Linus Torvalds wrote:
: Jan - can you give Jens a bit of an idea of what drivers and/or schedulers
: you're using?
I have a Tyan S2882 dual Opteron, network is on-board tg3,
there are 8 P-ATA HDDs hooked on 3ware 7506-8 controller (no HW RAID
there, but the drives are partitioned and
Hi.
Sorry; I accidentally deleted my email and your response, Dmitry. :/
Anyhow, here is /proc/bus/input/devices
$ cat /proc/bus/input/devices
I: Bus=0011 Vendor=0001 Product=0001 Version=ab41
N: Name="AT Translated Set 2 keyboard"
P: Phys=isa0060/serio0/input0
H: Handlers=kbd event0
B:
And, here's an updated version of hid-core.c:
Signed-off-by: Mikkel Krautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- clean/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c
+++ dirty/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c
@@ -37,13 +37,20 @@
* Version Information
*/
-#define DRIVER_VERSION "v2.0"
+#define DRIVER_VERSION "v2.01"
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Paulo Marques schrieb:
[...]
It seems to me that x86 emulation in the kernel is the way to go because:
[...]
3 - it's always there and can be executed at *any* time: booting,
returning from suspend, etc. Also it would allow the VESA framebuffer
driver to change
Here's an updated version of kernel-parameters.txt:
Signed-off-by: Mikkel Krautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- clean/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ dirty/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
SWSUSP Software suspension is enabled.
TS Appropriate
I'm sorry for this truncated report... but it's all I've got. If you
need .config or system configuration, etc. let me know and I'll send'em
ASAP. I don't believe this is hardware related; ide-smart shows all fine.
From dmesg:
xfs_da_do_buf: bno 8388608
dir: inode 117526252
Filesystem "hda4":
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
>
>The server has been running 2.6.11-rc2 + patch to fs/pipe.c
>for last 8 days.
>
> # cat /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal: 4045168 kB
> Cached:2861648 kB
> LowFree: 59396 kB
> Mapped: 206540 kB
> Slab: 861176 kB
Ok,
Hi Justin ;),
On Feb 07 at 07:32:48, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Main Question >> Why does Linux 'freeze up' when W2K gives a BadCRC error
> msg (never freezes)?
I don't know, but i can reproduce it too. I complained several months ago
about the problem (in 2.6.7/2.6.8 time) but nobody seemed to
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 04:01:02PM +0100, P.O. Gaillard wrote:
> Pasi Kärkkäinen
> >Hi!
> >
> >I have P8SCi motherboard, and I just tried the watchdog with Linux 2.6.10.
> >
> >I loaded w83627hf_wdt driver, and the watchdog was detected:
> >
> >WDT driver for the Winbond(TM) W83627HF Super I/O
Hello,
on my notebook, when I plugged in my USB keyboard the kernel doesnt boot
correctly, ...
...
BIOS hangoff failed ( 112, 1010001 )
continuing after BIOS bug
irq 192, pci mem 0xfebff000
new usb device registered, assigned bus number 1
...
then the notebook hangs. If I boot without the
Hi, I am trying to compile and run UM-Linux with PREEMPT_REALTIME. I
managed to get it to compile but it wont start - it simply stops somewhere
in start_kernel() :-(
Have anyone else looked at it?
It doesn't sound like it makes much sense to have PREEMPT_REALTIME for UML
but I thought it was a
Pasi Kärkkäinen
Hi!
I have P8SCi motherboard, and I just tried the watchdog with Linux 2.6.10.
I loaded w83627hf_wdt driver, and the watchdog was detected:
WDT driver for the Winbond(TM) W83627HF Super I/O chip initialising.
w83627hf WDT: initialized. timeout=60 sec (nowayout=0)
But it is not
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:48:49PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 10:00:03AM +0100, P.O. Gaillard wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I am replying to myself so that people googling for similar problems can
> >>find the answer.
> >>
> >>Supermicro says
Hi,
On Monday, 7 of February 2005 15:27, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > The following patch is (yet) an(other) attempt to eliminate the need for
> > > using higher
> > > order memory allocations on resume. It accomplishes this by replacing
> > > the array
> > > of page backup entries with
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 10:00:03AM +0100, P.O. Gaillard wrote:
Hi,
I am replying to myself so that people googling for similar problems can
find the answer.
