... and use ITER_BVEC for the page part of request to send
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
---
fs/cifs/cifsproto.h | 2 -
fs/cifs/transport.c | 141 +++-
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
---
fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 2 --
fs/cifs/connect.c | 72 --
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
index d21da9f..df03c5e 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
three practically identical copies...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
---
fs/cifs/cifsencrypt.c | 97 ---
fs/cifs/cifsproto.h | 3 ++
fs/cifs/smb2transport.c | 107 +---
3 files changed,
all callers have it equal to msg_data_left(msg).
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
---
drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_util.c | 5 ++---
include/linux/net.h | 3 +--
net/socket.c | 23 ++-
3 files changed, 13
three practically identical copies...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
---
fs/cifs/cifsencrypt.c | 97 ---
fs/cifs/cifsproto.h | 3 ++
fs/cifs/smb2transport.c | 107 +---
3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 140
all callers have it equal to msg_data_left(msg).
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
---
drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_util.c | 5 ++---
include/linux/net.h | 3 +--
net/socket.c | 23 ++-
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18
Now that sendmsg/recvmsg do not mangle iovecs and are capable of
handling bvec-based ->msg_iter, we can seriously reduce the amount of PITA
in cifs. The series below is completely untested, and I would appreciate
comments/review/testing/etc.
I'll post the individual patches in followups;
Now that sendmsg/recvmsg do not mangle iovecs and are capable of
handling bvec-based ->msg_iter, we can seriously reduce the amount of PITA
in cifs. The series below is completely untested, and I would appreciate
comments/review/testing/etc.
I'll post the individual patches in followups;
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 08:58:44PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> This function compiles to 839 bytes of machine code.
> In C, it is ~150 lines long.
>
> This function has 3 callsites.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko
> CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> CC:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 08:58:44PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> This function compiles to 839 bytes of machine code.
> In C, it is ~150 lines long.
>
> This function has 3 callsites.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko
> CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> CC: virtualizat...@lists.linux-foundation.org
> > I do feel that the importance of the mentioned bug is currently
> > underestimated. Can anyone here give a note, how much current linux
> > kernel is supposed to be stable on general baytrail machines?
>
> If you did not get any replies... you might want to check MAINTAINERS file,
> and
>
> > I do feel that the importance of the mentioned bug is currently
> > underestimated. Can anyone here give a note, how much current linux
> > kernel is supposed to be stable on general baytrail machines?
>
> If you did not get any replies... you might want to check MAINTAINERS file,
> and
>
From: Mohammed Billoo
Remove unnecessary comments (highlighting sections of functions), make
multiline comments into single line comments, and ensure that multiline
comments adhere to coding style.
---
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_sdio.c | 136
From: Mohammed Billoo
Remove unnecessary comments (highlighting sections of functions), make
multiline comments into single line comments, and ensure that multiline
comments adhere to coding style.
---
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_sdio.c | 136 ---
1 file
select_task_rq_fair() can leave cpu utilization a little lumpy,
especially as the workload ramps up to the maximum capacity of the
machine. The end result can be high p99 response times as apps
wait to get scheduled, even when boxes are mostly idle.
I wrote schbench to try and measure this:
select_task_rq_fair() can leave cpu utilization a little lumpy,
especially as the workload ramps up to the maximum capacity of the
machine. The end result can be high p99 response times as apps
wait to get scheduled, even when boxes are mostly idle.
I wrote schbench to try and measure this:
Signed-off-by: Sergio Prado
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
index
Signed-off-by: Sergio Prado
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
index e52cc8a6b2ae..3d08bafd5669 100644
---
Клиентские базы тел +79139393506 (tеlеgгam_whatsapp_vibег) Skype: prodawez389
Email: prodawez...@yandex.ru
Клиентские базы тел +79139393506 (tеlеgгam_whatsapp_vibег) Skype: prodawez389
Email: prodawez...@yandex.ru
Hi Linus, please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm libnvdimm-fixes
...to receive 3 fixes, the first 2 are tagged for -stable.
1/ The ndctl utility/library gained expanded unit tests illuminating a
long standing bug in the libnvdimm SMART data retrieval
Hi Linus, please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm libnvdimm-fixes
...to receive 3 fixes, the first 2 are tagged for -stable.
1/ The ndctl utility/library gained expanded unit tests illuminating a
long standing bug in the libnvdimm SMART data retrieval
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 23:37 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> This is combined series of two things:
>> - split out the Intel LPSS specific driver from 8250_pci into
>> 8250_lpss
>> - enable DMA support on
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 23:37 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> This is combined series of two things:
>> - split out the Intel LPSS specific driver from 8250_pci into
>> 8250_lpss
>> - enable DMA support on Intel Quark UART
>>
>> The patch
Embest MarS Board [1] is a multi-core platform based on Freescale i.MX6
Cortex-A9 Dual Core, running up to 1GHz with 1 GB of RAM, 4GB of eMMC
and with a 4MB SPI flash.
