Attempt to reduce stack usage in sys.c (linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3). Stack
usage was noted using checkstack.pl. Specifically
Before patch
sys_reboot - 256
After patch
---
sys_reboot - none (register usage only)
Along the way, wrap code to 80 column width and cleanup lock usage.
Hi Mariusz :)
* Mariusz Mazur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> On ?roda 30 marzec 2005 20:10, DervishD wrote:
> > Yes, I know, this is in the llh FAQ, but the answer starts with
> > 'Not too sure on this one', that's the reason I'm asking here...
> Use whatever works. And ignore anybody
Yup - kills my x86_64 too. I can't stay up for half a minute.
I got a couple of Oops
Unable to handle kernel paging request at 2730 RIP:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at 81773ffc6918 RIP:
The first try ended with a sudden reboot. The second time, I ctrl-C'd
out
Attempt to reduce stack usage in itimer.c (linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3). Stack
usage was noted using checkstack.pl. Specifically
Before patch
do_setitimer - 160
After patch
---
do_setitimer - none
do_setitimer_real 52
do_setitimer_virtual 52
do_setitimer_prof 52
A singularly heavy
Attempt to reduce stack usage in acct.c (linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3). Stack
usage was noted using checkstack.pl. Specifically:
Before patch
check_free_space - 128
do_acct_process - 105
After patch
---
check_free_space - 36
do_acct_process - 44
Signed-off-by: Yum Rayan <[EMAIL
* Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes. Together with the radix tree-based sorting of dirty requests,
> > that's pretty much what I've spent most of today doing. Lee, could you
> > see how the attached combined patch changes your latency numbers?
>
> Different code path, and the
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well. The radix-tree approach's best-case is probably quite a lot
> worse than the list-based approach's best-case. It hits a lot more
> cachelines and involves a lot more code.
The list-based approach's best-case are large continuous append
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Wright wrote:
> * John Richard Moser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>Well the LSM mailing list seems to be dead, even the archives stop at
>>Jan 15 2005. My own mails don't come back to me
On Thursday 31 March 2005 07:38, Robert Hancock wrote:
> Philip Lawatsch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I do have a very strange problem:
> >
> > If I memset a ~1meg buffer some thousand times (in the userspace) it
> > will hardlock my machine.
>
> I thought that this must be impossible, but I
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 17:35, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > We currently freeze processes for suspend-to-ram, too. I guess that
> > > disable_usermodehelper is probably better and that in_suspend() should
> > > only be used for sanity checks... go with disable_usermodehelper and
> > > sorry
Christian Bornträger wrote:
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 15:00, Yves Crespin wrote:
1/ is-it possible to *really* be synchronize. I prefer to have a blocked
write() than use cache and get swap!
Try to mount with the sync option.
exactly async and noatime ?
2/ is-it possible to disable
This patch fixes build error for CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM.
Please apply.
* arch/m32r/mm/discontig.c: Fix build error for CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM.
* arch/m32r/kernel/setup.c: ditto.
* arch/m32r/mm/discontig.c:
- Add topology_init.
- Cosmetics: change indentation of
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> * Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The 7 ms are spent in this loop:
> >
> > Which is basically confirming what the guys from Bull already told me,
> > namely that the radix tree tag stuff is much less efficient that what
> >
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think all it needs now is a lock-breaker in the main radix-lookup
> loop in nfs_scan_lock_dirty(), or a latency-oriented reduction in the
> npages argument, to make the loop bounded. [...]
can nfsi->req_lock be dropped within nfs_scan_dirty()? Or
* Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is a bunch of gobbledygook. Hows about you interpret it for us?
