[patch 1/1] arm/kernel: Audit return code of create_proc_*

2005-07-14 Thread domen
From: Christophe Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- apm.c |5 - ecard.c | 14 -- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Index: quilt/arch/arm/kernel/apm.c === --- quilt.orig/arch/arm/kernel/apm.c +++

Re: [patch 1/5] Spelling fixes for Documentation/

2005-07-14 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > +++ quilt/Documentation/cpu-freq/cpufreq-stats.txt > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ cpufreq stats provides following statist > > All the statistics will be from the time the stats driver has been inserted > to the time when a read of a particular statistic is done. Obviously,

Re: (v9fs) -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status

2005-07-14 Thread Eric Van Hensbergen
On 7/14/05, Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 15 July 2005 00:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > normally we prefer a patch per actual change, not per file so the > > description fits. Given that all these are pretty trivial fixes one > > patch would have done it aswell,

[patch 3/5] dmapool: Fix "nocast type" warnings

2005-07-14 Thread domen
From: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix the sparse warning "implicit cast to nocast type" File/Subsystem:drivers/base/dmapool Signed-off-by: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- --- drivers/base/dmapool.c |3 ++- include/linux/dmapool.h

Re: (v9fs) -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status

2005-07-14 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Friday 15 July 2005 00:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > normally we prefer a patch per actual change, not per file so the > description fits. Given that all these are pretty trivial fixes one > patch would have done it aswell, though. > > With these changes the code is fine for mainline in my

[patch 4/5] telephony/ixj: use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout()

2005-07-14 Thread domen
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() to guarantee the task delays as expected. Patch is compile-tested. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- ixj.c | 62

[patch 5/5] i386/smpboot: use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout()

2005-07-14 Thread domen
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() to guarantee the task delays as expected. Patch is compile-tested. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL

Re: Problem with kernel 2.6.11

2005-07-14 Thread FyD
Quoting Alistair John Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I have a problem with a program named Gaussian (http://www.gaussian.com) > > (versions g98 or g03) and FC 4.0 (default kernel 2.6.11): I am used to take > > Gaussian binaries compiled on the RedHat 9.0 version, and used them on FC > > 2.0 or

[patch 1/1] mca/mca-proc: Audit return code of create_proc_*

2005-07-14 Thread domen
From: Christophe Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- mca-proc.c | 13 ++--- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Index: quilt/drivers/mca/mca-proc.c === --- quilt.orig/drivers/mca/mca-proc.c +++

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread john stultz
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 13:13 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, john stultz wrote: > > > > We'll I'd probably put it as: "they do care about absolute time, but > > they do not care about ticks or timer interrupt frequency" > > Well, the thing is, you have to count time some

[patch 1/1] dm-crypt: Fix "nocast type" warnings

2005-07-14 Thread domen
From: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix the sparse warning "implicit cast to nocast type" File/Subsystem:drivers/md/dm-crypt.c Signed-off-by: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- --- dm-crypt.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

Re: [patch 2.6] remove PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_VGA handling from setup-bus.c

2005-07-14 Thread Ivan Kokshaysky
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:07:34AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > I'm don't think it has ever been working in the 2.6 series. If you are > getting rid of it get rid of the #define PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_VGA in pci.h > too since this code was the only user. No. The PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_VGA is not something

Re: [patch 2.6] remove PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_VGA handling from setup-bus.c

2005-07-14 Thread Ivan Kokshaysky
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:53:27PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > What happens when there is no firmware? It shouldn't be a problem. These days we have a lot of arch hooks in the PCI layer. I'd probably start with the following: static void __init pcibios_enable_p2p_vga_fwd(struct pci_dev *dev) {

[patch 1/5] Spelling fixes for Documentation/

2005-07-14 Thread domen
From: Tobias Klauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The attached patch fixes the following spelling errors in Documentation/ - double "the" - Several misspellings of function/functionality - infomation - memeory - Recieved - wether and possibly others which I

Re: resuming swsusp twice

2005-07-14 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 08:36:15PM +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > But the failure you have seen now - failure to invalidate the resume > header - could also happen as long as we do not fix the reason for your > failure. If we fix it, we don't need additional security nets ;-) So if the header is

[patch 2/5] lib/radix-tree: Fix "nocast type" warnings

2005-07-14 Thread domen
From: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix the sparse warning "implicit cast to nocast type" File/Subsystem:lib/radix-tree Signed-off-by: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- --- include/linux/radix-tree.h |4 ++-- lib/radix-tree.c

