Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Once the migration operation is complete we know we will receive
>> > no more interrupts on this vector so the irq pending state for
>> > this irq will no longer be updated. If the irq is not pending and
>> > we are in the intermediate state we
Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc7 compared to 2.6.19
>> that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
>>
>> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
>> of the bugs, maintainer of an
On Friday 02 February 2007 17:47, Maynard Johnson wrote:
>
> > We also want to be able to profile the context switch code itself, which
> > means that we also need one event buffer associated with the kernel to
> > collect events that for a zero context_id.
> The hardware design precludes tracing
> > Once the migration operation is complete we know we will receive
> > no more interrupts on this vector so the irq pending state for
> > this irq will no longer be updated. If the irq is not pending and
> > we are in the intermediate state we immediately free the vector,
> > otherwise in we
Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Starikovskiy, Alexey Y wrote:
>>> so it probably means that drivers/acpi/tables/tbxfroot.c is
>>> obsolete ?
>> Yes.
Could you please try it?
>>> sure, I'll cancel the current boot test in which I was using
>>> acpi_find_root_pointer() in tbxfroot.c and restart one
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 04:56:22PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Well, in my picture, 'only if you block' is a pure thread utilization
> > decision: bounce a piece of work to another thread if this thread cannot
> > complete it. (if the kernel
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 08:30, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Well, Usenix has offerred to provide logistical support for some
> mini-summits if anyoen wants to take them up on it. Using some of the
> sponsorship money from last year, we've proposed to make some hotel
> conference rooms right before
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 03:52:32PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:31:37 +0100 (CET)
> Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The following set of patches attempt to fix the buffered write
> > locking problems (and there are a couple of peripheral patches
> > and
This is a new variation on the earlier RFC for tracking mlocked pages.
We now mark a mlocked page with a bit in the page flags and remove
them from the LRU. Pages get moved back when no vma that references
the page has VM_LOCKED set anymore.
This means that vmscan no longer uselessly cycles over
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc7 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a
Hi. I'm late.
I'll to resend the patch against 2.6.19.
original code doesn't write back to CCR4 register. this patch reflects a
value of a register.
diff -Narup linux-2.6.19.orig/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c
linux-2.6.19/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c
---
Björn Steinbrink wrote:
On 2007.01.24 01:39:23 +0100, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
On 2007.01.23 17:18:43 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
Larry Walton wrote:
The last patch (sata_nv-force-int-dev-in-interrupt.patch)
seems to have fix the problem. Much appreciated,
thank you. I'd consider it a must
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:25:41 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:56:30 -0800
> > Andrew Vasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > dt of=/dev/raw/raw1 procs=8 oncerr=abort bs=16k disable=stats
> > > > > limit=2m
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 08:53:00PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Magnus Damm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/2/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Magnus Damm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > kexec: Fix CONFIG_SMP=n compilation (ia64)
> > > >
> > > > This patch
Hello,
here is a bugfix to d_path. Please apply (after 2.6.20).
First, when d_path() hits a lazily unmounted mount point, it tries to
prepend the name of the lazily unmounted dentry to the path name. It
gets this wrong, and also overwrites the slash that separates the name
from the following
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 17:56 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Thanks - I'll queue this up for 2.6.20 also.
>
> No objection from me, as long as James says this is ok.
>
> I wonder why we haven't noticed this in the past?
Because the race is so small ...
I'll queue it in the rc-fixes tree .. I have
On Friday 02 February 2007 20:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:54:12 -0600
> John Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The SN Altix platform does not conform to the
> > IOSAPIC IRQ routing model. Add code in acpi_unregister_gsi()
> > to check if (acpi_irq_model ==
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Ard van Breemen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The pci_find_subsys gets called very early by obsolete ide setup parameters.
This is a bogus call since pci is not initialized yet, so the list is empty.
But in
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The included patch translates arpt_counters to xt_counters, making
userspace arptables compile against recent kernels.
Signed-off-by: Bart De Schuymer <[EMAIL
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Join all-node multicast group after assignment of dev->ip6_ptr
because it must be assigned when ipv6_dev_mc_inc() is called.
