oops

2000-10-16 Thread Silas S. Brown
ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.2.17. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.2.17/ (default) -m /boot/System.map-2.2.17 (default) Warning: You did not tell me where to find symbol information. I will assume that the log

Re: Patch to remove undefined C code

2000-10-16 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > --- linux-2.4/drivers/scsi/aha152x.cMon Oct 16 13:51:24 2000 > > +++ linux-2.4-fixed/drivers/scsi/aha152x.c Mon Oct 16 14:51:29 2000 > > @@ -1280,7 +1280,8 @@ > > scsi_unregister(shpnt); > >

Re: effect of pci_unregister_driver

2000-10-16 Thread Jeff Garzik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If I have two identical network cards on my machine and I unregister the > driver of one > of them (say eth0) using the call "pci_unregister_driver(pdev->driver)" > where pdev is > the 'pci_dev' structure for eth0, does the device 'eth1' i.e. the other one > gets

Re: failure to blank CDRWs (2.2.18pre15 smp ide-scsi hp7100i)

2000-10-16 Thread Ricky Beam
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: >> Umm, doesn't cdrecord know how to address IDE devices directly? > >IDE cd burners talk ATAPI. ATAPI is just a scsi variant. SCSI won the battle >at the protocol level ... Yeah yeah yeah. What I meant was "you don't have to use ide-scsi." However, after

Re: Patch to remove undefined C code

2000-10-16 Thread Jeff Garzik
Bernd Schmidt wrote: > diff -x log.build -x .* -dru linux-2.4/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c >linux-2.4-fixed/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c > --- linux-2.4/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.cMon Oct 16 13:51:23 2000 > +++ linux-2.4-fixed/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c Mon Oct 16 15:40:12

Re: failure to blank CDRWs (2.2.18pre15 smp ide-scsi hp7100i)

2000-10-16 Thread Alan Cox
> >Its a message from the drive politely requesting cd-record to talk valid > >commands. But as ide-scsi touches some commands (remapping old ones that are > >not supported on ATAPI) its possible to be kernel > > Umm, doesn't cdrecord know how to address IDE devices directly? IDE cd burners

Re: PATCH 2.4.0.10.3: pc_keyb and q40_keyb cleanup

2000-10-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 03:48:55PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Changes: > > * both: we know we are in an interrupt, so > > s/spin_lock_irqsave/spin_lock/ > > There request_irq is not called passing the SA_INTERRUPT flag so the irq > handler is

test10-pre[23] warnings/BOOT-OOPS

2000-10-16 Thread Randy Dunlap
Hi, I'm seeing these gcc warnings in test10-pre[23]. They could have occurred before that also -- I don't know. I'm using gcc 2.7.2.3. Is that a problem? Also, I can't boot test10-pre[23]. I get an oops in swapper. It's not logged so I can't see where it's actually happening. I'll try to hook

Re: [Criticism]C++ Flamewar

2000-10-16 Thread Timur Tabi
** Reply to message from Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:43:58 +1100 > Interesting concept, linking a module with libg++. Would that be a > dynamic or static link? > > If it is dynamic then you can absolutely forget about loading the > module into the kernel, there is

[linux-fbdev] [PATCH] mdacon SMP fix

2000-10-16 Thread James Simmons
ANyone with a MDA card on a SMP or even UP machione please test this patch. This patch should fix any SMP deadlocks that could happen with a MDA card. Thank you. --- mdacon.c.orig Wed Oct 11 18:09:01 2000 +++ mdacon.cWed Oct 11 18:14:18 2000 @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ #include #include

[linux-fbdev] Re: 2.4.0test9 VESA kernel config options not available

2000-10-16 Thread James Simmons
> for some reason, xconfig is not giving me the chance to select the kernel > options i found in the 2.2.13 kernel .config: Did you select Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers under Code maturity level options? You need to select this to select framebuffer devices. Also make

Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Timur Tabi
** Reply to message from Eray Ozkural <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 16 Oct 2000 07:55:30 +0300 > I don't want to repeat myself, but C++ doesn't force you to use > any bad programming practice that will result in slow code: > * exceptions everywhere > * polymorphism everywhere > * dynamic

