What is the output of 'lspci -v'? If it says that the chip revision is '78' then
this is one of the new 3C905CX (note the CX) NIC's or ASIC on the motherboard.
I've seen a problem with the 3c59x.c driver and this chip, it can send packets
but not receive any. The 3Com 3c90x-1.0.0i.tgz driver at
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>Changes since the prerelease:
>...
>Matti Aarnio:
> - teach tulip driver about media types 5 and 6
This part of the patch introduces a bug in 2.4.0, as noticed by gcc:
media.c: In function `tulip_select_media':
media.c:268: warning: unused variable
> I need to look at fdisk, because it is doing things wrong.
I don't think so, unless you have a really old version.
> Linux sees the correct size, but fdisk still sees 32 GB.
> Probably a recompile / upgrade.
Yes, upgrade in case your version is older than 2.10i.
Andries
-
To unsubscribe
> * VFS?VM - mmap/write deadlock (demo code seems to show lock
> is there)
Linus fixed that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/lib'
ld -m elf_i386 -T /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext
arch/i386/kernel/head.o arch/i386/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o init/version.o \
--start-group \
arch/i386/kernel/kernel.o arch/i386/mm/mm.o kernel/kernel.o
Sorry to follow up, but I forgot to note that it is trying to share IRQ
11 for aic7xx and eth0. However, even if I move the Adaptec card to
another slot, where it gets IRQ 10, still no joy for eth0 on IRQ 11.
--Lee Hetherington
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Please do. The boot-time messages which come out of the driver
> would be interesting. It would help if you add `debug=7' to
> the 3c59x modprobe command line also.
OK. I've included dmesg output due to modprobe with debug=7 followed by ifup
(using pump -- problems
Hi Ted,
in the last few weeks quite a few of the bugs listed on your
(excellent) http://linux24.sourceforge.net/ have been fixed.
Here is a list of the VM bugs that are on your list and can
be moved to the "fixed" category:
* truncate->invalidate_inode_pages removes mapping information from
Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Jan 5, 3:26am, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > ...
> > This filesystem mount option parsing code is completely ad hoc, and uses
> > strtok which is horribly horribly broken. (Do man strtok and read the
> > 'Bugs' section.)
> >
> > It would be worth thinking about how to do
Hello!
I've installed 2.4.0 on a system that has been tracking 2.3.xx/2.4test for
quite a while. With 2.4.0 installed, I've started to see the following
errors:
reset_xmit_timer sk=cfd889a0 1 when=0x3b4a, caller=c01e0748
reset_xmit_timer sk=cfd889a0 1 when=0x3a80, caller=c01e0748
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> [If you don't mind, please help test 2.4.0 a bit more. I'm
> pretty confident it's better than 2.2.18 when under load,
> but maybe the device drivers you use still need some tweaking]
I'll be trying to move to 2.4.0 again soon. First 2.4.0-test* I
Manfred Bartz wrote:
> Why a new system call?
Well, you'd be accessing a different kernel variable--"ytime" instead of
"xtime". This new variable wouldn't be adjusted when the system
time/date was, it would start at zero and always increase.
> regarding a: it could have microsecond
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Brad Hartin wrote:
> Jan 4 00:06:05 osprey kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for X...
> Jan 4 00:06:06 osprey last message repeated 6 times
This bug is fixed in 2.2.19-pre2 and later.
Oh, and 2.4.0 of course doesn't have it either ;)
[If you don't mind, please help
Hi,
I have a problem with a network-driver.
The ne2k-pci modules loads fine, no problem at all. Everything works
like a sunshine.
But as soon as I try to assign an IP-adress the whole system halts
rock-solid, the magic sysrq combinations don't even work anymore.
I am not sure if this is due to
On Friday, January 05, 2001 02:04:08 PM +0100 Claas Langbehn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:52:49PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
>> This patch is meant to be applied on top of the reiserfs
>> 3.6.23 patch to get everything working in the new prerelease
>> kernels. The
I recieved the following messages from the kernel yesterda morning. It
doesn't appear that any running programs actually died, or ran out of
memory (128M physical/ 256M swap, only about 150M total or so in use when
I got back on the machine.
