On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 06:54:36PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Replace the device number bitmap with IDR. Extend the number of devices we
> can create to 64k.
> Since an IDR allows us to associate a pointer with an ID, we use this now
> to rewrite tpm_chip_find_get() to simply look up the chip
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 06:54:36PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Replace the device number bitmap with IDR. Extend the number of devices we
> can create to 64k.
> Since an IDR allows us to associate a pointer with an ID, we use this now
> to rewrite tpm_chip_find_get() to simply look up the chip
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 21:43 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > I wrote a little cocci script to remove unnecessary
> > > casts for memset and memcpy (below) and tested it on
> > > linux kernel's drivers/staging/
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 21:43 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > I wrote a little cocci script to remove unnecessary
> > > casts for memset and memcpy (below) and tested it on
> > > linux kernel's drivers/staging/
The following changes since commit 92e963f50fc74041b5e9e744c330dca48e04f08d:
Linux 4.5-rc1 (2016-01-24 13:06:47 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
git://github.com/andersson/remoteproc.git tags/rproc-v4.6
for you to fetch changes up to 69ae9895d3fed49ee830c491b3d51c72966a8a4c:
The following changes since commit 92e963f50fc74041b5e9e744c330dca48e04f08d:
Linux 4.5-rc1 (2016-01-24 13:06:47 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
git://github.com/andersson/remoteproc.git tags/rproc-v4.6
for you to fetch changes up to 69ae9895d3fed49ee830c491b3d51c72966a8a4c:
On 2016年03月15日 05:01, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:09:11AM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> This patchset adds following functions for tegra_soctherm driver:
>> 1. add T210 support.
>
> It would be good to update the compatible string in the
On 2016年03月15日 05:01, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:09:11AM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> This patchset adds following functions for tegra_soctherm driver:
>> 1. add T210 support.
>
> It would be good to update the compatible string in the
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 03:37:51PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:14:37AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed that piglit.time.elapsed_time 3.6% regression on
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>> commit
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 03:37:51PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:14:37AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed that piglit.time.elapsed_time 3.6% regression on
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>> commit
On 2016年03月15日 05:16, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 04:46:55PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2016年03月10日 05:35, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>> This changes the driver to use the devm_ version
>>> of thermal_zone_of_sensor_register and
On 2016年03月15日 05:16, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 04:46:55PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2016年03月10日 05:35, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>> This changes the driver to use the devm_ version
>>> of thermal_zone_of_sensor_register and
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:24:38AM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 08:35:23AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > The aio changes have either been reviewed negatively or not at all. That
> > tree should be dropped.
>
> That isn't solely your decision. If you have
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:24:38AM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 08:35:23AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > The aio changes have either been reviewed negatively or not at all. That
> > tree should be dropped.
>
> That isn't solely your decision. If you have
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Jassi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 03/07/2016 12:31 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4,
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Jassi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 03/07/2016 12:31 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>
>>>
bb11cff327e54 ("MIPS: Make smp CMP, CPS and MT
use the new generic IPI functions". Bisect log is attached.
> mips64:smp:mips_malta64_defconfig
> mips:mipsel_malta_smp_defconfig
> mips:mipsel_malta64_smp_defconfig
If necessary I can repeat the bisect for those. Please let me
bb11cff327e54 ("MIPS: Make smp CMP, CPS and MT
use the new generic IPI functions". Bisect log is attached.
> mips64:smp:mips_malta64_defconfig
> mips:mipsel_malta_smp_defconfig
> mips:mipsel_malta64_smp_defconfig
If necessary I can repeat the bisect for those. Please let me
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:07:12AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> There *is* a reason for code review. Or, at least, asking somebody familiar
> with the code you are working with whether some assumption you are making
> is true or false. Me, for example, in our conversation regarding earlier
> parts
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:07:12AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> There *is* a reason for code review. Or, at least, asking somebody familiar
> with the code you are working with whether some assumption you are making
> is true or false. Me, for example, in our conversation regarding earlier
> parts
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:34:48AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> Incidentally, why the hell has that thing never landed in my mailbox? Not
> directly, not Cc'd, not via fsdevel either.
>
> Ben, what the fuck going on? OK, you don't feel necessary to mention
> that to me (or have me take a look
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:34:48AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> Incidentally, why the hell has that thing never landed in my mailbox? Not
> directly, not Cc'd, not via fsdevel either.
