; > Can anyone suggest why I can't seem to change permissions of files
> > on a disk-on-key mounted on my PI?
> > The chmod command reports success, but nothing has changed.
> > BTW - all commands over SSH
> >
> > Here's the Raspbian version:
> > pi@ra
hlomo Solomon :
> > Can anyone suggest why I can't seem to change permissions of files on a
> > disk-on-key mounted on my PI?
> > The chmod command reports success, but nothing has changed.
> > BTW - all commands over SSH
> >
> > Here's the Raspbian ve
Eliyahu - אליהו
2015-03-17 9:08 GMT+02:00 Shlomo Solomon :
> Can anyone suggest why I can't seem to change permissions of files on a
> disk-on-key mounted on my PI?
> The chmod command reports success, but nothing has changed.
> BTW - all commands over SSH
>
> Here's th
Can anyone suggest why I can't seem to change permissions of files on a
disk-on-key mounted on my PI?
The chmod command reports success, but nothing has changed.
BTW - all commands over SSH
Here's the Raspbian version:
pi@raspberrypi /media/D80C-5ACC/pictures $ uname -a
Linux r
gt;
> The thread there deals with older versions. I'm running version 17, which
> just came out in a disk-on-key version.
>
> As someone in the thread reported, the support people can't help with
> running on the program Linux. The fellow I spoke with asked to let him know
>
Hi Baruch,
The thread there deals with older versions. I'm running version 17,
which just came out in a disk-on-key version.
As someone in the thread reported, the support people can't help with
running on the program Linux. The fellow I spoke with asked to let him
know if I can
Hi Alan,
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 09:09:58PM +0300, Alan Yaniger wrote:
> Has anyone out there successfully run the Bar-Ilan Responsa project
> on disk-on-key using wine? If so, what did you change in the
> settings?
See the following long thread:
http://whatsup.org.il/index.php?name
Hi everyone,
Has anyone out there successfully run the Bar-Ilan Responsa project on
disk-on-key using wine? If so, what did you change in the settings?
Thanks,
--
Alan Yaniger
Tk Open Systems
0546-841-481
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il
Hi,
I'm trying to install Insert Linux
on 2GB disk on key.
Insert has a built-in
support for this using a shell script the have created.
The requirements for
the installation are:
- The 1st partition
must be at least 64MB.
- The partition should
be formatted as ext2
I've in
Hi,
I had problems writing to my disk-on-key and since I found the solution, I
hope this can be of use to anyone with a similar problem.
Although my disk-on-key was mounted properly and used to funtion correctly, I
was getting I/O errors and according to dmesg:
FAT: Filesystem panic (dev sdb1
D]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 4:32 PM
> Subject: Disk On Key support in Linux
>
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Which Disk On Key devices are wel
erman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 4:32 PM
Subject: Disk On Key support in Linux
> Hi
>
> Which Disk On Key devices are well supported in Linux ?
> ( Do they al
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Maxim Kovgan wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Boris Zingerman wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Which Disk On Key devices are well supported in Linux ?
> i have not seen disk-on-key devices that my box cannot read/write.
>
I have not se
]>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 4:32 PM
Subject: Disk On Key support in Linux
> Hi
>
> Which Disk On Key devices are well supported in Linux ?
> ( Do they all use the same protocol ?..)
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
> ==
Boris Zingerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> Which Disk On Key devices are well supported in Linux ?
> ( Do they all use the same protocol ?..)
I can personally vouch for my Sandisk "Traveling Disk". I've also
connected two other Sandisk USB disk-on-keys
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Boris Zingerman wrote:
> Hi
>
> Which Disk On Key devices are well supported in Linux ?
i have not seen disk-on-key devices that my box cannot read/write.
> ( Do they all use the same protocol ?..)
i think they all use SCSI USB susbsystem, depending on
stuck it to the USB cable and mounted - no problem.
I'd recommand you make sure it's a USB 2.0 device - so much faster than
1.1.
Good luck,
--Amos
Boris Zingerman wrote:
Hi
Which Disk On Key devices are well supported in Linux ?
( Do they all use the same protocol ?
Hi
Which Disk On Key devices are well supported in Linux ?
( Do they all use the same protocol ?..)
Thanks.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run t
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:39:11AM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> On Saturday 29 November 2003 22:55, Oron Peled wrote:
> > On Saturday 29 November 2003 20:17, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > > I then went to the **extreme** of re-booting and spoiling my uptime ;-)
> > > a few times with and without the
On Saturday 29 November 2003 22:55, Oron Peled wrote:
> On Saturday 29 November 2003 20:17, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > I then went to the **extreme** of re-booting and spoiling my uptime ;-)
> > a few times with and without the device in the USB plug. What I
> > discovered is that the device seems
On Saturday 29 November 2003 20:17, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> I then went to the **extreme** of re-booting and spoiling my uptime ;-)
> a few times with and without the device in the USB plug. What I discovered
> is that the device seems to work as expected **out-of-the-box** the first
> time only,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 08:17:41PM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> Unfortunately, I discovered that the change from auto to vfat was not the
> solution to the problem. I don't like **magic** or things that seem to happen
> for no reason. There's always a reason - we just have to find it.
>
> Afte
Few other ideas:
1. Try to write to an existing file. Create a file an a "stable" way
(e.g. after reboot - you said that works), then 'cat >' into it and
see if it stays there or returning to original content. When you do,
do umount and sync yourself before unplugging it. This should eliminate
FS-s
In my post 2 minutes ago, I forgot to add that after the first time,
re-plugging the donggle doesn't create a desktop icon automatically. But
mount /dev/sda1 creates the icon and mounts the device.
On Saturday 29 November 2003 20:31, Oded Arbel wrote:
> On Saturday 29 November 2003 20:17, Shlomo
On Saturday 29 November 2003 20:31, Oded Arbel wrote:
> On Saturday 29 November 2003 20:17, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > was gone. I can only guess that kudzu periodically checks and updates
> > fstab (maybe a cron job - I didn't check).
>
> Please note that when you plug the dongle while running, wha
On Saturday 29 November 2003 20:17, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> was gone. I can only guess that kudzu periodically checks and updates fstab
> (maybe a cron job - I didn't check).
Please note that when you plug the dongle while running, what is responsible
for mounting the driver (and putting an icon
Unfortunately, I discovered that the change from auto to vfat was not the
solution to the problem. I don't like **magic** or things that seem to happen
for no reason. There's always a reason - we just have to find it.
After my previous message (about an hour ago), I decided to play with the
dev
On Saturday 29 November 2003 01:39, Oded Arbel wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 20:49, you wrote:
> > xfs, xiafs are supported). If this probe fails,
> > mount will try to read the file /etc/filesystems,
> > or, if that does not exist, /proc/filesy
On Friday 28 November 2003 20:49, you wrote:
> xfs, xiafs are supported). If this probe fails,
> mount will try to read the file /etc/filesystems,
> or, if that does not exist, /proc/filesystems. All
> of the filesystem types listed the
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 12:14:57PM +0200, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 08:43:14AM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > On Friday 28 November 2003 02:36, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Don't trust any app ;). Change 'auto' to 'vfat' in fstab and
> > > give it a try.
> >
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 08:43:14AM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > On Friday 28 November 2003 02:36, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Don't trust any app ;). Change 'auto' to 'vfat' in fstab and
> > > give it a try.
> >
> >
> > Thanks - that d
On Friday 28 November 2003 13:05, Amichai Rotman wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 12:14, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> > You have no idea what a relief this is for me :-)
> > BTW, it's weird that msdos is ahead of vfat when 'auto'. Does anyone
> > have any idea why is this? vfat exists for many ye
On Friday 28 November 2003 12:14, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> You have no idea what a relief this is for me :-)
> BTW, it's weird that msdos is ahead of vfat when 'auto'. Does anyone
> have any idea why is this? vfat exists for many years, and I don't
> think it's considered less stable than msdos.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 08:43:14AM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 02:36, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>
>
> > Don't trust any app ;). Change 'auto' to 'vfat' in fstab and
> > give it a try.
>
>
> Thanks - that did it .
You have no idea what a relief this is for me :-)
BTW
On Friday 28 November 2003 02:36, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Don't trust any app ;). Change 'auto' to 'vfat' in fstab and
> give it a try.
Thanks - that did it .
And thanks to all the others who made suggestions.
--
Shlomo Solomon
http://come.to/shlomo.solomon
Sent by KMail (KDE 3.1) on LINU
November 2003 22:30, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
[... snipped ...]
> > I didn't make any changes to fstab. Kudzu detectedthe disk-on-key and
> > automatically set up all parameters. Here's what I found in fstab:
> > /dev/sda1 /mnt/removable auto user,iocharset=utf8,kudzu
ng a file or umount don't show anything in dmesg or syslog
> >
> > utf8 is suspicious for me - I never used it on vfat. Is this
> > autodetected, or in /etc/fstab (by you or by kudzu)? Oh, just a
>
> I didn't make any changes to fstab. Kudzu detected the disk-on
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > second - it's MSDOS? Not vfat? Why? Can you try vfat, with and
> > without options (such as iocharset=, codepage=, uni_xlate, utf8)?