As a side note, during times of what I consider only
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
>Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 01:08:49 +0100 (MET)
>From: Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>Subject: Network oddity
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>I have a server, and it reports ("netstat -a")
>
>tcp
> since Mark posted his views to the list, I figured I could safely post the
> conversation I've been having with him in email
which is universally considered rude, if not illegal.
in any case, please don't respond to this thread, which is quite off-topic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:46:19PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > recovery. Because the ext3 journal is just a series of data blocks to
> > be copied into the filesystem (rather than "actions" to be done), it
> > doesn't matter how many times it is done. The recovery flags are not
> > reset
sys_poll spends around 1/2 of the execution time allocating / freeing a
few bytes temporary memory.
The attached patch tries to avoid these allocation by using the stack -
usually only a few bytes are needed, kmalloc is used for the rest.
The result: one poll of stdin is down from 1736 cpu
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:52:49PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> This patch is meant to be applied on top of the reiserfs
> 3.6.23 patch to get everything working in the new prerelease
> kernels. The order is:
>
> untar linux-2.4.0-prerelease.tar.bz2
> apply linux-2.4.0-test12-reiserfs-3.6.23.gz
Mark Hahn wrote:
> > I personaly do not trust the 2.4.x kernel entirely yet, and would prefer to
> ...
> > afraid that this may partialy criple 2.2 driver development.
>
> egads! how can there be "development" on a *stable* kernel line?
>
> maybe this is the time to reconsider
> and added a few comments. I also fixed compilation problems
> (when quota was disabled) - Alan, were there any problems
> I didn't fix (I've seen you and someone else were fixing some
AFAIK the only reported problem was the compile with no quotas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> wanted to try the latest stuff, but X fails to start now.
Yep
> dmesg part:
> Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
> agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 93M
> agpgart: agpgart: Detected an Intel i815 Chipset.
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> Unless Stephen says otherwise, my understanding is that a crash during
> journal recovery will just mean the journal is replayed again at the next
> recovery. Because the ext3 journal is just a series of data blocks to
> be copied into the filesystem (rather than "actions" to be done), it
>
> No. 2.2.* handles large drives since 2.2.14.
> This looks more like you used the jumper to clip the drive to 32GB.
> Don't use it and get full capacity.
> If your BIOS hangs when it sees such a large drive so that you
> cannot avoid using the jumper, use setmax in your boot scripts,
> or use a
Hello.
So I've updated my quota patches for 2.4.0-prerelease. I also
fixed one locking bug in implementation of new quotafile format
and added a few comments. I also fixed compilation problems
(when quota was disabled) - Alan, were there any problems
I didn't fix (I've seen you and someone
...is still broken. It does not build Fore 200e driver.
Jan
--- linux/drivers/atm/Makefile.orig Tue Jan 2 10:18:25 2001
+++ linux/drivers/atm/Makefile Tue Jan 2 12:00:05 2001
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
endif
endif
-obj-$(CONFIG_ATM_FORE200E) += fore200e.o $(FORE200E_FW_OBJS)
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:59:49PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > Unfortunately you seem to ignore my arguments, so lets
> > I've not ignored them, as said they were either obviously wrong of offtopic.
>
> Would the two of you ajourn this debate to
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:01:37AM +0100, Stefan Traby wrote:
>
> Please tell me how to specify "noreplay" for the initial "/" mount
> :)
You don't have to: the filesystem knows when a root mount is
happening, and can do the extra work then to make sure that the mount
isn't failed on a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Powering down a VCR whilst recording can damage the tape or even
> worse have the tap get jammed in the video. I have also had a TV die
> because it was unpowered from the mains without being switched off
> first.
> Sure, these things don't always happen -- but they
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> In what way? A root fs readonly mount is usually designed to prevent
^^^
> the filesystem from being stomped on during the initial boot so that
> fsck can run without the filesystem being volatile. That's the only
>
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Nicholas Knight wrote:
> While I understand the reasoning behind this, and might do the
> same thing if I was in your position, I feel it may be a
> mistake. I personaly do not trust the 2.4.x kernel entirely yet,
> and would prefer to wait for 2.4.1 or 2.4.2 before upgrading
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike wrote:
> Hi !!