>
> Ben, what the fuck going on? OK, you don't feel necessary to mention
> that to me (or have me take a look
Hi Al,
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 04:34:48 + Al Viro wrote:
>
> > between commit:
> >
> > 5955102c9984 ("wrappers for ->i_mutex access")
> >
> > from the vfs tree and commit:
>
> What.
>
> The.
>
> Hell?
>
> The first commit is in the mainline, not in vfs tree. And
Hi Al,
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 04:34:48 + Al Viro wrote:
>
> > between commit:
> >
> > 5955102c9984 ("wrappers for ->i_mutex access")
> >
> > from the vfs tree and commit:
>
> What.
>
> The.
>
> Hell?
>
> The first commit is in the mainline, not in vfs tree. And it had been
> there
On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 09:52 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16-12-15, 21:29, Dawei Chien wrote:
> > Use Intelligent Power Allocation (IPA) technical to add dynamic power model
> > for binding CPU thermal zone. The power allocator governor allocates power
> > budget to control CPU temperature.
> >
On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 09:52 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16-12-15, 21:29, Dawei Chien wrote:
> > Use Intelligent Power Allocation (IPA) technical to add dynamic power model
> > for binding CPU thermal zone. The power allocator governor allocates power
> > budget to control CPU temperature.
> >
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:06:40PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the aio tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/namei.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 5955102c9984 ("wrappers for ->i_mutex access")
>
> from the vfs tree and commit:
>
> 5d3d80fcf992 ("aio:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:06:40PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the aio tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/namei.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 5955102c9984 ("wrappers for ->i_mutex access")
>
> from the vfs tree and commit:
>
> 5d3d80fcf992 ("aio:
Hi,
On 2016년 03월 15일 13:18, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on v4.5-rc7]
> [also build test ERROR on next-20160314]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
> help improving the system]
>
> url:
&
Hi,
On 2016년 03월 15일 13:18, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on v4.5-rc7]
> [also build test ERROR on next-20160314]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
> help improving the system]
>
> url:
&
From: Magnus Damm
Neither the ARM page table code enabled by IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE
nor the IPMMU_VMSA driver actually depends on ARM_LPAE, so get
rid of the dependency.
Tested with ipmmu-vmsa on r8a7794 ALT and a kernel config using:
# CONFIG_ARM_LPAE is not set
From: Magnus Damm
Neither the ARM page table code enabled by IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE
nor the IPMMU_VMSA driver actually depends on ARM_LPAE, so get
rid of the dependency.
Tested with ipmmu-vmsa on r8a7794 ALT and a kernel config using:
# CONFIG_ARM_LPAE is not set
Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm
From: Magnus Damm
Make the driver compile on more than just 32-bit ARM
by breaking out and wrapping ARM specific functions
in #ifdefs. Not pretty, but needed to be able to use
the driver on other architectures like ARM64.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm
While working on a script to restore all sysctl params before a series of
tests I found that writing any value into the
/proc/sys/kernel/{nmi_watchdog,soft_watchdog,watchdog,watchdog_thresh}
causes them to call proc_watchdog_update().
[ 955.756196] NMI watchdog: enabled on all CPUs,
Hi Chanwoo,
[auto build test ERROR on v4.5-rc7]
[also build test ERROR on next-20160314]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Chanwoo-Choi/ARM-dts-Add-new-Exynos3250-based-ARTIK5
From: Magnus Damm
Make the driver compile on more than just 32-bit ARM
by breaking out and wrapping ARM specific functions
in #ifdefs. Not pretty, but needed to be able to use
the driver on other architectures like ARM64.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm
---
Changes since V1:
- Rebased to work
While working on a script to restore all sysctl params before a series of
tests I found that writing any value into the
/proc/sys/kernel/{nmi_watchdog,soft_watchdog,watchdog,watchdog_thresh}
causes them to call proc_watchdog_update().
[ 955.756196] NMI watchdog: enabled on all CPUs,
Hi Chanwoo,
[auto build test ERROR on v4.5-rc7]
[also build test ERROR on next-20160314]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Chanwoo-Choi/ARM-dts-Add-new-Exynos3250-based-ARTIK5
From: Magnus Damm
The IPMMU driver is using DT these days, and platform data is no longer
used by the driver. Remove unused code.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart
---
Changes
From: Magnus Damm
The IPMMU driver is using DT these days, and platform data is no longer
used by the driver. Remove unused code.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart
---
Changes since V1:
- Added Reviewed-by from Laurent
drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c |5 -
1
From: Magnus Damm
Introduce a bitmap for context handing and convert the
interrupt routine to go handle all registered contexts.
