Re: nbd problem.

2007-05-09 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On May 9 2007 14:38, Rogier Wolff wrote: ozon:~ ps auxww | grep D USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 110 0.4 0.0 0 0 ?D10:28 0:31 [pdflush] root 112 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?D 10:28 0:05 [kswapd0] root

Re: [patch 4/4] Add common orderly_poweroff()

2007-05-09 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 22:51, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Various pieces of code around the kernel want to be able to trigger an orderly poweroff. This pulls them together into a single implementation. Fine for me from the x86 side. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: pcmcia ioctl removal

2007-05-09 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! pcmcia-delete-obsolete-pcmcia_ioctl-feature.patch ... Dominik is busy. Will probably re-review and send these direct to Linus. The patch above is the removal of cardmgr support. While I'd love to see this cruft gone it definitively needs maintainer judgement on whether they

Re: [patch 3/9] lguest: the host code

2007-05-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Wed, 09 May 2007 02:51:35 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +++ a/drivers/lguest/core.c @@ -0,0 +1,446 @@ +/* World's simplest hypervisor, to test paravirt_ops and show + * unbelievers that virtualization is the future. Plus, it's fun! */ This may have been asked before, but is there some

Re: pcmcia ioctl removal

2007-05-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! pcmcia-delete-obsolete-pcmcia_ioctl-feature.patch ... Dominik is busy. Will probably re-review and send these direct to Linus. The patch above is the removal of cardmgr support. While I'd love to see this cruft gone it

[GIT PULL] sh fixes

2007-05-09 Thread Paul Mundt
There were some collisions with Andrew's last couple rounds of patches, so this is a second set of updates that includes fixes for all of those things, and gets us back to a working state. Please pull from: master.kernel.org::/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6.git Which contains:

Re: pcmcia ioctl removal

2007-05-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 12:54:16PM +, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! pcmcia-delete-obsolete-pcmcia_ioctl-feature.patch ... Dominik is busy. Will probably re-review and send these direct to Linus. The patch above is the removal of cardmgr support. While I'd love to see this

Re: [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version

2007-05-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 14:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 10:59, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 01:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: I suspect I just tested the wrong thing yesterday. Let me

Re: [BUG] Current -git kernel kills X

2007-05-09 Thread Mark Lord
Jeff Garzik wrote: Symptoms: Machine boots successfully to gdm (GNOME) login screen. When logging in, the session immediately dies. Dialog your session lasted less than 10 seconds appears. I click OK, and am returned to the gdm login screen. Reproducability: 100% Mmm... sounds more

Re: PCI: Bus #02 (-#05) is hidden behind transparent bridge #01 (-#01) (try 'pci=assign-busses')

2007-05-09 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 09 May 2007, Mihai Donțu wrote: On Sunday 01 April 2007 19:18, you wrote: Hi, dmesg told me to report this to LKML. And here is my report. Have a nice day.. x 2 ;) And again, from a different email address. I would also like to take the opportunity to

Re: [patch] Add the device IDs for AMD/ATI SB700

2007-05-09 Thread Tejun Heo
Henry Su wrote: --- linux-2.6.21.1.orig/drivers/ide/pci/atiixp.c 2007-05-10 06:30:17.0 +0800 +++ linux-2.6.21.1/drivers/ide/pci/atiixp.c 2007-05-10 07:18:39.0 +0800 @@ -353,6 +353,7 @@ static struct pci_device_id atiixp_pci_t { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI,

Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper

2007-05-09 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On May 8 2007 20:17, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: +static int __logfs_readdir(struct file *file, void *buf, filldir_t filldir) +{ + err = read_dir(dir, dd, pos); + if (err == -EOF) + break; -EOF results in a return code 0 ?

