programmes I could
use. I am a newbe and need ease of installation besides dual language.Moshe
--- On Sun, 8/2/09, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il wrote:
From: Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il
Subject: Re: Fw: Webcam driver Can someone make me .rpm auto install file?
To: mbrace...@yahoo.co.uk
Date
On Sunday 08 February 2009 14:21:48 Moshe Brace using Yahoo wrote:
No answer to you I saw this file on a website.
I see. Searching for sn9c1xx, I see that this driver is now part of the
kernel. You can load it by typing as root:
{{{
modprobe sn9c102
}}}
No need to prepare an outdated
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Alon Altman wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know of a linux driver for a USB webcam called twinklecam?
Windows identifies it as CIF USB CAMERA 2110. Google search returns
nothing of use.
when i bought a camera that wasn't supported under linux (eventually i
found an alpha-grade
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, guy keren wrote:
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Alon Altman wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know of a linux driver for a USB webcam called twinklecam?
Windows identifies it as CIF USB CAMERA 2110. Google search returns
nothing of use.
when i bought a camera that wasn't supported under
when i bought a camera that wasn't supported under linux (eventually i
found an alpha-grade driver that was just in the beginning of being
written, and did nothing) - i passed the camera to a windows machine, and
used what i learned form the attempt of installing a non-working camera -
to buy
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:26:15PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
You don't need it to match your kernel - just use insmod -f to install the
module. I'm using the module (I assume you mean pwcx-i386.o) on several
kernel builds on Redhat 7.3 and on Redhat 8.1 RC5 - works perfectly.
Use insmod
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 07:54:41PM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:26:15PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
You don't need it to match your kernel - just use insmod -f to install the
module. I'm using the module (I assume you mean pwcx-i386.o) on several
kernel
Does CONFIG_MODVERSIONS relevant to this discussion?
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS
Usually, modules have to be recompiled whenever you switch to a new
kernel. Saying Y here makes it possible, and safe, to use the
same modules even after compiling a new kernel; this requires the
program
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:48:15PM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
Does CONFIG_MODVERSIONS relevant to this discussion?
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS
Usually, modules have to be recompiled whenever you switch to a new
kernel. Saying Y here makes it possible, and safe, to use the
same modules even
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:02:16PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
The pwcx-i386.o module itself worked for me when insmod -f without any
problems on several kernels. I also tested it on kernel 2.5.61 and it worked
without a problem with insmod -f
And yes, I know it's dangeous, but:
1. I
It's the Unix philosophy to give you enough rope to shoot yourself in
the feet. I certainly do not object to it. I do believe in informed
decisions - just telling people to 'use insmod -f, it works' without
mentioning the risks is inappropriate.
Did you (or anyone else) consider reverse
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:37:53AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Did you (or anyone else) consider reverse engineering the driver? is
documentation available?
Well, I don't know how much (if any) got to reverse engineer the algorithm
inside. There are no documentation available, as the
So he maitains the driver but doesn't release the source? if the
source is available, recompiling for each kernel you want to support
is rather trivial.
If the source was available, then there wouldn't be any issue of insmod -f ...
No, the source is not available, nor the documentation for the
Hi,
Anyone know of a linux driver for a USB webcam called twinklecam?
Windows identifies it as CIF USB CAMERA 2110. Google search returns
nothing of use.
Alon
--
This message was sent by Alon Altman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ICQ:1366540
The RIGHT way to contact me is by e-mail. I am otherwise
14 matches
Mail list logo
