Hi!
> > > The main change involves the introduction of a new SYNCTHREAD flag. We
> > > use this to avoid deadlocking over processes that are running sys_sync
> > > and siblings. Processes that enter those routines get the flag added,
> > > and it's removed when they exit the sync routine. We then
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:04:45 -0200
Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:14:36AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> > Hi Marcelo,
> >
> > I did not receive any feedback on this e-mail, so I assume it
> > was lost on the way. Would you mind pushing that in
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 07:21:54PM +0100, Eric Piel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For now, a bug in the PSX controllers support in gamecon prevents
> hot-swapping of such controllers. If a controllers is removed then all
> the controllers stop working and cpu usage gets high. The attached patch
>
Hi!
> > > I wonder if reverting the patch will restore the old behaviour?
> >
> > This seems to be minimal fix to get Kylix application back to the
> > working state... Maybe it is good idea for 2.6.11?
>
> Why does clearing the BSS fail? Are the program headers bogus?
> (readelf -l).
No
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:22:19AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:20:33 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > > Opening braces should go on the same line as the statement (if (...)
> >
On Tuesday, 8 of February 2005 20:10, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > so it is okay, but...
> >
> > ... I could have done it more elegantly. You're right, I've now introduced
> > a function eat_page() that adds a page to the list of unusable pages and
> > used it instead of the free_page()
Martin J. Bligh wrote:
Sorry to reply a long quiet thread, but I've been trading emails with
Paul Jackson on this subject recently, and I've been unable to convince
either him or myself that merging CPUSETs and CKRM is as easy as I once
believed. I'm still convinced the CPU side is doable, but
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://pax.grsecurity.net/docs/pax-future.txt
>
>To understand the future direction of PaX, let's summarize what we
>achieve currently. The goal is to prevent/detect exploiting of
>software bugs that allow arbitrary read/write access to
Paul Jackson wrote:
Matthew wrote:
The reason Paul and I decided that they weren't totally reconcilable is
because of the memory binding side of the CPUSETs code.
Speak for yourself, Matthew ;).
I agree you that the scheduler experts (I'm not one, nor do I aspire to
be one) may well find that
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:51:12PM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:01:16PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > I'm very ignorant about wireless but it doesnt appear to me that "Wireless
> > Extension v17"
> > is a critical feature.
>
> You
Hi.
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 03:36, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I'm keen to see if we can merge Suspend2's freezer implementation after
> > 2.6.11. Does that conflict with any of your intended changes? If it
> > doesn't, I'll submit a patch for review/merge as quickly as I can.
>
> Freezer is
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:01:16PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Hi Jean,
>
> I'm very ignorant about wireless but it doesnt appear to me that "Wireless
> Extension v17"
> is a critical feature.
You are right, it's not critical, and I was already thinking
of not pushing WE-18 to
Hi Jean,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:14:36AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> I did not receive any feedback on this e-mail, so I assume it
> was lost on the way. Would you mind pushing that in 2.4.x ?
> Thanks...
As an ignorant person I have no problems with
I have two identical machines [mobo/hardware wise]:
Each machine is a Dell GX1p (500MHZ).
I have two Intel Gigabit NICs, one in each box, hooked up to a GigE
switch.
Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82541GI/PI Gigabit Ethernet Controller
Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82541GI/PI Gigabit
Hi Jean,
I'm very ignorant about wireless but it doesnt appear to me that "Wireless
Extension v17"
is a critical feature.
It seems more appropriate to declare it as 2.6 functionality ?
Cheers
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:16:37AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> the Makefiles were heavily changed, however, recently (after 2.6.10).
There was a bug in that patch. The fix is:
Index: 2.6.10/arch/um/Makefile
===
--- 2.6.10.orig/arch/um/Makefile2005-02-08
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:20:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> In my inbox I have a patch that enables SCCS support for all files.
> Today it fails for Kconfig files at least.
I guess the kconfig system needs to try to make Kconfig files before
including them ... this works for me, checking a
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:00:20 -0600, Joseph Pingenot
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From Joseph Pingenot on Monday, 07 February, 2005:
> >Hope that helps.