At this point the number of contexts are still limited.
Also remove the use of the ARM specific mapping variable
from ipmmu_irq() to
from initial series
- Updated bitmap code locking and also used lighter bitop functions
- Updated the Kconfig bits to apply on top of ARCH_RENESAS
Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+rene...@opensource.se>
---
Built on top of next-20160314
drivers/iommu/Kconfig |1
drivers/iommu
From: Magnus Damm
Introduce a bitmap for context handing and convert the
interrupt routine to go handle all registered contexts.
At this point the number of contexts are still limited.
Also remove the use of the ARM specific mapping variable
from ipmmu_irq() to allow compile on ARM64.
from initial series
- Updated bitmap code locking and also used lighter bitop functions
- Updated the Kconfig bits to apply on top of ARCH_RENESAS
Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm
---
Built on top of next-20160314
drivers/iommu/Kconfig |1
drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 146
Hi Ben,
Today's linux-next merge of the aio tree got a conflict in:
fs/namei.c
between commit:
5955102c9984 ("wrappers for ->i_mutex access")
from the vfs tree and commit:
5d3d80fcf992 ("aio: add support for in-submit openat")
from the aio tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can
Hi Ben,
Today's linux-next merge of the aio tree got a conflict in:
fs/namei.c
between commit:
5955102c9984 ("wrappers for ->i_mutex access")
from the vfs tree and commit:
5d3d80fcf992 ("aio: add support for in-submit openat")
from the aio tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can
On 14/03/2016 11:19 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
This allows to set multiple outputs using a single SPI transfer.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
Reviewed-by: Phil Reid
I do have a general question about GPIO drivers.
pca953x does not
On 14/03/2016 11:19 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
This allows to set multiple outputs using a single SPI transfer.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
Reviewed-by: Phil Reid
I do have a general question about GPIO drivers.
pca953x does not update the cached data unless the write operation
On 03/14/2016 11:29 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
Hi Josh,
I believe Uli thought the below patch might fix it.
Cheers,
Don
Don
It looks like I was incorrect when I said 4.5 was getting the soft
lockup. I originally found this problem on 4.1.19 and saw both the
problem my patch solves and the
On 03/14/2016 11:29 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
Hi Josh,
I believe Uli thought the below patch might fix it.
Cheers,
Don
Don
It looks like I was incorrect when I said 4.5 was getting the soft
lockup. I originally found this problem on 4.1.19 and saw both the
problem my patch solves and the
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm just catching back up on this thread; so without reference to
> > > any particular previous mail in the thread.
> > >
> > > 1) How many of the free pages do we tell the host about?
> > > Your main change is telling the host about all the
> > > free pages.
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm just catching back up on this thread; so without reference to
> > > any particular previous mail in the thread.
> > >
> > > 1) How many of the free pages do we tell the host about?
> > > Your main change is telling the host about all the
> > > free pages.
> >
> >
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 03/14/2016 05:27 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
> > This setting does not need to be conditional on Atari ST or TT.
> >
> > Without TCQ support, cmd_per_lun == 2 is probably reasonable...
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Finn Thain
> >
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 03/14/2016 05:27 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
> > This setting does not need to be conditional on Atari ST or TT.
> >
> > Without TCQ support, cmd_per_lun == 2 is probably reasonable...
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Finn Thain
> >
> > ---
> >
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Well ... using individual printk() like here might end up in each
> call to be broken up into individual lines.
> You might want to consider using a line buffer here or, better
> still, move to seq_file or debugfs output.
This routine is meant to be
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Well ... using individual printk() like here might end up in each
> call to be broken up into individual lines.
> You might want to consider using a line buffer here or, better
> still, move to seq_file or debugfs output.
This routine is meant to be
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 03:27:14PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > The driver has a limit of eight LUs because of the byte-sized bitfield
> > that is used for busy flags. Reject commands with LUN > 7.
