On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 05:50:12PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 09:46:37PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > >
> > > There may be deeper issues. I just started running scalability tests
> > >
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 05:50:12PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 09:46:37PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > >
> > > There may be deeper issues. I just started running scalability tests
> > > (e.g. 16-way fsmark
Hi Cyrille,
[auto build test ERROR on cryptodev/master]
[also build test ERROR on next-20161222]
[cannot apply to v4.9]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Cyrille-Pitchen/crypto
Hi Cyrille,
[auto build test ERROR on cryptodev/master]
[also build test ERROR on next-20161222]
[cannot apply to v4.9]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Cyrille-Pitchen/crypto
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Geoff Lansberry wrote:
> I can make that change, however, I worry that it may be a bit
> misleading, since there are only two supported clock frequencies, but
> a number like that to me implies that it could be set to any number
> you want. I'm
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Geoff Lansberry wrote:
> I can make that change, however, I worry that it may be a bit
> misleading, since there are only two supported clock frequencies, but
> a number like that to me implies that it could be set to any number
> you want. I'm new at this, and
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 06:54:51AM +0100, John Crispin wrote:
> On 21/12/2016 15:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:11:25PM +0100, John Crispin wrote:
> >> I can turn it into an enable patch that is selected by default.
> >>
> >> The current patch disables all those quirks
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 06:54:51AM +0100, John Crispin wrote:
> On 21/12/2016 15:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:11:25PM +0100, John Crispin wrote:
> >> I can turn it into an enable patch that is selected by default.
> >>
> >> The current patch disables all those quirks
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:25:53PM +0800, Changming Huang wrote:
> New property "snps,incr-burst-type-adjustment = , " for USB3.0 DWC3.
> Field "x": 1/0 - undefined length INCR burst type enable or not;
> Field "y": INCR4/INCR8/INCR16/INCR32/INCR64/INCR128/INCR256 burst type.
>
> While enabling
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:25:53PM +0800, Changming Huang wrote:
> New property "snps,incr-burst-type-adjustment = , " for USB3.0 DWC3.
> Field "x": 1/0 - undefined length INCR burst type enable or not;
> Field "y": INCR4/INCR8/INCR16/INCR32/INCR64/INCR128/INCR256 burst type.
>
> While enabling
Aleksa Sarai writes:
> If you have a process that has set itself to be non-dumpable, and it
> then undergoes exec(2), any CLOEXEC file descriptors it has open are
> "exposed" during a race window between the dumpable flags of the process
> being reset for exec(2) and CLOEXEC
Aleksa Sarai writes:
> If you have a process that has set itself to be non-dumpable, and it
> then undergoes exec(2), any CLOEXEC file descriptors it has open are
> "exposed" during a race window between the dumpable flags of the process
> being reset for exec(2) and CLOEXEC being applied to the
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart
wrote:
> On 12/21/16 5:05 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> The name pmc_plt_clk_ follows the data sheet specification, where
>>> this convention is suggested:
>>> PLT_CLK[2:0] - Camera
>>> PLT_CLK[3] -
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:26:18PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Some platforms have the capability to configure the performance state of
> their Power Domains. The performance levels are represented by positive
> integer values, a lower value represents lower performance state.
>
> The
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart
wrote:
> On 12/21/16 5:05 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> The name pmc_plt_clk_ follows the data sheet specification, where
>>> this convention is suggested:
>>> PLT_CLK[2:0] - Camera
>>> PLT_CLK[3] - Audio Codec
>>> PLT_CLK[4] -
>>>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:26:18PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Some platforms have the capability to configure the performance state of
> their Power Domains. The performance levels are represented by positive
> integer values, a lower value represents lower performance state.
>
> The
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:20:45AM +0800, Ryder Lee wrote:
> Add DT bindings documentation for the crypto driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/crypto/mediatek-crypto.txt | 27
> ++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:20:45AM +0800, Ryder Lee wrote:
> Add DT bindings documentation for the crypto driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/crypto/mediatek-crypto.txt | 27
> ++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
>
On 12/22/2016 06:31 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 09:04:02PM +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote:
>> On 12/20/2016 08:52 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 19:53 +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote:
>> >> This patch updates LZ4 kernel module to LZ4 v1.7.2 by Yann Collet.
>> >> The kernel
On 12/22/2016 06:31 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 09:04:02PM +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote:
>> On 12/20/2016 08:52 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 19:53 +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote:
>> >> This patch updates LZ4 kernel module to LZ4 v1.7.2 by Yann Collet.