[1] http://www.embest-tech.com/shop/star/marsboard.html
Signed-off-by: Sergio Prado
---
Embest MarS Board [1] is a multi-core platform based on Freescale i.MX6
Cortex-A9 Dual Core, running up to 1GHz with 1 GB of RAM, 4GB of eMMC
and with a 4MB SPI flash.
[1] http://www.embest-tech.com/shop/star/marsboard.html
Signed-off-by: Sergio Prado
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-marsboard.dts
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 09:27:24AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 14:08 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
>
> > Now, on to the patch. I pushed some code around and narrowed the
> > problem down to select_idle_sibling() We have cores going into and out
> > of idle fast enough
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 09:27:24AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 14:08 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
>
> > Now, on to the patch. I pushed some code around and narrowed the
> > problem down to select_idle_sibling() We have cores going into and out
> > of idle fast enough
The following changes since commit f55532a0c0b8bb6148f4e07853b876ef73bc69ca:
Linux 4.6-rc1 (2016-03-26 16:03:24 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git/ tags/tty-4.6-rc3
for you to fetch changes up to
The following changes since commit f55532a0c0b8bb6148f4e07853b876ef73bc69ca:
Linux 4.6-rc1 (2016-03-26 16:03:24 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git/ tags/tty-4.6-rc3
for you to fetch changes up to
The following changes since commit f55532a0c0b8bb6148f4e07853b876ef73bc69ca:
Linux 4.6-rc1 (2016-03-26 16:03:24 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git/
tags/staging-4.6-rc3
for you to fetch changes up to
The following changes since commit f55532a0c0b8bb6148f4e07853b876ef73bc69ca:
Linux 4.6-rc1 (2016-03-26 16:03:24 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git/
tags/staging-4.6-rc3
for you to fetch changes up to
The following changes since commit 9735a22799b9214d17d3c231fe377fc852f042e9:
Linux 4.6-rc2 (2016-04-03 09:09:40 -0500)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/ tags/usb-4.6-rc3
for you to fetch changes up to
The following changes since commit 9735a22799b9214d17d3c231fe377fc852f042e9:
Linux 4.6-rc2 (2016-04-03 09:09:40 -0500)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/ tags/usb-4.6-rc3
for you to fetch changes up to
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:11:30PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 04:40:27AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Boris sent out the first HVMLite series of patches to add a new Xen guest
> > type
> > February 1, 2016 [0]. We've been talking off list with a few folks now over
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:11:30PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 04:40:27AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Boris sent out the first HVMLite series of patches to add a new Xen guest
> > type
> > February 1, 2016 [0]. We've been talking off list with a few folks now over
On 04/09/2016 12:33 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
Following a recent pull of the wireless-drivers-next repo. my system got a
kernel panic on startup at native_apic_msr_write+0x27. The problem was
bisected to commit
On 04/09/2016 12:33 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
Following a recent pull of the wireless-drivers-next repo. my system got a
kernel panic on startup at native_apic_msr_write+0x27. The problem was
bisected to commit 3b24d854cb35 ("tcp/dccp: do not
On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 23:37 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This is combined series of two things:
> - split out the Intel LPSS specific driver from 8250_pci into
> 8250_lpss
> - enable DMA support on Intel Quark UART
>
> The patch has been tested on few Intel SoCs / platforms.
>
> This is
On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 23:37 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This is combined series of two things:
> - split out the Intel LPSS specific driver from 8250_pci into
> 8250_lpss
> - enable DMA support on Intel Quark UART
>
> The patch has been tested on few Intel SoCs / platforms.
>
> This is
Hm, setting gov=performance, and taking the average of 3 30 second
interval PkgWatt samples as pipe-test runs..
714KHz/28.03Ws = 25.46
877KHz/30.28Ws = 28.96
..for pipe-test, the tradeoff look a bit more like red than green.
-Mike
Hm, setting gov=performance, and taking the average of 3 30 second
interval PkgWatt samples as pipe-test runs..
714KHz/28.03Ws = 25.46
877KHz/30.28Ws = 28.96
..for pipe-test, the tradeoff look a bit more like red than green.
