On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:43:20PM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Scott Bauer
> > Sent: 09 February 2017 17:20
> > It may be too late to change anyhting in the uapi header. When we
> > switched over to using IOC_SIZE I found a bug where I had switched
> > up a structure in one of the series
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:43:20PM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Scott Bauer
> > Sent: 09 February 2017 17:20
> > It may be too late to change anyhting in the uapi header. When we
> > switched over to using IOC_SIZE I found a bug where I had switched
> > up a structure in one of the series
Application allocating overcommitted hugepages behave differently when
its mempolicy is set to bind with NUMA nodes containing CPUs and not
containing CPUs. When memory is allocated on node with CPUs everything
work as expected, when memory is allocated on CPU-less node:
1. Some memory is
Application allocating overcommitted hugepages behave differently when
its mempolicy is set to bind with NUMA nodes containing CPUs and not
containing CPUs. When memory is allocated on node with CPUs everything
work as expected, when memory is allocated on CPU-less node:
1. Some memory is
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Ben Gardner wrote:
> Allow the at24 driver to get configuration information from both OF and
> ACPI by using the more generic device_property functions.
> This change was inspired by the at25.c driver.
>
> I have a custom board with a ST
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Ben Gardner wrote:
> Allow the at24 driver to get configuration information from both OF and
> ACPI by using the more generic device_property functions.
> This change was inspired by the at25.c driver.
>
> I have a custom board with a ST M24C02 EEPROM attached to
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > You are just not getting it, really.
> >
> > The problem is that this for_each_online_cpu() is racy against a concurrent
> > hot unplug and therefor can queue stuff for a not longer online cpu. That's
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > You are just not getting it, really.
> >
> > The problem is that this for_each_online_cpu() is racy against a concurrent
> > hot unplug and therefor can queue stuff for a not longer online cpu. That's
On 9 Feb 2017, at 3:16, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 11:12:51AM -0500, Zi Yan wrote:
>> From: Naoya Horiguchi
>>
>> This patch enables thp migration for move_pages(2).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi
>> ---
>>
On 9 Feb 2017, at 3:16, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 11:12:51AM -0500, Zi Yan wrote:
>> From: Naoya Horiguchi
>>
>> This patch enables thp migration for move_pages(2).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi
>> ---
>> mm/migrate.c | 37 -
>>
On 9 Feb 2017, at 3:16, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 11:12:47AM -0500, Zi Yan wrote:
>> From: Naoya Horiguchi
>>
>> If one of callers of page migration starts to handle thp,
>> memory management code start to see pmd migration entry, so we need
>>
On 9 Feb 2017, at 3:16, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 11:12:47AM -0500, Zi Yan wrote:
>> From: Naoya Horiguchi
>>
>> If one of callers of page migration starts to handle thp,
>> memory management code start to see pmd migration entry, so we need
>> to prepare for it before
Allow the at24 driver to get configuration information from both OF and
ACPI by using the more generic device_property functions.
This change was inspired by the at25.c driver.
I have a custom board with a ST M24C02 EEPROM attached to an I2C bus.
With the following ACPI construct, this patch
Allow the at24 driver to get configuration information from both OF and
ACPI by using the more generic device_property functions.
This change was inspired by the at25.c driver.
I have a custom board with a ST M24C02 EEPROM attached to an I2C bus.
With the following ACPI construct, this patch
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 03:41:42PM +, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> Assuming a derived struct of the form:
>
> struct foo_bar_state
> {
> struct drm_bar_state bar_state;
> struct foo_private priv;
> struct foo_private2 *priv2;
> };
>
> memcpy priv and priv2 to the new instance
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 03:41:42PM +, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> Assuming a derived struct of the form:
>
> struct foo_bar_state
> {
> struct drm_bar_state bar_state;
> struct foo_private priv;
> struct foo_private2 *priv2;
> };
>
> memcpy priv and priv2 to the new instance
On a Fedora 25 system, make pdfdocs is failing with
[jim@krebstar linux-rc]$ grep -v -i 'warning:' /tmp/make-pdfdocs.err
/data/linux-rc/Documentation/doc-guide/sphinx.rst:110: ERROR: Unknown
target name: "sphinx c domain".
