If 'platform_device_alloc()' returns NULL, the current code returns
0, which means success. Return -ENOMEM instead.
Fixes: 846f0e9e74a0 ("ACPI/IORT: Add support for ARM SMMU platform devices
creation")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET
---
drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:54:42AM +0800, sean.w...@mediatek.com wrote:
> From: Sean Wang
>
> This patch adds documentation for devicetree bindings
> for LED support on MT6323 PMIC
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Wang
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-mt6323.txt | 60
>
Test the functionality of of_parse_phandle_with_args_map().
Cc: Pantelis Antoniou
Cc: Linus Walleij
Cc: Mark Brown
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dts
This is one small chunk of work related to DT overlays for expansion
boards. It would be good to have a way to expose #-cells types of
providers through a connector in a standard way. So we introduce a way
to make "nexus" nodes for these types of properties to remap the consumer
number space to
Test the functionality of of_parse_phandle_with_args_map().
Cc: Pantelis Antoniou
Cc: Linus Walleij
Cc: Mark Brown
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dts | 11 +++
drivers/of/unittest-data/tests-phandle.dtsi | 25 ++
drivers/of/unittest.c
This is one small chunk of work related to DT overlays for expansion
boards. It would be good to have a way to expose #-cells types of
providers through a connector in a standard way. So we introduce a way
to make "nexus" nodes for these types of properties to remap the consumer
number space to
Platforms like 96boards have a standardized connector/expansion
slot that exposes signals like GPIOs to expansion boards in an
SoC agnostic way. We'd like the DT overlays for the expansion
boards to be written once without knowledge of the SoC on the
other side of the connector. This avoids the
Platforms like 96boards have a standardized connector/expansion
slot that exposes signals like GPIOs to expansion boards in an
SoC agnostic way. We'd like the DT overlays for the expansion
boards to be written once without knowledge of the SoC on the
other side of the connector. This avoids the
Platforms like 96boards have a standardized connector/expansion
slot that exposes signals like GPIOs to expansion boards in an
SoC agnostic way. We'd like the DT overlays for the expansion
boards to be written once without knowledge of the SoC on the
other side of the connector. This avoids the
Platforms like 96boards have a standardized connector/expansion
slot that exposes signals like GPIOs to expansion boards in an
SoC agnostic way. We'd like the DT overlays for the expansion
boards to be written once without knowledge of the SoC on the
other side of the connector. This avoids the
On 01/21/2017 02:07 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jason Baron wrote:
For example the last line could sure be written as:
key->entries = jlm->entries;
key->type |= static_key_type(key);
right?
Hi,
So that is going to
On 01/21/2017 02:07 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jason Baron wrote:
For example the last line could sure be written as:
key->entries = jlm->entries;
key->type |= static_key_type(key);
right?
Hi,
So that is going to over-write the
Hi Michael,
[auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.10-rc5 next-20170123]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Michael-S-Tsirkin/virtio_net-fix
Hi Michael,
[auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.10-rc5 next-20170123]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Michael-S-Tsirkin/virtio_net-fix
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 07:11:16PM +0100, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> Add device-tree binding documentation for the MI0283QT display panel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes
> ---
>
> Datasheet: https://cdn-shop.adafruit.com/datasheets/MI0283QT-11+V1.1.PDF
>
>
>
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 07:11:16PM +0100, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> Add device-tree binding documentation for the MI0283QT display panel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes
> ---
>
> Datasheet: https://cdn-shop.adafruit.com/datasheets/MI0283QT-11+V1.1.PDF
>
>
>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:02:46PM -0800, Andrey Pronin wrote:
> > But if there is no actual need to do this right now then don't worry
> > about overdesigning things..
>
> OK, I can live with chip->id specific logic in probe/shutdown, if that's
> the current approach.
It is where we are
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:02:46PM -0800, Andrey Pronin wrote:
> > But if there is no actual need to do this right now then don't worry
> > about overdesigning things..
>
> OK, I can live with chip->id specific logic in probe/shutdown, if that's
> the current approach.