2.2.18pre16 on sparc64 (Ultra1): Remaining troubles

2000-10-16 Thread Horst von Brand
This is an (up to date, mildly hacked) RH 6.2 machine. Problems I still see: floppy.c: In function `result': floppy.c:1168: warning: `status' might be used uninitialized in this function Bogus gcc warning. floppy.c: In function `floppy_interrupt': floppy.c:1760: warning: unused

Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Timur Tabi
** Reply to message from "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 15 Oct 2000 18:06:05 -0600 > The [new] and constructor/destructor operations create hidden memory > allocations in C++ that can blow performance in kernel "fast paths". I don't consider the memory allocation that [new] and

Re: hello world module no longer compiles?!

2000-10-16 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > # kgcc -v -E -dM -Wall -O2 -g -c -o hello.o hello.c > > The biggest problem with this is that you use the glibc headers (in > /usr/include) instead of the kernel headers (in /usr/src/linux/include) >

Re: failure to blank CDRWs (2.2.18pre15 smp ide-scsi hp7100i)

2000-10-16 Thread Ricky Beam
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: >> is in cdrecord itself, since I have seen that if the FIFO ever hits 0% >> during CD burning, cdrecord has a tendency to bomb. =20 > >If you empty the fifo and the drive fifo you burn a coaster. Thats a feature >of CD burning and one reason I use 640Mb

Re: hello world module no longer compiles?!

2000-10-16 Thread Arjan van de Ven
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > # kgcc -v -E -dM -Wall -O2 -g -c -o hello.o hello.c The biggest problem with this is that you use the glibc headers (in /usr/include) instead of the kernel headers (in /usr/src/linux/include) kgcc -O2 -I/usr/src/linux/include -D__KERNEL__ -o hello.o

Need help with SPARC fork()

2000-10-16 Thread Felix von Leitner
I need help with fork() on SPARC Linux. I am trying to port my diet libc to SPARC Linux but can't get fork() to work. Even when I copy the fork() code from glibc verbatim, the tasks have a corrupted stack frame. I tried to strip the init code and it looks like I broke fork in the process.

Patch to remove undefined C code

2000-10-16 Thread Bernd Schmidt
I've been playing with some gcc patches to detect code with undefined behaviour of the i = i++ variety. The patch below fixes all places in the kernel that I could find. Note that in some cases, it wasn't entirely clear what the code intended, so I had to guess. I haven't tested this patch at

Re: ppp support in kernel

2000-10-16 Thread Wayne . Brown
You could do what I do with my ThinkPad 600X and Lucent modem, which is to keep a 2.2.14 kernel available just for using the modem. Both lilo and loadlin offer the capability of having a selection of kernels available. In fact, I usually have at least three or four versions from which to

Re: Device Driver

2000-10-16 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, John Alvord wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:45:03 +0200 (CEST), Igmar Palsenberg > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> >I presume your driver doesn't mind if this image is unavailable. > >> >If not, you'll need to provide a open source image to use in place > >> >of your

Netcard: RTL8139B Problems (Hangs)

2000-10-16 Thread kernel
Scenario: o Linux 2.2.16 (older driver) & Linux 2.4.0-test9 (8139too-fast) o Two machines o Netcards with RTL8139B chipsets o Both hang after seemingly random delays / random amounts of net activity o One seems to get a shitload of packet errors if left for a few days and used

PC speaker driver patch for 2.4.0-test10-pre3

2000-10-16 Thread David Woodhouse
ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/people/dwmw2/pcsp/patch-pcsp-soundcore-2.4.0-test10-pre3 Thanks to Erik Inge Bolsø for porting it to 2.3.45, this saving me most of the work. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ppp support in kernel

2000-10-16 Thread Alan Cox
> satellite laptop. Lucent released a bianary driver for 2.2.12 that works > with 2.2.14. To make it work with 2.2.15 or higher, you have to use a > script i found to mask a 2.2.14 ppp module as one for the higher kernel. It wont work reliably in 2.2.15 even then as it misses some wake up calls

(Re: Why no HPT370 RAID Support?) Promise FasTrak, AMI HyperDisk

2000-10-16 Thread Andre Hedrick
I answered this before, but here it is again. This is a software BIOS mix. Without knowing the location and format of the RAID signature, Linux will walk all over it. It is not and has never ever bin hardware raid. Cheers, On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Linux Kernel Developer wrote: > Hi, > > I

Re: hello world module no longer compiles?!

