All,
This patch implements the time sources shared between i386 acpi_pm,
cyclone, hpet, pit, tsc and tsc-interp). The patch should apply on top
of the timeofday-arch-i386-part4 patch.
The patch should be fairly straight forward, only adding the new
timesources.
thanks
-john
All,
The conversion of i386 to use the new timeofday subsystem has
been
split into 4 parts. This patch, the third of four, reworks some of the
code in the new tsc.c file. Additionally it adds some new interfaces and
hooks to use these new interfaces appropriately. This patch also
All,
The conversion of i386 to use the new timeofday subsystem has been
split into 4 parts. This patch, the final of four, converts the i386
arch to use the new timeofday subsystem and removes the old
timers/timer_opts infrastructure.
It applies on top of my timeofday-arch-i386-part3
Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 17:23 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Badari Pulavarty wrote:
...
I don't know why you wanna relax the alignment requirement, but
wouldn't it be easier to just write/use block-aligned allocator for
such buffers? It will even make the program more
2005-07-16 (Sat) 03:44 +0200 Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
Removing the cache parameter from mb_cache_shrink would break when more than
one mb_cache is used per filesystem, correct. Leaving the parameter in and
adding your patch is more future proof, so I'm fine with it. Are you
actually using
Dominik Brodowski wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 03:37:22PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
Dominik Brodowski wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 12:12:17AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
(/sbin/cardmgr chewing up lots of CPU cycles with 2.6.12 kernel)
Please post the output of lspci and lsmod as I'd
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 07:17:44PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:53:33AM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
That said, I will be testing this patch a bit further
Thanks. Let me know if you see any issues.
myself, and because it does address a real memory leak
We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.12.3 kernel.
The diffstat and short summary of the fixes are below.
I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch between
2.6.12.2 and 2.6.12.3, as it is small enough to do so.
The updated 2.6.12.y git tree can be
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
VERSION = 2
PATCHLEVEL = 6
SUBLEVEL = 12
-EXTRAVERSION = .2
+EXTRAVERSION = .3
NAME=Woozy Numbat
# *DOCUMENTATION*
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/time.c b/arch/ppc/kernel/time.c
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/time.c
+++
Hi,
for some time I was unable to use Atheros based cards on my
notebook (O2Micro oz6812 Cardbus controller) because of lots
of rx packets getting dropped by frame errors. running ping I got
this: (~1m from access point)
PING 192.168.67.1 (192.168.67.1): 56 data
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 12:58 -0700, Stephen Pollei wrote:
But If I understand Linus's points he wants jiffies to remain a memory
fetch, and make sure it doesn't turn into a singing dancing christmas
tree.
It seems it relatively easy to support dynamic tick, the ARM
architecture has it. But with
* Andi Kleen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 07:17:44PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:53:33AM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
That said, I will be testing this patch a bit further
Thanks. Let me know if you see any issues.
myself, and
Support UML builds and make O= when building Debian packages.
Sam, I'm pretty sure I've sent this before, but it seems to have been
dropped. I've been using this for a while to build my personal kernels,
and haven't had any problems. This is a combination of old patches.
Signed-Off-By: Ryan
501 - 513 of 513 matches
Mail list logo