-Mike
in this commit
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c?id=b2bb85549134c005e997e5a7ed303bda6a1ae738
Mike wrote:
> We should not try to save and restore cpus_allowed on current. We can't use
> work_on_cpu() here, > since
in this commit
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c?id=b2bb85549134c005e997e5a7ed303bda6a1ae738
Mike wrote:
> We should not try to save and restore cpus_allowed on current. We can't use
> work_on_cpu() here, > since
PEASE URGENT RESPONSE,
I am Dr Paul Lukas,the Audit and Account Manager (A.D.B)Bank in Ouagadougou
Burkina Faso,west africa
I have a business transaction for you.In my department i discovered an
abandoned Sum of US$10.2 Million Dollars.In an account that belongs to one of
our late foreign
PEASE URGENT RESPONSE,
I am Dr Paul Lukas,the Audit and Account Manager (A.D.B)Bank in Ouagadougou
Burkina Faso,west africa
I have a business transaction for you.In my department i discovered an
abandoned Sum of US$10.2 Million Dollars.In an account that belongs to one of
our late foreign
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:11:35PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Yes, I'm familiar with the problem; but simply mandating leaf only nodes
> > is not a solution, for the very simple fact that there are tasks in the
> > root cgroup that cannot ever be moved out, so we _must_ be able to deal
> > with
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:11:35PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Yes, I'm familiar with the problem; but simply mandating leaf only nodes
> > is not a solution, for the very simple fact that there are tasks in the
> > root cgroup that cannot ever be moved out, so we _must_ be able to deal
> > with
Hi!
> >> Also, because soon enough we will have to support USB Power Delivery
> >> with Type C connector, this is bound to change in the coming months.
> >>
> >> Frankly, I wanted all of this to be decided in userland with the
> >> kernel just providing notification and basic safety checks (we
Hi!
> >> Also, because soon enough we will have to support USB Power Delivery
> >> with Type C connector, this is bound to change in the coming months.
> >>
> >> Frankly, I wanted all of this to be decided in userland with the
> >> kernel just providing notification and basic safety checks (we
Hi!
> aprox. 6 months ago I started facing random freezes on my baytrail
> based computers I manage. It took me a while before I found a bug
> report in freedesktop bugzilla named "complete freeze after:
> drm/i915/vlv: WA for Turbo and RC6 to work together" -
>
Hi!
> >>>What's tricky about patterns is that you need to control 3 (or more)
> >>>leds at a time. Problem you are trying to solve here is ... control of
> >>>3 leds, at the same time.
> >>>
> >>>So let's solve them together.
> >>
> >>OK, now I've got your point. So we'd need to have a means for
Hi!
> aprox. 6 months ago I started facing random freezes on my baytrail
> based computers I manage. It took me a while before I found a bug
> report in freedesktop bugzilla named "complete freeze after:
> drm/i915/vlv: WA for Turbo and RC6 to work together" -
>
Hi!
> >>>What's tricky about patterns is that you need to control 3 (or more)
> >>>leds at a time. Problem you are trying to solve here is ... control of
> >>>3 leds, at the same time.
> >>>
> >>>So let's solve them together.
> >>
> >>OK, now I've got your point. So we'd need to have a means for
> It looks like I'm in quite a pickle. Even if the patch for the PnPBIOS
> driver removes the errors and warnings, there may be runtime bugs in
> other drivers expecting X86_32. The only way I can see to prevent that
> is to audit all the drivers which depend on the ISA option -- a behemoth
>
> It looks like I'm in quite a pickle. Even if the patch for the PnPBIOS
> driver removes the errors and warnings, there may be runtime bugs in
> other drivers expecting X86_32. The only way I can see to prevent that
> is to audit all the drivers which depend on the ISA option -- a behemoth
>
Здравствуйте!
Не так давно я проходил мимо Вашего здания, и заметил, что на фасаде здания нет
вывески Вашей организации.
Я профессионально занимаюсь производством и установкой вывесок (у нас своя
мастерская).
Размещение рекламных вывесок в Вашем здании разрешено. Поток привлеченных
клиентов
Здравствуйте!
Не так давно я проходил мимо Вашего здания, и заметил, что на фасаде здания нет
вывески Вашей организации.
Я профессионально занимаюсь производством и установкой вывесок (у нас своя
мастерская).
