Hello,
did you try without your patches, to see if you can reproduce the problem?
I can fix my issues if I disable usb autosuspend
To narrow down the causes I can think of:
*) Some hardware issue only on my side -> please try to reproduce it
with an unpached kernel
*) Some other stuff I modified
Hello,
did you try without your patches, to see if you can reproduce the problem?
I can fix my issues if I disable usb autosuspend
To narrow down the causes I can think of:
*) Some hardware issue only on my side -> please try to reproduce it
with an unpached kernel
*) Some other stuff I modified
'brick' has been allocated by 'devm_kzalloc', so there is no need here to
free it explicitly.
There is only one caller of 'tegra_clk_sor_brick_register()'. This function
is a probe function which correctly checks and handles the return value of
'tegra_clk_sor_brick_register()'.
Signed-off-by:
'brick' has been allocated by 'devm_kzalloc', so there is no need here to
free it explicitly.
There is only one caller of 'tegra_clk_sor_brick_register()'. This function
is a probe function which correctly checks and handles the return value of
'tegra_clk_sor_brick_register()'.
Signed-off-by:
Rename "sun4i_codec_widgets" to "sun4i_codec_controls" for
consistency with the struct field name.
Signed-off-by: Danny Milosavljevic
---
sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-codec.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-codec.c
Rename "sun4i_codec_widgets" to "sun4i_codec_controls" for
consistency with the struct field name.
Signed-off-by: Danny Milosavljevic
---
sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-codec.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-codec.c
Introduce mechanism to detect sun7i and provide a different regmap
(different compared to sun4i Allwinner A10).
The controls will be extended in a forthcoming patch - it is necessary
to distinguish between sun4i and sun7i controls because they have different
registers.
Rename
Introduce mechanism to detect sun7i and provide a different regmap
(different compared to sun4i Allwinner A10).
The controls will be extended in a forthcoming patch - it is necessary
to distinguish between sun4i and sun7i controls because they have different
registers.
Rename
Some of the registers defined in the driver are only usable on the
A20. Rename these registers.
Signed-off-by: Danny Milosavljevic
---
sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-codec.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-codec.c
The A20 has a few extra registers that the A10 doesn't have.
Therefore, use different regmaps for A10 as compared to A20.
Signed-off-by: Danny Milosavljevic
---
sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-codec.c | 38 +++---
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 3
Some of the registers defined in the driver are only usable on the
A20. Rename these registers.
Signed-off-by: Danny Milosavljevic
---
sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-codec.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-codec.c
The A20 has a few extra registers that the A10 doesn't have.
Therefore, use different regmaps for A10 as compared to A20.
Signed-off-by: Danny Milosavljevic
---
sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-codec.c | 38 +++---
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff
Hello,
I would like to discuss this commit:
commit d3d7e6c65f75de18ced10a98595a847f9f95f0ce
Author: Raghu Vatsavayi
Date: Tue Jun 21 22:53:07 2016 -0700
liquidio: Firmware image download
This patch has firmware image related changes for: firmware
Hello,
I would like to discuss this commit:
commit d3d7e6c65f75de18ced10a98595a847f9f95f0ce
Author: Raghu Vatsavayi
Date: Tue Jun 21 22:53:07 2016 -0700
liquidio: Firmware image download
This patch has firmware image related changes for: firmware
release upon failure, support
Larry Finger writes:
> On 09/24/2016 12:32 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> Is there any value in that or is Jes' work going to make
>> doing any or all of this unnecessary and futile?
>
> That is not yet determined. The only driver that is to be replaced at
> this point is
Larry Finger writes:
> On 09/24/2016 12:32 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> Is there any value in that or is Jes' work going to make
>> doing any or all of this unnecessary and futile?
>
> That is not yet determined. The only driver that is to be replaced at
> this point is rtl8192cu. Jes only has USB
>> Should the desired output be the same when the relevant data are passed by a
>> single function call
>> (instead of three as before)?