>
> Please just set the max_lun parameter in the
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 03:27:14PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > The driver has a limit of eight LUs because of the byte-sized bitfield
> > that is used for busy flags. Reject commands with LUN > 7.
>
> Please just set the max_lun parameter in the
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > @@ -1555,8 +1555,7 @@ static int NCR5380_transfer_dma(struct S
> > NCR5380_read(RESET_PARITY_INTERRUPT_REG);
> > *data = d + c;
> > *count = 0;
> > - *phase = NCR5380_read(STATUS_REG) & PHASE_MASK;
> > - return foo;
> > + return
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > @@ -1555,8 +1555,7 @@ static int NCR5380_transfer_dma(struct S
> > NCR5380_read(RESET_PARITY_INTERRUPT_REG);
> > *data = d + c;
> > *count = 0;
> > - *phase = NCR5380_read(STATUS_REG) & PHASE_MASK;
> > - return foo;
> > + return
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> I still would keep the 'DMA_MIN_LEN' definition around for sun3_scsi.c;
> makes it a bit more obvious what the magic number '129' is supposed to
> mean.
OK.
--
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> I still would keep the 'DMA_MIN_LEN' definition around for sun3_scsi.c;
> makes it a bit more obvious what the magic number '129' is supposed to
> mean.
OK.
--
On 03/10/2016 02:48 PM, Michael Rapoport wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
>> > Greg Kurz wrote on 03/09/2016 09:26:45 PM:
>>> > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 06:24:50 -0500
>>> > > Jason Wang wrote:
>> >
>>> > > This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost
On 03/10/2016 02:48 PM, Michael Rapoport wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
>> > Greg Kurz wrote on 03/09/2016 09:26:45 PM:
>>> > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 06:24:50 -0500
>>> > > Jason Wang wrote:
>> >
>>> > > This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost net. The idea is
>>> > > simple: at the end of
GM20B's definition is mostly similar to GK20A's, but requires an
additional clock.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
.../devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt | 27 --
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
The correct compatible name is "nvidia,gk20a".
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt
GM20B's definition is mostly similar to GK20A's, but requires an
additional clock.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
.../devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt | 27 --
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
The correct compatible name is "nvidia,gk20a".
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt
Small series that fixes/completes DT bindings for Tegra GPUs and add two
missing entries required for the Tegra210 GPU to operate properly.
Changes since v1:
- Renamed "pllg_ref" clock to "ref" in DT bindings
Alexandre Courbot (5):
dt-bindings: gk20a: Fix typo in compatible name
dt-bindings:
Small series that fixes/completes DT bindings for Tegra GPUs and add two
missing entries required for the Tegra210 GPU to operate properly.
Changes since v1:
- Renamed "pllg_ref" clock to "ref" in DT bindings
Alexandre Courbot (5):
dt-bindings: gk20a: Fix typo in compatible name
dt-bindings:
This clock is required for the GPU to operate.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi
Hello Krzysztof,
On 03/14/2016 11:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15.03.2016 10:59, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
if (info->data->needs_src_clk) {
info->rtc_src_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "rtc_src");
if (IS_ERR(info->rtc_src_clk)) {
-
This clock is required for the GPU to operate.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi
index
Hello Krzysztof,
On 03/14/2016 11:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15.03.2016 10:59, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
if (info->data->needs_src_clk) {
info->rtc_src_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "rtc_src");
if (IS_ERR(info->rtc_src_clk)) {
-
GK20A can optionally make use of an IOMMU.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt
Nouveau can take advantage of this declaration to remove the need for
contiguous memory.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi
GK20A can optionally make use of an IOMMU.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt
Nouveau can take advantage of this declaration to remove the need for
contiguous memory.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi
From: Daode Huang
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:56:02 +0800
> Could you please help me to review this patch set?
I am not reviewing anything until you guys sort out your submission
scheme, and resend these fresh using that central maintainer.
I am also not the only person
Hi Michael,
On 03/14/2016 07:26 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 03/15/2016 11:35 AM, Jason Baron wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On 03/14/2016 05:03 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>>> Hi Jason,
>>>
>>> On 03/15/2016 09:01 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
From: Daode Huang
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:56:02 +0800
> Could you please help me to review this patch set?
I am not reviewing anything until you guys sort out your submission
scheme, and resend these fresh using that central maintainer.