Размещение рекламных вывесок в Вашем здании разрешено. Поток привлеченных
клиентов
There's already a patch in the works for this:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/80078/
Regards,
Matt
There's already a patch in the works for this:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/80078/
Regards,
Matt
From: Andi Kleen
When I run chrome on my opensuse system every time I open
a new tab the system log is spammed with:
audit[16857]: SECCOMP auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=100 ses=1 pid=16857
comm="chrome" exe="/opt/google/chrome/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e
syscall=273 compat=0
From: Andi Kleen
When I run chrome on my opensuse system every time I open
a new tab the system log is spammed with:
audit[16857]: SECCOMP auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=100 ses=1 pid=16857
comm="chrome" exe="/opt/google/chrome/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e
syscall=273 compat=0 ip=0x7fe27c11a444
On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 14:33 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Mike Galbraith
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 22:59 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, April 08, 2016 08:50:54 AM Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Fri,
On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 14:33 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Mike Galbraith
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 22:59 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, April 08, 2016 08:50:54 AM Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 08:45 +0200, Peter
On 04/08/2016 06:12 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
[...]
>>
>> [...]
>>> +- adi,enable-audio: If set the ADV7511 driver will register a codec
>>> interface
>>> + into ALSA SoC.
>> This is not a description of the hardware.
>
> Is this okay: "adi,enable-audio: Set this boolean parameter if ADV7511
>
On 04/08/2016 06:12 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
[...]
>>
>> [...]
>>> +- adi,enable-audio: If set the ADV7511 driver will register a codec
>>> interface
>>> + into ALSA SoC.
>> This is not a description of the hardware.
>
> Is this okay: "adi,enable-audio: Set this boolean parameter if ADV7511
>
"H. Peter Anvin" writes:
> On April 9, 2016 6:09:09 AM PDT, One Thousand Gnomes
> wrote:
>>
>>> If anyone has a better idea on how userspace should connect the
>>master
>>> pty file descriptor the slave file descriptor, I would be willing to
>>>
"H. Peter Anvin" writes:
> On April 9, 2016 6:09:09 AM PDT, One Thousand Gnomes
> wrote:
>>
>>> If anyone has a better idea on how userspace should connect the
>>master
>>> pty file descriptor the slave file descriptor, I would be willing to
>>> implement that instead.
>>
>>If we are willing
On 04/08/2016 06:08 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
>
> On 08-04-2016 16:52, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 04/08/2016 12:06 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07-04-2016 18:53, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:53:59PM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
> +
On 04/08/2016 06:08 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
>
> On 08-04-2016 16:52, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 04/08/2016 12:06 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07-04-2016 18:53, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:53:59PM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
> +
On April 9, 2016 6:09:09 AM PDT, One Thousand Gnomes
wrote:
>
>> If anyone has a better idea on how userspace should connect the
>master
>> pty file descriptor the slave file descriptor, I would be willing to
>> implement that instead.
>
>If we are willing to go away
On April 9, 2016 6:09:09 AM PDT, One Thousand Gnomes
wrote:
>
>> If anyone has a better idea on how userspace should connect the
>master
>> pty file descriptor the slave file descriptor, I would be willing to
>> implement that instead.
>
>If we are willing to go away from the existing mess of a
Am 08.04.2016 um 20:10 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
> On 04/01/2016 12:33 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> From: Daniel Walter
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Walter
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
>> ---
>> man2/leftpad.2 | 55
Am 08.04.2016 um 20:10 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
> On 04/01/2016 12:33 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> From: Daniel Walter
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Walter
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
>> ---
>> man2/leftpad.2 | 55 +++
>> 1
Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> There is no reason to add this patch which handles the slowpath right now.
Oops.
There is no reason _not_ to add this patch which handles the slowpath right now.
Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> There is no reason to add this patch which handles the slowpath right now.
Oops.
There is no reason _not_ to add this patch which handles the slowpath right now.
Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 17-02-16 19:34:46, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > >From 6f07b71c97766ec111d26c3424bded465ca48195 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Tetsuo Handa
> > Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:37:01 +0900
> > Subject: [PATCH 5/6] mm,oom: Re-enable OOM
Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 17-02-16 19:34:46, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > >From 6f07b71c97766ec111d26c3424bded465ca48195 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Tetsuo Handa
> > Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:37:01 +0900
> > Subject: [PATCH 5/6] mm,oom: Re-enable OOM killer using timers.
> >
> > We are
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 01:58:14PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>> I believe this is the source of the issues I encountered on my initial
>> attempt to decouple the X86_32 dependency from the ISA option. I suspect
>> if I add an explicit X86_32 dependency to the PNPBIOS driver, I will be
>>
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 01:58:14PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>> I believe this is the source of the issues I encountered on my initial
>> attempt to decouple the X86_32 dependency from the ISA option. I suspect
>> if I add an explicit X86_32 dependency to the PNPBIOS driver, I will be
>>
On 2016/04/08 04:57PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 14:56 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> > On 2016/04/07 06:19PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 06/04/16 22:32, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This patchset fixes three issues found with perf probe on ppc64le:
> > >
On 2016/04/08 04:57PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 14:56 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> > On 2016/04/07 06:19PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 06/04/16 22:32, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This patchset fixes three issues found with perf probe on ppc64le:
> > >
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:11:35PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > Widely diverging from
> > > CPU's behavior, IO grouped all internal tasks into an internal leaf
> > > node and used to assign a fixed weight to it.