>
> Sorry. When I summarized them before, Ingo just asked for the full
> verbose trace.
please send non-verbose traces if possible. The verbose traces are
useful when it's not clear
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > There is one more improbable thing I can think of: comcom. This is
> > dosemu's built-in command.com and uses some very tricky code
> > (coopthreads), which certainly does not work any more with address space
> > randomization. It's deprecated
The current way of updating ptes in the Linux vm includes first clearing
a pte before setting it to another value. The clearing is performed while
holding the page_table_lock to insure that the entry will not be modified
by the CPU directly (clearing the pte clears the present bit which
notifies
* Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The 7 ms are spent in this loop:
>
> Which is basically confirming what the guys from Bull already told me,
> namely that the radix tree tag stuff is much less efficient that what
> we've got now. I never saw their patches, though, so I was
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 01:46 +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:28:20 +0200, Matthieu Castet
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The memory limits aren't good enough either: if you set them low
> > > enough that memory-forkbombs are unperilous for
> > >
* John Richard Moser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Well the LSM mailing list seems to be dead, even the archives stop at
> Jan 15 2005. My own mails don't come back to me (I'm subscribed).
They're coming through just fine, not sure why the
>tried it? (Last time I looked, cifs didn't work against win98 servers -
>maybe that got fixed).
Well, win98 by itself does not have CIFS support.
Jan Engelhardt
--
No TOFU for me, please.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
>but it does let you can hide files from find/fts, as demonstrated
>below.
That's because `find` optimizes its searching by looking at the link count.
IIRC, the -noleaf option should make it visible again.
>turing 7% mkdir .hidden
>turing 8% touch .hidden/secret
>turing 9% find . -name secret
Andrew Morton wrote:
Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Linux OOM LCA (Least Common Ancestor) Patch
...
--- 2.6.12-rc1-mm3/include/linux/sched.h 2005-03-26 13:21:11.0 +0800
+++ 2.6.12-rc1-mm3-cy/include/linux/sched.h 2005-03-28 10:18:24.0 +0800
@@
Dear Sir/Mam
We are using Linux in one of our embedded products.This is the first time we
are working in this Platform.We have few doubts regarding implementing s/w
timers & how to pass the timer interrupts to threads .
In net we coudnt find exactly what we want .Could you please help us
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 12:20:49AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Po 28-03-05 10:03:06, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> > > > since upgrading from 2.6.11 to 2.6.12-rc1 software suspend doesn't work
> > > > anymore for me:
> > > > The last I see when suspending (echo 4 > /proc/acpi/sleep) is a
> > > >
Hi Jesper,
I'm sending this mail to mailing list coz in my company we have some
restrictions on o/g mails, Sorry for that...
Lemme ask u smthing, herez the code
199 sndpkt = (RSI_sndpkt_t *) RSI_MALLOC(sizeof(RSI_sndpkt_t));
200 sndpkt->buf_list = (RSI_buf_t *)
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:17:42PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Should hopefully just be changing get-version.pl ...
Nah, this simple patch to snapshot fixes it.
I've also generated the 2.6.12-rc1-bk3 snapshot and fixed up the
directory on kernel.org so it should now work properly if you apply
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:13:45PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote:
> So, Which version of Linux will first implement stacking in LSM as per
> Serge Hallyn's patches?
Why do you think the stacking patches will ever be in mainline?
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 16:01 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 21:19 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:00 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > > > > quake3 still segfaults when run through "aoss". And can't be fixed,
> > > > > as
> > > > > it's closed source
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 09:55:36PM +0200, Wiktor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> recently i had to run some program (xmms) with lowered nice value as
> normal user.
See the new nice rlimit in recent -mm. This allows you to give various
users permission to raise priorities without root privileges.
--
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Will the lock be exported (via helper functions)? I always felt dirty using
> subsys.rwsem because it I think it was supposed to be implementation detail.
Sure, why not? See the attached patch for helpers, exported GPL only of
course.
Thanks,
>> You could wrap /lib/ld-linux.so, and get all dynamically linked
>> programs done in one sweep.
That does not handle static binaries :)
Jan Engelhardt
--
No TOFU for me, please.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Dear Friends,
Can anybody Help me in this Pc104 driver Problem;
What is the basics steps in doing read and write on
Pc104 cards.
