4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Patrik Jakobsson
commit 82bc9a42cf854fdf63155759c0aa790bd1f361b0 upstream.
With LVDS we were incorrectly picking the pre-programmed mode instead of
the prefered
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Brian Foster
commit 3b4683c294095b5f777c03307ef8c60f47320e12 upstream.
Lockdep complains about use of the iolock in inode reclaim context
because it doesn't understand that
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Patrik Jakobsson
commit 82bc9a42cf854fdf63155759c0aa790bd1f361b0 upstream.
With LVDS we were incorrectly picking the pre-programmed mode instead of
the prefered mode provided by VBT. Make sure
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Brian Foster
commit 3b4683c294095b5f777c03307ef8c60f47320e12 upstream.
Lockdep complains about use of the iolock in inode reclaim context
because it doesn't understand that reclaim has the
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Brian Foster
commit 63db7c815bc0997c29e484d2409684fdd9fcd93b upstream.
We've had user reports of unmount hangs in xfs_wait_buftarg() that
analysis shows is due to
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Brian Foster
commit 63db7c815bc0997c29e484d2409684fdd9fcd93b upstream.
We've had user reports of unmount hangs in xfs_wait_buftarg() that
analysis shows is due to btp->bt_io_count == -1.
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Darrick J. Wong
commit 78420281a9d74014af7616958806c3aba056319e upstream.
The inline directory verifiers should be called on the inode fork data,
which means after
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Darrick J. Wong
commit 78420281a9d74014af7616958806c3aba056319e upstream.
The inline directory verifiers should be called on the inode fork data,
which means after iformat_local on the read
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Darrick J. Wong
commit 630a04e79dd41ff746b545d4fc052e0abb836120 upstream.
When we're reading or writing the data fork of an inline directory,
check the contents to
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Darrick J. Wong
commit 630a04e79dd41ff746b545d4fc052e0abb836120 upstream.
When we're reading or writing the data fork of an inline directory,
check the contents to make sure we're not
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Christoph Hellwig
commit 52813fb13ff90bd9c39a93446cbf1103c290b6e9 upstream.
bno should be a xfs_fsblock_t, which is 64-bit wides instead of a
xfs_aglock_t, which truncates the
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Christoph Hellwig
commit 52813fb13ff90bd9c39a93446cbf1103c290b6e9 upstream.
bno should be a xfs_fsblock_t, which is 64-bit wides instead of a
xfs_aglock_t, which truncates the value to 32
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Zorro Lang
commit 892d2a5f705723b2cb488bfb38bcbdcf83273184 upstream.
By run fsstress long enough time enough in RHEL-7, I find an
assertion failure (harder to reproduce on
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ursula Braun
[ Upstream commit 9111e7880ccf419548c7b0887df020b08eadb075 ]
When setting up the device from within the layer discipline's
probe routine, creating the
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Daniel Borkmann
[ Upstream commit d8b54110ee944de522ccd3531191f39986ec20f9 ]
Shubham was recently asking on netdev why in arm64 JIT we don't multiply
the index for
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Zorro Lang
commit 892d2a5f705723b2cb488bfb38bcbdcf83273184 upstream.
By run fsstress long enough time enough in RHEL-7, I find an
assertion failure (harder to reproduce on linux-4.11, but
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ursula Braun
[ Upstream commit 9111e7880ccf419548c7b0887df020b08eadb075 ]
When setting up the device from within the layer discipline's
probe routine, creating the layer-specific sysfs
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Daniel Borkmann
[ Upstream commit d8b54110ee944de522ccd3531191f39986ec20f9 ]
Shubham was recently asking on netdev why in arm64 JIT we don't multiply
the index for accessing the tail call
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jan Kara
commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c upstream.
XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
can be seen by the following command:
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Brian Foster
commit cb52ee334a45ae6c78a3999e4b473c43ddc528f4 upstream.
Directory block readahead uses a complex iteration mechanism to map
between high-level directory
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Sandeen
commit 023cc840b40fad95c6fe26fff1d380a8c9d45939 upstream.
Carlos had a case where "find" seemed to start spinning
forever and never return.
This was on a
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jan Kara
commit 5375023ae1266553a7baa0845e82917d8803f48c upstream.