[PATCH] Add security_task_post_setgid

2005-07-14 Thread Jan Engelhardt
Hi, the following patch adds a post_setgid() security hook, and necessary dummy funcs. Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -dpru linux-2.6.13-rc1-git3-20050706140055/include/linux/security.h AS17/include/linux/security.h ---

RE: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread Brown, Len
>Of course using APIC internal timers is generally the best idea on SMP, >but they may have had reasons to avoid them (it's not an ISA interrupt, so >it could have been simply out of question in the initial design). Best? No. Local APIC timers are based on a clock which on many processors will

[PATCH 2.6.13-rc2-mm2] v9fs: fix problems spotted in previous patchset (2.0.2)

2005-07-14 Thread ericvh
Fix formating errors and a memory leak that crept in the previous round of revisions to v9fs. These will be reincorperated into the patchset and resent to akpm. Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- commit 22d785a22895513c6ab67dfa53c25b8b833fe235 tree

Re: [PATCH] char: Add Dell Systems Management Base driver

2005-07-14 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Please use enter key every 70 chars or so... > >> This patch adds the Dell Systems Management Base driver. > > > >You keep posting this driver without explaining/showing how it's used. > >Could you perhaps give some more details here please? > > Here's some more information on

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > HPETs have a fixed frequency (usually 14.31818 MHz, but that depends > on the manufacturer). > >> - 64-bit "match timer" (i.e., a register in the counter which fires IRQ >> when it matches the counter value) > > That's implemented in the HPET

Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] add jiffies_to_nsecs() helper and fix up size of usecs

2005-07-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 14.07.2005 [13:54:47 -0700], Dave Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 13:28 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > +static inline u64 jiffies_to_nsecs(const unsigned long j) > > +{ > > +#if HZ <= NSEC_PER_SEC && !(NSEC_PER_SEC % HZ) > > + return (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * (u64)j; > > +#elif HZ >

Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] add jiffies_to_nsecs() helper and fix up size of usecs

2005-07-14 Thread Dave Hansen
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 13:28 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > +static inline u64 jiffies_to_nsecs(const unsigned long j) > +{ > +#if HZ <= NSEC_PER_SEC && !(NSEC_PER_SEC % HZ) > + return (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * (u64)j; > +#elif HZ > NSEC_PER_SEC && !(HZ % NSEC_PER_SEC) > + return ((u64)j +

[RFC][PATCH 0/4] new human-time soft-timer subsystem

2005-07-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 14.07.2005 [12:18:41 -0700], john stultz wrote: > Nish has some code, which I hope he'll be sending out shortly that > does just this, converting the soft-timer subsystem to use absolute > time instead of ticks for expiration. I feel it both simplifies the > code and makes it easier to

[RFC][PATCH 4/4] convert sys_nanosleep() to use set_timer_nsecs()

2005-07-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: Add timespec and timeval conversion functions for nanoseconds. Convert sys_nanosleep() to use schedule_timeout_nsecs(). Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/linux/time.h | 33

[RFC][PATCH 3/4] new human-time schedule_timeout() functions

2005-07-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: Add new human-time schedule_timeout() style functions, along with the appropriate constants/prototypes. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/linux/sched.h |7 ++ include/linux/time.h |4 +

[RFC][PATCH 2/4] human-time soft-timer core changes

2005-07-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: The core revision to the soft-timer subsystem to divorce it from the timer interrupt in software, i.e. jiffies. Instead, use getnstimeofday() (via do_monotonic_clock()) as the basis for addition and expiration of timers. Add a new unit,

[RFC][PATCH 1/4] add jiffies_to_nsecs() helper and fix up size of usecs

2005-07-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: Add a jiffies_to_nsecs() helper function. Make consistent the size of microseconds (unsigned long) throughout the conversion functions. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- jiffies.h | 15 +-- 1

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So the _sane_ way to do timeouts is to define an _arbitrary_ clock that is > just an integer counter. None of this "nanoseconds + full seconds" crap. > None of this stupid confusion with "real time". You select something that > is conceptually

Re: [rfc patch 2/2] direct-io: remove address alignment check

2005-07-14 Thread Daniel McNeil
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 11:23, Andi Kleen wrote: > > That is exactly why I made this a separate patch, so that we > > can test and find out where the problems are and work to fix > > them. > > That's pretty hard because there are a lot of block drivers. > > And might not very nice for people's