./include/net/cfg80211.h:3154: ERROR: Unexpected indentation.
When CONFIG_KASAN is enabled, compilation fails:
block/sed-opal.c: In function 'sed_ioctl':
block/sed-opal.c:2447:1: error: the frame size of 2256 bytes is larger than
2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
Moved all the ioctl structures off the stack and dynamically activate
using _IOC_SIZE()
When CONFIG_KASAN is enabled, compilation fails:
block/sed-opal.c: In function 'sed_ioctl':
block/sed-opal.c:2447:1: error: the frame size of 2256 bytes is larger than
2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
Moved all the ioctl structures off the stack and dynamically activate
using _IOC_SIZE()
On a Fedora 25 system, make pdfdocs is failing with
[jim@krebstar linux-rc]$ grep -v -i 'warning:' /tmp/make-pdfdocs.err
/data/linux-rc/Documentation/doc-guide/sphinx.rst:110: ERROR: Unknown
target name: "sphinx c domain".
./include/net/cfg80211.h:3154: ERROR: Unexpected indentation.
the IOW for the IOC_OPAL_ACTIVATE_LSP took the wrong strcure which
would give us the wrong size when using _IOC_SIZE, switch it to the
right structure.
Fixes: 058f8a2 ("Include: Uapi: Add user ABI for Sed/Opal")
Signed-off-by: Scott Bauer
---
the IOW for the IOC_OPAL_ACTIVATE_LSP took the wrong strcure which
would give us the wrong size when using _IOC_SIZE, switch it to the
right structure.
Fixes: 058f8a2 ("Include: Uapi: Add user ABI for Sed/Opal")
Signed-off-by: Scott Bauer
---
include/uapi/linux/sed-opal.h | 2 +-
1 file
It may be too late to change anyhting in the uapi header. When we
switched over to using IOC_SIZE I found a bug where I had switched
up a structure in one of the series from v4 to v5 but never changed
the structure in the IOW. The structure that was in there was to small
so when we kzalloc on it
It may be too late to change anyhting in the uapi header. When we
switched over to using IOC_SIZE I found a bug where I had switched
up a structure in one of the series from v4 to v5 but never changed
the structure in the IOW. The structure that was in there was to small
so when we kzalloc on it
Le 2017-01-31 14:09, Linus Walleij a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Paul Cercueil
wrote:
[Rob]:
From the overlapping register addresses in the examples and this
description, it looks like the pinctrlr and gpio controller are 1
block.
If so, then there should
Le 2017-01-31 14:09, Linus Walleij a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Paul Cercueil
wrote:
[Rob]:
From the overlapping register addresses in the examples and this
description, it looks like the pinctrlr and gpio controller are 1
block.
If so, then there should only be 1 node.
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> You are just not getting it, really.
>
> The problem is that this for_each_online_cpu() is racy against a concurrent
> hot unplug and therefor can queue stuff for a not longer online cpu. That's
> what the mm folks tried to avoid by preventing a CPU
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> You are just not getting it, really.
>
> The problem is that this for_each_online_cpu() is racy against a concurrent
> hot unplug and therefor can queue stuff for a not longer online cpu. That's
> what the mm folks tried to avoid by preventing a CPU
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 03:41:41PM +, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was working on a few patches adding fields to struct malidp_crtc_state and
> found myself writing memcpy multiple times in the ->atomic_duplicate_state
> hook because I wanted to avoid copying the drm_crtc_state twice
>
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 03:41:41PM +, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was working on a few patches adding fields to struct malidp_crtc_state and
> found myself writing memcpy multiple times in the ->atomic_duplicate_state
> hook because I wanted to avoid copying the drm_crtc_state twice
>
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:00 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got the following error report while fuzzing the kernel with syzkaller.