>
> Did it help any?
>
Yes, thank you. A patch is forthcoming later tonight.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > but what this discussion was about was the _dl_make_stack_executable()
> > function.
>
> the jury is still out on that one, i just don't have the time and beer
> to do the full research that a real exploit writer would do. in
> security, unless
On 2005.02.08, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:23:48PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > Enabling the following in the Makefile should have the same effect:
> >
> > # For maximum performance (+ possibly random breakage, uncomment
> > # the following)
> >
> > #MAKEFLAGS += -rR
>
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Jeff, any objections against adding this change to UML at some point?
>
> No, not at all. I just need to understand what CONFIG_PREEMPT requires of
> UML.
Ingo can probably tell you in much more detail. My problem when I tried
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> We also need to try to identify workloads whcih might experience a
> regression and test them too. It isn't very hard.
I'd be glad if you could provide some instructions on how exactly to do
that. I have run lmbench, aim9, aim7, unixbench, ubench for a
Hi!
I found out that vbetool is enough to get me back video after
suspend/resume. Good and thanks! Here's my current version of
video.txt file. If you have any comment, or have machine where S3
works and it is not listed below, please let me know and I'll update
video.txt file.
Matthew wrote:
> The reason Paul and I decided that they weren't totally reconcilable is
> because of the memory binding side of the CPUSETs code.
Speak for yourself, Matthew ;).
I agree you that the scheduler experts (I'm not one, nor do I aspire to
be one) may well find that it makes sense
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:51:06PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I wonder if reverting the patch will restore the old behaviour?
>
> This seems to be minimal fix to get Kylix application back to the
> working state... Maybe it is good idea for 2.6.11?
Why does clearing the BSS fail?
I am trying to get swsusp working on a 2.6.10 Debian kernel
(2.6.10-1-686, custom compile, enabling only CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
and leaving CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION empty) on this Sony Vaio Z1RSP
Centrino 1.7 Pentium M laptop... without much success. Whenever
I enter swsusp mode, the kernel
Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:06:11PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Looks pretty good to me. For clarity, I'd change:
- m7101 = pci_scan_single_device(dev->bus, 0x18);
+ m7101 = pci_scan_single_device(dev->bus, PCI_DEVFN(3, 0));
No, it's pretty broken regardless of
Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > No its a page fault benchmark. Dave Miller has done some kernel compiles
> > > and I have some benchmarks here that I never posted because they do not
> > > show any material change as far as I can
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 09:33:06AM -0600, Brian King wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:35:05AM -0600, Brian King wrote:
> >
> >>>If we've done a write to config space while the adapter was blocked,
> >>>shouldn't we replay those accesses at this point?
> >>
> >>I did not
I'm getting your mail!
Check out you code cause if I'm getting your mail, then you're sending
it out to all your customers.
-Alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gmail user
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:42:43 +0100, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:43:59AM +, Russell King
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 11:24:50 CST, Michael Halcrow said:
>
> > While the program is waiting for a keystroke, mount the block device.
> > Enter a keystroke. The result without the patch is 1, which is a
> > security violation. This occurs because
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Enrico Bartky
>>>Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 7:12 AM
>>>To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>>Subject: BIOS Bug
>>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>on my notebook, when I plugged in my USB keyboard the kernel
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 12:06:14PM -0500, jon ross wrote:
> I have an app with a small fixed memory footprint that does a lot of
> random reads from a large file. I thought if I added more memory to
> the machine the VM would do more caching of the disk, but added
> memory does not seem to make
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 03:03:38PM -0500, Martin Hicks wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> One of your patches in 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 breaks ACPI_BOOT for ia64. It
> removes the dependence on CONFIG_ACPI and makes it exclusively depend on
> X86_HT, which is wrong.
Thanks for the patch.
Already fixed in my
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:42:43PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:43:59AM +, Russell King wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we need an architecture hook or something for post-processing
> > vmlinux?