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 Linus Torvalds wrote: > In other words, the _right_ way to do this is literally > > unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ/2; > for (;;) { > if (ready()) > return 0; > if (time_after(timeout, jiffies)) >

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread Russell King
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 01:06:00PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Russell King wrote: > > Umm. Except, according to your description of what it's supposed to > > do, the above code can have an accumulating error. > > No. It can have a local drift, but the point is, the error

Re: Problem with kernel 2.6.11

2005-07-14 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Thursday 14 Jul 2005 20:34, FyD wrote: > Dear All, > > I have a problem with a program named Gaussian (http://www.gaussian.com) > (versions g98 or g03) and FC 4.0 (default kernel 2.6.11): I am used to take > Gaussian binaries compiled on the RedHat 9.0 version, and used them on FC > 2.0 or FC

Re: [PATCH] Filesystem capabilities support

2005-07-14 Thread Horst von Brand
Nicholas Hans Simmonds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Other than this, what are the general thoughts about this method as > opposed to just using a well defined byte order? I'd prefer a defined byte order. That way it won't bite too hard if I happen to move a filesystem (image) from PC to

Re: [RFC][PATCH] split PCI probing code [1/9]

2005-07-14 Thread Francois Romieu
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 07:10:14PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: > > Adam Belay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > > [...] > > > > Some nits + a suspect error branch. It seems nice otherwise. > > If I'm correct, this patch only moves the code into different files, it >

Re: Realtime Preemption, 2.6.12, Beginners Guide?

2005-07-14 Thread Lee Revell
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 20:58 +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote: > the responsiveness of our instrument to 300us which is low enough > for the real-time PCR industry PCR, as in polymerase chain reaction? They can do that in realtime? Impressive. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 2/7] v9fs: VFS file, dentry, and directory operations (2.0.2)

2005-07-14 Thread Eric Van Hensbergen
Doh! Good catch, I'll fix and resubmit - same goes for the formating issues. On 7/14/05, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > @@ -383,9 +379,10 @@ v9fs_file_write(struct file *filp, const > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > ret = copy_from_user(buffer, data, count); > > -

Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 5/7] v9fs: 9P protocol implementation (2.0.2)

2005-07-14 Thread Eric Van Hensbergen
On 7/14/05, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +static inline void buf_check_size(struct cbuf *buf, int len) > > +{ > > + if (buf->p+len > buf->ep) { > > + if (buf->p < buf->ep) { > > + eprintk(KERN_ERR, "buffer overflow\n"); > > +

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, john stultz wrote: > > We'll I'd probably put it as: "they do care about absolute time, but > they do not care about ticks or timer interrupt frequency" Well, the thing is, you have to count time some sane way. You can do it by having very expensive data structures that

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Russell King wrote: > > Umm. Except, according to your description of what it's supposed to > do, the above code can have an accumulating error. No. It can have a local drift, but the point is, the error never gets worse - it _stays_ local. There's no point in polling

Re: eepro100/e100 broken in 2.6.13-rc3

2005-07-14 Thread Horst von Brand
Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/13/05, Mikhail Kshevetskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > symptom > > === > > modprobe e100 > > ifconfig eth0 netmask > > > > result: > > === > > SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable > > > > There were no such error in 2.6.13-rc2 > odd,

Re: (v9fs) -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status

2005-07-14 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 01:23:24PM -0500, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote: > Sorry I didn't get to these quicker - was on vacation and basically > off-line for the past week and a half. I've made 90% of the changes > suggested and committed them to my git tree, I'll combine the changes > into a single

Re: [RFC][PATCH] split PCI probing code [1/9]

2005-07-14 Thread Adam Belay
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 12:30 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 07:10:14PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: > > Adam Belay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > > [...] > > > > Some nits + a suspect error branch. It seems nice otherwise. > > If I'm correct, this patch only moves the code into

Re: [RFC][PATCH] add PCI bus registration support [2/9]

2005-07-14 Thread Adam Belay
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 12:33 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:55:12AM -0400, Adam Belay wrote: > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_add_bus); > > This doens't need to be exported, right? No module uses it. But if > they do, I suggest EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() instead, is that ok? > > thanks, > >

Re: Realtime Preemption, 2.6.12, Beginners Guide?

