On 06 Mar 2001 17:01:02 -0800, Tim Wright wrote:
Hi Ettore,
I have no idea if this is related to your problem since you didn't mention
that key part, but with the same drive, I managed to trash my root partition
incredibly badly by trying to use DMA and then do APM suspend or hibernate.
On
Chip,
I thought O grabbed that from you...
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
With Andre's IDE subsystem, I found the below patch necessary to use
my IDE tape drive (Exabyte Eagle TR-4). Frankly, it's been so long
since I created this patch that I can't remember the detailed
tried both 2.4.3-pre2 and 2.4.2-ac12. Same results with each. Let me
know which reports are most important so I don't post more than
necassary. I was able to get lspci -vvxxx, dmesg, hdparm -i,
cat/proc/ide/via. I did notice it is detecting a 40w cable even though
I am using a 80w. Could
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 12:30:58PM -0800, Bryan Rittmeyer wrote:
Hello linux-kernel,
Is there any way to conduct TCP sessions (IE have a userland process
connect out, or accept connections) using non-local IPs? By "non-local"
I just mean IPs that aren't
Standard Red Hat has no MCA support (sorry much as I love my PS/2 its
rather
hard to make an honest business case for the huge amount of extra work to
build MCA boot disks/CD images). Debian I believe should install
straight
out
of the box on most MCA bus PC systems
Alan
Hard if you want to
Mar 6 16:35:32 osage kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd...
Update your kernel to 2.2.19 and try again.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001 14:17:28 -0800 (PST),
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is: Is there some better way of blocking
all open() calls to a particular device driver while
processes using it are being killed off?
Not yet. There have been some off list discussions about redoing the
Quick question...
Back in 2.2, we could use DHCP to auto-config the IP setup. In fact,
the choice was DHCP, BOOTP or RARP.
Now there is only BOOTP or RARP. What happened to DHCP support?
Later,
Kenn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 05:46:39PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 12:30:58PM -0800, Bryan Rittmeyer wrote:
Hello linux-kernel,
Is there any way to conduct TCP sessions (IE have a userland process
connect out, or accept connections) using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If you're a UP system, it never makes sense to spin in userland, since
you'll just burn up a timeslice and prevent the lock holder from
running. I haven't looked, but assume that their code only uses
spinlocks on SMP. If you're an SMP system, then you shouldn't be
Mike Fedyk wrote:
[snip]
/sbin/ip addr add 10.2.0.0/24 dev eth0
Tada
How would you deal with the other computer responding to the host "port not
reachable"?
What the hell kind of monster are you making? There's got to be another way.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Thiago,
I know that 2.2.19 is still in the -pre state. Is it that much
better? Have significant VM problems been fixed?
Thanks.
David
At 08:48 PM 3/6/01, Thiago Rondon wrote:
Mar 6 16:35:32 osage kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd...
Update your kernel to 2.2.19 and
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
With respect, Rik. You haven't finished the 2.4 VM yet.
It needs better design description.
Could you please take the time to raise a commentary patch
which describes the underlying design intent?
OK, I'll go work on this...
You are right, this
Jeff Dike wrote:
[ ... ]
Another synchronization method popular with database peeps is "post/
wait" for which SGI have a patch available for Linux. I understand
that this is relatively "light weight" and might be a better choice
for PG.
URL?
I know that 2.2.19 is still in the -pre state. Is it that much
better? Have significant VM problems been fixed?
Yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote:
I know that 2.2.19 is still in the -pre state. [ . . . ] Have
significant VM problems been fixed?
Yes, 2.2.19-pre incorporates what was known as Andrea's VM-global
patch, and it is widely reported to fix the exact problem you
mentioned.
Wayne
-
To
Alan Cox wrote:
running a bad hdparm command while running a full GNOME desktop:
(This was not a good idea...and I know, and knew that...but)
hdparm -X34 -d1 -u1 /dev/hda
(As found here: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/linux/2000/06/29/hdparm.html?page=2
Sorry for the lame bug
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
I have not had problems with 2.4.2, just tried 2.4.2-ac12. About the IDE
stage it just reboots.
Does ac11 also reboot like that. -ac is currently testing versions of the new
VIA IDE driver so knowing if the latest update did that would be very
From: Walter Hofmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Mon Mar 05 2001 - 15:19:10 EST
cancelling a burn session with cdrecord I am unable to eject the disc.
However that was on kernel 2.2.x and using "real" scsi (not ide-scsi).
This was a bug in cdrecord which used generic scsi access to lock the
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
I didn't pick-up on the fact that you planned on have other computers
listening with those addresses.
We won't--without getting into the specifics (NDA) we are developing a
TCP/IP load balance tester that needs to act--similtaneously--as many
machines. It is certainly
Jeremy Jackson wrote:
What the hell kind of monster are you making? There's got to be another way.
heh. As I mentioned in my other response, we're doing TCP/IP load
balance testing--so we need one linux system to act as many hosts. The
only solution, short of using bind/connect/accept/etc
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jamie Lokier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:
the space allowed for arguments is not a userland issue, it is a kernel
limit defined by MAX_ARG_PAGES in binfmts.h, so one could tweak it if one
wanted to without breaking any userland.
Which is
I actually had the problem with lack-of-lex also, but worked through that...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alan Cox
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 4:51 PM
To: J . A . Magallon
Cc: Phil Oester; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Error
I've scrolled through various code in net/ipv4, and I can't see how to query
the TOS of an incoming TCP stream (or at the least, the TOS of the SYN which
initiated the connection).