>
> On commit 926af6273fc683cd98cd0ce7bf0d04a02eed6742.
>
> A reproducer and .config are attached.
>
> general protection fault:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:00 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got the following error report while fuzzing the kernel with syzkaller.
>
> On commit 926af6273fc683cd98cd0ce7bf0d04a02eed6742.
>
> A reproducer and .config are attached.
>
> general protection fault: [#1] SMP KASAN
>
> Adding a 'select' statement to something as broad as NETDEVICES sounds
> really bad, it has a significant risk of introducing dependency loops
> and may be confusing if you want to build a multiplatform config without
> networking support (note that NETDEVICES in turn depends on NET, which
> can
> Adding a 'select' statement to something as broad as NETDEVICES sounds
> really bad, it has a significant risk of introducing dependency loops
> and may be confusing if you want to build a multiplatform config without
> networking support (note that NETDEVICES in turn depends on NET, which
> can
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:26:38PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> And while I mention libc I am seeing (rather rare) random segfaults
> in programs such as cp, tar, install and dpkg ever since the upgrade
> to glibc 2.23 (or maybe it was 2.24). I am struggling to get a
> backtrace because it only
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:26:38PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> And while I mention libc I am seeing (rather rare) random segfaults
> in programs such as cp, tar, install and dpkg ever since the upgrade
> to glibc 2.23 (or maybe it was 2.24). I am struggling to get a
> backtrace because it only
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 01:32:22AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Fix a possibility of deadlock case in kretprobe on arm
> implementation. There may be a chance that the kretprobe
> hash table lock can cause a dead lock.
>
> The senario is that a user puts 2 kretprobes, one on normal
> function
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 01:32:22AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Fix a possibility of deadlock case in kretprobe on arm
> implementation. There may be a chance that the kretprobe
> hash table lock can cause a dead lock.
>
> The senario is that a user puts 2 kretprobes, one on normal
> function
/linux-fs.git
keys-fixes-20170209
David
---
Dan Carpenter (2):
KEYS: Fix an error code in request_master_key()
KEYS: Use memzero_explicit() for secret data
Felix Fietkau (1):
sign-file: fix build error in sign-file.c with libressl
scripts/sign-file.c
From: Dan Carpenter
This function has two callers and neither are able to handle a NULL
return. Really, -EINVAL is the correct thing return here anyway. This
fixes some static checker warnings like:
security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c:709
/linux-fs.git
keys-fixes-20170209
David
---
Dan Carpenter (2):
KEYS: Fix an error code in request_master_key()
KEYS: Use memzero_explicit() for secret data
Felix Fietkau (1):
sign-file: fix build error in sign-file.c with libressl
scripts/sign-file.c
From: Dan Carpenter
This function has two callers and neither are able to handle a NULL
return. Really, -EINVAL is the correct thing return here anyway. This
fixes some static checker warnings like:
security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c:709 encrypted_key_decrypt()
error:
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 23:18 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:14:22 -0600
> Tom Zanussi wrote:
>
> > > > I'm submitting the patchset (based on tracing/for-next) as an RFC not
> > > > only to get comments, but because there are still
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 23:18 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:14:22 -0600
> Tom Zanussi wrote:
>
> > > > I'm submitting the patchset (based on tracing/for-next) as an RFC not
> > > > only to get comments, but because there are still some problems I
> > > >
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:57:04PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 03:41:41PM +, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was working on a few patches adding fields to struct malidp_crtc_state and
> > found myself writing memcpy multiple times in the
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:57:04PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 03:41:41PM +, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was working on a few patches adding fields to struct malidp_crtc_state and
> > found myself writing memcpy multiple times in the
Ignore this last patch. I should remember to test even the simplest of
cut-and-paste ops.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Ben Gardner wrote:
> Allow the at24 driver to get configuration information from both OF and
> ACPI by using the more generic device_property
Ignore this last patch. I should remember to test even the simplest of
cut-and-paste ops.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Ben Gardner wrote:
> Allow the at24 driver to get configuration information from both OF and
> ACPI by using the more generic device_property functions.