2000-10-16 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Keith Owens wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:29:53 +0100 (BST), > Tigran Aivazian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >static void __exit test_exit(void) > >{ > >return; > >} > > > >module_init(test_init); > >module_exit(test_exit); > ># kgcc -Wall -O2 -g -c -o hello.o

Re: hello world module no longer compiles?!

2000-10-16 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:29:53 +0100 (BST), Tigran Aivazian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >static void __exit test_exit(void) >{ >return; >} > >module_init(test_init); >module_exit(test_exit); ># kgcc -Wall -O2 -g -c -o hello.o hello.c >hello.c:13: parse error before `test_exit' Add -v -E

Re: K7 on SD11 and 2.2.17: memory not detected

2000-10-16 Thread Alan Cox
> crash and a serious root fs corruption 10 hours after boot? At least > with E820 (if we do not expect to work for all machines) people will see > at boot time that memory was misdetected. Not when the machine reports ROM as writable and other stupidities - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: K7 on SD11 and 2.2.17: memory not detected

2000-10-16 Thread Constantine Gavrilov
Alan Cox wrote: > > > 2.2.18-pre with good results on Thinkpad 600x. No adverse consequencies > > (memory is reported correctly, suspend/hibernate work fine). I also had > > a chance to use it on several big SMP and UP servers (where e801 memory > > reporting works fine) Intel, Compaqs and IBM.

Re: A patch to loop.c for better cryption support

2000-10-16 Thread Ingo Rohloff
> > > > IV generation is what I am worried about. > > > There is a paper about why it is a bad idea to use > > > sequence numbers for CBC IV's. I just have to find the reference to it. > > Does this mean sequence as in 0,1,2,3,4 ... or does this mean > > any pre-calculate-able sequence ? In the

ppp support in kernel

2000-10-16 Thread Chuck Radcliff
Hello all, I am trying to work out a problem that I will run into if I go to a newer kernel then 2.2.14. I am using a lucent modem in a toshiba satellite laptop. Lucent released a bianary driver for 2.2.12 that works with 2.2.14. To make it work with 2.2.15 or higher, you have to use a script i

Re: Device Driver

2000-10-16 Thread Alan Cox
> Aren't there other examples where firmware is supplied in a struct > which is initialized to the needed binary values? Seems like Linux > doesn't need every bit of source (probably for some completely other > processor or ASIC, maybe written in FORTH) included as part of the > kernel. Quite a

Re: A20 Gate enable sequence (setup.S)

2000-10-16 Thread Robert Kaiser
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard B. Johnson) writes: > On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Robert Kaiser wrote: > >> > The AMD/Elan box snoops for the sequence sent to the keyboard >> > controller to enable A<20>. >> > Robert Kaiser didn't write this. I did. And yes. It

Re: Device Driver

2000-10-16 Thread Olaf Titz
> See Documentation/SubmittingDrivers in a current kernel. (I've mailed you a Speaking of that file, < Portability:Pointers are not always 32bits, people do not all have < floating point and you shouldn't use inline x86 assembler in < your driver without

Re: 2.4 MM overview?

2000-10-16 Thread Alan Cox
> We are formulating cunning plans of aggregating 2, 4 or 8 pages together > into "bigpages", telling the arch-independent code that we've got > larger pages than we really have and manipulating multiple PTEs in the > set_pte() primitive and friends. If you ever want to get the networking

Re: [Q] init_etherdev()

2000-10-16 Thread Petko Manolov
Hi all, If we are talking about 2.4 there are two options: - call init_etherdev() with arguments == 0; - call it with non zero arguments; Successful return from init_etherdev(0,0) means that ethernet device is already registered and "eth?" is asigned to the driver

hello world module no longer compiles?!