Re: [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version

2007-05-09 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 15:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 14:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 10:59, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 01:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11 (PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)

2007-05-09 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Wed, 9 May 2007 02:25:10 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: makeing up an example today the process would be call driver X to initialize it's devices. driver X follows these steps 1. see if a compatible chipset/device appears to be available 2. initialize the chipset/device

Re: [patch 128/197] freezer: add try_to_freeze calls to all kernel threads

2007-05-09 Thread Stefan Richter
Gautham R Shenoy wrote: freezer_exempt() as of now does what its name says. I.e, exempt the thread from all kinds of freeze chills. But with more subsystems using the process freezer, the exemption needs to be event specific. There may be threads which should not be frozen for say kprobes,

Chaining sg lists for big I/O commands: Question

2007-05-09 Thread Justin Piszcz
http://kerneltrap.org/node/8176 I am a mdadm/disk/hard drive fanatic, I was curious: On i386, we can at most fit 256 scatterlist elements into a page, and on x86-64 we are stuck with 128. So that puts us somewhere between 512kb and 1024kb for a single IO. How come 32bit is 256 and 64 is only

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil

2007-05-09 Thread Alan Cox
When you are implementing the locking primitives on a new platform. When you are implementing the I/O and atomic prmitives on a new platform. Also in inline gcc assembler where volatile is used for subtly different purposes. Is there a good reason for using volatile in atomic/locking

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bug creating USB endpoints in 2.6.20.x (kernel bug 8198)

2007-05-09 Thread Tejun Heo
Chris Rankin wrote: --- Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, we can fix the problem Chris is seeing by breaking module unload (by allowing it to unload too early). It doesn't sound too hot but module unloading race is much less likely than sysfs node deletion/open race. Yikes! Just

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil

2007-05-09 Thread Alan Cox
Thus, any reliance on type-qualifying an object that represents an atomic or locking primitive on the keyword 'volatile' is misplaced. arch/foo is generally implementation specific code. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11 (PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)

2007-05-09 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Wed, 9 May 2007 02:53:02 -0700, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Sheer volume of devices on a bus. Even if the indivdual probing doesn't take long, having all devices probed one after the other may take a lot of time. Putting the actual probe on a thread makes it possible to run

Re: Chaining sg lists for big I/O commands: Question

2007-05-09 Thread Jens Axboe
On Wed, May 09 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: http://kerneltrap.org/node/8176 Oh I am a mdadm/disk/hard drive fanatic, I was curious: On i386, we can at most fit 256 scatterlist elements into a page, and on x86-64 we are stuck with 128. So that puts us somewhere between 512kb and 1024kb for a

Re: nbd problem.

2007-05-09 Thread Jens Axboe
On Wed, May 09 2007, Rogier Wolff wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 01:33:52PM -0700, Satyam Sharma wrote: On 5/8/07, Rogier Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The nbd client still reliably hangs when I use it. Someone suggested to use

[PATCH] AFS: Further write support fixes

2007-05-09 Thread David Howells
Further fixes for AFS write support: (1) The afs_send_pages() outer loop must do an extra iteration if it ends with 'first == last' because 'last' is inclusive in the page set otherwise it fails to send the last page and complete the RxRPC op under some circumstances. (2)

Re: [PATCH] Make bootsector stub 16-bit-only (i386)

2007-05-09 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 10:54 +0200, Alexander van Heukelum wrote: On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:04:07AM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 20:32 +0200, Alexander van Heukelum wrote: diff --git a/arch/i386/boot/bootsect.S b/arch/i386/boot/bootsect.S diff --git

Re: [PATCH 2/2] leds:arch/sh/boards/landisk LEDs supports

2007-05-09 Thread kogiidena
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 20:42 +0900, kogiidena wrote: As far as I can tell, the existing timer trigger can do everything the blink trigger can (and more besides). I want to blink LED in the initial state. Are you after to set that per LED or would some standard configurable default for all

Re: retry [PATCH] partition : add support for sysv68 partitions

2007-05-09 Thread Michael Schmitz
`default y if M68K SYSV_FS' I prefer `default y if VME'. Incidentally, what is the problem you have with SYSV68_PARTITION ? On my i586 machine, code size is 434 bytes for sysv68.o + 4 bytes more in check.c Traditionally, we have always been very conservative about enabling more

[PATCH] AF_RXRPC: Reduce debugging noise.