> This change was
From: Felix Fietkau
The sign-file tool failed to build against libressl. Fix this by extending
the PKCS7 check and thus making sign-file link against libressl without an
error.
Signed-off-by: John Crispin
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau
From: Felix Fietkau
The sign-file tool failed to build against libressl. Fix this by extending
the PKCS7 check and thus making sign-file link against libressl without an
error.
Signed-off-by: John Crispin
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau
Signed-off-by: David Howells
---
scripts/sign-file.c |
From: Dan Carpenter
I don't think GCC has figured out how to optimize the memset() away, but
they might eventually so let's future proof this code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
Signed-off-by: David Howells
From: Dan Carpenter
I don't think GCC has figured out how to optimize the memset() away, but
they might eventually so let's future proof this code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
Signed-off-by: David Howells
Acked-by: Mimi Zohar
---
security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c |2 +-
1
This patch adds bindings for dsm501 particle sensor driver.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Duszynski
---
Changes in v2:
o add 'data' prefix to gpios property
.../devicetree/bindings/iio/chemical/dsm501.txt | 16
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
create
This patch adds support for dsm501 and ppd42ns particle sensors.
Both sensors work on the same principle. Heater (resistor) heats up air
in sensor chamber which induces upward flow. Particles convect up through
a light beam provided by internal infra-red LED. Light scattered by
particles is
This patch adds bindings for dsm501 particle sensor driver.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Duszynski
---
Changes in v2:
o add 'data' prefix to gpios property
.../devicetree/bindings/iio/chemical/dsm501.txt | 16
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
This patch adds support for dsm501 and ppd42ns particle sensors.
Both sensors work on the same principle. Heater (resistor) heats up air
in sensor chamber which induces upward flow. Particles convect up through
a light beam provided by internal infra-red LED. Light scattered by
particles is
From: Colin Ian King
The initialisation of pointer ssp is from a dereference on sock->sk
before sock-sk is null checked, hence there is a potential for a
null pointer deference. Fix this by moving the assignment of ssp
to just before it is used in the call to
From: Colin Ian King
The initialisation of pointer ssp is from a dereference on sock->sk
before sock-sk is null checked, hence there is a potential for a
null pointer deference. Fix this by moving the assignment of ssp
to just before it is used in the call to smk_ipv6_check.
Also minor clean
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:39:37PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> and this makes me think, that this is not the right approach
>
> adding extra copy of an event when you want to add new expression?
I don't want to add new expressions.
I don't even need arbitrary expressions, just DividedBy
to get
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:39:37PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> and this makes me think, that this is not the right approach
>
> adding extra copy of an event when you want to add new expression?
I don't want to add new expressions.
I don't even need arbitrary expressions, just DividedBy
to get
On Thursday, February 9, 2017 4:57:51 PM CET Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The newly introduced mdiobus_register_board_info() function is only
> > available
> > as part of PHYLIB, so we get a link error when we call that from a board
> >
On Thursday, February 9, 2017 4:57:51 PM CET Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The newly introduced mdiobus_register_board_info() function is only
> > available
> > as part of PHYLIB, so we get a link error when we call that from a board
> >
Hi,
What some drivers do when they just get/set a bit in a register
to get/set or set the direction of a GPIO, is to select GPIO_GENERIC
and just bgpio_init() with the right iomem pointers, then the core
will register handlers for get, set, set_direcition callback and
get_direction and your
Hi,
What some drivers do when they just get/set a bit in a register
to get/set or set the direction of a GPIO, is to select GPIO_GENERIC
and just bgpio_init() with the right iomem pointers, then the core
will register handlers for get, set, set_direcition callback and
get_direction and your
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:31:56AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> From: Xinliang Liu
>
> This patch add a config to support to create multi buffer for cma fbdev.