> >
> > That's just plain broken... That is not how a proportional weight based
> >
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:11:35PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > Widely diverging from
> > > CPU's behavior, IO grouped all internal tasks into an internal leaf
> > > node and used to assign a fixed weight to it.
> >
> > That's just plain broken... That is not how a proportional weight based
> >
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 11:25:39AM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> > In any case, I just realized we do not in fact provide this guarantee
> > (of pointing to a blocked task) that needs a bit more work.
>
> Current patch calls rt_mutex_adjust_prio() before wake_up_q() the
> wakee, at that moment the
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 11:25:39AM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> > In any case, I just realized we do not in fact provide this guarantee
> > (of pointing to a blocked task) that needs a bit more work.
>
> Current patch calls rt_mutex_adjust_prio() before wake_up_q() the
> wakee, at that moment the
> If anyone has a better idea on how userspace should connect the master
> pty file descriptor the slave file descriptor, I would be willing to
> implement that instead.
If we are willing to go away from the existing mess of a tty interface
inflicted on us by BSD and then mashed up by POSIX then
> If anyone has a better idea on how userspace should connect the master
> pty file descriptor the slave file descriptor, I would be willing to
> implement that instead.
If we are willing to go away from the existing mess of a tty interface
inflicted on us by BSD and then mashed up by POSIX then
From: Enpeng Xu
Signed-off-by: Enpeng Xu
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
index 49e4f26..527eca7 100644
From: Enpeng Xu
Signed-off-by: Enpeng Xu
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
index 49e4f26..527eca7 100644
---
> I believe this is the source of the issues I encountered on my initial
> attempt to decouple the X86_32 dependency from the ISA option. I suspect
> if I add an explicit X86_32 dependency to the PNPBIOS driver, I will be
> able to remove the X86_32 dependency from the ISA option without
>
> I believe this is the source of the issues I encountered on my initial
> attempt to decouple the X86_32 dependency from the ISA option. I suspect
> if I add an explicit X86_32 dependency to the PNPBIOS driver, I will be
> able to remove the X86_32 dependency from the ISA option without
>
This patch adds SS_FLAG_BITS - the mask that splits sigaltstack
mode values and bit-flags. Since there is no bit-flags yet, the
mask is defined to 0. The flags are added by subsequent patches.
With every new flag, the mask should have the appropriate bit cleared.
This makes sure if some flag is
Currently x86's get_sigframe() checks for "current->sas_ss_size"
to determine whether there is a need to switch to sigaltstack.
The common practice used by all other arches is to check for
sas_ss_flags(sp) == 0
This patch makes the code consistent with other arches.
The slight complexity of the
This patch adds SS_FLAG_BITS - the mask that splits sigaltstack
mode values and bit-flags. Since there is no bit-flags yet, the
mask is defined to 0. The flags are added by subsequent patches.
With every new flag, the mask should have the appropriate bit cleared.
This makes sure if some flag is
Currently x86's get_sigframe() checks for "current->sas_ss_size"
to determine whether there is a need to switch to sigaltstack.
The common practice used by all other arches is to check for
sas_ss_flags(sp) == 0
This patch makes the code consistent with other arches.
The slight complexity of the
This patch adds the test case for SS_AUTODISARM flag.
The test-case tries to set SS_AUTODISARM flag and checks if
the nested signal corrupts the stack after swapcontext().
CC: Shuah Khan
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
CC: Andy Lutomirski
It is absolutely unclear what happened with my patch series,
but it is neither applied nor rejected. So here's the re-send.
The following patches make it possible to use swapcontext()
in a sighandler that works on sigaltstack.
The approach is inspired by Andy Lutomirski's suggestion that
This patch implements the SS_AUTODISARM flag that can be ORed with
SS_ONSTACK when forming ss_flags.
When this flag is set, sigaltstack will be disabled when entering
the signal handler; more precisely, after saving sas to uc_stack.
When leaving the signal handler, the sigaltstack is restored by
This patch adds the test case for SS_AUTODISARM flag.
The test-case tries to set SS_AUTODISARM flag and checks if
the nested signal corrupts the stack after swapcontext().
CC: Shuah Khan
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
CC: Andy Lutomirski
Signed-off-by: Stas
101 - 200 of 288 matches
Mail list logo