Deatails Given Below:
I am writing a Linux device driver for
Diamond systems
IR104 digital IO card. This is a PC104 bus device(that
means it ISA
bus
On Sunday 27 March 2005 06:23 am, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> On Friday 25 March 2005 09:28 am, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> > Nope, 2.6.10 is broken too. Now, off to 2.6.9...
>
> Hrm, 2.6.9 is also broke. 2.6.8 is next. (I should be coming along a
> working kernel any time now...)
That whacky real
> "Noah" == Noah Silverman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Noah> Sorry 2.6.7
Noah> Burton Windle wrote:
>> Kernel version?
Are you running on an x86 machine without TSC, e.g., a 486? the
Hangcheck timer then devolves into using jiffies, and a single jiffy
error gives you the printout you
Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:17:42PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >with the requirement (for me) that I not be required to use BK?
> >I'll munge scripts or whatever...
> >but I guess that I'll also need a kernel.org account to do that.
>
> Should hopefully just be changing
Philip Lawatsch wrote:
Hi,
I do have a very strange problem:
If I memset a ~1meg buffer some thousand times (in the userspace) it
will hardlock my machine.
I thought that this must be impossible, but I tried it on my machine
which is very similar (Asus A8N-SLI, Athlon 64 3500+, 2GB RAM) and to my
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
You want to allocate a lot of memory (16 GB), you don't have that much
space, so the Kernel hangs.
No, this is not what it is doing. The program is simply wiping the same
1MB block of memory over and over. If it was doing what you say it would
not (or should not)
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:17:42PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >with the requirement (for me) that I not be required to use BK?
> >I'll munge scripts or whatever...
> >but I guess that I'll also need a kernel.org account to do that.
>
> Should hopefully just be changing get-version.pl ...
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
sean wrote:
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
Did you look in
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/ ?
Yes I did.
Latest is 2.6.12-rc1-bk2, March 26.
None since then?
I can't explain it other than "the snapshots are broken."
All I do is look around for them, and behold,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:19:42PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:04:31 EST, Nick Orlov said:
>
> > Problem is that the latest bk-driver-core patch included in the
> > 2.6.12-rc1-mm3
> > removes class_simple API without providing EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed (as opposed to
> >
Hi,
My computer freezed after the kernel start. It started
with normal console messages and stopped with these messages:
--
... (just as the normal ones.)
NET: Registered protocol family 1
NET: Registered protocol family 17
NET: Registered protocol family 15
Bridge
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 18:38, John Pearson wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 12:53:28AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote
>
>> On Tuesday 29 March 2005 20:40, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> >On Tuesday 29 March 2005 16:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> >> Well, it's a matter of readability mostly. ?For now at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well the LSM mailing list seems to be dead, even the archives stop at
Jan 15 2005. My own mails don't come back to me (I'm subscribed).
So, Which version of Linux will first implement stacking in LSM as per
Serge Hallyn's patches?
Where is the new
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 07:47:24PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> sean wrote:
> >Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Did you look in
> >>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/ ?
> >>
> >
> >Yes I did.
> >
> >Latest is 2.6.12-rc1-bk2, March 26.
> >
> >None since then?
>
Hi,
I am sorry that the last patch about 32 bit compat ioctl on
64 bit kernel actually breaks the usbdevfs. That is on the current
BK tree. I am retarded.
Here is the patch to fix it. Tested with USB hard disk and webcam
in both 32bit compatible mode and native 64bit mode.
Again, sorry about
Jivin Jeff Garzik lays it down ...
...
> >If kernelspace can assist and driver _knows_ in advance that data
> >produced is cryptographically strong, why not allow it directly
> >access pools?
>
> A kernel driver cannot know in advance that the data from a hardware RNG
> is truly random, unless
Patch to fix the issues mentioned so far. The MAKE_LIST macro would also
not be good to some things that I have planned so lets drop it.