2000-10-16 Thread Tigran Aivazian
Hi guys, I always test new ideas or learn about things by writing a little module that does what I want to explore. But today I discovered that on a Red Hat 6.9 system (running test10-pre3 with everything correctly upgraded) I can no longer compile a trivial skeleton hello.c unless I use the

kgdb (kernel debugger) updates

2000-10-16 Thread Amit S. Kale
Hi, kgdb (patch for using gdb to do source level debugging for linux kernel) is available for 2.4.0-test9 and now supports console output in gdb. Thanks to Duane Voth, it's now available for 2.2.17 kernel also (all features except for console output). Please see http://kgdb.sourceforge.net/

Re: [Criticism]C++ Flamewar

2000-10-16 Thread Ian S. Nelson
Mark Salisbury wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Generic Kernel Geek wrote: > > > > > > C++ sucks for kernel dev, because I say it does. > > the original-original post was somebody asking why not make

Re: [Criticism]C++ Flamewar

2000-10-16 Thread Mark Salisbury
didn't say I wanted to do it, just that it could be done. my point was that a god-awful 365 message flamewar was unnecessary, and removing C++ keywords from system headers is not that big a deal. On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Keith Owens wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 08:50:24 -0400, > Mark Salisbury

test10-pre1: cd burn data mismatch

2000-10-16 Thread Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
Burnt a CD, compared the file with the original, and found out the following. As you can see, the mismatch is the same depending on the offset. What's wrong? I'm using the ide-scsi patch Andre posted, btw. 07CEE45D: 63 73 0C96C5FF: 85 05 0D4B259A: B8 38 0FA3259A: DC 5C 1259745D: E1 F1

Re: [Q] init_etherdev()

2000-10-16 Thread Andrey Panin
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 02:34:44AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Andrey Panin wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > after walking through some of NIC drivers and trying to remove check_region() > > calls, i have two small questions: > > > > 1) many NIC drivers contain (in XXX_probe1 functions) check

Re: [Criticism]C++ Flamewar

2000-10-16 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 08:50:24 -0400, Mark Salisbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >the original-original post was somebody asking why not make the kernel headers >C++ friendly. >all he wanted was the c++ reserved words removed from / kept out of the headers. >that way, if they for some reason want

Re: why is it taking so long to change interfaces?

2000-10-16 Thread Christopher Friesen
Horst von Brand wrote: > > "Christopher Friesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > I'm trying to figure out why swapping from one NIC to another is taking > > so long (on the order of a few seconds), and I was hoping one of you > > could help me out. > > Remote machines cache the IP <--> MAC

Re: Problems with Tulip driver in 2.2 and 2.4

2000-10-16 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 11:22:09AM +0930, Paul Schulz wrote: > > I'm seeing a similar problem with the Xircom Realport card > which uses the 'xircom_tulip_cb' driver. > > Workaround: > > Putting the card into promiscuous mode seems to get it going again. The fix is been finally merged in

Conversion of float denorm values

2000-10-16 Thread Uncle George
in arch/alpha/math-emu/math.c, one needs to disassemble the 32bit float value as 32 bit integer, and not presuppose it to be a 64 bit value with a double mentality. One this change is applied, then my sample test works everywhere. /gat case FOP_FNC_CVTxS:

RE: 2.4 MM overview?

2000-10-16 Thread Kenn Humborg
> > That's not the worst! Considering the 4-byte PTE and the > 40-byte mem_map_t, > > our memory management overhead is at least 44 bytes/page or 8.5%! > > use a logical page size of 4kb. > > > We are formulating cunning plans of aggregating 2, 4 or 8 pages together > > into "bigpages", telling

Re: [Criticism]C++ Flamewar

2000-10-16 Thread Mark Salisbury
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Generic Kernel Geek wrote: > > > > C++ sucks for kernel dev, because I say it does. the original-original post was somebody asking why not make the kernel headers C++ friendly.