2007-05-09 Thread David Howells
Reduce debugging noise generated by AF_RXRPC. Signed-off-by: David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/rxrpc/ar-peer.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-peer.c b/net/rxrpc/ar-peer.c index ce08b78..90fa107 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/ar-peer.c +++

Re: [PATCH] change zonelist order v5 [1/3] implements zonelist order selection

2007-05-09 Thread Lee Schermerhorn
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 10:20 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: On Tue, 8 May 2007 17:58:55 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007 09:29:12 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 08 May 2007 16:37:06 -0400 Lee Schermerhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bug creating USB endpoints in 2.6.20.x (kernel bug 8198)

2007-05-09 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, here's a half-assed fix. With this patch applied, if you try to unload a module while you're opening it's dev attribute, kernel will oops later when the file is accessed or closed later but it should fix the bug winecfg triggers. I really dunno

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bug creating USB endpoints in 2.6.20.x (kernel bug 8198)

2007-05-09 Thread Tejun Heo
Chris Rankin wrote: --- Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, here's a half-assed fix. With this patch applied, if you try to unload a module while you're opening it's dev attribute, kernel will oops later when the file is accessed or closed later but it should fix the bug winecfg

[BUG] local_softirq_pending storm

2007-05-09 Thread Anant Nitya
Hi, Ever since I upgrade to 2.6.21/.1, system log is filled with following messages if I enable CONFIG_NO_HZ=y, going through archives it seems ingo sometime back posted some patch and now it is upstream, but its not helping here. If I disable NOHZ by kernel command line nohz=off this problem

802.11n(draft)

2007-05-09 Thread Foli Ayivoh
Hi, I hope this is the right place to ask!? Is there a driver for the Marvell-TopDog-Chipset or is it in the making (in the near future) ? -- Foli Ayivoh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [patch] Add the device IDs for AMD/ATI SB700

2007-05-09 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:36:54AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: Henry Su wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Adding the device ID for AMD/ATI SB700. Signed-off-by:henry su [EMAIL PROTECTED] Time to train new people... You need to split up your patches: * send I2C and PCI quirk patches to

Re: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2 - Ethernet and HSS

2007-05-09 Thread David Acker
Lennert Buytenhek wrote: The people who need a LE network driver can use Christian's driver, as Christian's driver works in LE just fine. The people who care about LE support can add LE support to the driver that Krzysztof wrote. I don't think that not supporting LE is a reason not to merge

Re: [PATCH 8/8] One Laptop Per Child power/battery driver

2007-05-09 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Tue, 8 May 2007, David Woodhouse wrote: It's not an issue which needs resolving. We can spell your name just fine; we just need Pavel to quit whining and join us in the 21st century. I am pretty darn sure my name can be spelled correctly, but can it be reasonably assured to be printed

Re: [PATCH 1/2] leds:arch/sh/boards/landisk LEDs supports

2007-05-09 Thread kogiidena
Hi Richard-san The following three points were corrected. 1. You can't do this since the trigger will appear for all LEDs and it only applies to a single LED. There has been previous discussion of LED specific triggers and we'll need that support before you can make something like this work.

Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans -- vm bugfixes

2007-05-09 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: Hugh Dickins wrote: On Wed, 2 May 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: But I'm pretty sure (to use your words!) regular truncate was not racy before: I believe Andrea's sequence count was handling that case fine, without a second unmap_mapping_range.

