth noticing but is
 noticable.
 
  ___
  Linux-il mailing list
  Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
  http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
2012/12/5 vordoo vor...@yahoo.com:

 On 2012-12-05 12:48, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:

 BTW, in an unrelated discussion somewhere else two days ago, several
 professional sysadmins I know recommended OpenIndiana (an open source fork
 of Solaris) and ZFS for home NAS's.

 Geoff

 Yep, I like OpenIndiana/ZFS. But, the recommended 64-bit sys  a lot of RAM,
 kind of kills the give the old HW new life thing :-)  new HW for that
 setup may be an overkill for home usage.
These days old hw can also be 64b (Athlon64 was released almost sept.
2003 - how time flies).
But if you need 64b I would just go for some Via Nano, AMD E-series or
some of the Intel Atom series cpus, they have x86-64 support and
except for the Atom these CPUs support out-of-order execution which
also can boost performance considerably.
In addition these systems are generally cheap and the electricity
savings will probably cover the difference between recycling your old
hw and buying a new motherboard+ram...

As a side tangent: has anyone here started playing with btrfs yet?
Regards,
Eliyahu - אליהו



 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread vordoo

  
  
On 2012-12-05 12:31, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:

  
As a word of warning, it is usually better to link to the actual paper
(quite a famous one in this case),
http://research.google.com/archive/disk_failures.pdf, and not to a
blog about it by someone who mixes up mean and median (he is honest
enough to acknowledge it after it was pointed out to him, but the text
was not changed).


As a word of warning ;-) I actually prefer the blog link as I can
easily Google the original "famous paper". This way I got to read a
good blog sum-up + threads on the paper too.

Different strokes to earn the world.

Thanks!
  


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Geoffrey S. Mendelson
geoffreymendel...@gmail.com wrote:

 Since those new disks have not been around long enough for long term
 failure statistics, I would be careful using the old ones.

The failure statistics papers I know of predate the Thai flood and so
are applicable to the older disks 9to the extent that they are
applicable at all).

-- 
Oleg Goldshmidt | p...@goldshmidt.org

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:40 PM, vordoo vor...@yahoo.com wrote:

 As a word of warning ;-) I actually prefer the blog link as I can easily
 Google the original famous paper. This way I got to read a good blog
 sum-up + threads on the paper too.

I was seriously put off by the guy's attempt to explain what MTBF was,
very incorrectly. I read it, and I had read the paper. I didn't find
it a good summary, but YMMV. The blog does contain a link to the
paper.

-- 
Oleg Goldshmidt | p...@goldshmidt.org

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread Josh Roden
A few years ago I was very disappointed when I bought a WD My Book and found
out that it was only able to do 3MB a sec max - real bummer.

Josh

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.ilwrote:

 On Tue, Dec 04, 2012, David Suna wrote about Home made NAS:
  I have a bunch of old machines lying around which are currently just
  collecting dust.nbsp; I would like to collect the disks from all of
  them, put them together into a single server to act as a file server

 A couple of years I started doing something similar to what you are
 planning.
 I took an old computer, and stuck in it a bunch of hard disks I had from
 previous years - one was 1 terabyte, another 300 gigabyte, and a third
 80 gigabytes. The computer ran Linux, and served files (mostly CDs and
 DVDs)
 on my home network with NFS and Samba.

 But then I realized how annoying this setup was: the computer was very big,
 noisy, and had to be on all the time. The old disks (especially the 80
 gigabytes) were a joke, and I all three disks summed together were
 smaller than a just new disk I could buy.

 Instead, I decided to buy a 2-terabyte WD My Book Live for $160.

 For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM-based)
 server in one package. The package is 10 times smaller than my old
 computer,
 nearly silent, and uses up less electricity, and came preconfigured with
 the server software (it runs Linux, but you don't have direct access to
 it).

 So in my opinion, unless you're completely broke, and/or treating this
 as nothing more than an educational experience, building a NAS out of
 old equipment is waste of your energy.

 --
 Nadav Har'El|  Tuesday, Dec 4 2012, 20 Kislev
 5773
 n...@math.technion.ac.il
 |-
 Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |If you notice this notice, you'll
 notice
 http://nadav.harel.org.il   |it's not worth noticing but is
 noticable.