Re: Oops 2.2.x

2000-10-16 Thread Stefano Mason
And NOW! To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Oops 2.2.x I'm definitely conviced that in the actual kernel source 2.2.16 & 2.2.17 & 2.2.18pre15 there is a bug that generate this Oops: Oct 12 16:32:57 giulia kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0900841f

Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Gábor Lénárt
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 02:49:47PM +0200, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > > > Not meant to offend, but it's obvious you are not grasping hardware > > optimization issues relative to kernel development and performance. I > > would recommend getting

Re: Device Driver

2000-10-16 Thread John Alvord
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:45:03 +0200 (CEST), Igmar Palsenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >I presume your driver doesn't mind if this image is unavailable. >> >If not, you'll need to provide a open source image to use in place >> >of your proprietary one. >> >> Linus, please confirm. >> >>

Re: A patch to loop.c for better cryption support

2000-10-16 Thread Marc Mutz
David Wagner wrote: > > Marc Mutz wrote: > >> There are some who believe that "not unique" IVs (across multiple > >> filesystems) facilitates some methods of cryptanalysis. > > > >Do you have a paper reference? > > (However, it does get one > thing wrong: it claims that it's ok to use a

Re: A patch to loop.c for better cryption support

2000-10-16 Thread Marc Mutz
Ingo Rohloff wrote: > > > I can convert the stuff _in place_ (it actually works, anyone please > > complain loudly if it shouldn't) even when my 'cryptfile' is /dev/hdax > > and I don't have sizeof(/dev/hdax) space left on my hard drives. > This could be dangerous. I'm not sure that the kernel

Re: [PATCH] GPL licence corrections

2000-10-16 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I've found a few inconsistencies with the wording of some license > statements refering to "GNU public license" and similar, and have > reworded them properly to "GNU General Public License". If we're referring to it by name, we probably ought to call it the 'GNU

[Oops] in nfsd, Kernel 2.2.18pre15, on IBM Netfinity 5500

2000-10-16 Thread Peter H. Ruegg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I encountered the following Oops today, when coming back from the weekend. I am using Kernel-nfsd for Network-Backups and installed Kernel 2.2.18pre15 since 2.2.17's nfsd used to lock up the whole machine. The script contacts each server in a

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16

2000-10-16 Thread Matthias Andree
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > 2.2.18pre16 > o Finally get the m68k tree merged(Andrew McPherson >and a cast of many) Ah. Very good. > o NFSv3 server patches merge (Dave Higgen) This

RE: 2.4 MM overview?

2000-10-16 Thread Kenn Humborg
> > We've kind of got 1.5-level page tables. There are actually 3 > page tables. > > The system page table maps memory starting at 0x8000. The > P0 process > > page table maps from 0x0 up and the P1 process page table maps from > > 0x7fff down. > > And they have to be physically

Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > Not meant to offend, but it's obvious you are not grasping hardware > optimization issues relative to kernel development and performance. I > would recommend getting your hands on a bus analyzer, and testing out > some of your theories, and

2.4.0test9 VESA kernel config options not available

2000-10-16 Thread mark lewis
i am running 2.2.13 slackware on a sony vaio pcg-n505x (64mb/6.5gb/2.5mb gfx). this was a full off-the-shelf install. want to upgrade to a usb-ready (or as close as currently possible) kernel. for some reason, xconfig is not giving me the chance to select the kernel options i found in the

Re: Device Driver

2000-10-16 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
> >I presume your driver doesn't mind if this image is unavailable. > >If not, you'll need to provide a open source image to use in place > >of your proprietary one. > > Linus, please confirm. > > Firmware for cards can be proprietary. It can either be installed by a > userspace utility on

Re: 2.4 MM overview?