This fixes Bug#7817, reported by
* Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Responses should be made by Mon Feb 3 02:30 UTC 2007
Yes, that's Mon Feb 5 (thanks to those on their toes ;-)
And the roll-up will be available at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/chrisw/stable/patch-2.6.19.3-rc1.{gz,bz2}
once
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Both process_zones() and drain_node_pages() check for populated zones
before touching pagesets. However, __drain_pages does not do so,
This may result in a
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IP_CT_TCP_FLAG_CLOSE_INIT is a flag and should have a value of 0x4 instead
of 0x3, which is IP_CT_TCP_FLAG_WINDOW_SCALE | IP_CT_TCP_FLAG_SACK_PERM.
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_netlink.c |2 +-
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix NULL dereference in hda_generic.c.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Chris
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The new PDA code uses a dummy _proxy_pda variable to describe
memory references to the PDA. It is never referenced
in inline assembly, but exists as input/output
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Check that status flags are available in the netlink message received
to create a new conntrack.
Fixes a crash in ctnetlink_create_conntrack when the
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Erez Zilber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
iSER limits the number of outstanding PDUs to send. When this threshold is
reached, it should return an error code (-ENOBUFS) instead of setting the
suspend_tx bit
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
With the introduction of x_tables we accidentally broke compatibility
by defining IPT_TABLE_MAXNAMELEN to XT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN instead of
XT_TABLE_MAXNAMELEN,
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
recently cpufreq support on my laptop (Lenovo T60) broke completely:
when it's plugged into AC it would never go higher than 1 GHz - neither
1.3 GHz nor 1.83 GHz is
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Maxime Bizon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have a Marvell board which has the same i2c hw block than mv64xxx, so
I'm trying to use i2c-mv64xxx driver.
But I get the following random oops at boot:
Unable
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
mthca_table_find() will return the wrong address when the table entry
being searched for is exactly at the beginning of a sglist entry
(other than the first),
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Philippe De Muyter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
m41t00.c forgets to set the year field in set_rtc_time; fix that.
Signed-off-by: Philippe De Muyter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Mark A. Greer <[EMAIL
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Karsten Wiese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The previous patch "Repair snd-usb-usx2y for usb 2.6.18" assumed
urb->start_frame roll over beyond MAX_INT for both UHCI & OHCI.
This isn't true until now (kernel
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
When IPv6 connection tracking splits up a defragmented packet into
its original fragments, the packets are taken from a list and are
passed to the network stack
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Packets generated by the REJECT target in the output chain have a local
destination address and a foreign source address. Make sure not to use
the foreign source
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nfsd defines a type 'encode_dent_fn' which is much like 'filldir_t'
except that the first pointer is 'struct readdir_cd *' rather than
'void *'. It then casts
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Due to silly typos, if the nfs versions are explicitly set,
no NFSACL versions get enabled.
Also improve an error message that would have made this bug
a little easier
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Bob Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In some cases such as:
iph->check = 0;
iph->check = ip_fast_csum((unsigned char *)iph, iph->ihl);
GCC may optimize out the previous store.
Observed as
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
move_task_off_dead_cpu() requires interrupts to be disabled, while
migrate_dead() calls it with enabled interrupts. Added appropriate
comments to functions and
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Remove the __resched_legal() check: it is conceptually broken. The biggest
problem it had is that it can mask buggy cond_resched() calls. A
cond_resched() call is
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This fixes a bug introduced by:
commit fda9ef5d679b07c9d9097aaf6ef7f069d794a8f9
Author: Dmitry Mishin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu Aug 31 15:28:39 2006 -0700
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Masayuki Nakagawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I encountered a kernel panic with my test program, which is a very
simple IPv6 client-server program.
The server side sets IPV6_RECVPKTINFO on a listening
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The sorting of SACK blocks actually munges them rather than sort,
causing the TCP stack to ignore some SACK information and breaking the
assumption of ordered SACK
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The patch "Replace CHECKSUM_HW by CHECKSUM_PARTIAL/CHECKSUM_COMPLETE"
changed to unconditional copying of ip_summed field from collapsed
skb. This patch reverts
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If the device is down, invoking the device hard header callbacks
is not legal, so check it early.
Based upon a shaper OOPS report from Frederik Deweerdt.
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix up CIFS for "test_clear_page_dirty()" removal
This also adds he required page "writeback" flag handling, that cifs
hasn't been doing and that the page dirty
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
While enhancing the neighbour code to handle multiple network
namespaces I noticed that decnet is assuming neigh_parms_alloc
will allways succeed, which is
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
When main table is just a single leaf this gets printed as belonging to the
local table in /proc/net/fib_trie. A fix is below.