2005-07-14 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Wednesday 13 Jul 2005 16:30, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > it worked upon the first try, and indeed my testbox crashed within 10 > > seconds: > > > > BUG: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference > > BUG: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer

Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 2/7] v9fs: VFS file, dentry, and directory operations (2.0.2)

2005-07-14 Thread Christoph Hellwig
> @@ -383,9 +379,10 @@ v9fs_file_write(struct file *filp, const > return -ENOMEM; > > ret = copy_from_user(buffer, data, count); > - if (ret) > + if (ret) { > dprintk(DEBUG_ERROR, "Problem copying from user\n"); > - else > + return

Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 5/7] v9fs: 9P protocol implementation (2.0.2)

2005-07-14 Thread Christoph Hellwig
> +static inline void buf_check_size(struct cbuf *buf, int len) > +{ > + if (buf->p+len > buf->ep) { > + if (buf->p < buf->ep) { > + eprintk(KERN_ERR, "buffer overflow\n"); > + buf->p = buf->ep + 1; > + } > + } > +}

Re: [discuss] Re: [LinuxBIOS] NUMA support for dual core Opteron

2005-07-14 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 01:04:26PM -0600, Ronald G. Minnich wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > However you'll likely need ACPI for other reasons anyways, e.g. for > > better power saving. > > bummer. What the BIOS vendors are doing (to lock in proprietary BIOS, some >

Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 7/7] v9fs: debug and support routines (2.0.2)

2005-07-14 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 08:53:59AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This is part [7/7] of the v9fs-2.0.2 patch against Linux 2.6.13-rc2-mm2. > > This part of the patch contains debug and other misc routine changes related > to hch's comments. Here a few if( instead if ( formatting sneaked in.

Re: Realtime Preemption, 2.6.12, Beginners Guide?

2005-07-14 Thread Chuck Harding
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Karsten Wiese wrote: Have I corrected the other path of ioapic early initialization, which had lacked virtual-address setup before ioapic_data[ioapic] was to be filled in -51-28? Please test attached patch on top of -51-29 or later. Also on Systems that liked -51-28.

RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-14 Thread karl malbrain
> -Original Message- > From: Russell King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Russell > King > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 11:57 AM > To: karl malbrain > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel. Org > Subject: Re: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:16:23AM -0700, karl

Problem with kernel 2.6.11

2005-07-14 Thread FyD
Dear All, I have a problem with a program named Gaussian (http://www.gaussian.com) (versions g98 or g03) and FC 4.0 (default kernel 2.6.11): I am used to take Gaussian binaries compiled on the RedHat 9.0 version, and used them on FC 2.0 or FC 3.0. If I try to do so, on FC 4.0. (with the default

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread john stultz
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 19:02 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 09:37 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > just doesn't realize that the latter is a bit more complicated exactly > > because the latter is a hell of a lot more POWERFUL. Trying to get rid of > > jiffies for some

Re: [RFC][PATCH] add PCI bus registration support [2/9]

2005-07-14 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:55:12AM -0400, Adam Belay wrote: > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_add_bus); This doens't need to be exported, right? No module uses it. But if they do, I suggest EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() instead, is that ok? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: Linux On-Demand Network Access (LODNA)

2005-07-14 Thread Vlad C.
--- Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You might look into SFS by David Mazieres, some > concepts in it are > likely to interest you. Thank you for your suggestion. I've taken a look at SFS (http://www.fs.net/sfswww/), and I like its emphasis on user-friendliness and security. It's a

Re: [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file

2005-07-14 Thread Russell King
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 02:23:35PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > + > +--- > + > +What:register_serial/unregister_serial > +When:December 2005 > +Why: This interface does not allow serial ports to be registered against > + a struct device, and as such does

Re: [RFC][PATCH] split PCI probing code [1/9]

2005-07-14 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 07:10:14PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: > Adam Belay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > [...] > > Some nits + a suspect error branch. It seems nice otherwise. If I'm correct, this patch only moves the code into different files, it doesn't change any of it, so your comments apply to

Re: [CFT:PATCH] Serial + Serial PCI card cleanup

2005-07-14 Thread Russell King
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 09:57:02AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 12:15:00PM +0400, Andrey Panin wrote: > > Me too, but I can confirm that my SIIG single port serial card still works > > with the patch, so at least SIIG quirk table cleanup didn't broke anything. > > Thanks

[PATCH] char/vt: fix compile failure (typo)