>> >> The kernel
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 09:56:11AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> Add devicetree bindings for Rockchip cru which found on
> Rockchip SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
> ---
> .../bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3328-cru.txt | 57
> ++
> 1 file
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 09:56:11AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> Add devicetree bindings for Rockchip cru which found on
> Rockchip SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
> ---
> .../bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3328-cru.txt | 57
> ++
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Ross Zwisler
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:00:55AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Wed 21-12-16 10:51:18, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 09:53:47AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>> > > On Tue 20-12-16 17:37:40, Dan
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Ross Zwisler
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:00:55AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Wed 21-12-16 10:51:18, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 09:53:47AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>> > > On Tue 20-12-16 17:37:40, Dan Williams wrote:
>> > > > The lack
On 12/22/2016 06:29 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 07:53:09PM +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> This patchset is for updating the LZ4 compression module to a version based
>> on LZ4 v1.7.2 allowing to use the fast compression algorithm aka LZ4 fast
>> which provides an "acceleration"
On 12/22/2016 06:29 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 07:53:09PM +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> This patchset is for updating the LZ4 compression module to a version based
>> on LZ4 v1.7.2 allowing to use the fast compression algorithm aka LZ4 fast
>> which provides an "acceleration"
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 03:34:52PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2016-12-21 15:25:05, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 06:32:46PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Thu 2016-12-08 12:08:38, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 03:34:52PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2016-12-21 15:25:05, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 06:32:46PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Thu 2016-12-08 12:08:38, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > Change livepatch to use a basic per-task consistency
On 12/21/2016 05:07 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 12/21/16 5:05 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>
>> Ok, by clkdev design if a device is passed but there isn't a
>> match in the lookup table it allows it to match based solely on
>> the connection id. Given that the connection id is globally
>>
On 12/21/2016 05:07 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 12/21/16 5:05 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>
>> Ok, by clkdev design if a device is passed but there isn't a
>> match in the lookup table it allows it to match based solely on
>> the connection id. Given that the connection id is globally
>>
On 12/21/16 02:23, galcon zhao wrote:
> HI ALL:
>
> I am reading kernel source code ,but I have a question.
>
> struct klist {
> spinlock_t k_lock;
> struct list_head k_list;
> void (*get)(struct klist_node *);
> void (*put)(struct klist_node *);
> }
On 12/21/16 02:23, galcon zhao wrote:
> HI ALL:
>
> I am reading kernel source code ,but I have a question.
>
> struct klist {
> spinlock_t k_lock;
> struct list_head k_list;
> void (*get)(struct klist_node *);
> void (*put)(struct klist_node *);
> }
Peter Zijlstra writes:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:19:17PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Peter Zijlstra writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 08:21:23PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >>
>> >> And please make the array the last item in
Peter Zijlstra writes:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:19:17PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Peter Zijlstra writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 08:21:23PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >>
>> >> And please make the array the last item in the structure so that
>> >> expanding or
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > On 12/22/2016 04:29 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Julia,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 08:39:38PM
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > On 12/22/2016 04:29 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Julia,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 08:39:38PM
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> We don't prevent ebpf programs being loaded based on the digest but
> just to uniquely identify loaded programs from user space and match up
> with their source.
Okay, so in that case, a weak hashing
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> We don't prevent ebpf programs being loaded based on the digest but
> just to uniquely identify loaded programs from user space and match up
> with their source.
Okay, so in that case, a weak hashing function like SHA1 could result
On 12/22/2016 09:21 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
On 12/20/2016 02:23 PM, David Lechner wrote:
This adds a new UART port type for TI DA8xx/OMAPL13x/AM17xx/AM18xx. These
SoCs have standard 8250 registers plus some extra non-standard registers.
The UART will not function unless the
On 12/22/2016 09:21 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
On 12/20/2016 02:23 PM, David Lechner wrote:
This adds a new UART port type for TI DA8xx/OMAPL13x/AM17xx/AM18xx. These
SoCs have standard 8250 registers plus some extra non-standard registers.
The UART will not function unless the
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:26:17PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some platforms have the capability to configure the performance state of
> their Power Domains. The performance levels are represented by positive
> integer values, a lower value represents lower performance state.
>
> We
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> I wasn't concerned about performance but more about DoS resilience. I
> wonder how safe half md4 actually is in terms of allowing users to
> generate long hash chains in the filesystem (in terms of length
>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:26:17PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some platforms have the capability to configure the performance state of
> their Power Domains. The performance levels are represented by positive
> integer values, a lower value represents lower performance state.