Supermicro says that the internal driver of the southbridge (and also the
W83627HF chip) are not useable because
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
It turns out that to call ptep_clear_flush_dirty() on ppc64 from a
module I needed to export the following symbols:
__flush_tlb_pending
ppc64_tlb_batch
hpte_update
Any reason why you need to call that from a module ? Is the module
GPL'd ?
I explained this at the
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Le lundi 07 fÿÿvrier 2005 ÿÿ 08:05 -0500, linux-os a ÿÿcrit :
Main Question >> Why does Linux 'freeze up' when W2K gives a BadCRC error msg
(never freezes)?
Of course it should not. However, there were many incomplete changes
made in 2.6.nn and some may
This patch updates vrc4171 pcmcia driver.
Yoichi
Signed-off-by: Yoichi Yuasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -urN -X dontdiff a-orig/arch/mips/vr41xx/common/Makefile
a/arch/mips/vr41xx/common/Makefile
--- a-orig/arch/mips/vr41xx/common/Makefile Thu Feb 3 10:55:52 2005
+++
Le lundi 07 fÃvrier 2005 Ã 09:17 -0500, Justin Piszcz a Ãcrit :
> Yeah, I can try 2.4.29 later tonight; also, the DVD is not scratched, just
> formatted with Joilet/ISO instead of UDF (which is what should be used on
> DVDs).
>
> However, dd if=/dev/hdh of=file.img
> Even with bs=1
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 10:03:56AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:03:47AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > i have released the -V0.7.38-01 Real-Time Preemption patch, which can be
> > > downloaded from the usual place:
>
Paulo Marques schrieb:
> Adam Sulmicki wrote:
>
>>
>> hi all,
>> I would like point to work done by Li-Ta Lo.
>>
>> It allows you to completely initalize the VGA BIOS w/out using
>> PC BIOS at all.
>>
>>
>> http://www.clustermatic.org/pipermail/linuxbios/2005-January/010236.html
linux lover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now what i want is to use same bufproc_read &
> bufproc_write functions defined in /proc file
> handling kernel module to be used in another kernel
> module to read that /proc/file in kernel module.The
> second kernel module only used to read /proc file
Hi!
> > The following patch is (yet) an(other) attempt to eliminate the need for
> > using higher
> > order memory allocations on resume. It accomplishes this by replacing the
> > array
> > of page backup entries with a list, so it is only necessary to allocate
> > individual
> > memory
On 2005.02.07 08:47, Pozsár Balázs wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:48:00AM +, Nuno Monteiro wrote:
>
But the contents of /proc/filesystems comes from the kernel. And the
order of filesystems comes from the link order.
Yes, but /proc/filesystems is only processed after two other checks have
Adam Sulmicki wrote:
hi all,
I would like point to work done by Li-Ta Lo.
It allows you to completely initalize the VGA BIOS w/out using
PC BIOS at all.
http://www.clustermatic.org/pipermail/linuxbios/2005-January/010236.html
unforunatelly the information the web is somewhat
Hello,
This module sends a signal to one or several processes (in user
space) when a fork occurs in the kernel. It relays information about
forks (parent and child pid) to a user space application. The relay fork
module adds a hook in the do_fork() routine that can be used by other
> still wrong. What you get this way is a nice, complicated NOP.
not only a nop but also a likely crash given that i didn't adjust
the declaration of some_function appropriately ;-). let's cater
for less complexity too with the following payload (of the 'many
other ways' kind):
[field1 and other
Hi!
> >The problem with the radeon reset code is that there are many, many
> >variations of the radeon chips, including different steppings of the
> >same part. The ROM is matched to the paticular bugs of the chip. From
> >what I know ATI doesn't even have a universal radeon reset program.
> >
>
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:20:33 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > Opening braces should go on the same line as the statement (if (...) {).
> > >
> > > How about this patch?
> >
> > Looks fine now. Hmm, wait a
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 10:00:03AM +0100, P.O. Gaillard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am replying to myself so that people googling for similar problems can
> find the answer.
>
> Supermicro says that the internal driver of the southbridge (and also the
> W83627HF chip) are not useable because the
Yeah, I can try 2.4.29 later tonight; also, the DVD is not scratched, just
formatted with Joilet/ISO instead of UDF (which is what should be used on
DVDs).