I am also not the only person in the world who is
Hi Michael,
On 03/14/2016 07:26 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 03/15/2016 11:35 AM, Jason Baron wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On 03/14/2016 05:03 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>>> Hi Jason,
>>>
>>> On 03/15/2016 09:01 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
On 15.03.2016 11:39, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 2016년 03월 15일 11:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 15.03.2016 11:08, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> This patchset add the support for Device Tree source for Samsung ARTIK5
>>> module[1]
>>> based on Exynos3250 SoC and development board[2]. The ARTIK5
On 15.03.2016 11:39, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 2016년 03월 15일 11:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 15.03.2016 11:08, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> This patchset add the support for Device Tree source for Samsung ARTIK5
>>> module[1]
>>> based on Exynos3250 SoC and development board[2]. The ARTIK5
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> +/**
> + * fetch_or - perform *ptr |= mask and return old value of *ptr
> + * @ptr: pointer to value
> + * @mask: mask to OR on the value
> + *
> + * cmpxchg based fetch_or, macro so it works for different integer types
> +
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> +/**
> + * fetch_or - perform *ptr |= mask and return old value of *ptr
> + * @ptr: pointer to value
> + * @mask: mask to OR on the value
> + *
> + * cmpxchg based fetch_or, macro so it works for different integer types
> + */
> +#ifndef
On 2016년 03월 15일 11:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15.03.2016 11:08, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patch adds the support for Device Tree source for Samsung ARTIK5
>> module[1]
>> based on Exynos3250 SoC. The ARTIK5 module includes the follwoing devices:
>> - Application Processor (Samsung
On 2016년 03월 15일 11:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15.03.2016 11:08, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patch adds the support for Device Tree source for Samsung ARTIK5
>> module[1]
>> based on Exynos3250 SoC. The ARTIK5 module includes the follwoing devices:
>> - Application Processor (Samsung
On 2016년 03월 15일 11:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15.03.2016 11:08, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patchset add the support for Device Tree source for Samsung ARTIK5
>> module[1]
>> based on Exynos3250 SoC and development board[2]. The ARTIK5 module includes
>> the follwoing devices:
>> -
On 2016년 03월 15일 11:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15.03.2016 11:08, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patchset add the support for Device Tree source for Samsung ARTIK5
>> module[1]
>> based on Exynos3250 SoC and development board[2]. The ARTIK5 module includes
>> the follwoing devices:
>> -
On 15.03.2016 11:08, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch adds initial pin configuration of MMC2 device on exynos3250-monk
> board because the MMC2 gpio pin (gpk2[0-6]) are NC (not connected) state.
>
> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi
On 15.03.2016 11:08, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch adds initial pin configuration of MMC2 device on exynos3250-monk
> board because the MMC2 gpio pin (gpk2[0-6]) are NC (not connected) state.
>
> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi
> ---
>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:28:11PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 3/14/2016 9:48 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> Yes. I was talking about PCIe on ARM64.
>
> > If you go to Fry's and buy a conventional PCI card, it is going to
> > pull INTA# low to assert an interrupt. It doesn't matter whether you
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:28:11PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 3/14/2016 9:48 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> Yes. I was talking about PCIe on ARM64.
>
> > If you go to Fry's and buy a conventional PCI card, it is going to
> > pull INTA# low to assert an interrupt. It doesn't matter whether you
Hi Laurent,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
Thanks for your feedback!
> On Tuesday 15 December 2015 21:02:49 Magnus Damm wrote:
>> From: Magnus Damm
>>
>>
On 03/14/2016 10:52 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.101 release.
There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 15.03.2016 11:08, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> From: Jaehoon Chung
>
> This patch adds MSHC (Mobile Storage Host Controller) dt node for
> Exynos3250 SoC. MSHC is an interface between the system and the SD card
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
>
Hi Laurent,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
Thanks for your feedback!
> On Tuesday 15 December 2015 21:02:49 Magnus Damm wrote:
>> From: Magnus Damm
>>
>> Introduce a bitmap for context handing and convert the
>> interrupt
On 03/14/2016 10:52 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.101 release.
There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 15.03.2016 11:08, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> From: Jaehoon Chung
>
> This patch adds MSHC (Mobile Storage Host Controller) dt node for
> Exynos3250 SoC. MSHC is an interface between the system and the SD card
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi
> ---
>
1 - 100 of 1802 matches
Mail list logo