Re: [PATCH] Make bootsector stub 16-bit-only (i386)

2007-05-09 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:04:07AM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 20:32 +0200, Alexander van Heukelum wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 03:28:17AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sat, 5 May 2007 12:44:52 +0200 Alexander van Heukelum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ---

Re: increase Linux kernel address space 3.5 G memory on Redhat Enterprise

2007-05-09 Thread Robert Hancock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi: I am running Redhat Linux Enterprise version 4 update 4 on a dual-core 4G memory machine. There are many references on the web talking about increasing default user address space to 3.5 G however lacking specific instructions. My questions: 1. What is the specific

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bug creating USB endpoints in 2.6.20.x (kernel bug 8198)

2007-05-09 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
Hi Tejun, On 5/9/07, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Rankin wrote: --- Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, here's a half-assed fix. With this patch applied, if you try to unload a module while you're opening it's dev attribute, kernel will oops later when the file is accessed

Re: 2.6.21-ext4-1

2007-05-09 Thread Amit K. Arora
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:24:49AM +1000, David Chinner wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 03:05:56PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 12:50 +1000, David Chinner wrote: BTW, have you guys tested mmap writes into unwritten extents? ;) I am not sure, Amit, have you done some

Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans -- vm bugfixes

2007-05-09 Thread Nick Piggin
Hugh Dickins wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: Hugh Dickins wrote: On Wed, 2 May 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: But I'm pretty sure (to use your words!) regular truncate was not racy before: I believe Andrea's sequence count was handling that case fine, without a second

Re: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2 - Ethernet and HSS

2007-05-09 Thread Michael-Luke Jones
On 9 May 2007, at 15:22, David Acker wrote: Big endian is the natural setup for the NPEs on this hardware according to the intel documentation. Please don't stop this driver from moving forward so that a few folks can run their hardware in slow mode. No-one is saying that this driver

Re: [PATCH 8/8] One Laptop Per Child power/battery driver

2007-05-09 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 15:23 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: I am pretty darn sure my name can be spelled correctly, but can it be reasonably assured to be printed correctly on a reasonable subset of systems out there? Yes. I haven't used a system on which it cannot for a number of years.

Re: [PATCH] Make bootsector stub 16-bit-only (i386)

2007-05-09 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 10:30 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:04:07AM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 20:32 +0200, Alexander van Heukelum wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 03:28:17AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sat, 5 May 2007 12:44:52 +0200

Re: 2.6.21-ext4-1

2007-05-09 Thread Eric Sandeen
Amit K. Arora wrote: And, how does XFS behave now if we write to mmapped preallocated blocks, since XFS also doesn't have -page_mkwrite() implemented as of date ? unwritten extents remain unwritten after mmap() modifies them http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=418 :) -Eric - To

Re: 2.6.21-mm2 - Kconfig horkage

2007-05-09 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 09 May 2007 01:23:22 PDT, Andrew Morton said: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm2/ 1) Spotted in init/Kconfig: config SLUB_DEBUG default y bool Enable SLUB debugging support if EMBEDDED help Shouldn't that have an

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bug creating USB endpoints in 2.6.20.x (kernel bug 8198)

2007-05-09 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:30:41PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: Chris Rankin wrote: --- Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, we can fix the problem Chris is seeing by breaking module unload (by allowing it to unload too early). It doesn't sound too hot but module unloading race is much less

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bug creating USB endpoints in 2.6.20.x (kernel bug 8198)

2007-05-09 Thread Tejun Heo
Dmitry Torokhov wrote: As written above, I think it's better to risk module unload / sysfs race than keeping the current sysfs deletion / open race. What do you guys think? How about embedding struct attribute fro devt into struct [class_]device for now? It is not too big and device is

[Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] atmel_lcdfb: AT91/AT32 LCD Controller framebuffer driver

2007-05-09 Thread Nicolas Ferre
From: Nicolas Ferre [EMAIL PROTECTED] Adds a framebuffer driver to ATMEL AT91SAM9x and AT32 aka AVR32 platforms. Those chips share quite the same IP and this code is suitable for both architectures. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This second patch is rebuild following

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] atmel_lcdfb: AT91/AT32 LCDController framebuffer driver

2007-05-09 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Antonino A. Daplas : On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 16:11 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: From: Nicolas Ferre [EMAIL PROTECTED] + +static struct fb_fix_screeninfo atmel_lcdfb_fix __initdata = { + .type = FB_TYPE_PACKED_PIXELS, + .visual = FB_VISUAL_TRUECOLOR, +

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bug creating USB endpoints in 2.6.20.x (kernel bug 8198)

2007-05-09 Thread Tejun Heo
Greg KH wrote: On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:30:41PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: Chris Rankin wrote: --- Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, we can fix the problem Chris is seeing by breaking module unload (by allowing it to unload too early). It doesn't sound too hot but module unloading race

Re: [PATCH 2/2] leds:arch/sh/boards/landisk LEDs supports

2007-05-09 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 22:45 +0900, kogiidena wrote: On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 20:42 +0900, kogiidena wrote: As far as I can tell, the existing timer trigger can do everything the blink trigger can (and more besides). I want to blink LED in the initial state. Are you after to set that per

Re: [RFC 2/3] SLUB: Implement targeted reclaim and partial list defragmentation

2007-05-09 Thread Mel Gorman
On Fri, 4 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Targeted reclaim allows to target a single slab for reclaim. This is done by calling kmem_cache_vacate(slab, page); It will return 1 on success, 0 if the operation failed. The vacate functionality is also used for slab shrinking. During the shrink

Re: [patch] Add the device IDs for AMD/ATI SB700

2007-05-09 Thread Hans-Jürgen Koch
Am Mittwoch 09 Mai 2007 16:21 schrieb Greg KH: On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:36:54AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: Henry Su wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Adding the device ID for AMD/ATI SB700. Signed-off-by:henry su [EMAIL PROTECTED] Time to train new people... You need to split

Re: [PATCH 1/2] leds:arch/sh/boards/landisk LEDs supports

2007-05-09 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 23:26 +0900, kogiidena wrote: Hi Richard-san The following three points were corrected. 1. You can't do this since the trigger will appear for all LEDs and it only applies to a single LED. There has been previous discussion of LED specific triggers and we'll need

Re: [patch 7/9] lguest: the net driver

2007-05-09 Thread Rusty Russell
Hi Jeff, Thanks for your review. Questions below. On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 08:28 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +static void transfer_packet(struct net_device *dev, ... + hcall(LHCALL_SEND_DMA, peer_key(info,peernum), __pa(dma), 0); __pa() should not be used

Re: [patch 128/197] freezer: add try_to_freeze calls to all kernel threads

2007-05-09 Thread Gautham R Shenoy
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:20:47PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: Gautham R Shenoy wrote: freezer_exempt() as of now does what its name says. I.e, exempt the thread from all kinds of freeze chills. But with more subsystems using the process freezer, the exemption needs to be event

Re: Long file names in VFAT broken with iocharset=utf8

2007-05-09 Thread Albert Cahalan
On 5/8/07, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 8 2007 00:43, Albert Cahalan wrote: Fix: the vfat driver should use the 8.3 name for such files. Or the 31-character ISO Level 1(?). That might be appropriate for a similar problem on CD-ROM filesystems. (when the CD is rockridge

Re: [PATCH] pci-quirks: disable MSI on RS400-200 and RS480, take #2

2007-05-09 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Tejun Heo wrote: MSI doesn't work on RS400-200 and RS480 requiring pci=nomsi kernel boot parameter for ahci to work. This patch renames quirk_svw_msi() to quirk_disable_all_msi() and use it to disable MSI on those chips. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/17820

Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans -- vm bugfixes

2007-05-09 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: The filesystem (or page cache) allows pages beyond i_size to come in there? That wasn't a problem before, was it? But now it is? The filesystem still doesn't, but if i_size is updated after the page is returned, we can have a problem that was

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v11

2007-05-09 Thread Kasper Sandberg
Hello Ingo. Sorry it has taken this long, but i've been quite busy with work. Here are my results with v11 for smoothness. under slight load (spamasassin nice 19'ed), its now doing okay in smoothness, almost as good as SD. but under harder load such as pressing a link in a browser while 3d(at