>
> Adding a singleton for a pr_fmt #define constant string and
> updating the printk subsystem to prepend that constant string
> to each use of a pr_ at
>> Should the desired output be the same when the relevant data are passed by a
>> single function call
>> (instead of three as before)?
>
> Adding a singleton for a pr_fmt #define constant string and
> updating the printk subsystem to prepend that constant string
> to each use of a pr_ at
Remove deprecated __setup for parsing command line parameters.
g_NCR5380.* parameters could be used instead.
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary
---
drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c | 135 --
1 file changed, 135 deletions(-)
diff --git
Remove compile-time card type definition GENERIC_NCR5380_OVERRIDE.
Then remove all code iterating the overrides[] array and reduce it to
struct card.
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary
---
drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c | 351 ++
1 file
Remove deprecated __setup for parsing command line parameters.
g_NCR5380.* parameters could be used instead.
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary
---
drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c | 135 --
1 file changed, 135 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c
Remove compile-time card type definition GENERIC_NCR5380_OVERRIDE.
Then remove all code iterating the overrides[] array and reduce it to
struct card.
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary
---
drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c | 351 ++
1 file changed, 167 insertions(+),
This small patch series removes deprecated code from g_NCR5380 driver
and converts it from scsi_module.c to scsi_add_host().
Tested with:
HP C2502 (53C400A chip)
Canon FG2-5202 (53C400 chip, memory-mapped)
DTC-3181L (DTCT-436P chip, PnP)
P.S. I don't like the ifdef mess needed for
This small patch series removes deprecated code from g_NCR5380 driver
and converts it from scsi_module.c to scsi_add_host().
Tested with:
HP C2502 (53C400A chip)
Canon FG2-5202 (53C400 chip, memory-mapped)
DTC-3181L (DTCT-436P chip, PnP)
P.S. I don't like the ifdef mess needed for
Convert g_NCR5380 to use scsi_add_host instead of scsi_module.c
Use pnp_driver and isa_driver to manage cards.
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary
---
drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c | 310 +-
drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.h |8 --
2 files
Convert g_NCR5380 to use scsi_add_host instead of scsi_module.c
Use pnp_driver and isa_driver to manage cards.
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary
---
drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c | 310 +-
drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.h |8 --
2 files changed, 169 insertions(+),
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:58:15AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday, September 24, 2016 1:11:56 PM CEST Baoyou Xie wrote:
> > ---
> > drivers/hsi/clients/ssi_protocol.c | 2 --
> > include/linux/hsi/hsi.h| 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:58:15AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday, September 24, 2016 1:11:56 PM CEST Baoyou Xie wrote:
> > ---
> > drivers/hsi/clients/ssi_protocol.c | 2 --
> > include/linux/hsi/hsi.h| 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >
Linus,
please pull the latest perf-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
perf-urgent-for-linus
Three fixlets for perf:
- Add a missing NULL pointer check in the intel BTS driver.
- Make BTS an exclusive PMU because BTS can only
Linus,
please pull the latest perf-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
perf-urgent-for-linus
Three fixlets for perf:
- Add a missing NULL pointer check in the intel BTS driver.
- Make BTS an exclusive PMU because BTS can only
Linus,
please pull the latest locking-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
locking-urgent-for-linus
Two smallish fixes:
- Use the proper asm constraint in the Super-H atomic_fetch_ops
- A trivial typo fix in the Kconfig help text
Linus,
please pull the latest locking-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
locking-urgent-for-linus
Two smallish fixes:
- Use the proper asm constraint in the Super-H atomic_fetch_ops
- A trivial typo fix in the Kconfig help text
Linus,
please pull the latest efi-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
efi-urgent-for-linus
Two fixes for EFI/PAT:
- A 32bit overflow bug in the PAT code which was unearthed by the large
EFI mappings
- Prevent a boot hang on large
Linus,
please pull the latest efi-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
efi-urgent-for-linus
Two fixes for EFI/PAT:
- A 32bit overflow bug in the PAT code which was unearthed by the large
EFI mappings
- Prevent a boot hang on large
Linus,
please pull the latest irq-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
irq-urgent-for-linus
Three fixes for irq core and irq chip drivers
- Do not set the irq type if type is NONE. Fixes a boot regression on
various SoCs
- Use
Linus,
please pull the latest irq-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
irq-urgent-for-linus
Three fixes for irq core and irq chip drivers
- Do not set the irq type if type is NONE. Fixes a boot regression on
various SoCs
- Use
> I'm not necessarily against this change which does perhaps clarify the code
> ever so slightly,
Thanks for another bit of positive feedback.