Someone has sent in a feature request for squid which would require this,
presumably so they can set the TOS in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Here it is:
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/postwait/
Check out the download section for a 2.4.0 patch.
After having thought about this a bit more, I don't see why pw_post and
pw_wait can't be implemented in userspace as:
int pw_post(uid_t uid)
{
VP_IDE: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39
VP_IDE: chipset revision 16
VP_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
VP_IDE: VIA vt82c686a (rev 22) IDE UDMA66 controller on pci00:07.1
ide0: BM-DMA at
Hello,
While 'make modules_install' on 2.4.2-ac13, I receive the following error:
make -C kernel modules_install
make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux/kernel'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'modules_install'.
..
make -C drivers modules_install
make[1]: Entering directory
getsockopt(fd, SOL_IP, IP_TOS, ..
Doesn't work. Returns the TOS of outgoing packets, which defaults to 0 even if
there is a TOS set on incoming traffic... that was what I tried in my first
test program.
David.
cheers,
lincoln.
At 03:00 PM 7/03/2001 +1100, David Luyer wrote:
I've
Greetings,
Is there some way to map a piece of process X's address space into
process Y, without X's knowledge or cooperation? (The non-cooperating
nature of process X is why I can't use plain old shared memory.)
Put another way, I need to grant Process Y permission to write into a
private
I would say the escape sequence are for /dev/ttyX since only Vt emulate
Dec VT 100s. The web site to look for this info is http://www.vt100.net
MS: (n) 1. A debilitating and surprisingly widespread affliction that
renders the sufferer barely able to perform the simplest task. 2. A disease.
From: "Jens Axboe" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Andre Hedrick" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Alan Cox" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Linus Torvalds"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a LIE, it does not destroy the drive, only the partition table.
Please recally the limited effects of "DiskDestroyer" and
"Justin T. Gibbs" wrote:
Can you provide me with a dmesg from a boot with aic7xxx=verbose?
I just tested this on a 3940AUW and the behavior was as expected.
Perhaps you have a motherboard based controller that has no seeprom?
I don't know how to detect flipped channels in that configuration
I've a Super P6SBS motherboard with a builtin dual channel Adaptec 7890
Ultra II scsi controller. I'm attaching the console grab when booting
2.4.3-pre2. The controller BIOS is configured to boot off the disk with
scsi id 0 on channel B.
It looks like Doug was right to think that the functions
I am not going to bite on your flame bate, and are free to waste you money.
I don't flamebait. I was trying to clear up some confusion...
No, SCSI does with queuing.
I am saying that the ata/ide driver rips the heart out of the
io_request_lock what to darn long. This means that upon execution
You are reinventing the wheel.
man ptrace (see PTRACE_{PEEK,POKE}{TEXT,DATA} and PTRACE_{ATTACH,CONT,DETACH})
Cheers,
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Justin T. Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've a Super P6SBS motherboard with a builtin dual channel Adaptec 7890
Ultra II scsi controller. I'm attaching the console grab when booting
2.4.3-pre2. The controller BIOS is configured to boot off the disk with
scsi id 0 on
At the time, I didn't feel like creating a custom sub-allocator just
for USB, ...
I'd be good to get it done "properly" at some point though.
Something like
struct pci_pool *pci_alloc_consistent_pool(int objectsize, int align)
struct pci_pool *
pci_create_consistent_pool
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 00:04:08 -0500 (EST),
Frank Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make[2]: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux/drivers/atm'
mkdir -p /lib/modules/2.4.2-ac13/kernel/$(shell ($CONFIG_SHELL)
$(TOPDIR)/scripts/pathdown.sh)
/bin/sh: CONFIG_SHELL: command not found
/bin/sh: TOPDIR: command
So, if I configure the interface as suggested ("/sbin/ip addr add
10.0.0.0/24 dev eth0") can I really bind to any IP in 10.0.0.0/24 and
conduct TCP sessions (as a client or server) using that IP--assuming all
the ARP, etc, issues are worked out?
hostA: ip a a 10.0.0.0/24 brd + dev lo
hostB:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Jonathan Morton wrote:
Still doesn't make a difference - there is one revolution between writes,
no matter where on disk it is.
Oh it does, because you are hitting the same sector with the same data.
Rotate your buffer and then you will see the difference.
Because of
David Brownell wrote:
There are two problems I see.
(1) CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG breaks the documented
requirement that the slab cache return adequately aligned
data ...
adequately aligned for the _cpu_, not for some controllers. It's neither
documented that HW_CACHEALIGN aligns to 16 byte
I suspect it's easier to just make the PCI layer call the probe function
in that order, instead of working around it in your driver. Jeff?
Would 'pci=reverse' do the trick already?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Leonard,
My story is somewhat similar to what Dick Johnson has encountered except
this is with 2.4.2 running on a pentium 200.
I encountered an oops last night while untarring a file. Upon reboot, it
appears that the partition labels disappeared along with the superblock.
Unfortunately, I was
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
You are reinventing the wheel.
man ptrace (see PTRACE_{PEEK,POKE}{TEXT,DATA} and PTRACE_{ATTACH,CONT,DETACH})
With ptrace data will be copied twice. As far as I understood, Jeremy
wants to avoid that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Hi.
I've had the same problem, it also happens in 2.4.2ac12
Cheers,
Matt Johnston
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 13:04, Frank Davis wrote:
Hello,
While 'make modules_install' on 2.4.2-ac13, I receive the following
error:
make -C kernel modules_install
make[1]: Entering directory
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
The merging at the elevator level only works if the requests sent to
it are right next to each other on disk. This means that randomly
sending stuff
401 - 446 of 446 matches
Mail list logo
