This reverts commit a3cd7d9070be417a21905c997ee32d756d999b38.
The original commit breaks iSER reliably, making it complain:
iser: iser_reg_page_vec:ib_fmr_pool_map_phys failed: -11
The FMR cleanup thread runs ib_fmr_batch_release() as dirty
entries build up. This commit causes clean but
Commit a3cd7d9070be417a21905c997ee32d756d999b38 (IB/fmr_pool:
ib_fmr_pool_flush() should flush all dirty FMRs) caused a
regression for iSER and was reverted in
e5507736c6449b3253347eed6f8ea77a28cf688e.
This change attempts to redo the original patch so that all used
FMR entries are flushed when
Hi,
Josh Triplett wrote:
[I did not see this patch go by on any mailing list, so I replied to
the -mm mail and CCed LKML.]
Well I'm pretty sure to have always CC'ed LKML, see for example:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/19/150
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/19/151
Thanks,
I see these warnings on 32 bit ARM systems:
CC kernel/time.o
kernel/time.c: In function 'msecs_to_jiffies':
kernel/time.c:472: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
kernel/time.c: In function 'usecs_to_jiffies':
kernel/time.c:487: warning: integer constant is too large for
Andre Noll wrote:
we are experiencing massive performance problems with two of our
Linux servers that contain 3ware controllers on a Tyan mainboard and
a couple of 1T disks.
During the daily cron job that uses rsync to sync a 500G file system
from another machine to the raid on the 3ware
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:27:42PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Ravikiran Thirumalai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:46:25AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
If you can't support that in your hardware you're supposed
to clear it.
Hmm! How would
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 08:00:35PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
volume keys work. But anything through acpid does not. Even AC/battery
switch
is not signalized. So the bug may be somewhere else?
Yeah, there is an EC-related
Hi Adrian.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:34:21PM +0200, Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Using ndelay() with a 64bit variable as parameter can result in build
errors like the following on some 32bit systems when it results in a
64bit division:
-- snip --
...
MODPOST 759
I know that tmpfs is a memmory filesystem. Is there a possibility to create
also a memory block device?
Is there a possibility to create for example a 1 GB memory block device (from
the RAM)?
--
E-Mail sent with anti-spam site TrashMail.net!
Free disposable email addresses:
Seperate mmconf for fam10h out from setup_64.c
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
index 199f8b5..4f2b9ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
@@ -101,4 +101,6 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_64),y)
It does happen with 2.6.22 too.
Do you see any known pattern in these extra bytes ?
Best Regards
Gerold
2a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
0010 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ||
*
0002 2a 00 00 00 00 40
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:16:11 +0100 Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue 2008-02-26 13:10:01, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work
toward at the power management summit
Hi folks:
I posted this in linux-raid, though I thought it might interest the
kernel folks due to the subsystems in question. No responses there.
Executive summary version: building a RAID0 across 2 large hardware
RAIDed disks results in buffered I/O performance that is similar to a
single
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Following up after quite some time:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 12:57 AM, Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:53:36 +0100, rzryyvzy said:
I know that tmpfs is a memmory filesystem. Is there a possibility to create
also a memory block device?
Is there a possibility to create for example a 1 GB memory block device (from
the RAM)?
A better question would be:
What problem are
Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
Josh Triplett wrote:
[I did not see this patch go by on any mailing list, so I replied to
the -mm mail and CCed LKML.]
Well I'm pretty sure to have always CC'ed LKML, see for example:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/19/150
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/19/151
I
Hi,
I've bisected anyway and although the results are not absolutely
conclusive, as I neared the end of the process, I was amongst a bunch of
mac80211 patches. This set me on a path that resulted in me discovering
that with the rt61pci driver, I can freeze my wireless network connection
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Ravikiran Thirumalai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:27:42PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Ravikiran Thirumalai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:46:25AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Following up after quite some time:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 12:57 AM, Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, David Schwartz wrote:
Eric Dumazet wrote:
Events are not necessarly reported by descriptors. epoll uses an opaque
field provided by the user.
It's up to the user to properly chose a tag that
Pete, the subject says PATCH 1/2 but I didn't see any follow-up message
for PATCH 2/2. Just wondering :)
Benny
On Feb. 26, 2008, 10:27 -0800, Pete Wyckoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This reverts commit a3cd7d9070be417a21905c997ee32d756d999b38.
The original commit breaks iSER reliably, making
Hi Andrew,
no, right now I have the machine in the weird state, swap is empty (3GB),
and so is bigger part of RAM (~100MB free), and the gcc crashes even when
trying to compile c program with empty main function. so it doesn't seem
to be problem with memory exhaustion.
Hopefully the areca guys
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Okay -- I'll look at it some more. I am however loathe to drop the
term open file description, because POSIX uses, as well as a number of
other Linux man pages by now.
Heh, POSIX. Now doesn't take a genius to see that file description and
file
Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 00:22, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
Today I got this oops, someone has an idea of what's going wrong?
Unable to handle kernel paging request at 0200 RIP:
[802735c3] find_get_pages+0x3c/0x69
At this
On Tue, Feb 26 2008 Jens Axboe wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26 2008, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:20:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:26:15 +0100 Anders Henke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently stuck between Kernel LVM and DRBD, as I'm using Kernel
Hi Quel,
Delete a possibly armed timer before kfree'ing the connection object.