> but I am interested to know where 'current Linux coding style convention'
> comes from?
How often do you check the status of a document like
> I'm not necessarily against this change which does perhaps clarify the code
> ever so slightly,
Thanks for another bit of positive feedback.
> but I am interested to know where 'current Linux coding style convention'
> comes from?
How often do you check the status of a document like
On 09/24/2016 01:58 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
+Example
+===
+
+led1: ncp5623@38 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "onnn,ncp5623";
+ reg = <0x38>;
+ onnn,led-iref-microamp = <10>;
+
+ led1r@0 {
+ label =
On 09/24/2016 01:58 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
+Example
+===
+
+led1: ncp5623@38 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "onnn,ncp5623";
+ reg = <0x38>;
+ onnn,led-iref-microamp = <10>;
+
+ led1r@0 {
+ label =
On 09/24/2016 12:32 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
(adding Jes Sorensen to recipients)
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 11:35 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
I have patches that makes HAL_DEF_WOWLAN be a no-op for the rest of the drivers,
and one that sets the enum values for that particular statement to hex values.
On 09/24/2016 12:32 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
(adding Jes Sorensen to recipients)
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 11:35 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
I have patches that makes HAL_DEF_WOWLAN be a no-op for the rest of the drivers,
and one that sets the enum values for that particular statement to hex values.
> Again, what is the purpose of the changes?
I came also along a few source code places where their maintainers
requested the usage of a function like "kmalloc_array".
How do you think about to clarify the consistent use of programming
interfaces for Linux a bit more?
> Are you working on the
> Again, what is the purpose of the changes?
I came also along a few source code places where their maintainers
requested the usage of a function like "kmalloc_array".
How do you think about to clarify the consistent use of programming
interfaces for Linux a bit more?
> Are you working on the
On 09/23/2016 03:10 PM, Norbert Lange wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to reply to the Linux mailing List (your patch thread), I
dont know exactly where since the addresses are blanked out.
Just tell me where I should move this discussion.
The board can use both USB peripherals (haven`t tested the OTG
On 09/23/2016 03:10 PM, Norbert Lange wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to reply to the Linux mailing List (your patch thread), I
dont know exactly where since the addresses are blanked out.
Just tell me where I should move this discussion.
The board can use both USB peripherals (haven`t tested the OTG
On 23/09/2016 19:36, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:48:58PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
Add support for hip07 chipset to bindings.
Chipset hip07 has v2 hw.
The sas-v2 quirk amt is expanded to cover hip07.
Signed-off-by: John Garry
Signed-off-by: Xiang Chen
On 23/09/2016 19:36, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:48:58PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
Add support for hip07 chipset to bindings.
Chipset hip07 has v2 hw.
The sas-v2 quirk amt is expanded to cover hip07.
Signed-off-by: John Garry
Signed-off-by: Xiang Chen
---
I forget to add a dummy function in case the CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY
is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Randy Li
---
include/linux/phy/phy.h | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/phy/phy.h b/include/linux/phy/phy.h
index ee1bed7..78bb0d7 100644
---
The "host1" port (AKA the dwc2 port that isn't the OTG port) on rk3288
has a hardware errata that causes everything to get confused when we get
a remote wakeup. We'll use the reset that's in the CRU to reset the
port when it's in a bad state.