XFS SEEK_HOLE implementation could miss a hole in an unwritten extent as
can be seen by the following command:
xfs_io -c
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Brian Foster
commit cb52ee334a45ae6c78a3999e4b473c43ddc528f4 upstream.
Directory block readahead uses a complex iteration mechanism to map
between high-level directory blocks and underlying
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Sandeen
commit 023cc840b40fad95c6fe26fff1d380a8c9d45939 upstream.
Carlos had a case where "find" seemed to start spinning
forever and never return.
This was on a filesystem with
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Brian Foster
commit 756baca27fff3ecaeab9dbc7a5ee35a1d7bc0c7f upstream.
Inodes that are inserted into the perag tree but still under
construction are flagged with the
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Brian Foster
commit 756baca27fff3ecaeab9dbc7a5ee35a1d7bc0c7f upstream.
Inodes that are inserted into the perag tree but still under
construction are flagged with the XFS_INEW bit. Most
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Julian Wiedmann
[ Upstream commit 2d2ebb3ed0c6acfb014f98e427298673a5d07b82 ]
commit b4d72c08b358 ("qeth: bridgeport support - basic control")
broke the support for
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Darrick J. Wong
commit bf9216f922612d2db7666aae01e65064da2ffb3a upstream.
Fix a memory exposure problems in inumbers where we allocate an array of
structures with
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mohamad Haj Yahia
[ Upstream commit 73dd3a4839c1d27c36d4dcc92e1ff44225ecbeb7 ]
Currently when firmware command gets stuck or it takes long time to
complete, the driver
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.11.4 release.
There are 115 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed Jun 7 15:30:31 UTC 2017.
Anything
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Brian Foster
commit ae2c4ac2dd39b23a87ddb14ceddc3f2872c6aef5 upstream.
The AG inode iterator currently skips new inodes as such inodes are
inserted into the inode radix
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Darrick J. Wong
commit bf9216f922612d2db7666aae01e65064da2ffb3a upstream.
Fix a memory exposure problems in inumbers where we allocate an array of
structures with holes, fail to zero the
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mohamad Haj Yahia
[ Upstream commit 73dd3a4839c1d27c36d4dcc92e1ff44225ecbeb7 ]
Currently when firmware command gets stuck or it takes long time to
complete, the driver command will get
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.11.4 release.
There are 115 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed Jun 7 15:30:31 UTC 2017.
Anything
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Brian Foster
commit ae2c4ac2dd39b23a87ddb14ceddc3f2872c6aef5 upstream.
The AG inode iterator currently skips new inodes as such inodes are
inserted into the inode radix tree before they are
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Julian Wiedmann
[ Upstream commit 2d2ebb3ed0c6acfb014f98e427298673a5d07b82 ]
commit b4d72c08b358 ("qeth: bridgeport support - basic control")
broke the support for OSM and OSN devices as
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jon Paul Maloy
[ Upstream commit 844cf763fba654436d3a4279b6a672c196cf1901 ]
The macro tipc_wait_for_cond() is embedding the macro sk_wait_event()
to fulfil its task.
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Darrick J. Wong
commit 3ecb3ac7b950ff8f6c6a61e8b7b0d6e3546429a0 upstream.
If a malicious user corrupts the refcount btree to cause a cycle between
different levels of
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 04:57:59PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.txt | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
I acked v2. Please add acks when posting new versions.
Rob
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Darrick J. Wong
commit 3ecb3ac7b950ff8f6c6a61e8b7b0d6e3546429a0 upstream.
If a malicious user corrupts the refcount btree to cause a cycle between
different levels of the tree, the next mount
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 04:57:59PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.txt | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
I acked v2. Please add acks when posting new versions.