>
> When i boot linux from rescue disk, i get following message:
>
> VFS: Insert root floppy disk to be loaded in RAM disk and press ENTER
>
> Now how can i create a root disk... I am trying to boot Redhat 6.0
>
>
> Regards,
>
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Evan Thompson wrote:
> I hear about the 2.4.0 release. I have, in my mailbox, many
> messages titled "Re: And oh, btw...", BUT NO ORIGINAL MESSAGE!
> What happened? Is my stupid mailserver selective or something?
>
> Anyways. My bug report is: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] does
>
Mike,
there are docs named HOWTO-. There is also
one about boot/root disks.
I recommend you to boot from redhat instalation CD
and after launch pres Alt-F2 (or F3,4... a can't remember)
to get into free console with bash prompt.
Then mount your hacked(TM) disk and try to repair.
devik
> When
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:06:47AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Stephen, you write:
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 05:31:12PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote:
> > > BTW, what inumber do you want for whiteouts? IIRC, we decided to use
> > > the same entry type as UFS does (14), but I don't
> EIP: 0010:[<>]
> Call Trace: [] [] [] []
> [] [] []
> [] [] []
>
> Code: Bad EIP value.
Could you parse your oops through ksymoops?
Probably someone called an uninitialized function pointer, or there was
a stack overrun.
--
Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> video1394.o(.data+0x0): multiple definition of `ohci_csr_rom'
> ohci1394.o(.data+0x0): first defined here
Known bug, fix attached below.
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
diff -urN /mnt/kernel/clean/linuxprereleaseac5/drivers/ieee1394/ohci1394.c
Interesting,
yesterday I have TCP problems with my three independent systems.
They all acts as simple firewalls with MASQ. Yesterday they all
suddenly stopped responding to ssh TCP connections to IP on eth1
(internal net) but they continued to work on IP attached to eth0
and lo. The problem
> Cícero Clarindo Campelo Neto
> Analista de Suporte, MCSE
> Departamento de Suporte
> Lanlink Informática Ltda
> * (0xx85) 466-8004
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.lanlink.com.br
>
> Serviço de Atendimento ao Cliente:
> * (85) 0800-85-0800
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from
Dear developers!
(sorry for the long mail)
We have a compaq proliant server with NO raid and 5 scsi discs:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 04 Lun: 00
Vendor: COMPAQ Model: BD00911934 Rev: 3B02
Type: Direct-AccessANSI SCSI revision: 02
bounded together to a volume
I tried linux single but it says " no such image"
Actually someone hacked my linux box and now i can't boot it. Can somone help
me.
"J . A . Magallon" wrote:
> On 2001.01.04 Mike wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am unable to boot my linux. I got the following message during boot.
> >
> >
Hi !!
When i boot linux from rescue disk, i get following message:
VFS: Insert root floppy disk to be loaded in RAM disk and press ENTER
Now how can i create a root disk... I am trying to boot Redhat 6.0
Regards,
Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
Hello.
> Perhaps the help text for disk quotas needs to be updated, or at least the
> howto for quotas.
>
> The help text for disk quotas says to see the Quota mini-HOWTO. The howto
> says to get the quota source from:
>
>
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
>>>
>>> And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ?
>>> Would you volunteer to handle the support
Hi,
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.0/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=i586 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS
-include /usr/src/linux-2.4.0/include/linux/modversions.h -c -o r128_cce.o r128_cce.c
r128_cce.c: In function
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:48:04PM +0600, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
> Why not DEB?
Because Keith doesn't have a Debian system? He just provides the rpms
as a service, he doesn't have to do that.
Install the "alien" package on your machine and you will be able to
convert between rpm and deb.