 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012, Dan Shimshoni wrote about Re: Home made NAS:
 Hello, Nadav,
  Instead, I decided to buy a 2-terabyte WD My Book Live for $160.
 For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM- based server 
 in one package.
 
 What do you mean by ARM-based server here ? I don't sure
 I understand. Does this product include some tiny ARM server?

The WD My Book Live (you can look it up on the Web...) is a small
device, about twice the size of a hard disk. You plug it to the
electricity, and to the network (Ethernet). Inside it it contains
a hard disk (you don't need to, and can't, buy it separately), and
some sort of processor running prepackaged software which serves the
files with NFS or SMB, presents a Web interface, and so on.

While I heard the prepackaged software is based on Linux, I never
tried to hack it and modify the software or verify the type of
processor. Frankly, I don't really care about the processor or software -
I already have a general-purpose desktop for doing everything else, and
all I need this NAS to do is NAS, which it already does well.

 Do you have access to this server by telnet/ssh, and is there a BSP
 open source package ?

I have no idea. I assume that some hobbyists already managed to hack
this device, but like I said, I never really cared - it already does
pretty well everything I wanted to do.

 I see you have ethernet connection there.
 I look in WD site, and I don't see that they mention an ARM
 based server there:

It obviously has *some* processor - it's a full-fleged filesystem, HTTP, 
SMB and NFS servers. I thought it was ARM but I'm no longer sure:
according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Digital_My_Book,
My Book Live uses Applied Micro APM82181 processor working at 1 GHz and
has 256 MB of RAM. Apparently you're right - it's not ARM but actually,
believe it or not, a type of powerpc. But who cares - the only thing
important is that it runs Linux :-)

A short Google search turns up that people have indeed been able to
log into the Linux running on this device, 

 http://wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=280
 
 Can you please give a link/elaborate about the product you are talking about ?

Here the link to my review on Amazon of the 2TB model:

http://www.amazon.com/review/R1ABMTXISNZY6M/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm

A 3 TB model is already available, and if you have patience you may get
it for as low as $160 (last week on BH...).

You can also get a two-disk version (with RAID support), with 4-8 TB
versions (the 8 TB one was released yesterday, and contains WD's newly
announced 4 TB disks).

-- 
Nadav Har'El|Wednesday, Dec 5 2012, 21 Kislev 5773
n...@math.technion.ac.il |-
Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |You do not need a parachute to skydive.
http://nadav.harel.org.il   |You only need one to skydive twice.

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread David Suna


On 12/4/2012 10:43 AM, David Suna wrote:
I have a bunch of old machines lying around which are currently just 
collecting dust.  I would like to collect the disks from all of them, 
put them together into a single server to act as a file server / NAS 
on our home network.  There would probably be a combination of IDE and 
SATA drives.  What would you recommend as the best way to achieve this 
(with minimal cash outlay).  The home network is a mixed Windows and 
Linux environment so I assume I would run Linux on the new server and 
provide access to the disks via SAMBA.  For now the main function of 
the server would be to serve as a place to do backups.  I have never 
done anything with RAID so I don't know if that is something that I 
should take into consideration (especially as the disks are of varying 
sizes).


Any information, suggestions or pointers would be appreciated.  I am 
viewing this as a learning experience (in addition to making use of 
old hardware for a positive purpose). 

Thank you all for all the useful information.

The consensus seems to be that the only real value in doing this would 
be for the learning experience as the cost benefit does not fall in 
favor of using old hardware.   Since that is not my priority at the 
moment I will give it a pass.


Thanks again.

--
David Suna
da...@davidsconsultants.com


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread Moish

On 05/12/2012 12:11, E.S. Rosenberg wrote:

2012/12/5 Dan Shimshoni danshi...@gmail.com:

Hello, Nadav,

Instead, I decided to buy a 2-terabyte WD My Book Live for $160.
For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM- based server in 
one package.


What do you mean by ARM-based server here ? I don't sure
I understand. Does this product include some tiny ARM server?
Do you have access to this server by telnet/ssh, and is there a BSP
open source package ? I see you have ethernet connection there.
I look in WD site, and I don't see that they mention an ARM
based server there:

http://wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=280


Can you please give a link/elaborate about the product you are talking about ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WD_TV
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=wd+live+debian

Basically it's a disk + server to handle cifs/nfs
Regards,
Eliyahu - אליהו


rgs
DS

For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM-based)
server in one package.