Rob
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jon Paul Maloy
[ Upstream commit 844cf763fba654436d3a4279b6a672c196cf1901 ]
The macro tipc_wait_for_cond() is embedding the macro sk_wait_event()
to fulfil its task. The latter, in turn, is
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Dumazet
[ Upstream commit f6ba8d33cfbb46df569972e64dbb5bb7e929bfd9 ]
I should have known that lowering skb->truesize was dangerous :/
In case packets are not
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Dumazet
[ Upstream commit f6ba8d33cfbb46df569972e64dbb5bb7e929bfd9 ]
I should have known that lowering skb->truesize was dangerous :/
In case packets are not leaving the host via a
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Dumazet
[ Upstream commit 657831ffc38e30092a2d5f03d385d710eb88b09a ]
syzkaller found a way to trigger double frees from ip_mc_drop_socket()
It turns out that leave
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Dumazet
[ Upstream commit 657831ffc38e30092a2d5f03d385d710eb88b09a ]
syzkaller found a way to trigger double frees from ip_mc_drop_socket()
It turns out that leave a copy of parent
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yuchung Cheng
[ Upstream commit b451e5d24ba6687c6f0e7319c727a709a1846c06 ]
This patch fixes a bug in splitting an SKB during SACK
processing. Specifically if an skb
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yuchung Cheng
[ Upstream commit b451e5d24ba6687c6f0e7319c727a709a1846c06 ]
This patch fixes a bug in splitting an SKB during SACK
processing. Specifically if an skb contains multiple
packets
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Sandeen
commit a4d768e702de224cc85e0c8eac9311763403b368 upstream.
This structure copy was throwing unaligned access warnings on sparc64:
Kernel unaligned access at
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Sandeen
commit a4d768e702de224cc85e0c8eac9311763403b368 upstream.
This structure copy was throwing unaligned access warnings on sparc64:
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[1043c088]
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Darrick J. Wong
commit 6eadbf4c8ba816c10d1c97bed9aa861d9fd17809 upstream.
When we're fulfilling a BMAPX request, jump out early if the data fork
is in local format.
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Darrick J. Wong
commit 6eadbf4c8ba816c10d1c97bed9aa861d9fd17809 upstream.
When we're fulfilling a BMAPX request, jump out early if the data fork
is in local format. This prevents us from
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ursula Braun
[ Upstream commit ebccc7397e4a49ff64c8f44a54895de9d32fe742 ]
commit 5f78e29ceebf ("qeth: optimize IP handling in rx_mode callback")
added new hash
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: WANG Cong
[ Upstream commit 83eaddab4378db256d00d295bda6ca997cd13a52 ]
Like commit 657831ffc38e ("dccp/tcp: do not inherit mc_list from parent")
we should clear
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: WANG Cong
[ Upstream commit 83eaddab4378db256d00d295bda6ca997cd13a52 ]
Like commit 657831ffc38e ("dccp/tcp: do not inherit mc_list from parent")
we should clear ipv6_mc_list etc. for IPv6
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ursula Braun
[ Upstream commit ebccc7397e4a49ff64c8f44a54895de9d32fe742 ]
commit 5f78e29ceebf ("qeth: optimize IP handling in rx_mode callback")
added new hash tables, but missed to
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Gal Pressman
[ Upstream commit e3c19503712d6360239b19c14cded56dd63c40d7 ]
Pause bit should set when RX pause is on, not TX pause.
Also, setting Asym_Pause is incorrect,
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 04:58:00PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> From: Abhishek Sahu
>
> This patch adds support for the global clock controller found on
> the IPQ8074 based devices. This includes UART, I2C, SPI etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Gal Pressman
[ Upstream commit e3c19503712d6360239b19c14cded56dd63c40d7 ]
Pause bit should set when RX pause is on, not TX pause.
Also, setting Asym_Pause is incorrect, and should be turned
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 04:58:00PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> From: Abhishek Sahu
>
> This patch adds support for the global clock controller found on
> the IPQ8074 based devices. This includes UART, I2C, SPI etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Dumazet
[ Upstream commit 232cd35d0804cc241eb887bb8d4d9b3b9881c64a ]
Andrey Konovalov and idaif...@gmail.com reported crashes caused by
one skb shared_info being
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Dumazet
[ Upstream commit 232cd35d0804cc241eb887bb8d4d9b3b9881c64a ]
Andrey Konovalov and idaif...@gmail.com reported crashes caused by
one skb shared_info being overwritten from
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Christoph Hellwig
[ Upstream commit 19a0f7e37c0761a0a1cbf550705a6063c9675223 ]
The driver explicitly bypasses APIs to register all memory once a
connection is made, and thus
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Christoph Hellwig
[ Upstream commit 19a0f7e37c0761a0a1cbf550705a6063c9675223 ]
The driver explicitly bypasses APIs to register all memory once a
connection is made, and thus allows remote
mir Davydov <vdavydov@gmail.com>
Presumably this is already known, but a remarkable number of crashes
in next-20170605 bisects to this patch.