> Makes sense.
> For now arm can provide an arm specific cmd_vmlinux__ like um
Hi Andrew,
One of your patches in 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 breaks ACPI_BOOT for ia64. It
removes the dependence on CONFIG_ACPI and makes it exclusively depend on
X86_HT, which is wrong.
Signed-off-by: Martin Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:10:57AM +0100, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Good morning!
>
> I was trying to compile Megaraid on 2.6.10 and
> noticed that pci_dma_sync_single and pci_dma_sync_sg
> are deprecated. Greg seems to tried to patch it in 2.6.9
> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/19/425), but it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Why not simply disable CONFIG_GCOV for him, in this case?
Anton presumably turned on CONFIG_GCOV because he wanted to do some profiling...
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:43:59AM +, Russell King wrote:
>
> Maybe we need an architecture hook or something for post-processing
> vmlinux?
Makes sense.
For now arm can provide an arm specific cmd_vmlinux__ like um does.
The ?= used in Makefile snippet below allows an ARCH to override the
I've update the patch with changes from the comments below.
ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/sn2/sn2-update/033-ioc4-support
As usual forgot this:
Signed-off-by: Patrick Gefre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Patrick Gefre wrote:
I've update the patch with changes from the comments below.
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:20:06 PST, Linus Torvalds said:
> I'm not going to put this into 2.6.11, since I worry about compiler
> interactions, but the more people who test it anyway, the better.
Well, since I'm a known glutton for punishment. ;)
a 2.6.11-rc3-RT tree I had handy from last night
Nick Piggin wrote:
Dinakar Guniguntala wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 03:59:49PM -0800, Matthew Dobson wrote:
Sorry to reply a long quiet thread, but I've been trading emails with
Paul Jackson on this subject recently, and I've been unable to
convince either him or myself that merging CPUSETs
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> The SCCS rules is the sole reason why -rR has not been enabled.
An easy way to make sure that the SCCS business is not a factor would be
to explicitly put the SCCS rules into the Makefile -- it's just two lines.
This way one could easily make sure
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 03:44:17PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:23:48PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > Enabling the following in the Makefile should have the same effect:
> >
> > # For maximum performance (+ possibly random breakage, uncomment
> > # the following)
> >
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
If I attempt to compile IEE1394 without CONFIG_NET, I get:
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xcf885): In function `hpsb_alloc_packet':
: undefined reference to `alloc_skb'
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xd03a6): In function `hpsb_send_packet':
: undefined reference to `skb_queue_tail'
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:51:06 +0100
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I wonder if reverting the patch will restore the old behaviour?
>
> This seems to be minimal fix to get Kylix application back to the
> working state... Maybe it is good idea for 2.6.11?
>
> Signed-off-by:
Hi!
> > so it is okay, but...
>
> ... I could have done it more elegantly. You're right, I've now introduced
> a function eat_page() that adds a page to the list of unusable pages and
> used it instead of the free_page() here.
Thanks.
> > > + p = pbe;
> > > + pbe +=
Dinakar Guniguntala wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 03:59:49PM -0800, Matthew Dobson wrote:
Sorry to reply a long quiet thread, but I've been trading emails with Paul
Jackson on this subject recently, and I've been unable to convince either
him or myself that merging CPUSETs and CKRM is as easy
Hi!
> > boots fine and shrinks the image size quite noticeably:
> >
> > [Nr] Name TypeAddr OffSize
> > [ 1] .textPROGBITSc010 001000 2771a9 [vmlinux-orig]
> > [ 1] .textPROGBITSc010 001000 2742dd [vmlinux-patched]
> >
> > that's 11980 bytes
Hi!
> I wonder if reverting the patch will restore the old behaviour?
This seems to be minimal fix to get Kylix application back to the
working state... Maybe it is good idea for 2.6.11?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi!