Index: linux-2.6.11/mm/page_alloc.c
===
--- linux-2.6.11.orig/mm/page_alloc.c 2005-03-30
on den 30.03.2005 Klokka 21:47 (-0500) skreiv Lee Revell:
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 18:39 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes. Together with the radix tree-based sorting of dirty requests,
> > > > that's pretty much what I've spent most of today
sean wrote:
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
Did you look in
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/ ?
Yes I did.
Latest is 2.6.12-rc1-bk2, March 26.
None since then?
I can't explain it other than "the snapshots are broken."
All I do is look around for them, and behold, just look in
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
Did you look in
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/ ?
Yes I did.
Latest is 2.6.12-rc1-bk2, March 26.
None since then?
sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:32:32 PST, Paul Jackson wrote:
> A question for the CKRM developers:
>
> What middleware packages, outside the kernel, exist or are
> in the works that will rely on CKRM?
Primarily, CKRM classes can be instantiated today by simple
echo's into the /rcfs
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 15:37, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The Coverity checker found the following null pointer dereference in
> drivers/acpi/video.c:
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> ...
> static int
> acpi_video_switch_output(
> ...
> {
> ...
> struct acpi_video_device *dev=NULL;
> ...
>
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:04:31 EST, Nick Orlov said:
> Problem is that the latest bk-driver-core patch included in the 2.6.12-rc1-mm3
> removes class_simple API without providing EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed (as opposed to
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL) alternative.
>
> As the result I don't see a way how
Greetings,
I'm attempting to benchmark software RAID5 on a system with:
- Promise SATAII150 TX4 card
- 4 Segate ST3300831AS drives
- custom built kernel 2.6.11 (to get driver for promise SATAIITX4)
- FC3 install
- EPIA M1 mainboard, 256MB memory
The tools I'm familiar with for
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 21:16, Patrick Mochel wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> >
> > > How is this related to (8) above? Do you need some sort of protected,
> > > short path through the core to add the device, but not bind it
I have a server:
2.4.20-28.7 #1 Thu Dec 18 11:31:59 EST 2003 i686
with SCSI hard disks (not raid):
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 6.2.8
aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs
scsi1 : Adaptec
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 18:39 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes. Together with the radix tree-based sorting of dirty requests,
> > > that's pretty much what I've spent most of today doing. Lee, could you
> > > see how the attached combined patch
Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes. Together with the radix tree-based sorting of dirty requests,
> > that's pretty much what I've spent most of today doing. Lee, could you
> > see how the attached combined patch changes your latency numbers?
> >
>
> Different code path, and the
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:42:58AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 01:06:01PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > The correct fix, used for reiserfs (and a patch for ext3 also) is to
> > set i_nlink = 1 in case the filesystem count has wrapped. When nlink==1
> > the fts/find
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 16:14 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> on den 30.03.2005 Klokka 11:56 (-0800) skreiv Andrew Morton:
> > > That's normal and cannot be avoided: when writing, we have to look for
> > > the existence of old nfs_page requests. The reason is that if one does
> > > exist, we must
Hi Artem:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 12:55:11PM +0100, Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote:
>
> I'm not sure. David Woodhouse (the author) said that this is probably
> enough in any case but a lot of time has gone since the code was written
> and he doesn't remember for sure. I have also seen some magic
Chris Wright wrote:
The patches on kernel.org in v2.6/ are already against the base (i.e.
patch-2.6.11.6.bz2 is against 2.6.11). The patches in v2.6/incr/
are incremental between -stable releases (i.e. patch-2.6.11.5-6.bz2 is
against 2.6.11.5).
I see. I had looked at the "Changelog" page
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 11:58, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Thursday March 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 18:49, Greg Banks wrote:
> > > This patch seeks to remedy the interaction between knfsd and HSMs by
> > > providing mechanisms to allow knfsd to tell an underlying filesystem
>
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Patrick Mochel wrote:
>
> > How is this related to (8) above? Do you need some sort of protected,
> > short path through the core to add the device, but not bind it or add it
> > to the PM core?