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.il wrote:

On Tue, Dec 04, 2012, David Suna wrote about Home made NAS:

 I have a bunch of old machines lying around which are currently just
 collecting dust.nbsp; I would like to collect the disks from all of
 them, put them together into a single server to act as a file server


A couple of years I started doing something similar to what you are planning.
I took an old computer, and stuck in it a bunch of hard disks I had from
previous years - one was 1 terabyte, another 300 gigabyte, and a third
80 gigabytes. The computer ran Linux, and served files (mostly CDs and DVDs)
on my home network with NFS and Samba.

But then I realized how annoying this setup was: the computer was very big,
noisy, and had to be on all the time. The old disks (especially the 80
gigabytes) were a joke, and I all three disks summed together were
smaller than a just new disk I could buy.

Instead, I decided to buy a 2-terabyte WD My Book Live for $160.

For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM-based)
server in one package. The package is 10 times smaller than my old computer,
nearly silent, and uses up less electricity, and came preconfigured with
the server software (it runs Linux, but you don't have direct access to
it).

So in my opinion, unless you're completely broke, and/or treating this
as nothing more than an educational experience, building a NAS out of
old equipment is waste of your energy.

--
Nadav Har'El|  Tuesday, Dec 4 2012, 20 Kislev 5773
n...@math.technion.ac.il |-
Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |If you notice this notice, you'll notice
http://nadav.harel.org.il   |it's not worth noticing but is noticable.


snip

I use WD MyBook Duo 2x3T.
http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=620
Transfer rate more than enough for HD over N-wireless network.

On A side note:
Above storage is used (among other devices) by two Apple Tv 2 (jb with 
Xbmc) and for fun, I will
add a Raspberry Pi model B which cost me almost 50$ in the USA.  (ATV2 
cost 103$ w/tax)


--
Moish


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread Ori Berger

On 12/05/2012 08:00 AM, Moish wrote:

I use WD MyBook Duo 2x3T.
http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=620
Transfer rate more than enough for HD over N-wireless network.

On A side note:
Above storage is used (among other devices) by two Apple Tv 2 (jb with
Xbmc) and for fun, I will
add a Raspberry Pi model B which cost me almost 50$ in the USA. (ATV2
cost 103$ w/tax)



For those going the DIY route, older PogoPlugs can often be found for 
between $12-$25 in the US (new from the store; they've spent the last 
year clearing this inventory). These things come with Linux and some 
software that lets you pierce firewall and access them from everywhere 
(which is useful), as well as some photo and video conversion software.


You can reflash them with debian if you want full control. They are rock 
solid, completely silent, 6W maximum draw (with 4 portable USB powered 
drives), ARM with 128MB or 256MB (depending on model), with 1Gb ethernet 
and 4 USB 2.0 - perfect with 1-2TB portable drives.


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-05 Thread Moish

On 05/12/2012 23:55, Ori Berger wrote:

On 12/05/2012 08:00 AM, Moish wrote:

I use WD MyBook Duo 2x3T.
http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=620
Transfer rate more than enough for HD over N-wireless network.

On A side note:
Above storage is used (among other devices) by two Apple Tv 2 (jb with
Xbmc) and for fun, I will
add a Raspberry Pi model B which cost me almost 50$ in the USA. (ATV2
cost 103$ w/tax)



For those going the DIY route, older PogoPlugs can often be found for
between $12-$25 in the US (new from the store; they've spent the last
year clearing this inventory). These things come with Linux and some
software that lets you pierce firewall and access them from everywhere
(which is useful), as well as some photo and video conversion software.

You can reflash them with debian if you want full control. They are rock
solid, completely silent, 6W maximum draw (with 4 portable USB powered
drives), ARM with 128MB or 256MB (depending on model), with 1Gb ethernet
and 4 USB 2.0 - perfect with 1-2TB portable drives.

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Pogoplugs also have Sata connector on board.
Support can be found in 
http://archlinuxarm.org/platforms/armv5/pogoplug-v2-pinkgray.

USB 2.0 is slow for a file server.
The original implementation is lame to my taste.
You can't really flash new OS but rather boot it from a DOK or a Sata disk.