2000-10-16 Thread Philipp Rumpf
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 11:35:23PM +0100, Kenn Humborg wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 09:45:11PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Well, we ain't got these luxuries/complications in VAXland... Hell, > > > we don't even have two-level page tables :-( > > > > Really. Ugh. I always assumed Vax had

Re: Quota fixes and a few questions

2000-10-16 Thread Juri Haberland
"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote: > > Hi Jan, > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 02:56:20PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > > So I've been thinking about fixes in quota (and also writing some parts). > > While we're at it, I've attached a patch which I was sent which simply > teaches quota about ext3 as a

Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Tell you what. You should go look into the Chorus or TMOK projects that are based on C++ and pester them. Next you'll be telling me that IDL and Corba stubs in every layer of the OS are in order and won't hurt performance. I did this OOM mental mastrubation excercise with the USL folks 7

Re: failure to blank CDRWs (2.2.18pre15 smp ide-scsi hp7100i)

2000-10-16 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
I hope yu get some progress. I just saw mine bomb again at spped=4... Jeff Mark Cooke wrote: > > Hi Jeff, Alan, Jens, > > Thank you all for the replies. I guess I'll try to contact > appropriate people at HP / try newer/older versions of cdrecord. I do > know the drive was working with

[patch-2.4.0-test10-pre3] bugfix for BFS

2000-10-16 Thread Tigran Aivazian
Hi Linus, I just noticed that BFS did not update the number of free blocks correctly on extending the file (in some circumstances) so after running bonnie on BFS (although showing it's a lot faster than ext2! :) one could see some very strange numbers in df(1) output. The patch below fixes this

Re: On labelled initialisers, gcc-2.7.2.3 and tcp_ipv4.c

2000-10-16 Thread Rusty Russell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you w rite: > The 'C' language can order structure members anyway it wants. You are an idiot. Rusty. -- Hacking time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at

Re: failure to blank CDRWs (2.2.18pre15 smp ide-scsi hp7100i)

2000-10-16 Thread Mark Cooke
Hi Jeff, Alan, Jens, Thank you all for the replies. I guess I'll try to contact appropriate people at HP / try newer/older versions of cdrecord. I do know the drive was working with 2.2. a long time back. It's just rare I use the burner. One other thing that may be relevent - the HP doesn't

[PATCH] GPL licence corrections

2000-10-16 Thread Mike A. Harris
I've found a few inconsistencies with the wording of some license statements refering to "GNU public license" and similar, and have reworded them properly to "GNU General Public License". Please apply this to 2.4.0, it's against test9. I'll do one for 2.2.x too, and look for other such

Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Eray Ozkural
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: > > Not meant to offend, but it's obvious you are not grasping hardware > optimization issues relative to kernel development and performance. I > would recommend getting your hands on a bus analyzer, and testing out > some of your theories, and explore for yourself

PC speaker driver patch for 2.2.17 and 2.2.18-pre16

2000-10-16 Thread David Woodhouse
Includes a fix provided by Paul for building without CONFIG_PCSP_MIXER. ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/people/dwmw2/pcsp/patch-pcsp-soundcore-2.2.1{7,8-pre16} -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read

effect of pci_unregister_driver

2000-10-16 Thread mdaljeet
Hi, If I have two identical network cards on my machine and I unregister the driver of one of them (say eth0) using the call "pci_unregister_driver(pdev->driver)" where pdev is the 'pci_dev' structure for eth0, does the device 'eth1' i.e. the other one gets effected by this. Regards, daljeet.

Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Actually, I spent four months at Novell profiling Chorus, MACH and TMOK (Trusted Modular Object Kernel -- a very nice piece of work) with EMON and an AArium profiling bus footprints -- the result. C++ kernels are slightly slower, and hit the wall on I/O performance due to excessive memory

Re: On labelled initialisers, gcc-2.7.2.3 and tcp_ipv4.c

2000-10-16 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > The 'C' language can order structure members anyway it wants. It also > can add any 'fill' or alignment bytes it wants. The compiler is not > broken in this respect. Anyone who's been following this list for a while will know not to take any notice of Dick,