It is where we are
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:17:25PM -0800, Lance Roy wrote:
> SRCU uses two per-cpu counters: a nesting counter to count the number of
> active critical sections, and a sequence counter to ensure that the nesting
> counters don't change while they are being added together in
>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:17:25PM -0800, Lance Roy wrote:
> SRCU uses two per-cpu counters: a nesting counter to count the number of
> active critical sections, and a sequence counter to ensure that the nesting
> counters don't change while they are being added together in
>
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 07:11:15PM +0100, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> Multi-Inno Technology Co.,Ltd is a Hong Kong based company offering
> LCD, LCD module products and complete panel solutions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes
> ---
>
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 07:11:15PM +0100, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> Multi-Inno Technology Co.,Ltd is a Hong Kong based company offering
> LCD, LCD module products and complete panel solutions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:34:45AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:42:55PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:53:46PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Commit d2db185bfee8 ("rcu: Remove short-term CPU kicking") removed
> > > frequent calls to
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:34:45AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:42:55PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:53:46PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Commit d2db185bfee8 ("rcu: Remove short-term CPU kicking") removed
> > > frequent calls to
On Mon 2017-01-23 15:13:31, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > It seems that battery driver stopped working on N900 between -rc4 and
> > -rc5.
>
> pavel@amd:/data/l/linux-n900$ git bisect log
> # bad: [41f283973653dc44af47585fa79fb6da6ffdc2e2] Merge
> /data//l/clean-cg into mini-v4.10
> # good:
On Mon 2017-01-23 15:13:31, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > It seems that battery driver stopped working on N900 between -rc4 and
> > -rc5.
>
> pavel@amd:/data/l/linux-n900$ git bisect log
> # bad: [41f283973653dc44af47585fa79fb6da6ffdc2e2] Merge
> /data//l/clean-cg into mini-v4.10
> # good:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 08:04:59PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 06:29:22PM
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 08:04:59PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 06:29:22PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> >> I think it could work by
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This adds the top level SoC bindings for Cortina systems Gemini
> platforms.
>
> Cc: Janos Laube
> Cc: Paulius Zaleckas
> Cc: Hans Ulli Kroll
> Cc:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 01:28:52PM -0600, Edward James wrote:
> I still just can't get gmail to reply to this. Thanks for the review.
>
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 01/16/2017 01:13 PM, eajames@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> From: "Edward A.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This adds the top level SoC bindings for Cortina systems Gemini
> platforms.
>
> Cc: Janos Laube
> Cc: Paulius Zaleckas
> Cc: Hans Ulli Kroll
> Cc: Florian Fainelli
> Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 01:28:52PM -0600, Edward James wrote:
> I still just can't get gmail to reply to this. Thanks for the review.
>
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 01/16/2017 01:13 PM, eajames@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> From: "Edward A. James"
> >>
> >>
SRCU uses two per-cpu counters: a nesting counter to count the number of
active critical sections, and a sequence counter to ensure that the nesting
counters don't change while they are being added together in
srcu_readers_active_idx_check().
This patch instead uses per-cpu lock and unlock
SRCU uses two per-cpu counters: a nesting counter to count the number of
active critical sections, and a sequence counter to ensure that the nesting
counters don't change while they are being added together in
srcu_readers_active_idx_check().
This patch instead uses per-cpu lock and unlock
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
During rmdir only reset the ctrl values for the rdtgroup's closid. This
is done so that that next time when the closid is reused they dont
reflect old values.
How on earth is that related to MBA?
This
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
During rmdir only reset the ctrl values for the rdtgroup's closid. This
is done so that that next time when the closid is reused they dont
reflect old values.
How on earth is that related to MBA?
This
Here is a more recent version of the patch. It has more accurate comments.
Here is a more recent version of the patch. It has more accurate comments.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:02:46PM -0800, Andrey Pronin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:22:07PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 03:00:53PM -0800, Andrey Pronin wrote:
> >
> > > Here I was talking not about tpm_tis_spi or tpm_tis. Those can
> > > continue relying on
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:02:46PM -0800, Andrey Pronin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:22:07PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 03:00:53PM -0800, Andrey Pronin wrote:
> >
> > > Here I was talking not about tpm_tis_spi or tpm_tis. Those can
> > > continue relying on
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 01:21:19PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This adds device tree bindings for the Cortina systems Gemini
> flash controller, a simple physmap which however need a few
> syscon bits to be poked to operate properly.
