On Sat, 03 Feb 2001 18:54:44 +0100,
Viktor Rosenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With ISA-PnP compiled in, and 3c509 support compiled as module:
# modprobe 3c509
/lib/modules/2.4.1/kernel/drivers/net/3c509.o: invalid parameter parm_io
/lib/modules/2.4.1/kernel/drivers/net/3c509.o: insmod
[root@coredump /proc]# cd 9338
[root@coredump 9338]# ls
Feb 3 17:57:08 coredump kernel: gnomeicu S CD17 0 9338
1(NOTLB)9340 9332
Feb 3 17:57:08 coredump kernel: Call Trace: [search_by_key+203/3232]
[search_for_position_by_key+170/916] [make_cpu_key+57/64] [$
Feb 3
This fixes units, and makes format tag: value. Please apply.
The units seem to vary. I suggest using fundamental SI units.
That would be meters, kilograms, seconds, and maybe a very
few others -- my memory fails me on this.
Power meter applets will be eternally buggy if you force them
to deal
Thus spake J . A . Magallon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
How about a simple patch to the top level makefile that checks the gcc
version then prints a distinct message ..'this compiler hasn't been approved
for compiling the kernel', sleeping for one second, then continuing on. This
solution
Hi,
I have a server with RAID1 partitions with linux 2.4.1 (stock,
self-compiled) installed.
It was easy to create the RAID partitions but when booting, no
auto-detection is successful.
The kernel says that autodetect is running, then done, but nothing is
auto-detected.
My devices are IDE
Ok, I rebooted the system, then syslogd was using 100% cpu?
it seems like perhaps reiserfs is causing this problem??
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hi,
I have a server with RAID1 partitions with linux 2.4.1 (stock,
self-compiled) installed. It was easy to create the RAID partitions
but when booting, no auto-detection is successful. The kernel says
that autodetect is running, then done, but nothing is auto-detected.
My devices are IDE
Alan Cox writes:
[Albert Cahalan]
David Woodhouse writes:
-a "$CC" = "gcc"
Not worth it; they should upgrade the local gcc too.
If anything, they are getting a reminder that they need.
The local gcc has no bearing on the compiler. The local
compiler might not even be gcc - eg if they
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Miles Lane wrote:
I asked David Hinds to write up an outline of the things that
will be needed to get PCMCIA support cleanly and completely
integrated into the kernel tree.
David has expressed that he'll not be able to participate in
this
Albert D. Cahalan writes:
The units seem to vary. I suggest using fundamental SI units.
That would be meters, kilograms, seconds, and maybe a very
few others -- my memory fails me on this.
iirc, SI comes from France, and therefore it should be "metres"
[flames to /dev/null please] ;)
--
The units seem to vary. I suggest using fundamental SI units.
That would be meters, kilograms, seconds, and maybe a very
few others -- my memory fails me on this.
There are lots of SI units, one for each physical dimension that can be
measured. Some of the ones that might apply here are:
-
Thank goodness, it's about time. :-)
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 07:08:44PM +, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
This is to announce the first public release of the Linux-NTFS project
hosted on sourceforge. The project page, where you can download the source
code tar ball or rpm as well as
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 06:14:33PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank goodness, it's about time. :-)
Amen.
Jeff
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 07:08:44PM +, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
This is to announce the first public release of the Linux-NTFS project
hosted on sourceforge.
Hi,
Could anybody please help me to resolve why this error is returned?
(md_import_device() returned -22)
I'm trying to setup software RAID0
on Asus CUR-DLS (dual channel ULTRA2 SCSI - sym53c896).
kernel is pure 2.4.1(SMP),
with devfs, sym53c8xx and raid0 support linked in.
raidtools are
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 06:14:33PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank goodness, it's about time. :-)
To date, I have provided tools to 7,000+ folks who use this driver that
trash their NTFS partitions. TRG will discontinue distribution of these
tools at this point since Anton has a
What does it typically mean when accept returns 0
and that the perror outputs "Interupted system call"??
Thanks
-Mat
--
Mathieu Dube
Mondo-Live
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
At 01:16 04/02/2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
To date, I have provided tools to 7,000+ folks who use this driver that
trash their NTFS partitions. TRG will discontinue distribution of these
tools at this point since Anton has a Linux based version.
Please do not email me for any more NT based
The units seem to vary. I suggest using fundamental SI units.
That would be meters, kilograms, seconds, and maybe a very
few others -- my memory fails me on this.
There are lots of SI units, one for each physical dimension
that can be measured. Some of the ones that might apply here are:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 01, 2001 02:16:43 PM -0200 Rik van Riel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About the system hanging completely, I wonder if it goes
away by pressing sysrq-S (sync all disks). If it does,
maybe Reiserfs was blocking all the pages in the inactive
list from
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 11:05:44PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've never could make this CDRW ATAPI to work, if someone could
provide me any clue about the baby. I just said that people on the
kernel mailing list may care of its but. It looks like the baby didn't
even noticed. ;-)
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 05:48:36PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
[root@coredump spstarr]# killall -9 gnomeicu
... waiting...
Could you try it on 2.4.2ac2, I guess its this item:
o Fix datagram hang on shutdown (Alexey
Kuznetsov)
--
marko
-
To unsubscribe from this
Wasn't on shutdown though ;-)
I was just about to receive a message when things started to lock up slowly.
Then everything else followed.
Marko Kreen wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 05:48:36PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
[root@coredump spstarr]# killall -9 gnomeicu
... waiting...
