alias: pci:v14E4d164Asv103Csd3106bc*sc*i*
alias: pci:v14E4d164Asv103Csd3101bc*sc*i*
depends:
supported: yes
vermagic: 2.6.16.60-0.21-smp SMP gcc-4.1
parm: disable_msi:Disable Message Signaled Interrupt (MSI) (int)
--
Warm regards,
Mi
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Aviv Greenberg wrote:
> What is the server used for? What traffic is comming into the server
> (small packets? full MTU?)? at what rate? How many RX descriptors is
> your driver set for? Do you have 802.3X flow control enabled (both
> ends)? Do you see any abnorma
I'm not in the infrustructure team, so to me it looks ok.
Are frame errors usually suggest a problem on the physical layer?
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:48 PM, wrote:
> Actually, there are 2k frame errors. Is your physical onfrastructute ok?
> Ca
)
This is for a backup server that should/will push respectable amounts of IO.
The idea is to achieve maximum possible throughput by utilizing
parallel reads/writes to a lot of spindles.
What parameters and how I should take into consideration?
--
Warm regards,
Mic
1:
\3/p' /etc/sudoers
%nice ALL=NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/renice
math02-lx:/root->1036#
Is there more elegant way of doing this using sed?
TIA!
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
Assistant Unix Admin
Division of Information Systems
Weizmann Institute of Science
Recho
I agree with Ariel.
I'm administering NetApp NAS (relatevely high-end one I must admit)
here. I've seen also SATA Raids baised on Intel server boards. You
just cannot compare first to the second. In my opinion no Linux with
whatever RAID will perform as good as a dedicated NAS machine that was
desi
belive that any dedicated NAS even the cheapest one (assuming
it's a quality one) in terms of features and speed will be more stable
and solid solution than a generic computer with DAS attached.
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
Assistant Unix Admin
Division of
aving here is not an isolated case. Some people
suggest that the hang occures because of the unfinished background
jobs. That's not my case however.
To make things worse it happens at random with different combinations
of *NIX/SSH.
Any insights?
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
is different: putting
usernames into .rhosts makes no effect, but putting hostnames _does_!
Why is the difference?
Anyone?
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
Assistant Unix Admin
Division of Information Systems
Weizmann Institute of Science
Rechovot 76100, Israel
uldn't be able to rsh from anywhere, right?
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
Assistant Unix Admin
Division of Information Systems
Weizmann Institute of Science
Rechovot 76100, Israel
Tel.: 972-8-93442
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:54:38 +0200, Karasik, Vitaly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You cannot use "+" instead of hostname in linux.
that did it! thanks!
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
Assistant Unix Admin
Division of Information Systems
We
0:31 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 11:24:01AM +0200, Michael Green wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:58:31 +0200, Shachar Shemesh
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > First, let me state what should,
sell for cheap, please contact me!
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
open up and sit
there?
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ure rich and
well laid out userland tools.
I'm waiting impatiently to test OM release on kernel 2.6 when it will be out.
Hope this helps.
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
To unsubscribe,
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
for
Matlab). There are several, commercially available. We haven't tried
any.
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
To unsubscribe,
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone has experience with the suite (ipvsadm+piranha+redhat-config-cluster)?
I have problem with the process 'nanny' not parsing properly
rup/ruptime output. If you had/saw this problem before I'd appreciate
your feedback!
--
Warm regards
I'm looking for script that will traverse filesystem of an RPM-based
distro and find files that do not belong to any RPM.
Anyone?
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
To unsubscribe,
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
To unsubscribe,
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed and attractive.
Good machine for occasional command line user or a scientist who don't
need quality Hebrew support.
Cool second machine for Linux/BSD geek at home.
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
To unsubscribe,
send mail to
7;t forked from FreeBSD.
Darwin is Mach kernel with FreeBSD-synchronised userspace tools.
It is BSD compatible,
compatible on what level? considering FreeBSD doesn't offer PowerPC
port its binary code won't run on PPC/OSX combo right away.
and can even run BSD X
What is BSD X?
&g
On 10/10/05, Geoffrey S. Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:37:44AM +0200, Michael Green wrote:
>
Hebrew support in MS Office doesn't exist.
> > Not a quality replacement for Windows Office imho.
>
> Not true. I have a friend that is wr
I'm looking for a tool that can:
1. Tell me files size distribution on a given filesystem
2. Access patterns (how often small files are accessed vs. big files)
over certain period of time.
anyone?
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
=
out needed
> to make very frequent measurements.
I'm terribly sorry but I don't quite get the idea...
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
To unsubscribe,
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe"
Is Out Of Memory Killer configurable? Can I tell it not to kill
daemons? Is there any sort of "exclude list"?
OS in question: SLES9 SP1 (kernel 2.6.5).
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
To unsubscribe,
send mail to [EMAIL
ly directly.
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
To unsubscribe,
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s.
Or I've seen another qwirck attributed to X/ssh tunneling: window open
extremely small. So small you cannot catch their lower right corner to
expand them.
Anyone?
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
To unsubscribe,
send mail to [
Is there an easy way to split a single john process into several
(smaller?) tasks each running on a separate CPU in order to speed up
the cracking process?
I've got a dozen of Opteron cores idling here...
--
Warm regards,
Michael
vide you with an absolutely valid/legitimate
reason, would you give me the answer I'm looking for?
perhaps this should be added to the FAQ ;)
perhaps.
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PRO
n one CPU
and [n..z] on another one. Or (given I've got even more CPU cores to
spare) to break it into even smaller chunks: [a..d] [d..h] and so
on...
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PRO
On 6/11/06, Daniel Daboul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/11/06, Michael Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, maybe I need to clarify this a bit further: I need to crack only
> one password.
I have never tried it, but it seems that Medussa does much of what you want:
Yea
0 0 0 1066 116 0 0 100 0
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2903600 0 0 1066 116 0 0 100 0
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There could be disk and/or RAID problems affecting disk I/O, wich could
lead to higher than normal load averages.
Henry
Michael Green wrote:
> I have 18 identical Sun Fire X4100 systems here all configured
> identically:
> 4-way Opteron, 4G RAM, 70G SAS HDD, RH
#x27; not recognized
Invalid configuration `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine
`x86_64-unknown' not recognized
Unrecognized host system name x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Anyone know how to get around this?
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
==
On 11/23/06, Ilya Konstantinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/23/06, Michael Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to build old gcc-2.95.* on AMD x64 with RHEL4.
Does such an old version of gcc even support x86-64 (as a target for
the code it compiles, not as a tar
boxes.
What products are there that would allow me to implement this?
I tried stunnel but it doesn't seem to cut it when it comes to web serving.
It seems that (2) should be capable of rewriting http requests.
Pointers to relevant reading are also appreciated.
--
Warm regard
pped across two different RAIDs)
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
38 matches
Mail list logo