Re: [GIT PULL] MMC updates

2007-05-09 Thread Pierre Ossman
Stefan Richter wrote: Sounds to me like either struct xyz_host { atomic_t removed; } would do the job, or that actually wider regions of mmc_host_remove() and mmc_detect_change() need to be serialized. AFAIK, an atomic_t doesn't guarantee any ordering, just atomicity. So an atomic_t with a

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil

2007-05-09 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 09 May 2007 10:50:21 +0200 Stefan Richter wrote: Randy Dunlap wrote: Add information on the problems with the C-language volatile keyword and why it should not be used (most of the time). I like Jonathan's article http://lwn.net/Articles/233479/ a lot. It puts as much emphasis on

Re: kernel expection generated with 2.6.21-mm1 kernel boot up

2007-05-09 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Srinivasa Ds wrote: Christoph Lameter wrote: On Tue, 8 May 2007, Srinivasa Ds wrote: Looks like there is a bug in SLUB implementaion for ppc64 in 2.6.21-mm1. I unmarked CONFIG_SLUB and build the kernel, its booting cleary now. This is a known issue for PPC with

Re: [2.6.22 PATCH 22/26] dm: bio list helpers

2007-05-09 Thread Alasdair G Kergon
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 05:41:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 8 May 2007 20:48:45 +0100 Alasdair G Kergon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +#define BIO_LIST(bl) \ + struct bio_list bl = BIO_LIST_INIT BIO_LIST is a strange name for something which initialises storage. Those came by

Re: [PATCH] pci-quirks: disable MSI on RS400-200 and RS480, take #2

2007-05-09 Thread Tejun Heo
Chuck Ebbert wrote: Tejun Heo wrote: MSI doesn't work on RS400-200 and RS480 requiring pci=nomsi kernel boot parameter for ahci to work. This patch renames quirk_svw_msi() to quirk_disable_all_msi() and use it to disable MSI on those chips. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/17820

Re: [PATCH] pci-quirks: disable MSI on RS400-200 and RS480, take #2

2007-05-09 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Tejun Heo wrote: FWIW several distros have turned off MSI by default and added a pci=msi option to enable it. Yeah, it seem to cause a lot of problems on certain chips but I think the correct path is to add PCI quirks for those. Most MSI problems I've seen are on these ATI chips. Do you

Re: Long file names in VFAT broken with iocharset=utf8

2007-05-09 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
On Wednesday 09 May 2007, Albert Cahalan wrote: On 5/8/07, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 8 2007 00:43, Albert Cahalan wrote: Fix: the vfat driver should use the 8.3 name for such files. Or the 31-character ISO Level 1(?). That might be appropriate for a similar problem

Re: [2.6.22 PATCH 22/26] dm: bio list helpers

2007-05-09 Thread Alasdair G Kergon
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:49:23AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: Besides, manual prefetching is very rarely a win. I dabbled with some benchmarks a few weeks back (with the doubly linked lists), and in most cases it was actually a loss. So I'd vote for just removing the prefetch() above. OK.

RE: [PATCH -mm] timer: parenthesis fix in tbase_get_deferrable() etc.

2007-05-09 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
-Original Message- From: Jarek Poplawski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:32 PM To: Andrew Morton Cc: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] timer: parenthesis fix in tbase_get_deferrable() etc. On Tue, May 08,

Re: [PATCH 1/5] fallocate() implementation in i86, x86_64 and powerpc

2007-05-09 Thread Amit K. Arora
I have the updated patches ready which take care of Andrew's comments. Will run some tests and post them soon. But, before submitting these patches, I think it will be better to finalize on certain things which might be worth some discussion here: 1) Should the file size change when

Re: [PATCH] pci-quirks: disable MSI on RS400-200 and RS480, take #2

2007-05-09 Thread Tejun Heo
Chuck Ebbert wrote: Tejun Heo wrote: FWIW several distros have turned off MSI by default and added a pci=msi option to enable it. Yeah, it seem to cause a lot of problems on certain chips but I think the correct path is to add PCI quirks for those. Most MSI problems I've seen are on these

Re: [PATCH 1/2] leds:arch/sh/boards/landisk LEDs supports

2007-05-09 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 04:13:14PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 23:26 +0900, kogiidena wrote: Hi Richard-san The following three points were corrected. 1. You can't do this since the trigger will appear for all LEDs and it only applies to a single LED.