2005-07-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: The mod_timer() statement mistakenly has a comma at the end of the line instead of a semicolon. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- vt.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -urpN

RE: 2.6.13-rc3 ACPI regression and hang on x86-64

2005-07-14 Thread Brown, Len
>acpi_ec-0217 [04] acpi_ec_leave_burst_mo: --->status fail > >on the console, and then the machine is hung hard. 2.6.13-rc3 x86_64 failed, but 2.6.13-rc2 x86_64 worked And both of these revisions in the i386 kernel still work? >+evxfevnt-0203 [07] acpi_enable_event : Could not enable

[patch] inotify: documentation update

2005-07-14 Thread Robert Love
Linus, Trivial documentation update for inotify. Please, apply. Robert Love Clean up and expand some of the inotify documentation. Signed-off-by: Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Documentation/filesystems/inotify.txt | 77 +++--- 1 files changed, 45

Re: [RFC][PATCH] split PCI probing code [1/9]

2005-07-14 Thread John Rose
I like it. I'm a little hung up on the fact that actual device probing happens in config.c rather than probe.c (if I'm correct). Regardless, this patch set cleans things up nicely. John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread john stultz
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 09:37 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > > A note on the relaive timer API: There needs to be a way to say > > "x milliseconds from the time this timer should have triggered" instead > > of "x milliseconds from now", to avoid

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread Russell King
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:21:41AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > In other words, the _right_ way to do this is literally > > unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ/2; > for (;;) { > if (ready()) > return 0; > if (time_after(timeout,

Re: [discuss] Re: NUMA support for dual core Opteron

2005-07-14 Thread Andi Kleen
[closed mailing list dropped. Sorry I have no plans to argue with your mailbots] On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 01:00:01PM -0600, Ronald G. Minnich wrote: > if there is any chance of getting along without ACPI entries that is best. > Linux did do this once already, for SMP K8: K8 can boot and run NUMA

Re: rcu-refcount stacker performance

2005-07-14 Thread serue
Thanks, Paul, that's a great idea! The approach I'm testing right now just does a module_get(mod), which is released when you manually disable the module by echoing it's name into /sys/kernel/security/stacker/unload, so that must be done before you can rmmod. This way no refcounting is actually

Re: NUMA support for dual core Opteron

2005-07-14 Thread Ronald G. Minnich
if there is any chance of getting along without ACPI entries that is best. Linux did do this once already, for SMP K8: K8 can boot and run NUMA without an SRAT table. What more is needed for dual core, and could Linux support in this area be extended? ron - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: [discuss] Re: [LinuxBIOS] NUMA support for dual core Opteron

2005-07-14 Thread Ronald G. Minnich
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > However you'll likely need ACPI for other reasons anyways, e.g. for > better power saving. bummer. What the BIOS vendors are doing (to lock in proprietary BIOS, some say) is making ACPI tables copyright the BIOS vendor, not the motherboard vendor. So

Re: [discuss] Re: [LinuxBIOS] NUMA support for dual core Opteron

2005-07-14 Thread yhlu
FYI in Tyan S4881 (8 ways dual core 875 cpu ) with LinuxBIOS I got also the 1G mem hole is enabled. So the kernel should be OK with read NUMA directly from HW. YH Firmware type: LinuxBIOS old bootloader convention, maybe loadlin? Bootdata ok (command line is apic=debug ramdisk_size=65536

Re: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-14 Thread Russell King
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:16:23AM -0700, karl malbrain wrote: > I'd love to do a ps listing for you, but, except for the mouse, the system > is completely unresponsive after issuing the blocking open("/dev/ttyS1", > O_RDRW). > > Telnet is dead; the console will respond to the mouse, but the only

[PATCH 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 6/7] v9fs: transport modules (2.0.2)

2005-07-14 Thread ericvh
This is part [6/7] of the v9fs-2.0.2 patch against Linux 2.6.13-rc2-mm2. This part of the patch contains transport routine changes related to hch's comments. Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- fs/9p/trans_sock.c |2 +- fs/9p/mux.c | 44

[PATCH 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 7/7] v9fs: debug and support routines (2.0.2)

2005-07-14 Thread ericvh
This is part [7/7] of the v9fs-2.0.2 patch against Linux 2.6.13-rc2-mm2. This part of the patch contains debug and other misc routine changes related to hch's comments. Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- fs/9p/error.c|3 +-- fs/9p/error.h|3 +++