Solves: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/514
Reported-by:Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
net/bluetooth/l2cap.c |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Index:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:23:01AM -0800, Benny Halevy wrote:
Pete, the subject says PATCH 1/2 but I didn't see any follow-up message
for PATCH 2/2. Just wondering :)
I think the problem's on your end ... I got it and so did marc:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsim=120405067313933w=2
--
Intel
Hi Roman.
We discovered a situation where we could set a
choice value in menuconfig but later when we either was
running menuconfig or oldconfig the value were changed.
I have created a minimal config that exhibit the error.
It was created in a pure mechanical trial-and-error fashion.
First the
On Tue, Feb 26 2008, Anders Henke wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26 2008 Jens Axboe wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26 2008, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:20:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:26:15 +0100 Anders Henke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm currently
Hi Loius,
--- linux-2.6.23/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c.orig 2008-02-25
17:17:11.0 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.23/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c 2008-02-25
17:30:23.0 +0900
@@ -1313,8 +1313,17 @@
hci_dev_lock(hdev);
conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, ev-link_type, ev-bdaddr);
- if (!conn)
-
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 06:33, David Howells wrote:
Suppose one were to take a mundane approach to the persistent cache
problem instead of layering filesystems. What you would do then is
change NFS's -write_page and variants to fiddle the persistent
cache
It is a requirement laid
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:04:02PM +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:47:03PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch moves the cris defconfigs to arch/cris/configs/ where they
belong.
As a side effect they can now be used directly through e.g.
make ARCH=cris
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:33:54AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:24:11 +0800 Dave Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know whom I should mail to, could you cc the proper guy? Thanks.
Hello, Dave,
Would you be willing to try out the following (untested, might not even
From: Pekka Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Convert the internal JUMBO_FRAME #ifdef to CONFIG_IP1000_JUMBO_FRAME proper and
fix compilation errors.
Cc: Francois Romieu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Sorbica Shieh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jesse Huang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Diabolical ;-)
Thanks for the pointer!
Benny
On Feb. 26, 2008, 11:39 -0800, Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:23:01AM -0800, Benny Halevy wrote:
Pete, the subject says PATCH 1/2 but I didn't see any follow-up message
for PATCH 2/2. Just wondering :)
I think
[ Sorry for the duplicate. I typoed Francois' email address. ]
From: Pekka Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Convert the internal JUMBO_FRAME #ifdef to CONFIG_IP1000_JUMBO_FRAME proper and
fix compilation errors.
Cc: Francois Romieu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Sorbica Shieh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jesse Huang
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:44:53PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:04:02PM +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:47:03PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch moves the cris defconfigs to arch/cris/configs/ where they
belong.
As a side effect
With KBUILD_DEFCONFIG we don't have to ship a second copy of
ip22_defconfig
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/mips/Makefile |2
arch/mips/defconfig | 1158
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1158 deletions(-)
The default defconfig should be one from arch/m68k/configs/
arch/m68k/defconfig was not exactly identical to amiga_defconfig but
also considering how long they have been without any update that doesn't
seem to have been on purpose.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
With using KBUILD_DEFCONFIG we don't have to ship a second copy of
m32700ut.smp_defconfig
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/m32r/Makefile |2
arch/m32r/defconfig | 863
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 863 deletions(-)
Please name the tools that are that broken that they wouldn't apply this
patch correctly and don't claim my patch was broken (or shut up).
It is only one or two weeks ago we ended up with a zero size file
in the kernel tree - and I do not know why.
I just wanted to make sure we did not see
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:49:22 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please feed the diff through scritps/checkpatch.pl and consider addressing
the things which it finds.
I checked that, but I didn't think any of them were worth fixing. And
since this is a work in progress and a in a
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:11:39PM +, Chris Clayton wrote:
Sorry, but that's not the case. I find the same results as without the
patches. With the parameter set to 'pid', the network connection fails very
quickly, but with it set to 'simple' I can ping and ftp files to and from my
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, rzryyvzy wrote:
I know that tmpfs is a memmory filesystem. Is there a possibility to
create also a memory block device?
Is there a possibility to create for example a 1 GB memory block device
(from the RAM)?
There are the /dev/ram* devices, created through kernel
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:43:49PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
find out vSMP setting is going away in config after make oldconfig
vSMP need to PARAVIRT and PCI.
so move PARAVIRT out of if PARAVIRT_GUEST, and make vSMP select PCI instead of
depends on PCI
after patch vSMP could stick there.
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:13:56AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 of February 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:52:56AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I'm not suggesting a partial revert; I just wonder which part of the
change
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:58:02PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Please name the tools that are that broken that they wouldn't apply this
patch correctly and don't claim my patch was broken (or shut up).
It is only one or two weeks ago we ended up with a zero size file
in the kernel tree
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
@@ -371,6 +372,9 @@ void __init dmi_scan_machine(void)
}
}
else {
+ if (e820_all_mapped(0xF, 0xF+0x1, E820_RAM))
+ goto out;
One issue with using the e820 map for this is that a
Hi,
this mail is to give feedback about the 2.6.25-rc3 kernel, on an Ubuntu
7.10 system, running on a Toshiba Satellite U305. Video is a Intel
845GM, and I run 915resolution at start to make X happy with the correct
widescreen resolution.
A lot of data is collected here (if more is needed,
This looks like a really nice approach to me. Olaf?
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
501 - 550 of 550 matches
Mail list logo