>
> We
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> I wasn't concerned about performance but more about DoS resilience. I
> wonder how safe half md4 actually is in terms of allowing users to
> generate long hash chains in the filesystem (in terms of length
> extension attacks against
On 22.12.2016 16:54, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:10:33PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> wrote:
>>> following up on what appears to be a random subject: ;)
>>>
>>> IIRC, ext4 code by
On 22.12.2016 16:54, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:10:33PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> wrote:
>>> following up on what appears to be a random subject: ;)
>>>
>>> IIRC, ext4 code by default still uses half_md4 for
Many times, when a user wants a random number, he wants a random number
of a guaranteed size. So, thinking of get_random_int and get_random_long
in terms of get_random_u32 and get_random_u64 makes it much easier to
achieve this. It also makes the code simpler.
On 32-bit platforms, get_random_int
Now that our crng uses chacha20, we can rely on its speedy
characteristics for replacing MD5, while simultaneously achieving a
higher security guarantee. Before the idea was to use these functions if
you wanted random integers that aren't stupidly insecure but aren't
necessarily secure either, a
Many times, when a user wants a random number, he wants a random number
of a guaranteed size. So, thinking of get_random_int and get_random_long
in terms of get_random_u32 and get_random_u64 makes it much easier to
achieve this. It also makes the code simpler.
On 32-bit platforms, get_random_int
Now that our crng uses chacha20, we can rely on its speedy
characteristics for replacing MD5, while simultaneously achieving a
higher security guarantee. Before the idea was to use these functions if
you wanted random integers that aren't stupidly insecure but aren't
necessarily secure either, a
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 04:31:12PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> This series adds support for all SBS compatible battery chargers, as defined
> here: http://sbs-forum.org/specs/sbc110.pdf.
>
> [...]
>
> Nicolas Saenz Julienne (2):
> power: supply: add sbs-charger driver
>
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 04:31:12PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> This series adds support for all SBS compatible battery chargers, as defined
> here: http://sbs-forum.org/specs/sbc110.pdf.
>
> [...]
>
> Nicolas Saenz Julienne (2):
> power: supply: add sbs-charger driver
>
Hi Thomas.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 08:19:47PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The following series completes the cpuhotplug rework stage ONE.
Just curious - what is the stage TWO (and onwards) plan?
lwn had some coverage of this work but I assume the
article is somewhat outdated.
Sam
Hi Thomas.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 08:19:47PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The following series completes the cpuhotplug rework stage ONE.
Just curious - what is the stage TWO (and onwards) plan?
lwn had some coverage of this work but I assume the
article is somewhat outdated.
Sam
Yes that is much more helpful. So looking at it things are being
padded but the last 4 bytes always have this extra data in them. I've
been trying to recreate the issue on an 82599 with an SR-IOV VF and I
haven't been having much luck reproducing the problem.
In your test environment is the
Yes that is much more helpful. So looking at it things are being
padded but the last 4 bytes always have this extra data in them. I've
been trying to recreate the issue on an 82599 with an SR-IOV VF and I
haven't been having much luck reproducing the problem.
In your test environment is the
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 09:25 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 08:07 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > >
> > > You mean:
> > >
> > > commit 7bd509e311f408f7a5132fcdde2069af65fa05ae
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 09:25 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 08:07 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > >
> > > You mean:
> > >
> > > commit 7bd509e311f408f7a5132fcdde2069af65fa05ae
> > > Author: Daniel
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 09:12 -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:57:36PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 08:52 -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > > This approach occurred to us, but we couldn't figure out a way to make
> > > blk_mq_tag_to_rq() work with it.
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 09:12 -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:57:36PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 08:52 -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > > This approach occurred to us, but we couldn't figure out a way to make
> > > blk_mq_tag_to_rq() work with it.
Hi Linus,
Please pull a single patch that advertises a change of my email address.
This pull request is based on my previous one that has been already merged.
The following changes since commit
Hi Linus,
Please pull a single patch that advertises a change of my email address.
This pull request is based on my previous one that has been already merged.
The following changes since commit
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > On 12/22/2016 04:29 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Julia,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 08:39:38PM
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > On 12/22/2016 04:29 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Julia,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 08:39:38PM
Dear Sir/Madam.
Assalamu`Alaikum.
I am Dr mohammad ouattara, I have ($10.6 Million us dollars) to transfer into
your account,
I will send you more details about this deal and the procedures to follow when
I receive a positive response from you,
Have a great day,
Dr mohammad ouattara.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 09:04:02PM +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote:
> On 12/20/2016 08:52 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 19:53 +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote:
> >> This patch updates LZ4 kernel module to LZ4 v1.7.2 by Yann Collet.