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:31:12AM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> "Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:
> >
> Yes, and so long as your journal is not on another partition/disk things
> will eventually be set right. The combination of a partially updated
> filesystem and its journal is in some sense
Dear all!
wanted to try the latest stuff, but X fails to start now.
dmesg part:
Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 93M
agpgart: agpgart: Detected an Intel i815 Chipset.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
a program using getch() function (included in curses.h) runs OK when it executes in
system prompt.
when I put it in rpm package's %post section, it can start running until getch()
statement. press any key to test getch(), getch() has no response!
Can anybody tell me how to resolve this
On 2001.01.05 Dominik Kubla wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:18:46AM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> >
> > Silly question, but have you realized that you don't have to enable
> > SMP in kernel to do multithreading ?
> >
>
> That depends on your definition: If you really want to run
On 2001.01.05 Michael D. Crawford wrote:
>
> In my own work I mostly do multithreaded software development and I just sort
> of
> felt like it would be good karma to enable it even if my machine didn't
> support
> it. Go figure. So this was mostly a user error, although I guess I've been
>
# IEEE 1394 (FireWire) support
#
CONFIG_IEEE1394=y
# CONFIG_IEEE1394_PCILYNX is not set
CONFIG_IEEE1394_OHCI1394=y
CONFIG_IEEE1394_VIDEO1394=y
CONFIG_IEEE1394_RAWIO=y
# CONFIG_IEEE1394_VERBOSEDEBUG is not set
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
Hello, and thank you to those who responded to my query about adding my
Agfa ePhoto to the USB mass storage device database. I had no success
with this (the machine locked hard on connecting the device), so I have
decided to try it with the dc2xx driver.
I have added it to
Hi,
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
my System hangs up if I have a high load and if I use XFree.
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
I'm using XFree 4.0.2 on a Vodoo3 2000 Graphics Board.
If I'm booting 2.4.0-test10 it works fine.
If I'm booting 2.4.0-test12 or pre my
This message has a couple of questions to it, so maybe a few people might
want to contribute to answering them all. My apologies in advance for the
long length of this post.
The Problem:
I have an Alpha PC164 with 512 Meg of memory. As a friend and I were setting
it up, we tried to compile
Michael D. Crawford wrote:
> You might think this is great because of all the extra testing the new users
> will do but I assert that it isn't. The environment for Linux is quite
> different these days than when 2.2 or 2.0 were released.
>
> A lot of the people who will be using it are not
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:30:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I agree. I can set up a "linux-hotplug" group using SourceForge if
...
> I'm only proposing SourceForge as I can set up a list easily there
> easily, and I don't know the right people to ask to get it
I gather from the combination of what I read on Slashdot and what folks replied
here that the mirrors are actually lightly loaded, but Slashdot readers don't
know about them because they couldn't read the home page at
http://www.kernel.org that directed them to the mirror list.
So I posted the
ludovic fernandez wrote:
>
> george anzinger wrote:
>
> > Roger Larsson wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > This part can probably be put in a proper non inline function.
> > > Cache issues...
> > > +/*
> > > +* At that point a scheduling is healthy iff:
> > > +
I gather from the combination of what I read on Slashdot and what folks replied
here that the mirrors are actually lightly loaded, but Slashdot readers don't
know about them because they couldn't read the home page at
http://www.kernel.org that directed them to the mirror list.
So I posted the
This message has a couple of questions to it, so maybe a few people might
want to contribute to answering them all. My apologies in advance for the
long length of this post.
The Problem:
I have an Alpha PC164 with 512 Meg of memory. As a friend and I were setting
it up, we tried to compile
Hi,
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
my System hangs up if I have a high load and if I use XFree.
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
I'm using XFree 4.0.2 on a Vodoo3 2000 Graphics Board.
If I'm booting 2.4.0-test10 it works fine.
If I'm booting 2.4.0-test12 or pre my
Hello, and thank you to those who responded to my query about adding my
Agfa ePhoto to the USB mass storage device database. I had no success
with this (the machine locked hard on connecting the device), so I have
decided to try it with the dc2xx driver.