--
Moish

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Home made NAS

2012-12-04 Thread David Suna

  
  
I have a bunch of old machines lying around which are currently just
collecting dust. I would like to collect the disks from all of
them, put them together into a single server to act as a file server
/ NAS on our home network. There would probably be a combination of
IDE and SATA drives. What would you recommend as the best way to
achieve this (with minimal cash outlay). The home network is a
mixed Windows and Linux environment so I assume I would run Linux on
the new server and provide access to the disks via SAMBA. For now
the main function of the server would be to serve as a place to do
backups. I have never done anything with RAID so I don't know if
that is something that I should take into consideration (especially
as the disks are of varying sizes).

Any information, suggestions or pointers would be appreciated. I am
viewing this as a learning experience (in addition to making use of
old hardware for a positive purpose).

Thanks in advance,
-- 
David Suna
da...@davidsconsultants.com
  


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-04 Thread ronys
I've had good experience with FreeNAS (http://www.freenas.org/), but on a
box with homogenous disks/controllers. YMMV, but it's definitely worth
checking out.

Rony


On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:43 AM, David Suna da...@davidsconsultants.comwrote:

  I have a bunch of old machines lying around which are currently just
 collecting dust.  I would like to collect the disks from all of them, put
 them together into a single server to act as a file server / NAS on our
 home network.  There would probably be a combination of IDE and SATA
 drives.  What would you recommend as the best way to achieve this (with
 minimal cash outlay).  The home network is a mixed Windows and Linux
 environment so I assume I would run Linux on the new server and provide
 access to the disks via SAMBA.  For now the main function of the server
 would be to serve as a place to do backups.  I have never done anything
 with RAID so I don't know if that is something that I should take into
 consideration (especially as the disks are of varying sizes).

 Any information, suggestions or pointers would be appreciated.  I am
 viewing this as a learning experience (in addition to making use of old
 hardware for a positive purpose).

 Thanks in advance,

 --
 David sunada...@davidsconsultants.com


 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il




-- 
Ubi dubium, ibi libertas (where there is doubt, there is freedom)
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-04 Thread vordoo

  
  
On 2012-12-04 10:43, David Suna wrote:

  
  
  I have a bunch of old machines lying around which are currently
  just collecting dust.  I would like to collect the disks from all
  of them, put them together into a single server to act as a file
  server / NAS on our home network.  There would probably be a
  combination of IDE and SATA drives.  
Make sure the TCO of running an old machine + lots of old HD's, is
not more then buying a cheep green M.B. + 1or2 green HD.
That said, ...
What would you recommend as the best way to achieve
  this (with minimal cash outlay).  The home network is a mixed
  Windows and Linux environment so I assume I would run Linux on the
  new server and provide access to the disks via SAMBA.  
Yep, you can RAID(1,5,10,6) the HD's as appropriate (i.e. see:
selecting a RAID sys. on any wiki) and put LVM2 on top of that for
use with SAMBA on a minimal stable Linux distro. If you need more,
fancy file system btfs/zfs or iSCSI, FTP, NFS, it may be
faster/better to go with a dedicated distro, checkout: OpenIndiana,
FreeNas, Nexentastor, Openfiler.

For now the main function of the server would be to
  serve as a place to do backups.  I have never done anything with
  RAID so I don't know if that is something that I should take into
  consideration (especially as the disks are of varying sizes).

Yes, you should select the best RAID sys for the H.D's size and
condition, S.M.A.R.T is your friend. Remember RAID is not a
  backup! 
 
  Any information, suggestions or pointers would be appreciated.  I
  am viewing this as a learning experience (in addition to making
  use of old hardware for a positive purpose).

For a  learning experience checkout: OpenIndiana, FreeNas,
Nexentastor, Openfiler ,see there implantation-points and D.I.Y.

Good Luck!

  


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-04 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012, David Suna wrote about Home made NAS:
 I have a bunch of old machines lying around which are currently just
 collecting dust.nbsp; I would like to collect the disks from all of
 them, put them together into a single server to act as a file server

A couple of years I started doing something similar to what you are planning.
I took an old computer, and stuck in it a bunch of hard disks I had from
previous years - one was 1 terabyte, another 300 gigabyte, and a third
80 gigabytes. The computer ran Linux, and served files (mostly CDs and DVDs)
on my home network with NFS and Samba.