>
> Having thought it through, I
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Alan Stern wrote:
> > For now, I'm willing to punt on those and consider them subsystem-specific
> > until more is known about those situations' characteristics. As it
> > currently stands, the core will not lock more than 1 device at a time.
>
> That's absolutely not true.
Terence Ripperda wrote:
I'm investigating some 4k stack issues with our driver, and I noticed
this ordering in do_IRQ:
asmlinkage unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs regs)
{
...
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
/* Debugging check for stack overflow: is there less than 1KB free? */
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 5:09 pm, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> David Brownell wrote:
> > http://www.tux.org/hypermail/linux-vortex/2001-Nov/0021.html
> >
> > If there are other rules, they belong in Documentation/netif-msg.txt
> > don't they? That way folk won't be forced to guess. Or risk
> >
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 01:55 pm, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> Actually it is. Dereferencing a null pointer is either undefined or
> implementation-dependant in the standard (don't remember which), and
> as such the compiler can do whatever it wants, be it starting nethack
Can this be configured
Please do a
bk pull bk://gkernel.bkbits.net/net-drivers-2.6
This will update the following files:
drivers/net/b44.c | 36 +++---
drivers/net/b44.h |3
drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h |1
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 21 +++
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:57:57AM +0200, Pau Aliagas wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, H. J. Lu wrote:
>
> >>>That is what the assembler generates, and should have generated, for
> >>>"movw %ds,(%eax)" since Nov. 4, 2004.
> >>
> >>Could this be the reason for the reported slowdown in the last six
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:40 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> This all seems off-topic for latency though. :)
>
Disagree, in the bug reports I saw from JACK users the symptoms are
exactly the same as a kernel latency problem. The only clear hint that
it's something else is that the RT kernel and
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 5:32 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:28 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 March 2005 4:51 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the exact configuration of one of the users who reported the
> > > problem on LAU. Got a pointer to the
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:28 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> This is what Greg just posted (and Linus merged into BK, so it'll be
> in BK snapshots starting tomorrow):
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel=111221966815043=2
Wow, just checked my mail and there were at least 5
Frank Rowand wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
hi Frank - sorry about the late reply, was busy with other things. Your
My turn to be late, but now I'm back from vacation :-).
ppc patches look mostly mergeable, with some small details still open:
* Frank Rowand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The patches
> > Please don't assume everyone subscribes to LKML, or that
> > everything crafted to be threaded more-or-less-correctly
> > was really crafted with any kind of "reply" command. :)
>
> Um, that's exactly why reply-to-all should be used,
There you go, assuming that there was a message to
Diego wrote:
> I bet I'm not the only one here
> who can't understand it either.
You're not alone.
See an email thread entitled:
Classes: 1) what are they, 2) what is their name?
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5328162_id=35191
on the
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:28 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 4:51 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
> > [cc list restored]
>
> Thanks, I never had one to start with ... :)
>
>
Thank you. Sorry for the tone of my reply...
> > On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 14:57 -0800, David Brownell
On Mar 30, 2005, at 20:12, Nick Piggin wrote:
Why should this be in the kernel makefiles? If my_struct is NULL,
then the kernel will never reach the if statement.
Well, I think there is probably some arch code that uses 16-bit
that might use a null pointer, or at least a struct that starts
at the
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 4:51 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
> [cc list restored]
Thanks, I never had one to start with ... :)
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 14:57 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > I think this is connected to a problem people have been reporting on the
> > >
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:13 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 4:43 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 14:57 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > > Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > > I think this is connected to a problem people have been reporting on the
> > > >
Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Mar 30, 2005, at 18:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
This testcase violates ISO C99 6.3.2.3:
If a null pointer constant is converted to a pointer type, the resulting
pointer, called a null pointer, is guaranteed to compare unequal to a
pointer to any object or function.
Except that
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 4:43 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 14:57 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > I think this is connected to a problem people have been reporting on the
> > > Linux audio lists. With some USB chipsets, USB audio interfaces just
>
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 4:39 pm, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > @@ -85,6 +85,11 @@
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(loopback, "Enable MAC loopback mode (bit 0)");
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(mii_mode, "Enable HomePNA mode (bit 0),default=MII mode =
> > 0");
> >
> > +/* use ethtool to change the level for any given
David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 4:30 pm, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
ChangeSet 1.2181.4.72, 2005/03/24 15:31:29-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] USB: usbnet uses netif_msg_*() ethtool filtering
This converts most of the usbnet code
On Mar 30, 2005, at 18:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
This testcase violates ISO C99 6.3.2.3:
If a null pointer constant is converted to a pointer type, the
resulting
pointer, called a null pointer, is guaranteed to compare unequal to a
pointer to any object or function.
Except that the result of
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, H. J. Lu wrote:
That is what the assembler generates, and should have generated, for
"movw %ds,(%eax)" since Nov. 4, 2004.
Could this be the reason for the reported slowdown in the last six months?
Can you elaborate?
There's an unexplained slowdown of kernel 2.6 detailed in
[cc list restored]
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 14:57 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > I think this is connected to a problem people have been reporting on the
> > Linux audio lists. With some USB chipsets, USB audio interfaces just
> > don't work. There are dropouts even at
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 4:30 pm, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > ChangeSet 1.2181.4.72, 2005/03/24 15:31:29-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > [PATCH] USB: usbnet uses netif_msg_*() ethtool filtering
> >
> > This converts most of the usbnet code to actually
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 01:06:01PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2005 20:43 +0100, David Malone wrote:
> > It seems that internally xfs uses a 32 bit field for the link count,
> > and the stat64 syscalls use a 32 bit field. These fields are copied
> > via the vattr structure in
applied 1-5
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 14:57 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > I think this is connected to a problem people have been reporting on the
> > Linux audio lists. With some USB chipsets, USB audio interfaces just
> > don't work. There are dropouts even at very high
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:18:55AM +0200, Pau Aliagas wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, H. J. Lu wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 07:57:28AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> >>>There is no such an instruction of "movl %ds,(%eax)". The old assembler
> >>>accepts it and turns it into "movw
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
ChangeSet 1.2181.4.70, 2005/03/24 15:30:57-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] USB: pegasus uses netif_msg_*() filters
This updates the messaging for the pegasus driver:
- Use driver model diagnostics or printk using the
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
ChangeSet 1.2181.4.72, 2005/03/24 15:31:29-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] USB: usbnet uses netif_msg_*() ethtool filtering
This converts most of the usbnet code to actually use the ethtool
message flags. The ASIX code is left
Joel,
I'm not specifically loading hangcheck anywhere. I just installed
slackware and mysql on the box. Nothing special.
-N
Joel Becker wrote:
>>Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:45:43 -0800
>>From: Noah Silverman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>Subject: Hangcheck problem
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:55:05PM +0200, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:05:30 -0800,
> Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
>
> > worth having. I for one am a CKRM skeptic, so won't be much help to you
> > in that quest. Good luck.
> >
> > I don't see any performance
Since 2.6.12-rc1-RT something I get this Oops on boot about 50% of the
time. It's clearly some kind of race because if I just reboot again it
works. Seems to happen shortly after ksoftirqd startup (maybe the first
time we hit the timer softirq?).
This is (lazily) hand copied and incomplete, but
Greg,
A while back I had volunteered to write a patch that stores the
resource ranges being decoded by root bridges for ACPI based
i386 and x86_64 systems. The thread at:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=10604487
has some context regarding this. The basic intent was to allow
Philip Lawatsch schrieb:
Hi,
I do have a very strange problem:
If I memset a ~1meg buffer some thousand times (in the userspace) it
will hardlock my machine.
I've been using 2.6.12-rc1 and also a lot of other kernels (2.6.9,
2.6.11). I've tried it both using a 32 bit kernel and a 64 bit kernel.
1 - 100 of 637 matches
Mail list logo