>
> Cc: Janos Laube
> Cc: Paulius
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 01:21:19PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This adds device tree bindings for the Cortina systems Gemini
> flash controller, a simple physmap which however need a few
> syscon bits to be poked to operate properly.
>
> Cc: Janos Laube
> Cc: Paulius Zaleckas
> Cc: Hans Ulli
On 01/20/2017 10:52 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
Another option is create something new either common or TI SCI
specific. It could be just a table of ids and phandles in the SCI
node. I'm much more comfortable with an isolated property in one node
than something scattered throughout the DT.
On 01/20/2017 10:52 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
Another option is create something new either common or TI SCI
specific. It could be just a table of ids and phandles in the SCI
node. I'm much more comfortable with an isolated property in one node
than something scattered throughout the DT.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:46 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 1:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> I agree that the kernel change to do it per task is very simple. But
>> this is an unfortunate slippery slope. What if you want to block
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:46 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 1:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> I agree that the kernel change to do it per task is very simple. But
>> this is an unfortunate slippery slope. What if you want to block off
>> everything in /proc that isn't
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 01:19:50PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This adds bindings and simple probing for the Cortina Systems Gemini
> SoC RTC.
>
> Cc: Janos Laube
> Cc: Paulius Zaleckas
> Cc: Hans Ulli Kroll
> Cc:
Em Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:55:21AM -0800, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > Do you know if there is any tool comparing the output of objdump -d to what
> > is
> > produced by a similar xed based tool?
>
> I'm not aware of such a tool, but could be written using the "xed" tool
> in the xed distribution.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 01:19:50PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This adds bindings and simple probing for the Cortina Systems Gemini
> SoC RTC.
>
> Cc: Janos Laube
> Cc: Paulius Zaleckas
> Cc: Hans Ulli Kroll
> Cc: Florian Fainelli
> Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Linus
Em Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:55:21AM -0800, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > Do you know if there is any tool comparing the output of objdump -d to what
> > is
> > produced by a similar xed based tool?
>
> I'm not aware of such a tool, but could be written using the "xed" tool
> in the xed distribution.
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:12:07 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:38:29AM -0800, Lance Roy wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:42:34 -0800
> > "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> >
> > > @@ -413,6 +415,8 @@ static void
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:12:07 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:38:29AM -0800, Lance Roy wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:42:34 -0800
> > "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> >
> > > @@ -413,6 +415,8 @@ static void __synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp,
> > > int
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 01:18:30PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This adds fairly standard DT bindings for the Cortina Systems
> Gemini GPIO controller.
>
> Cc: Janos Laube
> Cc: Paulius Zaleckas
> Cc: Hans Ulli Kroll
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 01:18:30PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This adds fairly standard DT bindings for the Cortina Systems
> Gemini GPIO controller.
>
> Cc: Janos Laube
> Cc: Paulius Zaleckas
> Cc: Hans Ulli Kroll
> Cc: Florian Fainelli
> Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:03:29PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:26:06PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > This translates to queue_work_on(), which has the comment of "We queue
> > > the work to a specific CPU, the caller must ensure it can't go away.",
> > > so is
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:03:29PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:26:06PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > This translates to queue_work_on(), which has the comment of "We queue
> > > the work to a specific CPU, the caller must ensure it can't go away.",
> > > so is
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 01:17:07PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This adds device tree bindings for the Cortina Systems Gemini
> timer block used in these SoCs.
>
> Cc: Janos Laube
> Cc: Paulius Zaleckas
> Cc: Hans Ulli Kroll
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 01:17:07PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This adds device tree bindings for the Cortina Systems Gemini
> timer block used in these SoCs.
>
> Cc: Janos Laube
> Cc: Paulius Zaleckas
> Cc: Hans Ulli Kroll
> Cc: Florian Fainelli
> Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:22:07PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 03:00:53PM -0800, Andrey Pronin wrote:
>
> > Here I was talking not about tpm_tis_spi or tpm_tis. Those can
> > continue relying on the core, or register the default handler using
> > .shutdown =
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:22:07PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 03:00:53PM -0800, Andrey Pronin wrote:
>
> > Here I was talking not about tpm_tis_spi or tpm_tis. Those can
> > continue relying on the core, or register the default handler using
> > .shutdown =
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 01:16:09PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This adds device tree bindings for the Cortina Gemini interrupt
> controller. They are pretty standard.