But then I realized how annoying this setup was: the computer was very big,
noisy, and had to be on all the time. The old disks (especially the 80
gigabytes) were a joke, and I all three disks summed together were
smaller than a just new disk I could buy.

Instead, I decided to buy a 2-terabyte WD My Book Live for $160.

For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM-based)
server in one package. The package is 10 times smaller than my old computer,
nearly silent, and uses up less electricity, and came preconfigured with
the server software (it runs Linux, but you don't have direct access to
it).

So in my opinion, unless you're completely broke, and/or treating this
as nothing more than an educational experience, building a NAS out of
old equipment is waste of your energy.

-- 
Nadav Har'El|  Tuesday, Dec 4 2012, 20 Kislev 5773
n...@math.technion.ac.il |-
Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |If you notice this notice, you'll notice
http://nadav.harel.org.il   |it's not worth noticing but is noticable.

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-04 Thread Mord Behar
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.ilwrote:

 On Tue, Dec 04, 2012, David Suna wrote about Home made NAS:
  I have a bunch of old machines lying around which are currently just
  collecting dust.nbsp; I would like to collect the disks from all of
  them, put them together into a single server to act as a file server

 A couple of years I started doing something similar to what you are
 planning.
 I took an old computer, and stuck in it a bunch of hard disks I had from
 previous years - one was 1 terabyte, another 300 gigabyte, and a third
 80 gigabytes. The computer ran Linux, and served files (mostly CDs and
 DVDs)
 on my home network with NFS and Samba.

 But then I realized how annoying this setup was: the computer was very big,
 noisy, and had to be on all the time. The old disks (especially the 80
 gigabytes) were a joke, and I all three disks summed together were
 smaller than a just new disk I could buy.

 Instead, I decided to buy a 2-terabyte WD My Book Live for $160.

 For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM-based)
 server in one package. The package is 10 times smaller than my old
 computer,
 nearly silent, and uses up less electricity, and came preconfigured with
 the server software (it runs Linux, but you don't have direct access to
 it).

 So in my opinion, unless you're completely broke, and/or treating this
 as nothing more than an educational experience, building a NAS out of
 old equipment is waste of your energy.


Unless you hook them up to a Raspberry Pi. That is silent, takes very
little electricity and can probably do what you want.



 --
 Nadav Har'El|  Tuesday, Dec 4 2012, 20 Kislev
 5773
 n...@math.technion.ac.il
 |-
 Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |If you notice this notice, you'll
 notice
 http://nadav.harel.org.il   |it's not worth noticing but is
 noticable.

 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-04 Thread vordoo

  
  

On 2012-12-04 13:37, Mord Behar wrote:


  

  
So in my opinion, unless you're completely broke, and/or
treating this
as nothing more than an educational experience, building a
NAS out of
old equipment is waste of your energy.
  
  
Unless you hook them up to a Raspberry Pi. That is silent,
takes very little electricity and can probably do what you
want.
  

  

Raspberry Pi takes care only of the CPU/board part not the price -in
timemoney, of inefficiently running a bunch of old H.D's 
there controllers. 

In my view the small Raspberry Pi form is less significant in this
case, though it is the cool thing in town. I would advocate an Arm
board more similar to the W.D. Book  other designs. In IL,
money wise, At less then $200 you are probably better-of just baying
it of the shelf, unless you need the flexibility of your personal
design (the education part can be done on a VM ;-)




  


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Mord Behar wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.ilwrote:
 
  On Tue, Dec 04, 2012, David Suna wrote about Home made NAS:
   I have a bunch of old machines lying around which are currently just
   collecting dust.nbsp; I would like to collect the disks from all of
   them, put them together into a single server to act as a file server
 
  A couple of years I started doing something similar to what you are
  planning.
  I took an old computer, and stuck in it a bunch of hard disks I had from
  previous years - one was 1 terabyte, another 300 gigabyte, and a third
  80 gigabytes. The computer ran Linux, and served files (mostly CDs and
  DVDs)
  on my home network with NFS and Samba.
 
  But then I realized how annoying this setup was: the computer was very big,
  noisy, and had to be on all the time. The old disks (especially the 80
  gigabytes) were a joke, and I all three disks summed together were
  smaller than a just new disk I could buy.
 