RE: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread J . A . Magallon
Firs of all, as someone said, is there any other list where we can discuss this ? It is ver off-topic here... I messed in the discussion because I'm tired of seein people say that they don't use C++ because their big overheads, being slow, messed, out of programmer's control for low level tasks

Core dump missing for a process forked

2000-10-16 Thread kloury
Hello, My application first start creating other pocess using "fork()". Executing this application for a standard bash after a login session enables me to have core dump files in case of task crash. My problem is that, I put my application in the /etc/inittab starting for level 2. Now I don't

Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Marty, There was no technical meat of any kind in your response. Jeff Marty Fouts wrote: > > Do you know that there is actually a name for the logical fallacy behind > this sort of argument? > > But please, enlighten me, what precisely about having once wrote some file > system code for

Re: Problems with Tulip driver in 2.2 and 2.4

2000-10-16 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: >> I've noticed this behavior for a few kernel revisions now, up to and >> including 2.2.17. It would be nice to get this bug worked out before >> 2.2.18. > >I dont think that is likely to happen. Every time someone touches the tulip >driver close to

RE: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Marty Fouts
Do you know that there is actually a name for the logical fallacy behind this sort of argument? But please, enlighten me, what precisely about having once wrote some file system code for Linux qualifies one as an expert on the topic of the relative difficulty of optimizing C and C++ as used in

Why no HPT370 RAID Support?

2000-10-16 Thread Linux Kernel Developer
Hi, I was just wondering if there was some reason why the HPT370's RAID capabilities weren't supported in the enhanced IDE patch for 2.2.*? Or if support for its RAID capabilities were being worked on. I noticed FreeBSD also appears to fail to support its RAID features so I am partially

Re: remap_page_range

2000-10-16 Thread aprasad
>suppose i allocate an buffer by calling kmalloc. >i want to map this buffer to user address space. >will remap_page_range will automatically map this >buffer to calling process's address space. it should do if have the struct vm_area_struct of the calling process. as far as i know if you

RE: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Marty Fouts wrote: > Which part of "what you wrote doesn't make sense, (for the following > reasons,) please explain it" are you having trouble responding to in public? the pragmatic and subjective part. Jeff wrote some cool nwfs code for Linux which is publically available

RE: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Marty Fouts
Which part of "what you wrote doesn't make sense, (for the following reasons,) please explain it" are you having trouble responding to in public? This has nothing to do with some imagined 'fight' and everything to do with a public challenge to a publicly made statement that, IMHO, gives every

Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Take your fights with me offline. You have my email address. Jeff Marty Fouts wrote: > > Um? Huh? This seems like mumbo-jumbo to me. With the exception of those > parts of the kernel that actually manipulate the hardware as hardware, -- > which is a surprisingly small part of the kernel,

2.2.18pre16 and USB_UHCI_ALT

2000-10-16 Thread David Rees
In 2.2.18pre16 an alternative USB_UHCI driver under the option CONFIG_USB_UHCI_ALT was added. Only this one works for me, and CONFIG_USB_UHCI throws up 50 messages a second like this one: Oct 16 00:12:22 spoke kernel: usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 3, frame# 188 and leaves my mouse in an

Re: Problems with Tulip driver in 2.2 and 2.4

2000-10-16 Thread David Rees
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 08:16:53AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > I've noticed this behavior for a few kernel revisions now, up to and > > including 2.2.17. It would be nice to get this bug worked out before > > 2.2.18. > > I dont think that is likely to happen. Every time someone touches the tulip

remap_page_range

2000-10-16 Thread anil kumar
Hi, suppose i allocate an buffer by calling kmalloc. i want to map this buffer to user address space. will remap_page_range will automatically map this buffer to calling process's address space. thanks. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk

Re: Can't boot 2.4.0test9..