>
> Cc: Janos Laube
> Cc: Paulius Zaleckas
> Cc: Hans Ulli Kroll
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 01:16:09PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This adds device tree bindings for the Cortina Gemini interrupt
> controller. They are pretty standard.
>
> Cc: Janos Laube
> Cc: Paulius Zaleckas
> Cc: Hans Ulli Kroll
> Cc: Florian Fainelli
> Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
>
Quoting Kishon Vijay Abraham I (2017-01-22 00:46:21)
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 21 January 2017 12:20 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Some USB PHYs need to be told about vbus changing state
> > explicitly. For example the qcom USB HS PHY needs to toggle a bit
> > when vbus goes from low to high
Quoting Kishon Vijay Abraham I (2017-01-22 00:46:21)
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 21 January 2017 12:20 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Some USB PHYs need to be told about vbus changing state
> > explicitly. For example the qcom USB HS PHY needs to toggle a bit
> > when vbus goes from low to high
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 04:16:46PM +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> This patch adds dt-binding documentation for zx2967 family
> watchdog controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie
> ---
> .../bindings/watchdog/zte,zx2967-wdt.txt | 31
> ++
> 1
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 04:16:46PM +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> This patch adds dt-binding documentation for zx2967 family
> watchdog controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie
> ---
> .../bindings/watchdog/zte,zx2967-wdt.txt | 31
> ++
> 1 file changed, 31
> Do you know if there is any tool comparing the output of objdump -d to what is
> produced by a similar xed based tool?
I'm not aware of such a tool, but could be written using the "xed" tool
in the xed distribution. However I would trust xed over objdump,
it is used widely in Intel tools with
> Do you know if there is any tool comparing the output of objdump -d to what is
> produced by a similar xed based tool?
I'm not aware of such a tool, but could be written using the "xed" tool
in the xed distribution. However I would trust xed over objdump,
it is used widely in Intel tools with
> On 23 January 2017 at 19:43 Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>
>
> On 01/23/2017 11:50 AM, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> > See i_size_read() comments in include/linux/fs.h
>
> Is this fixing a real problem? Can the bd_inode size change while we're
> mounting or resizing the
> On 23 January 2017 at 19:43 Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>
>
> On 01/23/2017 11:50 AM, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> > See i_size_read() comments in include/linux/fs.h
>
> Is this fixing a real problem? Can the bd_inode size change while we're
> mounting or resizing the filesystem?
>
Behind good
Em Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 05:41:49PM -0800, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> From: Andi Kleen
>
> When dumping PT traces with perf script it is very useful to see the
> assembler for each sample, so that it is easily possible to follow
> the control flow.
>
> As using objdump is
Em Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 05:41:49PM -0800, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> From: Andi Kleen
>
> When dumping PT traces with perf script it is very useful to see the
> assembler for each sample, so that it is easily possible to follow
> the control flow.
>
> As using objdump is difficult and inefficient
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Shivappa Vikas wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
Add the files in info directory for MBA.
The files in the info directory are as follows :
- num_closids: max
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Shivappa Vikas wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
Add the files in info directory for MBA.
The files in the info directory are as follows :
- num_closids: max
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:49:29PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:45:25PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > This commit is the third step towards full abstraction of all accesses
> > to the ->dynticks counter, implementing the previously open-coded atomic
> > add of 1
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:49:29PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:45:25PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > This commit is the third step towards full abstraction of all accesses
> > to the ->dynticks counter, implementing the previously open-coded atomic
> > add of 1
On 23/01/2017 19:44, Richard Cochran wrote:
>> device clock|sample1P,deviceclock| |sample2P,deviceclock|
>> -
>> realtime clock |sample1P,realtimeclock| |sample2P,realtimeclock|
>
> Are |sample1P,deviceclock| and
On 23/01/2017 19:44, Richard Cochran wrote:
>> device clock|sample1P,deviceclock| |sample2P,deviceclock|
>> -
>> realtime clock |sample1P,realtimeclock| |sample2P,realtimeclock|
>
> Are |sample1P,deviceclock| and
I don't have any guests with PAGE_SIZE > 64k but the
code seems to be clearly broken in that case
as PAGE_SIZE / MERGEABLE_BUFFER_ALIGN will need
more than 8 bit and so the code in mergeable_ctx_to_buf_address
does not give us the actual true size.