  Instead, I decided to buy a 2-terabyte WD My Book Live for $160.
 
  For this price, I got both the 2TB hard-disk and a tiny (ARM-based)
  server in one package. The package is 10 times smaller than my old
  computer,
  nearly silent, and uses up less electricity, and came preconfigured with
  the server software (it runs Linux, but you don't have direct access to
  it).
 
  So in my opinion, unless you're completely broke, and/or treating this
  as nothing more than an educational experience, building a NAS out of
  old equipment is waste of your energy.
 
 
 Unless you hook them up to a Raspberry Pi. That is silent, takes very
 little electricity and can probably do what you want.

A Raspberry Pi is relatively cheap, but is certainly not the only small
device around.

http://linux-sunxi.org/Mele_A1000
Includes a SATA adapter and a disk enclosure (you'll have to provide
your own disk). It does cost a bit more than a Pi, and the code is not
in mainline yet, but it's easier to work with than a Pi.

There are lots of them.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen | tzaf...@jabber.org | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il || a Mutt's
tzaf...@cohens.org.il ||  best
tzaf...@debian.org|| friend

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-04 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
2012/12/4 vordoo vor...@yahoo.com:

 On 2012-12-04 13:37, Mord Behar wrote:


 So in my opinion, unless you're completely broke, and/or treating this
 as nothing more than an educational experience, building a NAS out of
 old equipment is waste of your energy.


 Unless you hook them up to a Raspberry Pi. That is silent, takes very little
 electricity and can probably do what you want.

 Raspberry Pi takes care only of the CPU/board part not the price -in
 timemoney, of inefficiently running a bunch of old H.D's  there
 controllers.

 In my view the small Raspberry Pi form is less significant in this case,
 though it is the cool thing in town. I would advocate an Arm board more
 similar to the W.D. Book  other designs. In IL, money wise, At less then
 $200 you are probably better-of just baying it of the shelf, unless you need
 the flexibility of your personal design (the education part can be done on a
 VM ;-)
Don't forget you can hack the WD Live, or get to the linux it runs
(debian) and expand it...
(Unless they locked it down more recently)
Regards,
Eliyahu - אליהו





 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-04 Thread Doron Shikmoni
David,

FreeNAS works rather well in an environment like yours, however (a) as of
version 8 it needs considerable amounts of RAM to work reasonably well (v7
could get along well with half a gig) and (b) you need either all HDDs to
be of the same size or at least to have a few groups of similar size HDDs,
otherwise you're gonna lose a lot of space when building the pools.

For a home server with a bunch of varying size disks, you may want to take
a look at unRAID. It's a rather unique solution, with a few rather unique
features, for exactly this situation (different size, different age disks).
Downside: for more than 3 drives, it's not free.

Doron



On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:43 AM, David Suna da...@davidsconsultants.comwrote:

  I have a bunch of old machines lying around which are currently just
 collecting dust.  I would like to collect the disks from all of them, put
 them together into a single server to act as a file server / NAS on our
 home network.  There would probably be a combination of IDE and SATA
 drives.  What would you recommend as the best way to achieve this (with
 minimal cash outlay).  The home network is a mixed Windows and Linux
 environment so I assume I would run Linux on the new server and provide
 access to the disks via SAMBA.  For now the main function of the server
 would be to serve as a place to do backups.  I have never done anything
 with RAID so I don't know if that is something that I should take into
 consideration (especially as the disks are of varying sizes).

 Any information, suggestions or pointers would be appreciated.  I am
 viewing this as a learning experience (in addition to making use of old
 hardware for a positive purpose).

 Thanks in advance,

 --
 David sunada...@davidsconsultants.com


 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-04 Thread Baruch Siach
Hi Tzafrir,

On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 12:33:37PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
 http://linux-sunxi.org/Mele_A1000
 Includes a SATA adapter and a disk enclosure (you'll have to provide
 your own disk). It does cost a bit more than a Pi, and the code is not
 in mainline yet,

That is about to change in kernel v3.8. The patch below (and a few other 
related patches) are queued for inclusion in the upcoming merge window.

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git;a=commitdiff;h=3b52634f0b7adaaf2b29569025287b938b7c71a6

baruch

 but it's easier to work with than a Pi.
 