I have added it to
# IEEE 1394 (FireWire) support
#
CONFIG_IEEE1394=y
# CONFIG_IEEE1394_PCILYNX is not set
CONFIG_IEEE1394_OHCI1394=y
CONFIG_IEEE1394_VIDEO1394=y
CONFIG_IEEE1394_RAWIO=y
# CONFIG_IEEE1394_VERBOSEDEBUG is not set
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
On 2001.01.05 Michael D. Crawford wrote:
In my own work I mostly do multithreaded software development and I just sort
of
felt like it would be good karma to enable it even if my machine didn't
support
it. Go figure. So this was mostly a user error, although I guess I've been
helpful
On 2001.01.05 Dominik Kubla wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:18:46AM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote:
Silly question, but have you realized that you don't have to enable
SMP in kernel to do multithreading ?
That depends on your definition: If you really want to run multiple
threads
Dear all!
wanted to try the latest stuff, but X fails to start now.
dmesg part:
Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 93M
agpgart: agpgart: Detected an Intel i815 Chipset.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:48:04PM +0600, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
Why not DEB?
Because Keith doesn't have a Debian system? He just provides the rpms
as a service, he doesn't have to do that.
Install the "alien" package on your machine and you will be able to
convert between rpm and deb.
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:31:12AM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:
"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:
Yes, and so long as your journal is not on another partition/disk things
will eventually be set right. The combination of a partially updated
filesystem and its journal is in some sense a
Hi,
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.0/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=i586 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS
-include /usr/src/linux-2.4.0/include/linux/modversions.h -c -o r128_cce.o r128_cce.c
r128_cce.c: In function
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ?
Would you volunteer to handle the support load on l-k that
Hello.
Perhaps the help text for disk quotas needs to be updated, or at least the
howto for quotas.
The help text for disk quotas says to see the Quota mini-HOWTO. The howto
says to get the quota source from:
ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/Linux/PEOPLE/Linus/subsystems/quota/all.tar.gz
Dear developers!
(sorry for the long mail)
We have a compaq proliant server with NO raid and 5 scsi discs:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 04 Lun: 00
Vendor: COMPAQ Model: BD00911934 Rev: 3B02
Type: Direct-AccessANSI SCSI revision: 02
bounded together to a volume
Cícero Clarindo Campelo Neto
Analista de Suporte, MCSE
Departamento de Suporte
Lanlink Informática Ltda
* (0xx85) 466-8004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lanlink.com.br
Serviço de Atendimento ao Cliente:
* (85) 0800-85-0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Interesting,
yesterday I have TCP problems with my three independent systems.
They all acts as simple firewalls with MASQ. Yesterday they all
suddenly stopped responding to ssh TCP connections to IP on eth1
(internal net) but they continued to work on IP attached to eth0
and lo. The problem
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
video1394.o(.data+0x0): multiple definition of `ohci_csr_rom'
ohci1394.o(.data+0x0): first defined here
Known bug, fix attached below.
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
diff -urN /mnt/kernel/clean/linuxprereleaseac5/drivers/ieee1394/ohci1394.c
EIP: 0010:[]
Call Trace: [c8829bb0] [c8827000] [c8827068] [c8829d50]
[c882aa00] [c8827000] [c01156cd]
[c882] [c8827060] [c0108d5f]
Code: Bad EIP value.
Could you parse your oops through ksymoops?
Probably someone called an uninitialized function pointer, or
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:06:47AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Stephen, you write:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 05:31:12PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote:
BTW, what inumber do you want for whiteouts? IIRC, we decided to use
the same entry type as UFS does (14), but I don't remember what
Mike,
there are docs named HOWTO-. There is also
one about boot/root disks.
I recommend you to boot from redhat instalation CD
and after launch pres Alt-F2 (or F3,4... a can't remember)
to get into free console with bash prompt.
Then mount your hacked(TM) disk and try to repair.
devik
When
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike wrote:
Hi !!
When i boot linux from rescue disk, i get following message:
VFS: Insert root floppy disk to be loaded in RAM disk and press ENTER
Now how can i create a root disk... I am trying to boot Redhat 6.0
Regards,
Mike
man
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Evan Thompson wrote:
I hear about the 2.4.0 release. I have, in my mailbox, many
messages titled "Re: And oh, btw...", BUT NO ORIGINAL MESSAGE!
What happened? Is my stupid mailserver selective or something?