2000-10-16 Thread Mike A. Harris
Many thanks go to both Keith Owens, and the multitude of others that responded to my 2.4.x boot problem. Keith sent me his VIDEO_CHAR patch which helped track things down, and will also prove helpful in the future as well. The problem ended up being user error. ;o) My kernels are compiled for

Re: Problems with Tulip driver in 2.2 and 2.4

2000-10-16 Thread Alan Cox
> I've noticed this behavior for a few kernel revisions now, up to and > including 2.2.17. It would be nice to get this bug worked out before > 2.2.18. I dont think that is likely to happen. Every time someone touches the tulip driver close to release they fix one card and break another 8( -

Re: Device Driver

2000-10-16 Thread Alan Cox
> how do we begin the process of getting our drivers included into the = > kernel? > See Documentation/SubmittingDrivers in a current kernel. (I've mailed you a copy of the file offlist) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16

2000-10-16 Thread Alan Cox
> P.S. I apologize if this driver is allready marked EXPERIMENTAL for 2.2.x > -- but I don't have the disk space right now to check, and I wanted to make > sure that, as the maintainer, my official opinion on the matter was voiced. Its already marked experimental, no problem. - To unsubscribe

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16

2000-10-16 Thread Alan Cox
> Any particular reason why the new asm-m68k/*.h headers ended up under > asm-i386? :-) Its called 'I can apply this last diff just a minute before release, it cant possibly go wrong'. Fixed in my tree Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body

Re: Device Driver

2000-10-16 Thread Rogier Wolff
Keith Owens wrote: > On Sun, 15 Oct 2000 09:57:08 -0700, > Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:30:39 +1000, > >> "Mike McLeod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >All of the code is open except for an image file that is loaded > >> >onto the card when the driver is

linux kernel module questions.

2000-10-16 Thread dony
Hello, all: I compile my linux module program dony.c with "-D--Kernel__ -DMODULE" options enabled, and then insert it into kernel using "insmod dony.o" . It stops when it tries to access a global varible "struct dony_struct MyPrivateStruct" and complains such messages as "cannot handle page

RE: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Marty Fouts
Um? Huh? This seems like mumbo-jumbo to me. With the exception of those parts of the kernel that actually manipulate the hardware as hardware, -- which is a surprisingly small part of the kernel, even of the parts of the kernel that look like what they do is manipulate the hardware as hardware

Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Gábor Lénárt
Hi, I hope IF C++ kernel modules written I could find the same module written in C too, because I would refuse using C++ in kernel for various reasons. I'm Hungarian guy and I can speak English (yeah, only a bit ;-). Note that I can't make Hungarian the default language for a software made for

Re: [Q] init_etherdev()

2000-10-16 Thread Jeff Garzik
Andrey Panin wrote: > > Hi all, > > after walking through some of NIC drivers and trying to remove check_region() > calls, i have two small questions: > > 1) many NIC drivers contain (in XXX_probe1 functions) check like this: > > if (dev == NULL) { > dev =

Re: Problems with Tulip driver in 2.2 and 2.4

2000-10-16 Thread J. S. Connell
On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, David Rees wrote: > I've seen similar behavior on the same cards, but it only seems to affect > 100Mbps operation, plugging it into a 10Mbps hub instead of our 3Com > 100Mbps switch will also get things working as does running ifup/ifdown on > the interface. eth0 on my

Re: Device Driver

2000-10-16 Thread Andre Hedrick
On 15 Oct 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Nobody asked but, HDD solid state devices that could be used for booting > > would require the linking or inclusion of of non-open binaries that must > > be executed once the release of INT13/INT19 are completed from the bios > > bootstrapping. We are

Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-16 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Not meant to offend, but it's obvious you are not grasping hardware optimization issues relative to kernel development and performance. I would recommend getting your hands on a bus analyzer, and testing out some of your theories, and explore for yourself relative to these issues with some hard

Top 5 Web Sites

2000-10-16 Thread mmcdonald
Title: Top 5 Internet Sites TOP 5 Internet Web Sites 1. $1000.00 Weekly Give Away, Gaming Newsletters, Bad Bets section, Chat, Handy Caper's, Sportsbooks, Online Casinos & more.http://www.top100gamingsites.com  2. Computer Systems, Desktops, Notebooks, Mac, Still photo, Webcams,

<    1   2   3   4   >