 There are lots of them.

-- 
 http://baruch.siach.name/blog/  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}ooO--U--Ooo{=
   - bar...@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-04 Thread Baruch Shpirer
Too many ways to do this but if you consider the data you are going to put
on this nas valueable and the hw you are talking about is 2+yrs old then
you better off buying new

With old hw you can never be sure its going to come up next time and
basicly nothing is promised, but for sure stuff can still work for ever
with some miracle and a luck dragon..
On Dec 4, 2012 8:36 AM, E.S. Rosenberg esr+linux...@g.jct.ac.il wrote:

 2012/12/4 vordoo vor...@yahoo.com:
 
  On 2012-12-04 13:37, Mord Behar wrote:
 
 
  So in my opinion, unless you're completely broke, and/or treating this
  as nothing more than an educational experience, building a NAS out of
  old equipment is waste of your energy.
 
 
  Unless you hook them up to a Raspberry Pi. That is silent, takes very
 little
  electricity and can probably do what you want.
 
  Raspberry Pi takes care only of the CPU/board part not the price -in
  timemoney, of inefficiently running a bunch of old H.D's  there
  controllers.
 
  In my view the small Raspberry Pi form is less significant in this case,
  though it is the cool thing in town. I would advocate an Arm board more
  similar to the W.D. Book  other designs. In IL, money wise, At less then
  $200 you are probably better-of just baying it of the shelf, unless you
 need
  the flexibility of your personal design (the education part can be done
 on a
  VM ;-)
 Don't forget you can hack the WD Live, or get to the linux it runs
 (debian) and expand it...
 (Unless they locked it down more recently)
 Regards,
 Eliyahu - אליהו
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
  Linux-il mailing list
  Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
  http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
 

 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-04 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
2012/12/4 Baruch Shpirer bar...@shpirer.com:
 Too many ways to do this but if you consider the data you are going to put
 on this nas valueable and the hw you are talking about is 2+yrs old then you
 better off buying new

 With old hw you can never be sure its going to come up next time and basicly
 nothing is promised, but for sure stuff can still work for ever with some
 miracle and a luck dragon..
According to research done by google and also in my experience a
normal harddisk (spinner) that has functioned without failures for 3
years will generally last for a very long time

 On Dec 4, 2012 8:36 AM, E.S. Rosenberg esr+linux...@g.jct.ac.il wrote:

 2012/12/4 vordoo vor...@yahoo.com:
 
  On 2012-12-04 13:37, Mord Behar wrote:
 
 
  So in my opinion, unless you're completely broke, and/or treating this
  as nothing more than an educational experience, building a NAS out of
  old equipment is waste of your energy.
 
 
  Unless you hook them up to a Raspberry Pi. That is silent, takes very
  little
  electricity and can probably do what you want.
 
  Raspberry Pi takes care only of the CPU/board part not the price -in
  timemoney, of inefficiently running a bunch of old H.D's  there
  controllers.
 
  In my view the small Raspberry Pi form is less significant in this case,
  though it is the cool thing in town. I would advocate an Arm board more
  similar to the W.D. Book  other designs. In IL, money wise, At less
  then
  $200 you are probably better-of just baying it of the shelf, unless you
  need
  the flexibility of your personal design (the education part can be done
  on a
  VM ;-)
 Don't forget you can hack the WD Live, or get to the linux it runs
 (debian) and expand it...
 (Unless they locked it down more recently)
 Regards,
 Eliyahu - אליהו
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
  Linux-il mailing list
  Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
  http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
 

 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Home made NAS

2012-12-04 Thread Moish

On 04/12/2012 21:27, E.S. Rosenberg wrote:

2012/12/4 Baruch Shpirer bar...@shpirer.com:

Too many ways to do this but if you consider the data you are going to put
on this nas valueable and the hw you are talking about is 2+yrs old then you
better off buying new

With old hw you can never be sure its going to come up next time and basicly
nothing is promised, but for sure stuff can still work for ever with some
miracle and a luck dragon..

According to research done by google and also in my experience a
normal harddisk (spinner) that has functioned without failures for 3
years will generally last for a very long time




snip

Better read this article first (from 2007)
http://storagemojo.com/2007/02/19/googles-disk-failure-experience/

Moish

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il