Guenter
---
Qemu test results:
total: 122 pass: 51 fail: 71
Failed tests:
arm:vexpress-a9:vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-c
s already known, but a remarkable number of crashes
in next-20170605 bisects to this patch.
Guenter
---
Qemu test results:
total: 122 pass: 51 fail: 71
Failed tests:
arm:vexpress-a9:vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
arm:vexpress-a15:vexpress_defconfig:vexpre
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
[ Upstream commit bafbb9c73241760023d8981191ddd30bb1c6dbac ]
tcp_ack() can call tcp_fragment() which may dededuct the
value tp->fackets_out when MSS
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
[ Upstream commit bafbb9c73241760023d8981191ddd30bb1c6dbac ]
tcp_ack() can call tcp_fragment() which may dededuct the
value tp->fackets_out when MSS changes. When
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: David Ahern
[ Upstream commit f6c5775ff0bfa62b072face6bf1d40f659f194b2 ]
In general, rtnetlink dumps do not anticipate failure to dump a single
object (e.g., link or
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: David Ahern
[ Upstream commit f6c5775ff0bfa62b072face6bf1d40f659f194b2 ]
In general, rtnetlink dumps do not anticipate failure to dump a single
object (e.g., link or route) on a single pass.
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Craig Gallek
[ Upstream commit 2423496af35d94a87156b063ea5cedffc10a70a1 ]
The KASAN warning repoted below was discovered with a syzkaller
program. The reproducer is
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Craig Gallek
[ Upstream commit 2423496af35d94a87156b063ea5cedffc10a70a1 ]
The KASAN warning repoted below was discovered with a syzkaller
program. The reproducer is basically:
int s =
On 06/01/2017 11:34 PM, Anup Patel wrote:
> This patchset adds initial support of Broadcom Stingray SOC
> by reusing existing Broadcom iProc device drivers.
>
> Most of the patches in this patchset are DT patches except
> the Stingray clock tree support which just one patch.
>
> This patchset is
On 06/01/2017 11:34 PM, Anup Patel wrote:
> This patchset adds initial support of Broadcom Stingray SOC
> by reusing existing Broadcom iProc device drivers.
>
> Most of the patches in this patchset are DT patches except
> the Stingray clock tree support which just one patch.
>
> This patchset is
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Douglas Caetano dos Santos
[ Upstream commit d19b183cdc1fa3d70d6abe2a4c369e748cd7ebb8 ]
When using a TX ring buffer, if an error occurs processing a control
message
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Douglas Caetano dos Santos
[ Upstream commit d19b183cdc1fa3d70d6abe2a4c369e748cd7ebb8 ]
When using a TX ring buffer, if an error occurs processing a control
message (e.g. invalid message),
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Orlando Arias
[ Upstream commit deba804c90642c8ed0f15ac1083663976d578f54 ]
Greetings,
GCC 7 introduced the -Wstringop-overflow flag to detect buffer overflows
in
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Orlando Arias
[ Upstream commit deba804c90642c8ed0f15ac1083663976d578f54 ]
Greetings,
GCC 7 introduced the -Wstringop-overflow flag to detect buffer overflows
in calls to string handling
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tobias Jungel
[ Upstream commit a285860211bf257b0e6d522dac6006794be348af ]
Currently it is allowed to set the default pvid of a bridge to a value
above VLAN_VID_MASK
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tobias Jungel
[ Upstream commit a285860211bf257b0e6d522dac6006794be348af ]
Currently it is allowed to set the default pvid of a bridge to a value
above VLAN_VID_MASK (0xfff). This patch adds
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "David S. Miller"
[ Upstream commit 7dd7eb9513bd02184d45f000ab69d78cb1fa1531 ]
Do not use unsigned variables to see if it returns a negative
error or not.