> >> The kernel module is inspired by the previous work by
Dear Sir/Madam.
Assalamu`Alaikum.
I am Dr mohammad ouattara, I have ($10.6 Million us dollars) to transfer into
your account,
I will send you more details about this deal and the procedures to follow when
I receive a positive response from you,
Have a great day,
Dr mohammad ouattara.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 09:04:02PM +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote:
> On 12/20/2016 08:52 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 19:53 +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote:
> >> This patch updates LZ4 kernel module to LZ4 v1.7.2 by Yann Collet.
> >> The kernel module is inspired by the previous work by
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 07:53:09PM +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote:
>
> This patchset is for updating the LZ4 compression module to a version based
> on LZ4 v1.7.2 allowing to use the fast compression algorithm aka LZ4 fast
> which provides an "acceleration" parameter as a tradeoff between
>
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 07:53:09PM +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote:
>
> This patchset is for updating the LZ4 compression module to a version based
> on LZ4 v1.7.2 allowing to use the fast compression algorithm aka LZ4 fast
> which provides an "acceleration" parameter as a tradeoff between
>
>From 9ca76e7e3cb885bc5701e9b1fe90c44f4aef123a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:28:01 -0500
kn->priv which is a void * is used as a RCU pointer by cgroup. When
dereferencing it, it was passing kn->priv to rcu_derefreence() without
casting it
>From 9ca76e7e3cb885bc5701e9b1fe90c44f4aef123a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:28:01 -0500
kn->priv which is a void * is used as a RCU pointer by cgroup. When
dereferencing it, it was passing kn->priv to rcu_derefreence() without
casting it into a RCU pointer
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 08:43:55AM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> The gpiod_get* function family does not want the -gpio suffix.
> Use devm_gpiod_get_index_optional instead of devm_gpiod_get_optional.
> The descriptor based APIs handle active high/low automatically.
> The vbus-gpios are output,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 08:43:55AM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> The gpiod_get* function family does not want the -gpio suffix.
> Use devm_gpiod_get_index_optional instead of devm_gpiod_get_optional.
> The descriptor based APIs handle active high/low automatically.
> The vbus-gpios are output,
My previous email address is no longer valid.
>From now on, jacek.anaszew...@gmail.com should be used instead.
Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski
---
MAINTAINERS | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index
My previous email address is no longer valid.
>From now on, jacek.anaszew...@gmail.com should be used instead.
Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski
---
MAINTAINERS | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 1cd38a7..b61650d 100644
---
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 08:07 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 16:41 +0100, Jason A.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 08:07 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 16:41 +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> > > Hi Hannes,
>> > >
>> > > On Thu,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> This sort of thing is normally indicative of a memory reclaim or
> lock contention problem. Profile showed unusual spinlock contention,
> but then I realised there was only one kswapd thread running.
> Yup, sure
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> This sort of thing is normally indicative of a memory reclaim or
> lock contention problem. Profile showed unusual spinlock contention,
> but then I realised there was only one kswapd thread running.
> Yup, sure enough, it's caused by a
From: Moritz Fischer
The Zynq Ultrascale MP uses version 1.4 of the Cadence IP core
which fixes some silicon bugs that needed software workarounds
in Version 1.0 that was used on Zynq systems.
Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer
Cc: Michal Simek
From: Moritz Fischer
The Zynq Ultrascale MP uses version 1.4 of the Cadence IP core
which fixes some silicon bugs that needed software workarounds
in Version 1.0 that was used on Zynq systems.
Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer
Cc: Michal Simek
Cc: Sören Brinkmann
Cc: Rob Herring
---
Changes
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 11:09 +0100, Nicolas Iooss wrote:
> In ishtp_hid_probe(), use %04X instead of %04hX to format __u32
> values,
> in order to silent a format error reported by clang:
>
> drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp-hid.c:212:3: error: format
> specifies
> type 'unsigned short' but
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 11:09 +0100, Nicolas Iooss wrote:
> In ishtp_hid_probe(), use %04X instead of %04hX to format __u32
> values,
> in order to silent a format error reported by clang:
>
> drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp-hid.c:212:3: error: format
> specifies
> type 'unsigned short' but
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 11:09 +0100, Nicolas Iooss wrote:
> Structure ishtp_device contains a logging function, print_log(),
> which
> formats some of its parameters using vsnprintf(). Add a __printf
> attribute to this function field (and to ish_event_tracer()) in order
> to
> detect at compile
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 11:09 +0100, Nicolas Iooss wrote:
> Structure ishtp_device contains a logging function, print_log(),
> which
> formats some of its parameters using vsnprintf(). Add a __printf
> attribute to this function field (and to ish_event_tracer()) in order
> to
> detect at compile
Ignore this change. Sorry for the noise.