Re: rcu-refcount stacker performance

2005-07-14 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:13:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Paul E. McKenney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 08:44:50AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Quoting Paul E. McKenney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > My guess is that the reference count is indeed

Re: [discuss] Re: [LinuxBIOS] NUMA support for dual core Opteron

2005-07-14 Thread Andi Kleen
P.S.: It is very nasty to cc closed mailing lists when posting to open ones. Please don't do that in the future. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [LinuxBIOS] NUMA support for dual core Opteron

2005-07-14 Thread yhlu
For S2895, with 1Gx8 Installed and E stepping dual core opteron with 1G mem hole emable, got Bootdata ok (command line is apic=debug ramdisk_size=65536 root=/dev/ram0 rw console=tty0 console=ttyS0,115200n8 ) Linux version 2.6.12-rc5 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)) #26 SMP Thu

Re: [discuss] Re: [LinuxBIOS] NUMA support for dual core Opteron

2005-07-14 Thread Andi Kleen
> AFIAK, for x86_64 kernel, it will try to read NUMA configuration from > HW directory. We don't have to export any ACPI table. It doesn't work for dual core or 8 sockets for some reason. Since the SRAT code works fine and is in general more future proof we never tracked down why. Patches

[PATCH 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 5/7] v9fs: 9P protocol implementation (2.0.2)

2005-07-14 Thread ericvh
This is part [5/7] of the v9fs-2.0.2 patch against Linux 2.6.13-rc2-mm2. This part of the patch contains the 9P protocol function changes related to hch's comments. Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- fs/9p/9p.c |2 +- fs/9p/conv.c| 54

[PATCH 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 3/7] v9fs: VFS inode operations (2.0.2)

2005-07-14 Thread ericvh
This is part [3/7] of the v9fs-2.0.2 patch against Linux 2.6.13-rc2-mm2. This part of the patch contains the VFS inode interfaces changes related to hch's comments. Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 69

Re: Linux On-Demand Network Access (LODNA)

2005-07-14 Thread Vlad C.
--- Peter Staubach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vlad C. wrote: > > >--- Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Please treat at greater length how your proposal > >>differs from NFS. > >> > >> > > > >I think NFS is not flexible enough because: > > > >1) NFS requires

[PATCH 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 4/7] v9fs: VFS superblock operations and glue (2.0.2)

2005-07-14 Thread ericvh
This is part [4/7] of the v9fs-2.0.2 patch against Linux 2.6.13-rc2-mm2. This part of the patch contains VFS superblock and mapping code changes related to hch's comments. Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- v9fs.c | 103

Re: resuming swsusp twice

2005-07-14 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Andy Isaacson wrote: > Perhaps the image should be more rigorously checked? I'm wishing that > it would verify that the header and the image matched, after it finishes in your case, the header and the image matched. There was no new image on disk. And no new header. > reading the image. For

[PATCH 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 1/7] v9fs: Documentation, Makefiles, Configuration (2.0.2)

2005-07-14 Thread ericvh
This is part [1/7] of the v9fs-2.0.2 patch against Linux 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 This part of the patch contains Documentation, Makefiles, and configuration file changes related to hch's comments. Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- fs/9p/Makefile |1 - 1 files

[PATCH 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 2/7] v9fs: VFS file, dentry, and directory operations (2.0.2)

2005-07-14 Thread ericvh
This is part [2/7] of the v9fs-2.0.2 patch against Linux 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 This part of the patch contains the VFS file, dentry, & directory interface changes related to hch's comments. Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- fs/9p/vfs_file.c | 35

[PATCH 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 0/7] v9fs: Changes in response to hch comments (2.0.2)

2005-07-14 Thread ericvh
This is part [0/7] of the v9fs-2.0.2 patch against Linux 2.6.13-rc2-mm2. The changes in this patch-set are primarily motivated by comments from Chistoph Hellwig (hch): "there's a few issues with the code still I'd like to see fixed: - there's three sparse warnings still. Two of them are

Re: [LinuxBIOS] NUMA support for dual core Opteron

2005-07-14 Thread Li-Ta Lo
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 10:58 -0700, yhlu wrote: > Someone mentioned that NUMA support for dual core opteron need acpi > support in LinuxBIOS. > > there may be some other solution for that. > 1. PowerPC already support dual core and it should support NUMA, So > the Open Firmware must have some NUMA

Re: [rfc patch 2/2] direct-io: remove address alignment check

2005-07-14 Thread Andi Kleen
> That is exactly why I made this a separate patch, so that we > can test and find out where the problems are and work to fix > them. That's pretty hard because there are a lot of block drivers. And might not very nice for people's data. > > Are there problems only with odd sizes, or do

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > >> >>> What does Windows do here? > >> >> windows xp base rate is 100Hz... but multimedia apps can ask for almost > >> > 83Hz > >> Well, Windoes 98 (vmmon) shows very different ones: > >Wow. Windows has been doing this since *98*? > > ...since

Re: fdisk: What do plus signs after "Blocks" mean?