>
> Why? - as noted above, this was all set up by KUDZU. I'm not sure I understand
> your suggestion. Do you mean I sh
at. Is this
> autodetected, or in /etc/fstab (by you or by kudzu)? Oh, just a
I didn't make any changes to fstab. Kudzu detected the disk-on-key and
automatically set up all parameters. Here's what I found in fstab:
/dev/sda1 /mnt/removable auto user,iocharset=utf8,kudzu,noauto,umask=
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:18:16PM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> On Thursday 27 November 2003 22:30, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> > What does dmesg say?
>
> when I mount I get the following in dmesg:
> MSDOS FS: IO charset utf8
>
> and this is in syslog:
> Nov 27 23:12:54 shlomo1 kernel: MSDOS FS
On Thursday 27 November 2003 22:30, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:06:26PM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 November 2003 21:42, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 27 November 2003 20:48, Hetz Ben Hamo w
I had a similar problem with my USB disk-on-key.
The problem happened when it was mounted as /dev/sda1 on mount point
(/mnt/diskonkey in my system).
When I changed it to mount as /dev/sda4, the problem disappeared.
YMMV, so check also other /dev/sda* devices.
Usually, kudzu detects as /dev/sda1
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:06:26PM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> On Thursday 27 November 2003 21:42, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > > On Thursday 27 November 2003 20:48, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > > > Most of those devices have "write protect" latch/switch
On Thursday 27 November 2003 21:42, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 November 2003 20:48, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > > Most of those devices have "write protect" latch/switch on them, make
> > > sure it's off..
> >
> > that was the first thing I c
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> On Thursday 27 November 2003 20:48, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > Most of those devices have "write protect" latch/switch on them, make sure
> > it's off..
>
> that was the first thing I checked ;-)
Copy a huge file on it and the umount. At least one of th
On Thursday 27 November 2003 20:48, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Most of those devices have "write protect" latch/switch on them, make sure
> it's off..
that was the first thing I checked ;-)
--
Shlomo Solomon
http://come.to/shlomo.solomon
Sent by KMail (KDE 3.1) on LINUX Mandrake 9.1
=
If the switch doesn't work, try to mount it and unmount it manually. Don't
trust the automount, since this is sometimes a problematic issue...
When you unmount it, the file should then be copied, so leave the
disk-on-key connected for several moments, and only then remove/remount
Most of those devices have "write protect" latch/switch on them, make sure
it's off..
Hetz
On Thursday 27 November 2003 20:32, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I borrowed a friend's disk-on-key to try it on my Mandrake box. As hoped, I
> was able to read data fr
Hi,
I borrowed a friend's disk-on-key to try it on my Mandrake box. As hoped, I
was able to read data from the device with no problem. I just plugged in to
the USB and an icon appeared on the desktop. Clicking the icon mounted the
device. But I haven't been able to save data.
The p
On 2003-07-06 Meir Michanie wrote:
> I have a 8mg diskonkey. It came with several partitions, the one for
> storage was /dev/sda4
>
> run fdisk -l /dev/sda to see the partitions structure.
>
> then try mounting /dev/sda[1,2,3,4,...]
My 64MB memory bar came with several partitions, but nothing s
to
>> mount it.
>> What modules would it need?
>>
>
> DOn't knwo about additional modules, but there's one thing that bit me
> in the past - for some reasons, some USB disk on key are paritioned in
> such a way that you need to mount the first *parition* to get acc
Micha Feigin wrote:
I borrowed an 8 MB diskonkey from someone and I just can't seem to mount
it.
What modules would it need?
DOn't knwo about additional modules, but there's one thing that bit me
in the past - for some reasons, some USB disk on key are paritioned in
such a way t
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 04:25:57AM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> I borrowed an 8 MB diskonkey from someone and I just can't seem to mount
> it.
> What modules would it need?
[snip]
You also need sd_mod. It would also help (if it doesn't work) that you
send the relevant parts of dmesg.
--
Didi
==
I borrowed an 8 MB diskonkey from someone and I just can't seem to mount
it.
What modules would it need?
It appears under /proc/scsi/usb-storage-0/1 with data:
Host scsi1: usb-storage
Vendor: M-Systems
Product: DiskOnKey
Serial Number: 01046215100195F0
Protocol: Transparent S
>
>
> Hi
>
> I brought in and connect USB "disk on key" 32Mb device to Mandrake 8.1
> machine. (kernel 2.4.8-34.1mdk)
>
> I mount the disk in the following way
>
> > mount -t vfat /dev/sda /mnt/usb
>
> but found it write prote
Hi
I brought in and connect USB "disk on key" 32Mb device to Mandrake 8.1
machine. (kernel 2.4.8-34.1mdk)
I mount the disk in the following way
> mount -t vfat /dev/sda /mnt/usb
but found it write protected.
This disk do contain some files I put on it on WIn2k
56 matches
Mail list logo