Anyways. My bug report is: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] does
not
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Nicholas Knight wrote:
While I understand the reasoning behind this, and might do the
same thing if I was in your position, I feel it may be a
mistake. I personaly do not trust the 2.4.x kernel entirely yet,
and would prefer to wait for 2.4.1 or 2.4.2 before upgrading
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In what way? A root fs readonly mount is usually designed to prevent
^^^
the filesystem from being stomped on during the initial boot so that
fsck can run without the filesystem being volatile. That's the only
reason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Powering down a VCR whilst recording can damage the tape or even
worse have the tap get jammed in the video. I have also had a TV die
because it was unpowered from the mains without being switched off
first.
Sure, these things don't always happen -- but they
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:01:37AM +0100, Stefan Traby wrote:
Please tell me how to specify "noreplay" for the initial "/" mount
:)
You don't have to: the filesystem knows when a root mount is
happening, and can do the extra work then to make sure that the mount
isn't failed on a
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:59:49PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
Unfortunately you seem to ignore my arguments, so lets
I've not ignored them, as said they were either obviously wrong of offtopic.
Would the two of you ajourn this debate to alt.flame
...is still broken. It does not build Fore 200e driver.
Jan
--- linux/drivers/atm/Makefile.orig Tue Jan 2 10:18:25 2001
+++ linux/drivers/atm/Makefile Tue Jan 2 12:00:05 2001
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
endif
endif
-obj-$(CONFIG_ATM_FORE200E) += fore200e.o $(FORE200E_FW_OBJS)
Hello.
So I've updated my quota patches for 2.4.0-prerelease. I also
fixed one locking bug in implementation of new quotafile format
and added a few comments. I also fixed compilation problems
(when quota was disabled) - Alan, were there any problems
I didn't fix (I've seen you and someone
No. 2.2.* handles large drives since 2.2.14.
This looks more like you used the jumper to clip the drive to 32GB.
Don't use it and get full capacity.
If your BIOS hangs when it sees such a large drive so that you
cannot avoid using the jumper, use setmax in your boot scripts,
or use a
Unless Stephen says otherwise, my understanding is that a crash during
journal recovery will just mean the journal is replayed again at the next
recovery. Because the ext3 journal is just a series of data blocks to
be copied into the filesystem (rather than "actions" to be done), it
doesn't
wanted to try the latest stuff, but X fails to start now.
Yep
dmesg part:
Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 93M
agpgart: agpgart: Detected an Intel i815 Chipset.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:52:49PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
This patch is meant to be applied on top of the reiserfs
3.6.23 patch to get everything working in the new prerelease
kernels. The order is:
untar linux-2.4.0-prerelease.tar.bz2
apply linux-2.4.0-test12-reiserfs-3.6.23.gz
apply
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:46:19PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
recovery. Because the ext3 journal is just a series of data blocks to
be copied into the filesystem (rather than "actions" to be done), it
doesn't matter how many times it is done. The recovery flags are not
reset until
sys_poll spends around 1/2 of the execution time allocating / freeing a
few bytes temporary memory.
The attached patch tries to avoid these allocation by using the stack -
usually only a few bytes are needed, kmalloc is used for the rest.
The result: one poll of stdin is down from 1736 cpu
since Mark posted his views to the list, I figured I could safely post the
conversation I've been having with him in email
which is universally considered rude, if not illegal.
in any case, please don't respond to this thread, which is quite off-topic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 01:08:49 +0100 (MET)
From: Rogier Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Network oddity
Hi all,
I have a server, and it reports ("netstat -a")
tcp0 0
I recieved the following messages from the kernel yesterda morning. It
doesn't appear that any running programs actually died, or ran out of
memory (128M physical/ 256M swap, only about 150M total or so in use when
I got back on the machine.
As a side note, during times of what I consider only
On Friday, January 05, 2001 02:04:08 PM +0100 Claas Langbehn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:52:49PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
This patch is meant to be applied on top of the reiserfs
3.6.23 patch to get everything working in the new prerelease
kernels. The order is:
201 - 300 of 467 matches
Mail list logo
