On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 07:27:21AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:10:25PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > If machine's thread gets excited (EXIT event is received),
>
> Why a thread get *excited* when it received EXIT event? :)
wouldn't you? I would.. ;-)
jirka
--
To unsubsc
On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 19:31 +0200, Madalin Bucur wrote:
> + if (unlikely(fd_status & FM_FD_STAT_RX_ERRORS) != 0) {
> + if (net_ratelimit())
> + netif_warn(priv, hw, net_dev, "FD status = 0x%08x\n",
> + fd_status & FM_FD_STAT
* Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct, at 01:41:51PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > commit f5f3497cad8c8416a74b9aaceb127908755d020a ("x86/setup: Extend low
> > identity ma
Both tunnel6_protocol and tunnel46_protocol share the same error
handler, tunnel6_err(), which traverses through tunnel6_handlers list.
For ipip6 tunnels, we need to traverse tunnel46_handlers as we do e.g.
in tunnel46_rcv(). Current code can generate an ICMPv6 error message
with an IPv4 packet emb
i have a business proposal for you with urgent transfer notice please send me
reply to maekhalsa...@gmail.com or my official email sa...@iraqrepvp.comze.com
with your
contact details and personal mobile number if you are interested.
you can also call me at my direct sattelite number +44793745541
Hi Junxiao,
Thank for your reviewing.
Current design, we use a sysfile as a interface to check/fix a file (via pass a
ino number).
But, this operation is manually triggered by user, instead of automatically
fix in the kernel.
Why?
1) we should let users make this decision, since some users do n
901 - 906 of 906 matches
Mail list logo
