Re: Cost-Efficiency of Unix and Windows Admins [was Re: Relevancy Criticism (was: Re: [Job Offer] - Senior programmer (web))]

2005-08-20 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Friday 05 August 2005 22:38, Guy Teverovsky wrote: On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 20:28 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:54, Oron Peled wrote: BTW: My normal reply is that those people cost more because (on the average) they know more. If you'll get a *realy

Re: Cost-Efficiency of Unix and Windows Admins [was Re: Relevancy Criticism (was: Re: [Job Offer] - Senior programmer (web))]

2005-08-05 Thread Guy Teverovsky
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 20:28 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:54, Oron Peled wrote: BTW: My normal reply is that those people cost more because (on the average) they know more. If you'll get a *realy good* windows admin -- he also won't work for the

Re: Cost-Efficiency of Unix and Windows Admins [was Re: Relevancy Criticism (was: Re: [Job Offer] - Senior programmer (web))]

2005-08-03 Thread Geoffrey S. Mendelson
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 08:28:55PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: I should note that I'd also like to know from where GSM has his data regarding the salaries of Windows and Linux specialists. (not necessary admins). As I said in my original post, I was refering to the discussion on this list