> Such as double buffer and triple buffer.
>
> Cma fbdev is convient to add a legency fbdev. And still many
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:31:56AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> From: Xinliang Liu
>
> This patch add a config to support to create multi buffer for cma fbdev.
> Such as double buffer and triple buffer.
>
> Cma fbdev is convient to add a legency fbdev. And still many Android
> devices use
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:29:56 +
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 10:57:55PM +, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
> > +
> > +.macro __ftrace_regs_caller
> > +
> > + add ip, sp, #4 @ move in IP the value of
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:29:56 +
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 10:57:55PM +, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
> > +
> > +.macro __ftrace_regs_caller
> > +
> > + add ip, sp, #4 @ move in IP the value of SP as it was
> > +
Broke argument list so that it won't exceed 80 characters
Signed-off-by: Avraham Shukron
---
drivers/staging/media/omap4iss/iss_video.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/omap4iss/iss_video.c
Broke argument list so that it won't exceed 80 characters
Signed-off-by: Avraham Shukron
---
drivers/staging/media/omap4iss/iss_video.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/omap4iss/iss_video.c
b/drivers/staging/media/omap4iss/iss_video.c
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 12:47:01PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Unlike the other encoders in the driver, I've also dropped the debug
> dump function. There's only really one register to this device, and
> we have the debugfs reg entry still.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
Yeah,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 12:47:01PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Unlike the other encoders in the driver, I've also dropped the debug
> dump function. There's only really one register to this device, and
> we have the debugfs reg entry still.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
Yeah, dmesg spew by
Allow the at24 driver to get configuration information from both OF and
ACPI by using the more generic device_property functions.
This change was inspired by the at25.c driver.
I have a custom board with a ST M24C02 EEPROM attached to an I2C bus.
With the following ACPI construct, this patch
Allow the at24 driver to get configuration information from both OF and
ACPI by using the more generic device_property functions.
This change was inspired by the at25.c driver.
I have a custom board with a ST M24C02 EEPROM attached to an I2C bus.
With the following ACPI construct, this patch
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HYPERV_TSCPAGE
> +static notrace u64 vread_hvclock(int *mode)
> +{
> + const struct ms_hyperv_tsc_page *tsc_pg =
> + (const struct ms_hyperv_tsc_page *)_page;
> + u64 sequence, scale, offset, current_tick, cur_tsc;
>
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HYPERV_TSCPAGE
> +static notrace u64 vread_hvclock(int *mode)
> +{
> + const struct ms_hyperv_tsc_page *tsc_pg =
> + (const struct ms_hyperv_tsc_page *)_page;
> + u64 sequence, scale, offset, current_tick, cur_tsc;
>
On Thursday, February 9, 2017 4:51:25 PM CET Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the list, that looks very helpful. The ones I found myself
> >>> seem to be a strict (and small) subset of those, using gcc-7.0.1 on
On Thursday, February 9, 2017 4:51:25 PM CET Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the list, that looks very helpful. The ones I found myself
> >>> seem to be a strict (and small) subset of those, using gcc-7.0.1 on x86-64
> >>> with
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:31:57AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> From: Stefan Christ
>
> Implement legacy framebuffer ioctl FBIO_WAITFORVSYNC in the generic
> framebuffer emulation driver. Legacy framebuffer users like non kms/drm
> based OpenGL(ES)/EGL implementations may
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:31:57AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> From: Stefan Christ
>
> Implement legacy framebuffer ioctl FBIO_WAITFORVSYNC in the generic
> framebuffer emulation driver. Legacy framebuffer users like non kms/drm
> based OpenGL(ES)/EGL implementations may require the ioctl to
>
Fixed multi-line comments to their preferred style (First line empty)
Signed-off-by: Avraham Shukron
---
drivers/staging/media/omap4iss/iss_video.c | 38 --
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git
3.12.70-rt94-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
The RCU sched protection was changed to RCU only and so all IRQ-off and
preempt-off disabled region were changed to the relevant
Fixed multi-line comments to their preferred style (First line empty)
Signed-off-by: Avraham Shukron
---
drivers/staging/media/omap4iss/iss_video.c | 38 --
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/omap4iss/iss_video.c
3.12.70-rt94-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
The RCU sched protection was changed to RCU only and so all IRQ-off and
preempt-off disabled region were changed to the relevant rcu-read-lock
primitives.