Cc: John Fastabend
I don't have any guests with PAGE_SIZE > 64k but the
code seems to be clearly broken in that case
as PAGE_SIZE / MERGEABLE_BUFFER_ALIGN will need
more than 8 bit and so the code in mergeable_ctx_to_buf_address
does not give us the actual true size.
Cc: John Fastabend
Signed-off-by: Michael S.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:43:44PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:53:47PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Commit 4914950aaa12d ("rcu: Stop treating in-kernel CPU-bound workloads
>
> Does this commit ID still match what you have in your tree, post-rebase?
In light of
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:43:44PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:53:47PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Commit 4914950aaa12d ("rcu: Stop treating in-kernel CPU-bound workloads
>
> Does this commit ID still match what you have in your tree, post-rebase?
In light of
Linus,
Please pull the following change from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cmetcalf/linux-tile.git stable
This avoids an issue with short userspace reads for regset via ptrace.
Dave Martin (1):
tile/ptrace: Preserve previous registers for short regset write
Linus,
Please pull the following change from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cmetcalf/linux-tile.git stable
This avoids an issue with short userspace reads for regset via ptrace.
Dave Martin (1):
tile/ptrace: Preserve previous registers for short regset write
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:42:55PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:53:46PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Commit d2db185bfee8 ("rcu: Remove short-term CPU kicking") removed
> > frequent calls to resched_cpu(), which means that the only time
> > resched_cpu() is invoked
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:42:55PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:53:46PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Commit d2db185bfee8 ("rcu: Remove short-term CPU kicking") removed
> > frequent calls to resched_cpu(), which means that the only time
> > resched_cpu() is invoked
>From d786b91f422c6ad4c0d9bb9c1bef2dd5008e3d9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:28:51 -0500
@t1 and @t2i are calculated along with @t2 but never used. Drop them.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo
Reported-by: David Binderman
>From d786b91f422c6ad4c0d9bb9c1bef2dd5008e3d9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:28:51 -0500
@t1 and @t2i are calculated along with @t2 but never used. Drop them.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo
Reported-by: David Binderman
---
Applied to libata/for-4.11. Thanks.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:40:23PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:53:41PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > This commit switches RCU suspicious-access splats use pr_err()
> > instead of the current INFO printk()s. This change makes it easier
> > to automatically
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:40:23PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:53:41PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > This commit switches RCU suspicious-access splats use pr_err()
> > instead of the current INFO printk()s. This change makes it easier
> > to automatically
On 20.01.2017 19:23, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:25:48 +0100
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like
On 20.01.2017 19:23, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:25:48 +0100
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
> Comparison
Hi Nicolas,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc5 next-20170123]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nicolas-Dichtel/uapi-export-all-headers
Hi Nicolas,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc5 next-20170123]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nicolas-Dichtel/uapi-export-all-headers
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:38:29AM -0800, Lance Roy wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:42:34 -0800
> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>
> > If a process invokes synchronize_srcu(), is delayed just the right amount
> > of time, and thus does not sleep when waiting for the grace
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:38:29AM -0800, Lance Roy wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:42:34 -0800
> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>
> > If a process invokes synchronize_srcu(), is delayed just the right amount
> > of time, and thus does not sleep when waiting for the grace period to
> > complete,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:49:26PM +, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> int mxs_saif_put_mclk(unsigned int saif_id)
> {
> - struct mxs_saif *saif = mxs_saif[saif_id];
> - u32 stat;
> + struct clk *clk;
>
> - if (!saif)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + clk = clk_get(NULL,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:49:26PM +, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> int mxs_saif_put_mclk(unsigned int saif_id)
> {
> - struct mxs_saif *saif = mxs_saif[saif_id];
> - u32 stat;
> + struct clk *clk;
>
> - if (!saif)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + clk = clk_get(NULL,
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017, Shivappa Vikas wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > If it's going to stay, then Intel should be able to provide simple tables
> > which give us the required information for a particular CPU model.
>
> By sample table - does this mean we can map a throttle
Declare device_type structures as const as they are only stored in the
type field of a device structure. This field is of type const, so add
const to declaration of device_type structures.
File size before:
textdata bss dec hex filename
171841344 80 1860848b0
501 - 600 of 1646 matches
Mail list logo