Note that we add the reset to both dwc2 controllers
I forget to add a dummy function in case the CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY
is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Randy Li
---
include/linux/phy/phy.h | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/phy/phy.h b/include/linux/phy/phy.h
index ee1bed7..78bb0d7 100644
---
The "host1" port (AKA the dwc2 port that isn't the OTG port) on rk3288
has a hardware errata that causes everything to get confused when we get
a remote wakeup. We'll use the reset that's in the CRU to reset the
port when it's in a bad state.
Note that we add the reset to both dwc2 controllers
On the rk3288 USB host-only port (the one that's not the OTG-enabled
port) the PHY can get into a bad state when a wakeup is asserted (not
just a wakeup from full system suspend but also a wakeup from
autosuspend).
We can get the PHY out of its bad state by asserting its "port reset",
but
At this stage it is the only "full features" and well verified
USB EHCI controller in this platform. More review is always necessary.
Although V7 is almost fine but a forget a dummy function for the phy
system.
changelog:
v7
add the forgot dummy phy_reset() for the generic phy is disabled.
On the rk3288 USB host-only port (the one that's not the OTG-enabled
port) the PHY can get into a bad state when a wakeup is asserted (not
just a wakeup from full system suspend but also a wakeup from
autosuspend).
We can get the PHY out of its bad state by asserting its "port reset",
but
At this stage it is the only "full features" and well verified
USB EHCI controller in this platform. More review is always necessary.
Although V7 is almost fine but a forget a dummy function for the phy
system.
changelog:
v7
add the forgot dummy phy_reset() for the generic phy is disabled.
On 09/24/2016 02:00 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Instead I propose the following:
n_iled_max =
31 - (priv->led_iref * 2400 / priv->leds_max_current +
!!(priv->led_iref * 2400 % priv->leds_max_current))
div_round_up?
Exactly. Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
On 09/24/2016 02:00 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Instead I propose the following:
n_iled_max =
31 - (priv->led_iref * 2400 / priv->leds_max_current +
!!(priv->led_iref * 2400 % priv->leds_max_current))
div_round_up?
Exactly. Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
> When a chorus of voices says to you that you are wasting
> their time, perhaps you listen to their song.
I am listening to some degree. - I guess that I am making some decisions
and conclusions in a way that you would prefer to be different.
I know that my update suggestions won't be liked by
> When a chorus of voices says to you that you are wasting
> their time, perhaps you listen to their song.
I am listening to some degree. - I guess that I am making some decisions
and conclusions in a way that you would prefer to be different.
I know that my update suggestions won't be liked by
Hi Quentin,
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:26:08PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Dimitry,
>
> Sorry for the (long) delay, I did not have time to work on it. I'll
> mainly work in my free time now.
>
> On 20/07/2016 19:25, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Quentin,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at
Hi Quentin,
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:26:08PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Dimitry,
>
> Sorry for the (long) delay, I did not have time to work on it. I'll
> mainly work in my free time now.
>
> On 20/07/2016 19:25, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Quentin,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:16:16PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > So we have to multiply twice now, once in kmalloc_array, the second
> > time in memcpy().
>
> It looks so in the source code after the suggested refactoring.
>
>
> > No, thank you.
>
> Would you like to check any further if
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:16:16PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > So we have to multiply twice now, once in kmalloc_array, the second
> > time in memcpy().
>
> It looks so in the source code after the suggested refactoring.
>
>
> > No, thank you.
>
> Would you like to check any further if
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 8:27 AM, James Smart wrote:
>
> add u64 number parser
>
> Prior patch revised to use kasprintf.
> Modified match_number to use kasprintf as well
Why would you do this? It's insane. kasprintf() is not the right thing
at all to use for anything
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 8:27 AM, James Smart wrote:
>
> add u64 number parser
>
> Prior patch revised to use kasprintf.
> Modified match_number to use kasprintf as well
Why would you do this? It's insane. kasprintf() is not the right thing
at all to use for anything like this. It appears that
Hi Dimitry,
Sorry for the (long) delay, I did not have time to work on it. I'll
mainly work in my free time now.