Signed-off-by: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch fixes a regression in 2.6.19 in which the use of multiple
krb5 mounts against the same NFS server may result in an Oops on
unmount. The Oops is due to
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Use the same signal frame alignment calculations as the underlying
architecture. x86_64 appeared to do this, but the "- 8" was really
subtracting 8 * sizeof(struct
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jmicron module detects all JMB36x as JMB361 and PATA0 has wrong pin status
of XICBLID.
Cc: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In a kernel with trie routing enabled I had a simple routing setup
with only a single route to the outside world and no default
route. "ip route table list
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
When the packet counter of a connection is zero a division by zero
occurs in div64_64(). Fix that by using zero as average value, which
is correct as long as the
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A flag was recently added to the elevator code to avoid
performing an unplug when reuests are being re-queued.
The goal of this flag was to avoid a deep recursion
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
When 'repair' finds a block that is different one the various
parts of the mirror. it is meant to write a chosen good version
to the others. However it currently
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We are inside spin_lock_irqsave(). quoth akpm's debug facility:
[ 231.948000] SCSI device sda: 195371568 512-byte hdwr sectors (100030 MB)
[ 232.232000]
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Andy Gospodarek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
While working with the latest bonding code I noticed a nasty problem that
will prevent arp monitoring from always functioning correctly on x86_64
systems.
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mirror the logic in the sun4u handler, we have to update
both registers even when we branch out to window fault
fixup handling.
The way it works is that if we
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Adam Litke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
When expanding the stack, we don't currently check if the VMA will cross
into an area of the address space that is reserved for hugetlb pages.
Subsequent faults on
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
While developing more functionality in mdadm I found some bugs in md...
- When we remove a device from an inactive array (write 'remove' to
the 'state' sysfs file -
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The nfsservctl systemcall isn't used but recent nfs-utils releases for
exporting filesystems, and consequently the code that is uses -
exp_export - has suffered some
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If a GFP_KERNEL allocation is attempted in md while the mddev_lock is
held, it is possible for a deadlock to eventuate.
This happens if the array was marked 'clean',
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix few bugs that meant that:
- superblocks weren't alway written at exactly the right time (this
could show up if the array was not written to - writting to the
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This reverts commit 99a10a60ba9bedcf5d70ef81414d3e03816afa3f.
As per Hugh Dickins:
"Nadia Derbey has reported that mmap of /dev/kmem no longer works with
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7747
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
NFSd assumes that largest number of pages that will be needed
for a request+response is 2+N where N pages is the size of the largest
permitted read/write request. The
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
rtc_sysfs_add_device is needed even after dev initialization, so drop __devinit.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This fixes UML on hosts with non-standard VM splits. We had changed
the config variable that controls UML behavior on such hosts, but not
propogated the change
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The recent hashing introduced an off-by-one bug in policy list insertion.
Instead of adding after the last entry with a lesser or equal priority,
we're adding after
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In the case where a user has configured NetLabel in the kernel but is not
using a SELinux policy with the MLS/MCS feature enabled there is a bug in
mls_export_cat() where a NULL
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Since commit 98e238cd42be6c0852da519303cf0182690f8d9f in Linux 2.6.19,
"ieee1394: sbp2: don't prefer MODE SENSE 10", some FireWire DVD-ROMs and
DVD-RWs were
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Lars Ellenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
md raidX make_request functions strip off the BIO_RW_SYNC flag, thus
introducing additional latency.
Fixing this in raid1 and raid10 seems to be straightforward
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This changes all HWRNG driver initcalls to module_init().
We must probe the RNGs after the major kernel subsystems
are already up and running (like PCI).
This
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Ard van Breemen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The calls made by parse_parms to other initialization code might enable
interrupts again way too early.
Having interrupts on this early can make systems PANIC
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch fixes the case when we reparent to a different thread in the
same thread group. This modifies the code so that we do not send
signals and do not
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Nathan Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Commit 5c1e176781f43bc902a51e5832f789756bff911b ("sched: force /sbin/init
off isolated cpus") sets init's cpus_allowed to a subset of cpu_online_map
at boot time,
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.3 release.