If I attempt to compile IEE1394 without CONFIG_NET, I get:
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xcf885): In function `hpsb_alloc_packet':
: undefined reference to `alloc_skb'
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xd03a6): In function `hpsb_send_packet':
: undefined reference to `skb_queue_tail'
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > > I think you are dreaming. You've gone from wanting enough information
> > > to supposedly debug your source tree to being explicit about wanting to
> > > recreate the entire BK history in a different system. The former is a
> > > reasonable
Dear Kernel Developers,
I've got a machine where nfsd dies with an oops from time to time.
When this happens I need to reboot it to get nfsd working again.
Sometimes it also crashes (stops responding to network, keyboard).
The ksymoops output is attached below.
This happens quite often (every
Hi,
On Monday, 7 of February 2005 17:23, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > The (updated) patch follows.
>
> Okay, few comments...
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > diff -Nru linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1-orig/arch/i386/power/swsusp.S
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Jeff, any objections against adding this change to UML at some point?
No, not at all. I just need to understand what CONFIG_PREEMPT requires of
UML.
>From a quick read of Documentation/preempt-locking.txt, this looks like it's
implementing Rule #3 (unlock by the same
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:18:20PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 04:00:27PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Currently, code exists in the pci layer to allow userspace to specify
> > driver data when adding a pci dynamic id from sysfs. However, this data
> > is never used
* Joerg Sommrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050208 04:07]:
> Hi all,
>
> can anybody comment on some amd76x_pm issues? I've played around with
> this module for months and I'm quite satisfied with it now, but a couple
> of questions remain.
>
> The changes I made:
> - rediffed to 2.6.10
> - new module
Hi Marcelo,
I did not receive any feedback on this e-mail either, so I
assume it was also lost on the way. Would you mind pushing that in
2.4.x ?
Thanks...
Jean
- Forwarded message from jt -
Subject: [PATCH 2.4] Wireless Extension v17
E-mail: [EMAIL
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:17:30PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> > I think you are dreaming. You've gone from wanting enough information
> > to supposedly debug your source tree to being explicit about wanting to
> > recreate the entire BK
Hi Marcelo,
I did not receive any feedback on this e-mail, so I assume it
was lost on the way. Would you mind pushing that in 2.4.x ?
Thanks...
Jean
- Forwarded message from jt -
Subject: [PATCH 2.4] SIOCSIFNAME wildcard support
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From Joseph Pingenot on Monday, 07 February, 2005:
>Hope that helps.
Did it help any?
-Joseph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[An Intel exec] said, basically, that customers are "wed" to the Windows
desktop. What he didn't say is that hardware suppliers are wed to Microsoft as
well. And as long as the
Hi,
got this oops while unloading ide-scsi (rmmod segfaulted)
UP P4 1.7Ghz non Preempt, No HT, IDE DVD/CD-RW, IDE Disk, Vanilla
Kernel, (-chaos -> Debian make-kpkg --append-to-version=-chaos)
Linux chaos 2.6.11-rc3-chaos #1 Fri Feb 4 23:27:57 CET 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
Unable to handle kernel
G' day
It looks like XFS broken somewhere in 2.6.11-rc1,
sadly i can't sand "right" bugreport, some facts only.
Upgrade to 2.6.11-rc2 makes fcron non-working for me in case of
crontabs directory is placed on XFS partition.
When i try to install new crontab fcrontab die with error:
"could not
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 11:40, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:22 +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 February 2005 11:09, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > With the current linux-2.6 BK tree I get this when trying to compile
> > > UML:
> > >
> > >
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 11:24:50 CST, Michael Halcrow said:
> While the program is waiting for a keystroke, mount the block device.
> Enter a keystroke. The result without the patch is 1, which is a
> security violation. This occurs because the bd_release function will
> bd_release(bdev) and set
Stefan Seyfried wrote:
aurelien francillon wrote:
hi,
since just before linux-2.6.11-rc3 ( i think it's rc2-bk10 ) there
seems to have a bug in the acpi part of the proc file system :
reading /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info takes a very long time and locks
up the computer, time gives:
cat
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 19:29, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > arch/um/kernel/exec_kern.c:59: undefined reference to `__bb_init_func'
>
> The __bb_init_func export is to allow modules to be built with a
> gcov-enabled UML. I get a bunch of undefines in the module links when I
>
Export map_info (part of bio->bi_private) for targets like
multipath to use for storing context.
Signed-Off-By: Alasdair G Kergon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- diff/drivers/md/dm.c2005-02-08 16:38:49.0 +
+++ source/drivers/md/dm.c 2005-02-08 16:41:09.0 +
@@ -43,6
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:26:03PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Michael Halcrow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > This is the third in a series of eight patches to the BSD Secure
> > Levels LSM. It moves the claim on the block device from the inode
> > struct to the file struct in order to address
Hi!
> I wonder if reverting the patch will restore the old behaviour?
Yes, this fixes it: kylix application now works for me.
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 12:06 -0500, jon ross wrote:
> I have an app with a small fixed memory footprint that does a lot of
> random reads from a large file. I thought if I added more memory to
> the machine the VM would do more caching of the disk, but added memory
> does not seem to make any
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Why should I pay for something, I could easily do myself in less time?
>
> Why does the phrase "Shut up and code..." suddenly wander through my mind???
You didn't really read what I explained in detail, didn't you?
bye, Roman
-
To
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Larry McVoy wrote:
> I think you are dreaming. You've gone from wanting enough information
> to supposedly debug your source tree to being explicit about wanting to
> recreate the entire BK history in a different system. The former is a
> reasonable request, I suppose,
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:15:53 +0100, Roman Zippel said:
> Why should I pay for something, I could easily do myself in less time?
Why does the phrase "Shut up and code..." suddenly wander through my mind???
pgpO0Xrma93ma.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi!
> > > How should one set about reproducing this problem?
> >
> > IIRC, Some minimal "personal" version can be downloaded from borland.com.
>
> Well I'd prefer that we not back out the whole patch. Could someone please
> test with something like the below, let us know exactly where it's
Hello all,
Here is an oops I've just get on my smp system:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 001c
printing eip:
c01afe5b
*pde =
Oops: [#1]
PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: ipt_REJECT ipt_state ip_conntrack iptable_filter
CPU:2
EIP:
I have an app with a small fixed memory footprint that does a lot of
random reads from a large file. I thought if I added more memory to
the machine the VM would do more caching of the disk, but added memory
does not seem to make any difference. I played with some of the params
in /proc/sys/vm and
Stephane Raimbault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm using 2.6.11-rc3 + Peter's patch and xorg from Fedora Core 3, I
> still have touchpad problems.
>
> Tapping and focus work fine with 2.6.10 and 2.6.11-rc1 but not with :
> - 2.6.11-rc2
> - 2.6.11-rc3
> I read a similar report on LKML from
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 03:44:17PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:23:48PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > Enabling the following in the Makefile should have the same effect:
> >
> > # For maximum performance (+ possibly random breakage, uncomment
> > # the following)
> >
> Roman, if you want this so bad why don't you just pay Larry for the
> three month's work? It's just not reasonable to ask someone to do work
> for free that the only purpose of is to help someone clone their
> system.
That's an interesting idea, thanks, but we'd need both money and a new
I've update the patch with changes from the comments below.
ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/sn2/sn2-update/033-ioc4-support
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:58:33AM -0600, Patrick Gefre wrote:
Latest version with review mods:
* Julien TINNES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But if you consider code injection as in your previous post:
>
> >btw., do you consider PaX as a 100% sure solution against 'code
> >injection' attacks (meaning that the attacker wants to execute an
> >arbitrary piece of code, and assuming the
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:42:27 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've written a driver for probably the most common touchscreen type -
> the serial Elo touchscreen.
>
Hi,
Looks very nice, unfortunately I don;t have a touchscreen to test it.
One thing - now that kcalloc in
Simple functions to record and restore bio state so we can
resubmit a bio that returned an error.
DM multipath (following shortly) uses this.
This patch has it private to device-mapper: is it any use elsewhere?