On 20/07/2016 19:25, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Quentin,
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:29:10AM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>> This adds support for Allwinner SoCs' (A10, A13 and
Hi Dimitry,
Sorry for the (long) delay, I did not have time to work on it. I'll
mainly work in my free time now.
On 20/07/2016 19:25, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Quentin,
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:29:10AM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>> This adds support for Allwinner SoCs' (A10, A13 and
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 02:00:41PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2016/9/21 8:45, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > @@ -259,40 +290,26 @@ static inline void fill_node_footer_blkaddr(struct
> > page *page, block_t blkaddr)
> > {
> > struct f2fs_checkpoint *ckpt = F2FS_CKPT(F2FS_P_SB(page));
> > struct
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 02:00:41PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2016/9/21 8:45, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > @@ -259,40 +290,26 @@ static inline void fill_node_footer_blkaddr(struct
> > page *page, block_t blkaddr)
> > {
> > struct f2fs_checkpoint *ckpt = F2FS_CKPT(F2FS_P_SB(page));
> > struct
> So we have to multiply twice now, once in kmalloc_array, the second
> time in memcpy().
It looks so in the source code after the suggested refactoring.
> No, thank you.
Would you like to check any further if a specific compiler implementation
will still optimise common subexpressions as you
> So we have to multiply twice now, once in kmalloc_array, the second
> time in memcpy().
It looks so in the source code after the suggested refactoring.
> No, thank you.
Would you like to check any further if a specific compiler implementation
will still optimise common subexpressions as you
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:32:08AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2016/9/24 8:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:46:54AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Hi Jaegeuk,
> >>
> >> On 2016/9/24 7:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> Hi Chao,
> >>>
> >>> The basic rule is to stop every operations once
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:32:08AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2016/9/24 8:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:46:54AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Hi Jaegeuk,
> >>
> >> On 2016/9/24 7:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> Hi Chao,
> >>>
> >>> The basic rule is to stop every operations once
This prevent future potential pointer leaks when an unprivileged eBPF
program will read a pointer value from its context. Even if
is_valid_access() returns a pointer type, the eBPF verifier replace it
with UNKNOWN_VALUE. The register value that contains a kernel address is
then allowed to leak.
This prevent future potential pointer leaks when an unprivileged eBPF
program will read a pointer value from its context. Even if
is_valid_access() returns a pointer type, the eBPF verifier replace it
with UNKNOWN_VALUE. The register value that contains a kernel address is
then allowed to leak.
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 19:45 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > It's purposeless, creates unnecessary patches to review
> > and generally wastes other people's time.
> I have got an other opinion about this.
Nice for you, not nice for others that have to act on
your patch proposals to get them
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 19:45 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > It's purposeless, creates unnecessary patches to review
> > and generally wastes other people's time.
> I have got an other opinion about this.
Nice for you, not nice for others that have to act on
your patch proposals to get them
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 4:08 AM, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 12:42:45 +0200
>
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
> indicated that an array data
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 4:08 AM, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 12:42:45 +0200
>
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
> indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
> Thus use the corresponding
Hi Dmitry,
> Am 24.09.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov :
>
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:07 AM, H. Nikolaus Schaller
> wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>>> Am 24.09.2016 um 18:07 schrieb Jonathan Cameron :
>>>
>>> On 23/09/16
Hi Dmitry,
> Am 24.09.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov :
>
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:07 AM, H. Nikolaus Schaller
> wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>>> Am 24.09.2016 um 18:07 schrieb Jonathan Cameron :
>>>
>>> On 23/09/16 13:41, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
The tsc2007 chip not only has
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 09:02:02AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2016/9/24 5:11, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > When getting EIO while handling orphan inodes, we can get some dirty node
> > pages. Then, f2fs_write_node_pages() called by iput(node_inode) will try
> > to flush node pages. But in this case, we
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 09:02:02AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2016/9/24 5:11, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > When getting EIO while handling orphan inodes, we can get some dirty node
> > pages. Then, f2fs_write_node_pages() called by iput(node_inode) will try
> > to flush node pages. But in this case, we
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 4:10 AM, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 12:50:31 +0200
>
> Adjust a jump label according to the current Linux coding style convention.