Thanks
Arvind
On Thursday 22 December 2016 05:28 PM, Arvind Yadav wrote:
Here, If pcim_iomap_table will fail. It will return NULL.
Kernel can run into a NULL-pointer dereference.
This error check will avoid NULL pointer dereference.
Signed-off-by:
Ignore this change. Sorry for the noise.
Thanks
Arvind
On Thursday 22 December 2016 05:28 PM, Arvind Yadav wrote:
Here, If pcim_iomap_table will fail. It will return NULL.
Kernel can run into a NULL-pointer dereference.
This error check will avoid NULL pointer dereference.
Signed-off-by:
Ignore this change. Sorry for noise.
Thanks
-Arvind
On Thursday 22 December 2016 05:36 PM, Arvind Yadav wrote:
Here, If pcim_iomap_table will fail. It will return NULL.
Kernel can run into a NULL-pointer dereference.
This error check will avoid NULL pointer dereference.
Signed-off-by: Arvind
Ignore this change. Sorry for noise.
Thanks
-Arvind
On Thursday 22 December 2016 05:36 PM, Arvind Yadav wrote:
Here, If pcim_iomap_table will fail. It will return NULL.
Kernel can run into a NULL-pointer dereference.
This error check will avoid NULL pointer dereference.
Signed-off-by: Arvind
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:57:36PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 08:52 -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > This approach occurred to us, but we couldn't figure out a way to make
> > blk_mq_tag_to_rq() work with it. From skimming over the patches, I
> > didn't see a solution to
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:57:36PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 08:52 -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > This approach occurred to us, but we couldn't figure out a way to make
> > blk_mq_tag_to_rq() work with it. From skimming over the patches, I
> > didn't see a solution to
Yes, It will not fail. Sorry for the noise.
Thanks
-Arvind
On Thursday 22 December 2016 08:05 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 17:09 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
Here, If pcim_iomap_table will fail. It will return NULL.
Kernel can run into a NULL-pointer dereference.
This error
Yes, It will not fail. Sorry for the noise.
Thanks
-Arvind
On Thursday 22 December 2016 08:05 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 17:09 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
Here, If pcim_iomap_table will fail. It will return NULL.
Kernel can run into a NULL-pointer dereference.
This error
On Thu 2016-12-22 14:31:19, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (12/21/16 23:36), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > Use printk_safe per-CPU buffers in printk recursion-prone blocks:
> > -- around logbuf_lock protected sections in vprintk_emit() and
> >console_unlock()
> > -- around
On Thu 2016-12-22 14:31:19, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (12/21/16 23:36), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > Use printk_safe per-CPU buffers in printk recursion-prone blocks:
> > -- around logbuf_lock protected sections in vprintk_emit() and
> >console_unlock()
> > -- around
Às 4:57 PM de 12/22/2016, Phil Reid escreveu:
> On 22/12/2016 23:47, Joao Pinto wrote:
>>
>> Hello Phil,
>>
>> Às 3:42 PM de 12/22/2016, Phil Reid escreveu:
>>> G'day Joao,
>>>
>>> On 22/12/2016 20:38, Joao Pinto wrote:
When testing stmmac with my QoS reference design I checked a problem in
Às 4:57 PM de 12/22/2016, Phil Reid escreveu:
> On 22/12/2016 23:47, Joao Pinto wrote:
>>
>> Hello Phil,
>>
>> Às 3:42 PM de 12/22/2016, Phil Reid escreveu:
>>> G'day Joao,
>>>
>>> On 22/12/2016 20:38, Joao Pinto wrote:
When testing stmmac with my QoS reference design I checked a problem in
Hi,
Here's an updated version of the pcpu rwsem writer wait/wake changes
with the abstractions wanted by Oleg. Patch 1 adds rcuwait (for a lack
of better name), and patch 2 trivially makes use of it.
Has survived torture testing, which is actually very handy in this case
particularly dealing
Fixed checkpatch.pl warnings in rtl8188eu/core directory.
Signed-off-by: Yamanappagouda Patil
---
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c | 4
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_ieee80211.c | 5 -
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_led.c | 1 +
501 - 600 of 1180 matches
Mail list logo