Could
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 08:06:08PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
Wasn't on shutdown though ;-)
The 'shutdown' as in 'process shutdown' ? _Not_ machine
shutdown.
I was just about to receive a message when things started to lock up slowly.
Then everything else followed.
Marko Kreen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 12:37:16AM +, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
Anton,
I am noticeable impressed with your ability to address these issues.
Microsoft would be much happier I am certain with a pure Linux solution
for this problem. They have been incredibly tolerant in allowing
me to help
At 02:02 04/02/2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 12:37:16AM +, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
I am noticeable impressed with your ability to address these issues.
(-:
Microsoft would be much happier I am certain with a pure Linux solution
for this problem. They have been
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 01:43:54AM +, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
At 02:02 04/02/2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 12:37:16AM +, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
I am noticeable impressed with your ability to address these issues.
(-:
Microsoft would be much happier I am
At 02:42 04/02/2001, you wrote:
Hell will freeze, and the US will break off from the continental mass and
sink into the oceans before I think MS will ever endorse Linux
officially. I could be wrong, but I doubt it.
Well there is that. But why not think positive. You never know. Miracles
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 01:51:43AM +, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
At 02:42 04/02/2001, you wrote:
Hell will freeze, and the US will break off from the continental mass and
sink into the oceans before I think MS will ever endorse Linux
officially. I could be wrong, but I doubt it.
Well
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
And just as darkness covers the entire earth, a light comes from the
clouds. A voice says, "Behold, this is my beloved son, hear him"
And then the people didn't need Microsoft anymore.
:-)
Linux is the way, the truth, and the light,
Hi Jocelyn!
You wrote:
I made a very little patch to avoid
people complaining that the kernel doesn't compile
properly when trying to use radio miropcm20 driver.
(I've seen some of this in french newsgroups...)
-dep_tristate ' Miro PCM20 Radio' CONFIG_RADIO_MIROPCM20
$CONFIG_VIDEO_DEV
Hi Andre,
if you remember, last week I complained that Promise corrupts data
when I copy them from hdh to hde. Today I did some more experiments
(running 2.4.1-ac1) and found:
1) Debian sid's 'cmp' prints incorrect offsets when files differ
in more than one place if distance cmp buffer
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feb 3 17:57:08 coredump kernel: gnomeicu S CD17 0 9338 1
(NOTLB)9340 9332
Feb 3 17:57:08 coredump kernel: Call Trace: [search_by_key+203/3232]
[search_for_position_by_key+170/916] [make_cpu_key+57/64]
On Sat, 03 Feb 2001 00:57:45 -0800, David Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How about a simple patch to the top level makefile that checks the gcc
version then prints a distinct message ..'this compiler hasn't been approved
for compiling the kernel', sleeping for one second, then continuing on.
Adding now.. I just applied 2.4.1-ac2 and now i'll add this code snipet to the source.
It might take 4 days or so for the bug to show itself. At least, unless it triggers
eariler (?)
Restarting...
Shawn.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feb 3 17:57:08
Ok, ive added change. Im starting the applications that were running at the time of
the hang. XMMS, gnomeicu, a few consoles etc.
Let's see what happens.
Shawn.
Shawn Starr wrote:
Adding now.. I just applied 2.4.1-ac2 and now i'll add this code snipet to the
source. It might take 4 days or
Mainly a number of small details and some driver updates. The socket
datagram handling one is important, and has already been posted separately
here on linux-kernel. The VIA driver update is rather important if you
have one of the newer VIA chipsets.
Linus
-pre1:
- XMM:
Hello all,
I know this _really_ isn't the forum for this, but a friend of mine has
noticed major, persistent clock drift over time. After several weeks, the
clock is several minutes slow (always slow). Any thoughts on the
cause? (Google didn't show up anything worthwhile in the first couple of
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
Hi Andre,
if you remember, last week I complained that Promise corrupts data
when I copy them from hdh to hde. Today I did some more experiments
(running 2.4.1-ac1) and found:
1) Debian sid's 'cmp' prints incorrect offsets when files differ
in more than one
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Or even better, if you are going to patch, do a 'cp -rl', and your new
ITYM cp -al, and the main benifit (for me) is that diff -urN takes ~10
seconds (cold cache), rather than minutes.
Rusty.
--
Premature optmztion is rt of all evl. --DK
-
To unsubscribe
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Hi,
With the patch below...
However, tmpfs appears to cover the functionality provided by ramfs.
Are there any uses for ramfs which can't be handled by tmpfs?
The only thing I could think of was "what if you don't have a
swap device up and
On 03 Feb 2001 14:22:02 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
The driver is included with the USB stuff for 2.2, but not in 2.4.
That's because we stopped fooling with 2.4 around the middle of the
pre-test-ac series of releases. We'll probably pick it back up around
2.4.7 or so.
It also doesn't seem
Be happy, it was not that simple. ;-)
On Sat, 03 Feb 2001, Bob_Tracy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mount atapi cd writer outpu
Line:/mnt/home/pmo# mount /dev/hdb /cdrom
/dev/hdb: Input/output error
mount: block device /dev/hdb is write-protected, mounting read-only
/dev/hdb:
Josh Myer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know this _really_ isn't the forum for this, but a friend of mine has
noticed major, persistent clock drift over time. After several weeks, the
clock is several minutes slow (always slow). Any thoughts on the
cause? (Google didn't show up anything
201 - 243 of 243 matches
Mail list logo