Fixes:
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "David S. Miller"
[ Upstream commit 7dd7eb9513bd02184d45f000ab69d78cb1fa1531 ]
Do not use unsigned variables to see if it returns a negative
error or not.
Fixes: 2423496af35d ("ipv6:
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Michael Neuling
commit d957fb4d173647640a2b83e7c7e56a580e7fc7e7 upstream.
Currently if you disable CONFIG_PPC_RADIX_MMU you'll crash on boot on
a P9. This is because we
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Michael Neuling
commit d957fb4d173647640a2b83e7c7e56a580e7fc7e7 upstream.
Currently if you disable CONFIG_PPC_RADIX_MMU you'll crash on boot on
a P9. This is because we still set
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 03:50:24PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> And presumably that's mostly for debugging purposes and will lead
> to additional quirks to get "automatic" to do the right thing on those
> machines that's it's found to be needed or more beneficial.
I would say that
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 03:50:24PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> And presumably that's mostly for debugging purposes and will lead
> to additional quirks to get "automatic" to do the right thing on those
> machines that's it's found to be needed or more beneficial.
I would say that
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Garver
[ Upstream commit 11387fe4a98f75d1f4cdb3efe3b42b19205c9df5 ]
Since 9b4437a5b870 ("geneve: Unify LWT and netdev handling.") fill_info
does not return
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Garver
[ Upstream commit 11387fe4a98f75d1f4cdb3efe3b42b19205c9df5 ]
Since 9b4437a5b870 ("geneve: Unify LWT and netdev handling.") fill_info
does not return UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_RX when using
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> There are new types and helpers that are supposed to be used in new code.
>
> As a preparation to get rid of legacy types and API functions do
> the conversion here.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> There are new types and helpers that are supposed to be used in new code.
>
> As a preparation to get rid of legacy types and API functions do
> the conversion here.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
> ---
>
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Wei Wang
[ Upstream commit ba615f675281d76fd19aa03558777f81fb6b6084 ]
Fastopen API should be used to perform fastopen operations on the TCP
socket. It does not make sense
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Benjamin Tissoires
commit 878d8db039daac0938238e9a40a5bd6e50ee3c9b upstream.
Revert commit 77e9a4aa9de1 (ACPI / button: Change default behavior to
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Wei Wang
[ Upstream commit ba615f675281d76fd19aa03558777f81fb6b6084 ]
Fastopen API should be used to perform fastopen operations on the TCP
socket. It does not make sense to use fastopen API
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Benjamin Tissoires
commit 878d8db039daac0938238e9a40a5bd6e50ee3c9b upstream.
Revert commit 77e9a4aa9de1 (ACPI / button: Change default behavior to
lid_init_state=open) which changed the
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Davide Caratti
[ Upstream commit 804ec7ebe8ea003999ca8d1bfc499edc6a9e07df ]
sometimes ICMP replies to INIT chunks are ignored by the client, even if
the encapsulated
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Davide Caratti
[ Upstream commit 804ec7ebe8ea003999ca8d1bfc499edc6a9e07df ]
sometimes ICMP replies to INIT chunks are ignored by the client, even if
the encapsulated SCTP headers match an
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Dumazet
[ Upstream commit 3fb07daff8e99243366a081e5129560734de4ada ]
Andrey Konovalov reported crashes in ipv4_mtu()
I could reproduce the issue with KASAN
On 04/28/2017 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Cygnus has a single amac controller connected to the B53 switch with 2
> PHYs. On the BCM911360_EP platform, those two PHYs are connected to
> the external ethernet jacks.
>
> v2: Call the node "switch", just call the ports "port" (suggestions by
>
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Dumazet
[ Upstream commit 3fb07daff8e99243366a081e5129560734de4ada ]
Andrey Konovalov reported crashes in ipv4_mtu()
I could reproduce the issue with KASAN kernels, between
On 04/28/2017 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Cygnus has a single amac controller connected to the B53 switch with 2
> PHYs. On the BCM911360_EP platform, those two PHYs are connected to
> the external ethernet jacks.
>
> v2: Call the node "switch", just call the ports "port" (suggestions by
>
901 - 1000 of 2202 matches
Mail list logo