On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Michal Malý madcatxs...@prifuk.cz wrote:
On Monday 24 of February 2014 02:32:27 Anssi Hannula wrote:
I think we should extend the current ff-memless instead of duplicating
its functionality (even on a for now basis).
Having looked at ff-memless-next briefly,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:17:25PM +0100, Elias Vanderstuyft wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Michal Malý madcatxs...@prifuk.cz wrote:
On Monday 24 of February 2014 02:32:27 Anssi Hannula wrote:
I think we should extend the current ff-memless instead of duplicating
its
On Monday 24 of February 2014 13:48:18 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:17:25PM +0100, Elias Vanderstuyft wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Michal Malý madcatxs...@prifuk.cz
wrote:
On Monday 24 of February 2014 02:32:27 Anssi Hannula wrote:
I think we should extend
Hi everybody,
this patch series is a result of my work to improve FFB support for memoryless
devices. ff-memless-next is an improvement over the currently available
ff-memless which is well suited for joypads but cannot handle more advanced
devices such as racing wheels properly. As I have
24.02.2014 01:24, Michal Malý kirjoitti:
Hi everybody,
Hi,
this patch series is a result of my work to improve FFB support for memoryless
devices. ff-memless-next is an improvement over the currently available
ff-memless which is well suited for joypads but cannot handle more advanced
On Monday 24 of February 2014 02:32:27 Anssi Hannula wrote:
24.02.2014 01:24, Michal Malý kirjoitti:
Hi everybody,
Hi,
this patch series is a result of my work to improve FFB support for
memoryless devices. ff-memless-next is an improvement over the currently
available ff-memless
