On Mon, Jul 10, 2006, Amos Shapira wrote about Re: good book in tcsh shell
programming.:
I understand differently. As I understand, Bourne Shell and Csh were both
created around the same time, independently (the former at Bell Labs, the
latter at Berkeley), to replace Unix's first attempt
On Sunday 09 July 2006 02:45, Amos Shapira wrote:
On 09/07/06, Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but also the CS one to teach bash programming instead of csh programming:
If you go through all this to convince them to switch - I think you'll
do them a greater favour by convincing them to
On 09/07/06, Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 09 July 2006 02:45, Amos Shapira wrote:
On 09/07/06, Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but also the CS one to teach bash programming instead of csh programming:
If you go through all this to convince them to switch - I think
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006, Amos Shapira wrote about Re: good book in tcsh shell
programming.:
On 09/07/06, Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but also the CS one to teach bash programming instead of csh programming:
If you go through all this to convince them to switch - I think you'll
do them
On 09/07/06, Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The original Bourne Shell was released in 1977, almost 30 years ago.
I am not aware of any standard bourne shell other than this antique.
The question is, why limit yourself to teaching a 30 year old fossil?
Again - there are two goals I
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006, Amos Shapira wrote about Re: good book in tcsh shell
programming.:
1. Scriptability - for this I think that learning what a standard
Bourne Shell will accept is an important step towards writing
portable scripts (or just being able to move from one environment to
another
On 10/07/06, Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Interactive use - use whatever you like.
But this leads to what happens in the Technion: people used tcsh because
they liked its interactivity, and this lead them to use tcsh for scripts,
which sucks! So you should pick a shell which is
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 12:57, yahav Biran wrote:
Hi,
Does any body know a good book with examples for learning tcsh. I would
like to learn the benefits of using it by scripting such as: variables and
arithmetic, looping, functions and other stuff.
To complement what other people said, let
On 09/07/06, Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but also the CS one to teach bash programming instead of csh programming:
If you go through all this to convince them to switch - I think you'll
do them a greater favour by convincing them to switch to standard
Bourne Shell[1] rather than learn
Hi,
Does any body know a good book with examples for learning tcsh. I would like
to learn the benefits of using it by scripting such as: variables and
arithmetic, looping, functions and other stuff.
Thanks
yahav
=
To unsubscribe,
yahav Biran wrote:
Hi,
Does any body know a good book with examples for learning tcsh.
First, I don't think there is such a thing as tcsh programming. I'm
not aware that programming tcsh is, in any way, different than
programming csh. You are far more likely to find what you need by
Quoting yahav Biran, from the post of Tue, 04 Jul:
Hi,
Does any body know a good book with examples for learning tcsh. I would like
to learn the benefits of using it by scripting such as: variables and
arithmetic, looping, functions and other stuff.
start by GFI of course...
Quoth Shachar Shemesh:
At the risk of starting a flame war, why not study bourne shell
programming instead?
[snip]
Actually, there is one reason to learn {,t}csh - which may or may not apply
as the case may be - most biotech software/systems are done with csh glue
(except where I had my hand
13 matches
Mail list logo