Re: 2.6.21-mm2 - 100% CPU on ksoftirqd/1

2007-05-09 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 09 May 2007 01:23:22 PDT, Andrew Morton said: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm2/ Boots up to multiuser mostly OK. However... It comes up with a screaming ksoftirqd - usually /1 but one boot had /0. Just sitting there, 100% CPU according to

Re: 2.6.21-mm1 -- x86 verify_cpu.S compile failure

2007-05-09 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Andi Kleen wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:46:20AM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote: We are seeing the following compile error on older x86 installs: arch/i386/kernel/verify_cpu.S: Assembler messages: arch/i386/kernel/verify_cpu.S:13: Error: `(%esp)' is not a valid 16

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bug creating USB endpoints in 2.6.20.x (kernel bug 8198)

2007-05-09 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 05:01:25PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: Greg KH wrote: On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:30:41PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: Chris Rankin wrote: --- Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, we can fix the problem Chris is seeing by breaking module unload (by allowing it to unload

[PATCH] synclink_gt add compat_ioctl

2007-05-09 Thread Paul Fulghum
Add support for 32 bit ioctl on 64 bit systems for synclink_gt Cc: Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Paul Fulghum [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- a/include/linux/Kbuild 2007-04-25 22:08:32.0 -0500 +++ b/include/linux/Kbuild 2007-05-09 10:11:22.0 -0500 @@ -140,7

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Declare {compat_}sys_utimensat

2007-05-09 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 09 May 2007, Stephen Rothwell wrote: diff --git a/include/linux/compat.h b/include/linux/compat.h index ccd863d..70a157a 100644 --- a/include/linux/compat.h +++ b/include/linux/compat.h @@ -253,5 +253,8 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_epoll_pwait(int epfd,

Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11 (PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)

2007-05-09 Thread david
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Cornelia Huck wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007 02:25:10 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: makeing up an example today the process would be call driver X to initialize it's devices. driver X follows these steps 1. see if a compatible chipset/device appears to be available

[PATCH] early_pfn_to_nid needs to be __meminit

2007-05-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
since it is referenced by memmap_init_zone (which is __meminit) via the early_pfn_in_nid macro when CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES is set (which basically means PowerPC 64). This removes a section mismatch warning in those circumstances. Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [BUG] local_softirq_pending storm

2007-05-09 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 19:42 +0530, Anant Nitya wrote: Hi, Ever since I upgrade to 2.6.21/.1, system log is filled with following messages if I enable CONFIG_NO_HZ=y, going through archives it seems ingo sometime back posted some patch and now it is upstream, but its not helping here. If I

Re: [PATCH 3/3] AFS: Implement basic file write support

2007-05-09 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 09 May 2007 12:07:39 +0100 David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: set_page_dirty() will set I_DIRTY_PAGES only. ie: the inode has dirty pagecache data. To tell the VFS that the inode itself is dirty one needs to run mark_inode_dirty().

Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage

2007-05-09 Thread yhlu
On 5/9/07, Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We can look in /proc/ioports and see what has reserved the video resources. That should give us a reasonable estimate of the video adapter. We can do an ioctl to the console and see how many lines

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Declare {compat_}sys_utimensat

2007-05-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Wed, 9 May 2007 18:21:58 +0200 Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems bogus to declare compat_sys_futimesat in syscalls.h and compat_sys_utimensat in compat.h. Your patch is fine, since there are precedents for both, but maybe we should agree on one place and then move all of the

Re: [RFC 2/3] SLUB: Implement targeted reclaim and partial list defragmentation

2007-05-09 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Mel Gorman wrote: Must obtain a reference to the object if it has not been freed yet. It is up to the slabcache to resolve the race. Is there also a race here between the object being searched for and the reference being taken? Would it be appropriate to call this

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2.