However, dd if=/dev/hdh of=file.img
Even with bs=1 for 1 byte at a time, there seems to be no way to
get the data off,
Hi!
> > Some systems (intel notably) appear to expect you to use the bios
> > save/restore video state not re-POST.
>
> This works well in many cases, but there are some machines that freeze
> if you attempt to make a VBE state save call. Sadly, I don't have any
> access to an affected machine,
Andrew Morton wrote:
Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hope that Roland's changes for higher resolution of cputime would
make that possible. But this is Jay's thing not mine. I just want to make
sure that the CSA patches does not get in the way of our attempts to
improve the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07.02.2005 20:29, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> Making a symlink /etc/filesystems -> /proc/filesystems is
> meaningless.
well to be honest, I didn't even know Gentoo makes a symlink here, but
I'll definitly will make bug entry for that.
Perhaps its a
Le lundi 07 fÃvrier 2005 Ã 08:05 -0500, linux-os a Ãcrit :
> > Main Question >> Why does Linux 'freeze up' when W2K gives a BadCRC error
> > msg
> > (never freezes)?
>
> Of course it should not. However, there were many incomplete changes
> made in 2.6.nn and some may involve problems with
This patch had fixed the following warning.
arch/mips/lib-32/dump_tlb.c: In function 'dump_tlb':
arch/mips/lib-32/dump_tlb.c:69: warning: control may reach end of non-void
function 'msk2str' being inlined
This patch adds return value, when page size is not match.
Yoichi
Signed-off-by: Yoichi
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 16:02 +, Alan Cox wrote:
> Some systems (intel notably) appear to expect you to use the bios
> save/restore video state not re-POST.
This works well in many cases, but there are some machines that freeze
if you attempt to make a VBE state save call. Sadly, I don't have
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Justin Piszcz wrote:
I have a DVD where I have three files on it, (1.7gb,1.7gb,900mb).
On W2K, when I try to copy the second file, I get a BadCRC error message.
Under Linux, I copy up to about 860MB (watched via pipebench) and then it
freezes the machine, I cannot ping or get
Am 2005-02-07 07:38:36, schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
> the answer really is that you should not read files from kernel
> modules; /proc or otherwise.
I think, he mean something like
echo "1" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
Where you can (de)activate Kernel functions.
Greetings
Michelle
--
Am 2005-02-07 09:47:09, schrieb Pozsár Balázs:
> See? I _have_ that patch applied, that's why it tried vfat and not msdos
> first.
With this, you will nerver mount a Filesystem "msdos".
Because "vfat" IS "msdos" + "lfn".
You can attach to ALL "msdos" media "lfn" and you will have "vfat".
>
On Monday, 7 of February 2005 09:57, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > ah, ok. Could you try my patch and add touch_softlockup_watchdog() to
> > > the resume code (before interrupts are re-enabled)?
> >
> > I did:
> >
> > ---
> >
Hello Linus,
you can either use "bk receive" to patch with this mail,
or you can
Pull from: bk://krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/BK-kernel-tools
or in cases of dire need, you can apply the patch below.
BK: Parent repository is http://bktools.bkbits.net/bktools
Patch description:
[EMAIL
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:29:14PM +0100, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> and (ii) sometimes several types would succeed (e.g. msdos/vfat)
> and the user can override the kernel order.
But we are talking about the default order.
> By the way, it is best to consider the kernel order as undefined.
But
Hi,
On Friday, 4 of February 2005 00:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 3 of February 2005 15:22, Pavel Machek wrote:
[-- snip --]
> > > I'm currently thinking that the proper approach may be to add a
> > > ->suspend()
> > > routine to struct cpufreq_driver and call the driver-specific
I have a DVD where I have three files on it, (1.7gb,1.7gb,900mb).
On W2K, when I try to copy the second file, I get a BadCRC error message.
Under Linux, I copy up to about 860MB (watched via pipebench) and then it
freezes the machine, I cannot ping or get to it or do anything on the
console;
Paulo Marques wrote:
jjluza wrote:
Eyal Lebedinsky wrote
I am having bttv problems with vanilla -rc3. Does it work for you?
I don't know, as I said I didn't test kernel between 2.6.10 and
2.6.11-rc3-mm1.
Sorry.
If I have time enough later, I can test 2.6.11-rc3.
Since I don't really know if it's
jjluza wrote:
Eyal Lebedinsky wrote
I am having bttv problems with vanilla -rc3. Does it work for you?
I don't know, as I said I didn't test kernel between 2.6.10 and
2.6.11-rc3-mm1.
Sorry.
If I have time enough later, I can test 2.6.11-rc3.
Since I don't really know if it's the good place to
> From http://pax.grsecurity.net/docs/pax.txt:
>
>The goal of the PaX project is to research various defense mechanisms
>against the exploitation of software bugs that give an attacker arbitrary
>read/write access to the attacked task's address space.
>
> Could you please explain
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Opening braces should go on the same line as the statement (if (...) {).
> >
> > How about this patch?
>
> Looks fine now. Hmm, wait a sec... Don't we also need kill_fasync calls in
> disconnect routines as well?
This
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 10:07:48PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Somehow this part of one of the earlier patches was lost...
>
> --
> Dmitry
>
>
> ===
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-02-06 20:25:21-05:00, [EMAIL
* Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > inotify.patch
> > inotify
> Also ioctl is not an acceptable interface for adding new core
> functionality.
seconded. Robert?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
hi,
since just before linux-2.6.11-rc3 ( i think it's rc2-bk10 ) there
seems to have a bug in the acpi part of the proc file system :
reading /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info takes a very long time and locks
up the computer, time gives:
cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info 0.00s user 6.76s system
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:17:53PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:43:26PM +, Russell King wrote:
> > Sam,
> >
> > Where did the hacks go which detect the silent failure of the ARM binutils?
>
> They weant away because it caused lots of troubles with sparc and um.
>
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I no longer use x86 as my main machine, so this patch is totally
> untested. I've compiled it to see that things look somewhat sane, but
> that doesn't mean much. If I forgot some register or screwed something
> else up, this will result in a
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 03:53:00PM +0900, Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
> >>Yeah, but the link order could be changed... Patch inlined.
> >
> > And just what does the link order (or changes thereof) have to do with that?
>
> because some distributions (eg gentoo) make a symlink to
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:00:30PM +0100, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
> Well, with Linus' patch to fs/pipe.c the situation seems to
> improve a bit, but some leak is still there (look at the "monthly" graph
> at the above URL). The server has been running 2.6.11-rc2 + patch to fs/pipe.c
> for last 8
Hi,
On Monday, 31 of January 2005 00:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following patch is (yet) an(other) attempt to eliminate the need for
> using higher
> order memory allocations on resume. It accomplishes this by replacing the
> array
> of page backup entries with a list, so it
: I've been running 2.6.11-rc1 on my dual opteron Fedora Core 3 box for a week
: now, and I think there is a memory leak somewhere. I am measuring the
: size of active and inactive pages (from /proc/meminfo), and it seems
: that the count of sum (active+inactive) pages is decreasing. Please
: take
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:10:38AM -0500, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> Nobody answered so i repeat the question.
> I think i found a way to make use of NLS table for HFS filesystem and
> i'm going to try to implement it. But first i need to create NLS module
> for codepage 10007 (Mac cyrillic). In the
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:41:15PM -0500, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> I was seeing rmmod getting stuck consistently in D state while removing
> raw1394. Looking at raw1394.c:cleanup_raw1394 - the order of doing
> things seemed incorrect to me after comparing other places in raw1394.c
> which do the
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:48:43 +0100, Stefan DÃsinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The reset code of radeon card seems to be easy to reverse engineer. I have
started an attempt and I have 50-60% of my radeon M9 reset code implemented
in a 32 bit C program. I had to stop due to
Hi,
> > I have written one /proc file creation kernel
> > module. This module creates /proc/file and defied
> > operations on it. Also i have written user program
> > that will read & write to /proc files from user space.
> > Now what i want is to use same bufproc_read &
> > bufproc_write
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 11:44:05AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Here is a patch that exposes the IBM TrackPoint's extended properties
> > as well as scroll wheel emulation.
> >
> >
> > I would appreciate comments and suggestions to make this more acceptable.
> >
>
> Perhaps this should be
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 04:56:45PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:39:55 +0100, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This patch makes some needlessly global code static.
> >
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> I merged your patch into my tree and it is ready for Vojtech to pull from.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
(BHash: SHA1
(B
(BOn 02/07/2005 06:50 PM, Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
(B> hi,
(B>
(B> today, just 30min ago I found this in my messages file:
(B>
(B> The box is a Debian/Testing with a self compiled 2.6.8.1
(B
(BI forgot one thing:
(B
(Bthe CPU is a
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 09:00:54PM +0100, matthieu castet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch is based on http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2962
> patch from adam belay.
>
> It solve a oops when pnp_register_driver(_pnp_driver) failed.
>
> Please apply this patch.
Thanks; applied.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
(BHash: SHA1
(B
(Bhi,
(B
(Btoday, just 30min ago I found this in my messages file:
(B
(BThe box is a Debian/Testing with a self compiled 2.6.8.1
(B
(Bramen:~# lsmod
(BModule Size Used by
(Bloop 13704 4
(Bntfs
Hi All,
i wrote a driver for the watchdog timer provided by a small form factor
board from IEI ( the PCISA-C800EV :
http://www.iei.com.tw/en/product_IPC.asp?model=PCISA-C800 ).
This board has a Via Apollo PLE133 ( VT8601A and VT82C686B ) chipset.
The watchdog uses two registers at addresses 0x43
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 19:49, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> That leaves either the FC2 or FC3 installer kernels: one of
> them must have created the xattrs.
An FC3 install with SELinux would certainly create xattrs. Everywhere.
--Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 08:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > hm - i had a fix in this area in the -V0.7 series. Then i thought this
> > is a performance fix only and dropped it eventually, but could you give
> > it a go - does it fix the deadlock?
>
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Building with:
>
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_DESKTOP=y
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is not set
>
> CC kernel/sched.o
> kernel/sched.c:314:1: warning: "_finish_arch_switch" redefined
On Monday 07 February 2005 05:47, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Bartlomiej.
>
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > [ against ide-dev-2.6 tree, boot tested on LBA48 drive ]
> >
> > This small patch fixes unneeded writes/reads to LBA48 taskfile registers
> > on LBA48 capable disks for following
* Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:03:47AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > i have released the -V0.7.38-01 Real-Time Preemption patch, which can be
> > downloaded from the usual place:
> >
> > http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
>
> I thought I saw
Hi,
I am replying to myself so that people googling for similar problems can find
the answer.
Supermicro says that the internal driver of the southbridge (and also the
W83627HF chip) are not useable because the necessary support hardware is
missing. They say that the P8SCi board has a working
FWIW, there are two limitations of libata in this area:
1) ISTR some PATA vendor-specific commands have a very specific set of
input and output registers to use, and input/output sets of registers
may differ from each other.
2) libata is lazy, and just reads registers in "groups": the
* Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ah, ok. Could you try my patch and add touch_softlockup_watchdog() to
> > the resume code (before interrupts are re-enabled)?
>
> I did:
>
> ---
> /home/rafael/tmp/kernel/testing/linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c
> 2005-02-05
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:48:00AM +, Nuno Monteiro wrote:
>
> On 2005.02.07 00:42, Pozsár Balázs wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:36:10AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:21:08AM +0100, Pozsar Balazs wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 07:06:59AM +, Christoph
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:48:00AM +, Nuno Monteiro wrote:
On 2005.02.07 00:42, Pozsár Balázs wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:36:10AM +, Al Viro wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:21:08AM +0100, Pozsar Balazs wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 07:06:59AM +, Christoph Hellwig
* Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah, ok. Could you try my patch and add touch_softlockup_watchdog() to
the resume code (before interrupts are re-enabled)?
I did:
---
/home/rafael/tmp/kernel/testing/linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c
2005-02-05
Hi,
I am replying to myself so that people googling for similar problems can find
the answer.
Supermicro says that the internal driver of the southbridge (and also the
W83627HF chip) are not useable because the necessary support hardware is
missing. They say that the P8SCi board has a working
* Tom Rini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:03:47AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
i have released the -V0.7.38-01 Real-Time Preemption patch, which can be
downloaded from the usual place:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
I thought I saw you say x64
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Building with:
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
CONFIG_PREEMPT_DESKTOP=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is not set
CC kernel/sched.o
kernel/sched.c:314:1: warning: _finish_arch_switch redefined
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 19:49, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
That leaves either the FC2 or FC3 installer kernels: one of
them must have created the xattrs.
An FC3 install with SELinux would certainly create xattrs. Everywhere.
--Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
* Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 08:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
hm - i had a fix in this area in the -V0.7 series. Then i thought this
is a performance fix only and dropped it eventually, but could you give
it a go - does it fix the deadlock?
Hi All,
i wrote a driver for the watchdog timer provided by a small form factor
board from IEI ( the PCISA-C800EV :
http://www.iei.com.tw/en/product_IPC.asp?model=PCISA-C800 ).
This board has a Via Apollo PLE133 ( VT8601A and VT82C686B ) chipset.
The watchdog uses two registers at addresses 0x43
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
(BHash: SHA1
(B
(Bhi,
(B
(Btoday, just 30min ago I found this in my messages file:
(B
(BThe box is a Debian/Testing with a self compiled 2.6.8.1
(B
(Bramen:~# lsmod
(BModule Size Used by
(Bloop 13704 4
(Bntfs
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 09:00:54PM +0100, matthieu castet wrote:
Hi,
this patch is based on http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2962
patch from adam belay.
It solve a oops when pnp_register_driver(ns558_pnp_driver) failed.
Please apply this patch.
Thanks; applied.
--
Vojtech
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
(BHash: SHA1
(B
(BOn 02/07/2005 06:50 PM, Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
(B hi,
(B
(B today, just 30min ago I found this in my messages file:
(B
(B The box is a Debian/Testing with a self compiled 2.6.8.1
(B
(BI forgot one thing:
(B
(Bthe CPU is a Xeon
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 04:56:45PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:39:55 +0100, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch makes some needlessly global code static.
Hi Adrian,
I merged your patch into my tree and it is ready for Vojtech to pull from.
Yes,
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 11:44:05AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Here is a patch that exposes the IBM TrackPoint's extended properties
as well as scroll wheel emulation.
I would appreciate comments and suggestions to make this more acceptable.
Perhaps this should be done in
Hi,
I have written one /proc file creation kernel
module. This module creates /proc/file and defied
operations on it. Also i have written user program
that will read write to /proc files from user space.
Now what i want is to use same bufproc_read
bufproc_write functions
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:48:43 +0100, Stefan Dsinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reset code of radeon card seems to be easy to reverse engineer. I have
started an attempt and I have 50-60% of my radeon M9 reset code implemented
in a 32 bit C program. I had to stop due to school
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:41:15PM -0500, Parag Warudkar wrote:
I was seeing rmmod getting stuck consistently in D state while removing
raw1394. Looking at raw1394.c:cleanup_raw1394 - the order of doing
things seemed incorrect to me after comparing other places in raw1394.c
which do the same
FWIW, there are two limitations of libata in this area:
1) ISTR some PATA vendor-specific commands have a very specific set of
input and output registers to use, and input/output sets of registers
may differ from each other.
2) libata is lazy, and just reads registers in groups: the
On Monday 07 February 2005 05:47, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Bartlomiej.
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[ against ide-dev-2.6 tree, boot tested on LBA48 drive ]
This small patch fixes unneeded writes/reads to LBA48 taskfile registers
on LBA48 capable disks for following cases:
*
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:10:38AM -0500, Pavel Fedin wrote:
Nobody answered so i repeat the question.
I think i found a way to make use of NLS table for HFS filesystem and
i'm going to try to implement it. But first i need to create NLS module
for codepage 10007 (Mac cyrillic). In the
: I've been running 2.6.11-rc1 on my dual opteron Fedora Core 3 box for a week
: now, and I think there is a memory leak somewhere. I am measuring the
: size of active and inactive pages (from /proc/meminfo), and it seems
: that the count of sum (active+inactive) pages is decreasing. Please
: take
Hi,
On Monday, 31 of January 2005 00:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
The following patch is (yet) an(other) attempt to eliminate the need for
using higher
order memory allocations on resume. It accomplishes this by replacing the
array
of page backup entries with a list, so it is only
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:00:30PM +0100, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
Well, with Linus' patch to fs/pipe.c the situation seems to
improve a bit, but some leak is still there (look at the monthly graph
at the above URL). The server has been running 2.6.11-rc2 + patch to fs/pipe.c
for last 8 days.
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 03:53:00PM +0900, Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
Yeah, but the link order could be changed... Patch inlined.
And just what does the link order (or changes thereof) have to do with that?
because some distributions (eg gentoo) make a symlink to /proc/filesystems
201 - 300 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