> Thus replace the identifier
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 4:10 AM, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 12:50:31 +0200
>
> Adjust a jump label according to the current Linux coding style convention.
> Thus replace the identifier "out" by "unlock".
No, just no.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus
>> I find that it is a preparation. - If this addition could not be accepted,
>> the following update step would also be discussed under an other perspective,
>> wouldn't it?
>
> It's purposeless, creates unnecessary patches to review
> and generally wastes other people's time.
I have got an
>> I find that it is a preparation. - If this addition could not be accepted,
>> the following update step would also be discussed under an other perspective,
>> wouldn't it?
>
> It's purposeless, creates unnecessary patches to review
> and generally wastes other people's time.
I have got an
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:07 AM, H. Nikolaus Schaller
wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
>> Am 24.09.2016 um 18:07 schrieb Jonathan Cameron :
>>
>> On 23/09/16 13:41, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>> The tsc2007 chip not only has a resistive touch screen controller but
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:07 AM, H. Nikolaus Schaller
wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
>> Am 24.09.2016 um 18:07 schrieb Jonathan Cameron :
>>
>> On 23/09/16 13:41, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>> The tsc2007 chip not only has a resistive touch screen controller but
>>> also an external AUX adc imput
Hi Jonathan,
> Am 24.09.2016 um 19:26 schrieb Jonathan Cameron :
>
> On 24/09/16 18:07, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>>> Am 24.09.2016 um 18:07 schrieb Jonathan Cameron :
>>>
>>> On 23/09/16 13:41, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
The
Hi Jonathan,
> Am 24.09.2016 um 19:26 schrieb Jonathan Cameron :
>
> On 24/09/16 18:07, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>>> Am 24.09.2016 um 18:07 schrieb Jonathan Cameron :
>>>
>>> On 23/09/16 13:41, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
The tsc2007 chip not only has a resistive
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Herbert, Marc wrote:
> On 03/09/2016 11:10, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> I was thinking if we kernel could post
>> "conditions" (maybe simple stings) that it waits for, and userspace
>> could unlock these "conditions". One of them might be
Currently, if info is null, the dev_err message is dereferencing an
uninitialized module pointer. Instead, it should use codec->dev pointer
in dev_err call and better align with other err msg in this function.
Also, ret variable might be used uninitialized in a specific case.
Avoid using it this
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Herbert, Marc wrote:
> On 03/09/2016 11:10, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> I was thinking if we kernel could post
>> "conditions" (maybe simple stings) that it waits for, and userspace
>> could unlock these "conditions". One of them might be "firmware
>> available".
>
Currently, if info is null, the dev_err message is dereferencing an
uninitialized module pointer. Instead, it should use codec->dev pointer
in dev_err call and better align with other err msg in this function.
Also, ret variable might be used uninitialized in a specific case.
Avoid using it this
Hi Jonathan,
Sorry for the (long) delay, I did not have time to work on it. I'll
mainly work in my free time now.
Keep in mind this patch was proposed based on the v2 of the ADC patches.
Since then, substantial changes have been made and I'm working on
rebasing this series of patches on the v6,
Hi Jonathan,
Sorry for the (long) delay, I did not have time to work on it. I'll
mainly work in my free time now.
Keep in mind this patch was proposed based on the v2 of the ADC patches.
Since then, substantial changes have been made and I'm working on
rebasing this series of patches on the v6,
(adding Jes Sorensen to recipients)
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 11:35 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> I have patches that makes HAL_DEF_WOWLAN be a no-op for the rest of the
> drivers,
> and one that sets the enum values for that particular statement to hex
> values. I
> also looked at the other large
(adding Jes Sorensen to recipients)
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 11:35 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> I have patches that makes HAL_DEF_WOWLAN be a no-op for the rest of the
> drivers,
> and one that sets the enum values for that particular statement to hex
> values. I
> also looked at the other large
101 - 200 of 464 matches
Mail list logo