Signed-Off-By: Alasdair G Kergon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > btw., do you consider PaX as a 100% sure solution against 'code
> > injection' attacks (meaning that the attacker wants to execute an
> > arbitrary piece of code, and assuming the attacked application has a
> > stack overflow)? I.e. does PaX
Add a name field to struct dm_dev so we don't have to use
format_dev_t() all over the place for informative error messages.
Signed-Off-By: Alasdair G Kergon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- diff/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c 2005-02-08 16:38:49.0 +
+++
Hi!
I've written a driver for probably the most common touchscreen type -
the serial Elo touchscreen.
The driver should handle all generations of serial Elos, as it handles
Elo 10-byte, 6-byte, 4-byte and 3-byte protocols.
I do not have any touchscreen, so I can't test the driver myself.
So if
> I looked also at other 1394 drivers and all have the calls in 'bad' order.
> Sure this ordering has to be reversed or it is correct and is triggering
> other hidden bug ?
>
Quite possibly it's triggering (or is triggered by) some other bug.
There is also a possibility that raw1394.c might be
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 17:08 +0100, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 09:48 -0500, James Morris wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
> >
> > > + * The generic scatterwalker applies a certain function, pf, utilising
> > > + * an arbitrary number of scatterlist data
Hi!
> I'm keen to see if we can merge Suspend2's freezer implementation after
> 2.6.11. Does that conflict with any of your intended changes? If it
> doesn't, I'll submit a patch for review/merge as quickly as I can.
Freezer is very independend, and no, I do not plan any changes in that area.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> arch/um/kernel/exec_kern.c:59: undefined reference to `__bb_init_func'
The __bb_init_func export is to allow modules to be built with a gcov-enabled
UML. I get a bunch of undefines in the module links when I get rid of it.
This is probably being too intimate with libc,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, IWAMOTO Toshihiro wrote:
> > The current implementation of memory hotremoval relies on that pages
> > can be unmapped from process spaces. After successful unmapping,
> > subsequent accesses to the pages are blocked and don't interfere
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Roman, if you want this so bad why don't you just pay Larry for the
> three month's work?
Why should I pay for something, I could easily do myself in less time?
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> Sorry to reply a long quiet thread, but I've been trading emails with
> Paul Jackson on this subject recently, and I've been unable to convince
> either him or myself that merging CPUSETs and CKRM is as easy as I once
> believed. I'm still convinced the CPU side is doable, but I haven't
>
Hi,
As commented yesterday, I was going to release a few more hooks for some
*critical* syscalls, this one adds a hook to sys_chmod(), and makes us
able to apply checks and logics before releasing the operation to
sys_chmod().
The main goal is to provide a simple way to handle chmod() calls and
>> What about your proposed sched domain changes?
>> Cant sched domains be used handle the CPU groupings and the
>> existing code in cpusets that handle memory continue as is?
>> Weren't sched somains supposed to give the scheduler better knowledge
>> of the CPU groupings afterall ?
>>
>
> sched
William Stearns wrote:
Good afternoon, Matthias-Christian,
(This isn't a linux kernel development issue; please do further
discussion on the uml-user mailing list only.)
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
I have the following the problem:
I have server which is connected to
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 09:48 -0500, James Morris wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
>
> > + * The generic scatterwalker applies a certain function, pf, utilising
> > + * an arbitrary number of scatterlist data as it's arguments. These
> > + * arguments are supplied as an array of
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > No its a page fault benchmark. Dave Miller has done some kernel compiles
> > and I have some benchmarks here that I never posted because they do not
> > show any material change as far as I can see. I will be posting that soon
> > when this is complete
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:15:53PM +0100, zyphr wrote:
> Something looks odd.
> I've tested this with 2.6.11-rc3-bk5 + your lasted patch
>
> cat /sys/module/usbhid/parameters/mousepoll says it's at 2ms
> but if I check /proc/bus/usb/devices it's reading 10ms
>
> I've used parameter under
101 - 200 of 532 matches
Mail list logo