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 07:57:27PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:57:43PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> > @@ -332,6 +332,15 @@ static inline struct page
> > *grab_cache_page_nowait(struct address_space *mapping,
> >
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 07:57:27PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:57:43PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> > @@ -332,6 +332,15 @@ static inline struct page
> > *grab_cache_page_nowait(struct address_space *mapping,
> >
Dear RT Folks,
This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.12.70-rt94-rc1.
Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when
the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release
3.12.70-rt94-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
---
localversion-rt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/localversion-rt b/localversion-rt
index
3.12.70-rt94-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
---
localversion-rt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/localversion-rt b/localversion-rt
index e98a1fe050bd..dcc2fd2ca155
Dear RT Folks,
This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.12.70-rt94-rc1.
Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when
the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the list, that looks very helpful. The ones I found myself
>>> seem to be a strict (and small) subset of those, using gcc-7.0.1 on x86-64
>>> with allmodconfig and a few hundred randconfig builds. Which
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the list, that looks very helpful. The ones I found myself
>>> seem to be a strict (and small) subset of those, using gcc-7.0.1 on x86-64
>>> with allmodconfig and a few hundred randconfig builds. Which compiler
>>> version
This patch fixes a previous patch: "crypto: atmel-sha - update request
queue management to make it more generic".
Indeed the patch above should have replaced the "return -EINVAL;" lines by
"return atmel_sha_complete(dd, -EINVAL);" but instead replaced them by a
simple call of
This patch fixes a previous patch: "crypto: atmel-sha - update request
queue management to make it more generic".
Indeed the patch above should have replaced the "return -EINVAL;" lines by
"return atmel_sha_complete(dd, -EINVAL);" but instead replaced them by a
simple call of
Hi all,
this series is based on next-20170209.
The first patch fixes a bug reported by Dan Carpenter. I didn't put a
Fixes tag since the buggy patch is only in linux-next for now so its
commit ID is likely to change when entering Linus' tree.
It fixes a wrong 'sed' command: many "return -E
Hi all,
this series is based on next-20170209.
The first patch fixes a bug reported by Dan Carpenter. I didn't put a
Fixes tag since the buggy patch is only in linux-next for now so its
commit ID is likely to change when entering Linus' tree.
It fixes a wrong 'sed' command: many "return -E
This patch clarifies and fixes how errors should be handled by
atmel_sha_start().
For update operations, the previous code wrongly assumed that
(err != -EINPROGRESS) implies (err == 0). It's wrong because that doesn't
take the error cases (err < 0) into account.
This patch also adds many
This patch clarifies and fixes how errors should be handled by
atmel_sha_start().
For update operations, the previous code wrongly assumed that
(err != -EINPROGRESS) implies (err == 0). It's wrong because that doesn't
take the error cases (err < 0) into account.
This patch also adds many
Hi,
I've updated the container with Fedora Rawhide I use to build
tools/perf/ and samples/bcc/ and it now comes with gcc 7, where I get
things like:
CC /tmp/build/perf/tests/code-reading.o
util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c: In function 'intel_pt_walk_psb':
Hi,
I've updated the container with Fedora Rawhide I use to build
tools/perf/ and samples/bcc/ and it now comes with gcc 7, where I get
things like:
CC /tmp/build/perf/tests/code-reading.o
util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c: In function 'intel_pt_walk_psb':
901 - 1000 of 1850 matches
Mail list logo