There are 59 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
wants to add a
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 06:19:55PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 03:09:26 +0100
> Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> argh. Yesterday all my emails were getting a mysterious
>
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:03:48 -0500
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 06:49:16 +0100
> > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc7 compared to 2.6.19
> >> that are not yet fixed in
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 03:09:26 +0100
Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
argh. Yesterday all my emails were getting a mysterious
s/osdl/linux-foundation/ done to them at the server, so I switched everything
over.
Hi,
I got this SATA PCI card:
00:04.0 Mass storage controller: ALi Corporation ALi M5281 Serial ATA /
RAID Host Controller (rev a4) (prog-if 85)
Subsystem: ALi Corporation ALi M5281 Serial ATA / RAID Host
Controller
Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
This patch changes the module license handling code to:
- allow modules to have multiple licenses
- access GPL symbols if at least one license is GPL-compatible
- prevent the "GPL\0 for nothing"-trick
- fix an off-by-one buffer overflow
(exploitable only if the attacker can load modules)
- move
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:19:24PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:34:56 +0530
> Nagendra Singh Tomar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > sd_probe() calls class_device_add() even before initializing the
> > sdkp->device variable. class_device_add() eventually results
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:58:01PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 02:33:16 +0100
> Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think just setting page uptodate in commit_write might do the
> > trick? (and getting rid of the set_page_dirty there).
>
> Yes, the page just isn't
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 06:49:16 +0100
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc7 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
There are still a few things hanging around.
I have these queued:
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:39:15 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So is this a for-2.6.20 thing? The bug was present in 2.6.19, so
> > I assume it doesn't affect many people?
>
> If it's not to late, and this patch isn't too
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 06:49:16 +0100
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc7 compared to 2.6.19
> that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
There are still a few things hanging around.
I have these queued:
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 02:33:16 +0100
Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ===
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/buffer.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c
> > > @@ -2344,6 +2344,8 @@ int nobh_prepare_write(struct page *page
> > >
> >
On 2007.01.24 01:39:23 +0100, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2007.01.23 17:18:43 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > Larry Walton wrote:
> > >The last patch (sata_nv-force-int-dev-in-interrupt.patch)
> > >seems to have fix the problem. Much appreciated,
> > >thank you. I'd consider it a must have in
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So is this a for-2.6.20 thing? The bug was present in 2.6.19, so
> I assume it doesn't affect many people?
If it's not to late, and this patch isn't too scary.
It's a really rare set of circumstances that trigger it, but the
possibility of being hit
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:13:03PM +0300, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
> Hello
Hi Vladimir,
> On Wednesday 31 January 2007 10:02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > reiserfs:
> > commit de14569f94513279e3d44d9571a421e9da1759ae
> > [PATCH] resierfs: avoid tail packing if an inode was ever mmapped
> >
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:54:12 -0600
John Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The SN Altix platform does not conform to the
> IOSAPIC IRQ routing model. Add code in acpi_unregister_gsi()
> to check if (acpi_irq_model == ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_PLATFORM) and
> return.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Keller <[EMAIL
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 03:53:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:33:03 +0100 (CET)
> Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Modify the core write() code so that it won't take a pagefault while
> > holding a
> > lock on the pagecache page. There are a number of
On Feb 2 2007 17:12, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> >> >if (MODULE_LICENSE_contains_null(license))
>> >> > printk(KERN_WARNING "this module's license is suspicious\n");
>>
>> Whatever, I just want to see how you are going to implement
>> MODULE_LICENSE_contains_null.
>
>I was busy on other things this
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 03:52:36PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:31:46 +0100 (CET)
> Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > simple_prepare_write and nobh_prepare_write leak uninitialised kernel data.
>
> They do? Under what situation?
Yes, I have at least
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:25:41 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:56:30 -0800
> Andrew Vasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > dt of=/dev/raw/raw1 procs=8 oncerr=abort bs=16k disable=stats
> > > > limit=2m passes=100 pattern=iot dlimit=2048
>
> What is this
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 03:52:32PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:31:37 +0100 (CET)
> Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The following set of patches attempt to fix the buffered write
> > locking problems (and there are a couple of peripheral patches
> > and
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:34:56 +0530
Nagendra Singh Tomar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> sd_probe() calls class_device_add() even before initializing the
> sdkp->device variable. class_device_add() eventually results in the user mode
> udev program to be called. udev program can read the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TSC is either synchronized by design or not reliable
to be used for anything, let alone timekeeping.
This refers to eliminating the offset between multiple synchronized TSCs.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
1 - 100 of 638 matches
Mail list logo