2005-07-14 Thread Jan Engelhardt
>I always thought; > >First 446 bytes are boot code and all Right, of course. Otherwise it won't sum up to 512 bytes. Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread Jan Engelhardt
>> >>> What does Windows do here? >> >> windows xp base rate is 100Hz... but multimedia apps can ask for almost >> > 83Hz >> Well, Windoes 98 (vmmon) shows very different ones: >Wow. Windows has been doing this since *98*? ...since Windows does multitask scheduling I suppose, which is since 95

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread Andrew Morton
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A note on the relaive timer API: There needs to be a way to say > "x milliseconds from the time this timer should have triggered" instead > of "x milliseconds from now", to avoid skew in timers that try to be > strictly periodic.

NUMA support for dual core Opteron

2005-07-14 Thread yhlu
Someone mentioned that NUMA support for dual core opteron need acpi support in LinuxBIOS. there may be some other solution for that. 1. PowerPC already support dual core and it should support NUMA, So the Open Firmware must have some NUMA entry definition. Can we make x86-64 kernel support

Re: resuming swsusp twice

2005-07-14 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:58:12PM +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > Andy Isaacson wrote: > > Yesterday I booted my laptop to 2.6.13-rc2-mm1, suspended to swsusp, > > and [snip] > > and got a panic along the lines of "Unable to find swap space, try > > a panic? it should only be an error message,

Orinoco_plx woes on 2.6.13

2005-07-14 Thread Nathan Mahon
I use a Belkin F5D6020 wifi card, (version one), and a belkin f5d6000 pci adapter for it. A while ago, it was working flawlessly, though I didn't use it that much after the wife's laptop died. I've rolled through some kernel upgrades... and it appears my wifi does not work anymore. here's the

RE: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread Al Boldi
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 09:37 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > There's absolutely nothing wrong with "jiffies", and anybody who > thinks that > > msleep(20); > > is fundamentally better than > > timeout = jiffies + HZ/50; > What's wrong with structured programming? - To unsubscribe

Re: Kernel Bug Report

2005-07-14 Thread Alexander Nyberg
tor 2005-07-14 klockan 10:10 -0700 skrev Paul Vander Griend: > System: > Motherboard = Tyan K8WE > Processor = 2x Opteron 250 > Memory = 8GB ECC Registered > > On all of the recent release candidates except for > 2.6.13-rc2-git2 the kernel panics while booting. These > versions include

[GIT PATCH] SCSI updates for 2.6.13-rc3

2005-07-14 Thread James Bottomley
This is actually the accumulation of everything we've been saving for 2.6.12, but I was away for a bit and missed 2.6.12 when it came out ... The patch is available from http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-for- linus-2.6.git/ The short changelog is: Andrew Morton: o

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Chris Friesen wrote: > > But if all I really want is to sleep for 20ms, what does the additional > power actually buy me? If you _only_ want to sleep for 20ms, it doesn't buy you anything. But the sleep is often part of a bigger picture, where the 20ms might be part of

Re: RFC: Hugepage COW

2005-07-14 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, David Gibson wrote: > Now that the hugepage code has been consolidated across the > architectures, it becomes much easier to implement copy-on-write. > Hugepage COW is of limited utility of itself, however, it is > essentially a prerequisite for any of a number of methods of

Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

2005-07-14 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > I *will* argue that for relative delays in drivers, msleep() is better. Oh, I agree. I think we should continue the simplification of the simple stuff. If somebody just wants to sleep a while, do it. But if somebody is doing this because they

RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-14 Thread karl malbrain
> -Original Message- > From: Russell King > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 1:27 AM > To: karl malbrain > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel. Org > Subject: Re: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 10:53:19AM -0700, karl malbrain wrote: > > I've also noticed that the boot

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >