* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Josh suggested moving the _ONCE logic inside the trap handler, using a
> bit in the bug_entry::flags field, avoiding the need for the extra
> variable.
This looks interesting, as the _ONCE() methods of warning are far more
user-friendly than WARN() spam.
> Sadly t
* Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 02/24/2017 12:45 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Shuah Khan wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/23/2017 03:26 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >>> Shuah, I assume you'll take this patch in through the selftests tree.
> >>
> >> Yes I can do that.
> >
> > No, let's not do that please, we h
On 25 February 2017 at 08:18, Markus Trippelsdorf
wrote:
> On 2017.02.24 at 15:33 -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> On 02/24/2017 01:45 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> > On 24 February 2017 at 21:25, John Stultz wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>>
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that the thing that triggered this is once more commit
> a9b4f08770b4 ("x86/ioapic: Restore IO-APIC irq_chip retrigger
> callback") which seems to retrigger stale irqs that simply should not
> be retriggered.
>
> They aren't actually active any more, if
Hi Linus,
The following changes since commit 566cf877a1fcb6d6dc0126b076aad062054c2637:
Linux 4.10-rc6 (2017-01-29 14:25:17 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.infradead.org/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git
tags/platform-drivers-x86-v4.11-1
for you to fetch changes up to
Josh suggested moving the _ONCE logic inside the trap handler, using a
bit in the bug_entry::flags field, avoiding the need for the extra
variable.
Sadly this only works for WARN_ON_ONCE(), since the others have
printk() statements prior to triggering the trap.
Still, this saves some text and da
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> A64 PWM controller has same register layout as sun4i driver, so it works
> by adding A64 specific data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 9 +
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drive
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 12:31:21AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Willy Tarreau writes:
>
> > Hi Junio,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:28:58AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> * Use of an empty string that is used for 'everything matches' is
> >>still warned and Git asks users to use a
Willy Tarreau writes:
> Hi Junio,
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:28:58AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> * Use of an empty string that is used for 'everything matches' is
>>still warned and Git asks users to use a more explicit '.' for that
>>instead. The hope is that existing users wil
On 2017.02.24 at 15:33 -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 02/24/2017 01:45 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 24 February 2017 at 21:25, John Stultz wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Fedora was previously carrying a workaround for a gcc7 issue repo
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:26:05AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 48
> +++
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
I personally reject any patch with no changelog text, so I wouldn't get
Hi, Peter:
First, thank you for your approval of my last patch and fix my bad description.
And I have some questions about perf event and perf_fuzzer.
Recently I was using perf_fuzzer for testing in Hisilicon D03/D05(arm64,
linux-4.10-rc1).
As we know perf_fuzzer will write a random value to p
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:49:17PM +, Long Li wrote:
> A PCI_EJECT message can arrive at the same time we are calling
> pci_scan_child_bus in the workqueue for the previous PCI_BUS_RELATIONS
> message or in create_root_hv_pci_bus(), in this case we could potentailly
> modify the bus from mul
On 2017/2/25 2:12, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>
> This is to handle only one case in which:
>
> 1. uses old kernel without this flag,
> 2. calls fsync and gets sudden power-cut,
> 3. updates new kernel having this flag before mount.
>
> Then, if we do not check this flag at mount time, we will lose the
Le 24/02/2017 à 22:19, Javier Martinez Canillas a écrit :
Thanks for the patch, but Krzysztof sent the exact same patch before
[0]. There
was feedback from Sylwester at the time that you can also look at [0]. Could you
please take that into account and post a patch according to what he suggested
201 - 215 of 215 matches
Mail list logo