2007-05-09 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 09 May 2007 13:21:50 +0200 Martin Schwidefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: Andrew: I plan to add patches 1-5 to the for-andrew branch of the git390 repository if that is fine with you. The only thing that will be missing in

Re: [PATCH] MM: implement MADV_FREE lazy freeing of anonymous memory

2007-05-09 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote: I don't want to judge the numbers since I cannot but I want to make an observations: even if in the SMP case MADV_FREE turns out to not be a bigger boost then there is still the UP case to keep in mind where Rik measured a significant speed-up. As

Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11 (PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)

2007-05-09 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:38:13PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007 02:53:02 -0700, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Sheer volume of devices on a bus. Even if the indivdual probing doesn't take long, having all devices probed one after the other may take a lot of

Re: [PATCH] Make bootsector stub 16-bit-only (i386)

2007-05-09 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Alexander van Heukelum wrote: Hi! I'm making coffee now. I just don't see what I missed? Maybe you were led astray by the new PARAM_VESA_PAD I added? Again, I object to changing a documented interface when it's not necessary to do so. Just declare the structure packed. -hpa -

Re: 2.6.21-mm2 - hanging with initcall_debug and netconsole

2007-05-09 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 09 May 2007 01:23:22 PDT, Andrew Morton said: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm2/ So I have a canned grub config for booting with netconsole, initcall_debug, and all that fun stuff. Tried it on 21-mm2, and it wedged up hard here: [

Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11 (PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)

2007-05-09 Thread david
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Greg KH wrote: doesn't take long, having all devices probed one after the other may take a lot of time. Putting the actual probe on a thread makes it possible to run several probes in parallel, thereby cutting probing time. Again, not for PCI, right? It seems that

Re: [PATCH 1/5] fallocate() implementation in i86, x86_64 and powerpc

2007-05-09 Thread Andreas Dilger
On May 09, 2007 21:31 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote: 2) For FA_UNALLOCATE mode, should the file system allow unallocation of normal (non-preallocated) blocks (blocks allocated via regular write/truncate operations) also (i.e. work as punch()) ? - Though FA_UNALLOCATE mode is yet to be

Re: [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version

2007-05-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 15:19, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 15:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 14:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 10:59, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

Re: [PATCH 1/5] fallocate() implementation in i86, x86_64 and powerpc

2007-05-09 Thread Mingming Cao
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 21:31 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote: I have the updated patches ready which take care of Andrew's comments. Will run some tests and post them soon. But, before submitting these patches, I think it will be better to finalize on certain things which might be worth some

Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11 (PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)

2007-05-09 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Wed, 9 May 2007 09:18:10 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not worried about notification to userspace, I'm worried about devices getting registered during the async stage appearing in different orders on different boots due to different timeings. Ah, now I think I understand

Re: 2.6.21-mm2 - Kconfig horkage

2007-05-09 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Wed, 9 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 09 May 2007 01:23:22 PDT, Andrew Morton said: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm2/ 1) Spotted in init/Kconfig: config SLUB_DEBUG default y bool Enable SLUB debugging

Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11 (PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)

2007-05-09 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:18:10AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007, Cornelia Huck wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007 02:25:10 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: makeing up an example today the process would be call driver X to initialize it's devices. driver X

Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11 (PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)

2007-05-09 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Greg KH wrote: Why is it dead? Since when is PCI the only bus in the system? Quite frankly, any probing strategy that isn't relevant to PCI simply isn't relevant - full stop! No, it's not the only bus, but if something isn't relevant to PCI it shouldn't be in any

Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11 (PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)

2007-05-09 Thread david
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Cornelia Huck wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007 09:18:10 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not worried about notification to userspace, I'm worried about devices getting registered during the async stage appearing in different orders on different boots due to different

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >