On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 01:31:39PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> I was reading the memory barries documentation in order to make sure the
> RISC-V barries were correct, and I found a broken link to the atomic
> operations documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt
>
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 01:31:39PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> I was reading the memory barries documentation in order to make sure the
> RISC-V barries were correct, and I found a broken link to the atomic
> operations documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt
> Acked-by: Will Deacon
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:01:04AM -0500, Michael Stecklein wrote:
> Add the bindings for the family of HDC100x sensors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Stecklein
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/iio/humidity/hdc100x.txt| 17
> +
> 1 file changed, 17
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:01:04AM -0500, Michael Stecklein wrote:
> Add the bindings for the family of HDC100x sensors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Stecklein
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/iio/humidity/hdc100x.txt| 17
> +
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> create
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:53:45 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Page migration (for memory hotplug, soft_offline_page or mbind) needs
> to allocate a new memory. This can trigger an oom killer if the target
> memory is depleated. Although
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:53:45 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Page migration (for memory hotplug, soft_offline_page or mbind) needs
> to allocate a new memory. This can trigger an oom killer if the target
> memory is depleated. Although quite unlikely, still possible,
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 05:48:21PM +0300, Todor Tomov wrote:
> Add DT binding document for Qualcomm Camera subsystem driver.
"dt-bindings: media: ..." for the subject please.
>
> CC: Rob Herring
> CC: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Todor Tomov
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 05:48:21PM +0300, Todor Tomov wrote:
> Add DT binding document for Qualcomm Camera subsystem driver.
"dt-bindings: media: ..." for the subject please.
>
> CC: Rob Herring
> CC: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Todor Tomov
> ---
>
On 23/06/17 01:07 PM, Allen Hubbe wrote:
> The client's haven't been fully ported to the multi-port api yet. They were
> only minimally changed to call the new api, but so far other than that they
> have only been made to work as they had before.
So is it intended to eventually send the
On 23/06/17 01:07 PM, Allen Hubbe wrote:
> The client's haven't been fully ported to the multi-port api yet. They were
> only minimally changed to call the new api, but so far other than that they
> have only been made to work as they had before.
So is it intended to eventually send the
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 07:03:27PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> This function compiles to 147 bytes of machine code. 13 callsites.
>
> I'm no expert on SCTP events, but quick reading of SCTP docs tells me that
> SCTP events are not happening on every packet.
> They are ASSOC_CHANGE,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 07:03:27PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> This function compiles to 147 bytes of machine code. 13 callsites.
>
> I'm no expert on SCTP events, but quick reading of SCTP docs tells me that
> SCTP events are not happening on every packet.
> They are ASSOC_CHANGE,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 03:17:23PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgo...@redhat.com):
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:59:46PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > This series of patches primary goal is to enable file capabilities
> > > in user namespaces without affecting the
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 03:17:23PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgo...@redhat.com):
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:59:46PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > This series of patches primary goal is to enable file capabilities
> > > in user namespaces without affecting the
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, tip-bot for Michal Hocko wrote:
> TASK_SIZE (allowed by mmap_base) is pretty much unimited in the real
> life. This would give mmap 20TB of additional address space which is
> quite nice. Especially when it is much more likely to use that address
> space than the reserved
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, tip-bot for Michal Hocko wrote:
> TASK_SIZE (allowed by mmap_base) is pretty much unimited in the real
> life. This would give mmap 20TB of additional address space which is
> quite nice. Especially when it is much more likely to use that address
> space than the reserved
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:16:29 -0700
Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:53:58 -0600
> Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:23:02 -0700
> > Jacob Pan wrote:
> >
> > > If the source
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:16:29 -0700
Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:53:58 -0600
> Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:23:02 -0700
> > Jacob Pan wrote:
> >
> > > If the source device of a page request has its PASID table pointer
> > > bond to a guest, the first
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:29:54 PDT (-0700), cor...@lwn.net wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:25:22 -0700
> Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
>> I was reading the memory barries documentation in order to make sure the
>> RISC-V barries were correct, and I found a broken link to the atomic
>>
I was reading the memory barries documentation in order to make sure the
RISC-V barries were correct, and I found a broken link to the atomic
operations documentation.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt
Acked-by: Will Deacon
---
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:29:54 PDT (-0700), cor...@lwn.net wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:25:22 -0700
> Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
>> I was reading the memory barries documentation in order to make sure the
>> RISC-V barries were correct, and I found a broken link to the atomic
>> operations
I was reading the memory barries documentation in order to make sure the
RISC-V barries were correct, and I found a broken link to the atomic
operations documentation.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt
Acked-by: Will Deacon
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5
On 6/23/2017 11:35 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
>> On 06/23/2017 12:16 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>> On 6/23/2017 9:00 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Amir Goldstein (amir7...@gmail.com):
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Stefan
On 6/23/2017 11:35 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
>> On 06/23/2017 12:16 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>> On 6/23/2017 9:00 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Amir Goldstein (amir7...@gmail.com):
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Stefan
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:25:22 -0700
Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> I was reading the memory barries documentation in order to make sure the
> RISC-V barries were correct, and I found a broken link to the atomic
> operations documentation.
This looks good to me, but can you resend
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:25:22 -0700
Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> I was reading the memory barries documentation in order to make sure the
> RISC-V barries were correct, and I found a broken link to the atomic
> operations documentation.
This looks good to me, but can you resend with Paul McKenney on
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 01:49:16PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > BTW, could you try to check what happens if you kill the
> > if (__builtin_constant_p(n) && (n <= 8))
> > bits in raw_copy_{to,from}_user()? The usefulness of those (in
> > __copy_from_user()
> > originally) had always been
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 01:49:16PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > BTW, could you try to check what happens if you kill the
> > if (__builtin_constant_p(n) && (n <= 8))
> > bits in raw_copy_{to,from}_user()? The usefulness of those (in
> > __copy_from_user()
> > originally) had always been
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:28:47AM +0530, bincy_k_phi...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
> From: bincy k philip
Please use Capital Letters for your name.
>
> trivial fix for extra space error
>
> Signed-off-by: bincy k philip
> ---
>
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:28:47AM +0530, bincy_k_phi...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
> From: bincy k philip
Please use Capital Letters for your name.
>
> trivial fix for extra space error
>
> Signed-off-by: bincy k philip
> ---
> drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:35:22PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > I agree, that's what I'm saying here. I just do not see that happening
> > with your patch set at all. It's adding more code, a more complex way
> > to interact with the subsystem, and not making driver writer lives any
> >
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:35:22PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > I agree, that's what I'm saying here. I just do not see that happening
> > with your patch set at all. It's adding more code, a more complex way
> > to interact with the subsystem, and not making driver writer lives any
> >
To respond to one issue in your wall-of-text response:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:35:22PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> You may argue that *one* upstream users is not sufficient to introduce a new
> feature for, but I disagree given we have had new full *API* added for a new
> feature on the
To respond to one issue in your wall-of-text response:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:35:22PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> You may argue that *one* upstream users is not sufficient to introduce a new
> feature for, but I disagree given we have had new full *API* added for a new
> feature on the
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:36:56PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> Fix a bug where the transformation init code did
> not register a setkey method for none hash based MACs.
"none hash based MACs"? Is that the correct language, I don't
understand it, sorry, can you expand on it a bit in your v3
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:36:56PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> Fix a bug where the transformation init code did
> not register a setkey method for none hash based MACs.
"none hash based MACs"? Is that the correct language, I don't
understand it, sorry, can you expand on it a bit in your v3
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:36:59PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> Some SoC which implement CryptoCell have a dedicated clock
> tied to it, some do not. Implement clock support if exists
> based on device tree data and tie power management to it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:36:59PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> Some SoC which implement CryptoCell have a dedicated clock
> tied to it, some do not. Implement clock support if exists
> based on device tree data and tie power management to it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef
> ---
>
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 03:26:32PM +1200, Derek Robson wrote:
> Fixed checkpatch.pl warnings of "function definition argument FOO should
> also have an identifier name"
> Found using checkpatch
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Robson
>
> V1 had vauge subjet
v2 does as well :(
Also
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 05:49:32PM +0530, simran singhal wrote:
> Use the current logging style.
> Coalesce formats where appropriate.
>
> Signed-off-by: simran singhal
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_rx.c | 34
> ++-
> 1 file
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 03:26:32PM +1200, Derek Robson wrote:
> Fixed checkpatch.pl warnings of "function definition argument FOO should
> also have an identifier name"
> Found using checkpatch
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Robson
>
> V1 had vauge subjet
v2 does as well :(
Also this V1 line needs
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 05:49:32PM +0530, simran singhal wrote:
> Use the current logging style.
> Coalesce formats where appropriate.
>
> Signed-off-by: simran singhal
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_rx.c | 34
> ++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+),
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 14:59 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Before the current modifications, SELinux extended attributes were
> visible inside the user namespace but changes in patch 1 hid them.
> This patch enables security.selinux in user namespaces and allows
> them to be written to in the same
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:03:23 +0200
Markus Heiser wrote:
> I guess there are little remains lying around ;) what I have found:
I just committed the following to clean up that stuff, thanks.
jon
>From 52b3f239bb692d9b3a68461798fb15c011e4108e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 14:59 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Before the current modifications, SELinux extended attributes were
> visible inside the user namespace but changes in patch 1 hid them.
> This patch enables security.selinux in user namespaces and allows
> them to be written to in the same
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:03:23 +0200
Markus Heiser wrote:
> I guess there are little remains lying around ;) what I have found:
I just committed the following to clean up that stuff, thanks.
jon
>From 52b3f239bb692d9b3a68461798fb15c011e4108e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Corbet
Date:
> Christophe JAILLET hat am 23. Juni 2017 um
> 21:44 geschrieben:
>
>
> 'tz' is a valid pointer at this point, so calling PTR_ERR on it is
> pointless.
> This 'err = PTR_ERR(tz)' looks like a cut'n'paste from a few lines above.
> So remove it. 'err' is already
> Christophe JAILLET hat am 23. Juni 2017 um
> 21:44 geschrieben:
>
>
> 'tz' is a valid pointer at this point, so calling PTR_ERR on it is
> pointless.
> This 'err = PTR_ERR(tz)' looks like a cut'n'paste from a few lines above.
> So remove it. 'err' is already the error we want to report.
>
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 05:06:30PM +0100, James Simmons wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 11:01 -0400, James Simmons wrote:
> > > Cleanup many of the over 80 characters reported by checkpatch
> >
> > Please don't let checkpatch get in the way of lustre
> > readability.
> >
> > lustre commonly
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:36:57PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> Add support for the older CryptoCell 710 and 630P hardware revisions.
No, I do not want to add new features to staging drivers where ever
possible. I want you to spend your time fixing up the code to be good
enough to get it out
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 05:06:30PM +0100, James Simmons wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 11:01 -0400, James Simmons wrote:
> > > Cleanup many of the over 80 characters reported by checkpatch
> >
> > Please don't let checkpatch get in the way of lustre
> > readability.
> >
> > lustre commonly
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:36:57PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> Add support for the older CryptoCell 710 and 630P hardware revisions.
No, I do not want to add new features to staging drivers where ever
possible. I want you to spend your time fixing up the code to be good
enough to get it out
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 01:04:55AM +0530, srishti sharma wrote:
> Fixed alignment so that it matched open parenthesis.
>
> Signed-off-by: srishti sharma
> ---
> .../staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-ctl.c | 18
> +-
> 1 file changed, 9
I was reading the memory barries documentation in order to make sure the
RISC-V barries were correct, and I found a broken link to the atomic
operations documentation.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt
Acked-by: Will Deacon
---
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:01:21AM -0400, James Simmons wrote:
> Cleanup all braces that was reported by checkpatch. The only
> issue not fixed up is in mdc_lock.c. Removing the braces in
> the case of mdc_lock.c will break the build.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Simmons
>
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 01:04:55AM +0530, srishti sharma wrote:
> Fixed alignment so that it matched open parenthesis.
>
> Signed-off-by: srishti sharma
> ---
> .../staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-ctl.c | 18
> +-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
I was reading the memory barries documentation in order to make sure the
RISC-V barries were correct, and I found a broken link to the atomic
operations documentation.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt
Acked-by: Will Deacon
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:01:21AM -0400, James Simmons wrote:
> Cleanup all braces that was reported by checkpatch. The only
> issue not fixed up is in mdc_lock.c. Removing the braces in
> the case of mdc_lock.c will break the build.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Simmons
> ---
>
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:36:37PM +0530, simran singhal wrote:
> This patch changes the type of variable done from int to boolean. As it
> is been used as a boolean in the function sfw_test_rpc_done(). It also
> makes the code more readable and bool data type also requires less
> memory in
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 05:58:29PM -0500, yi1...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Yi Li
>
> This adds DRIVER_DATA_REQ_NO_CACHE flag with .req flag under struct
> driver_data_req_params. When this flag is set, the driver_data driver
> will not cache the firmware during PM
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 07:13:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> kernelci.org reports a crazy stack usage for the VT code when CONFIG_KASAN
> is enabled:
>
> drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c: In function 'kbd_keycode':
> drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c:1452:1: error: the frame size of 2240 bytes is
> larger
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:36:37PM +0530, simran singhal wrote:
> This patch changes the type of variable done from int to boolean. As it
> is been used as a boolean in the function sfw_test_rpc_done(). It also
> makes the code more readable and bool data type also requires less
> memory in
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 05:58:29PM -0500, yi1...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Yi Li
>
> This adds DRIVER_DATA_REQ_NO_CACHE flag with .req flag under struct
> driver_data_req_params. When this flag is set, the driver_data driver
> will not cache the firmware during PM cycle, which is expensive.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 07:13:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> kernelci.org reports a crazy stack usage for the VT code when CONFIG_KASAN
> is enabled:
>
> drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c: In function 'kbd_keycode':
> drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c:1452:1: error: the frame size of 2240 bytes is
> larger
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:01:20AM -0400, James Simmons wrote:
> -void ldlm_extent_policy_wire_to_local(const union ldlm_wire_policy_data
> *wpolicy,
> - union ldlm_policy_data *lpolicy)
> +void
> +ldlm_extent_policy_wire_to_local(const union
As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
request_firmware_into_buf(), so remove it, and the now unused internal
flag, which simplifies the logic around buffer handling a bit.
Reported-by: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:01:20AM -0400, James Simmons wrote:
> -void ldlm_extent_policy_wire_to_local(const union ldlm_wire_policy_data
> *wpolicy,
> - union ldlm_policy_data *lpolicy)
> +void
> +ldlm_extent_policy_wire_to_local(const union
As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
request_firmware_into_buf(), so remove it, and the now unused internal
flag, which simplifies the logic around buffer handling a bit.
Reported-by: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
---
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 01:23:59PM +0800, Jhih-Ming Hunag wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I fixed some coding style following scripts/checkpatch.pl suggestion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jhih-Ming Hunag
> ---
> drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c | 8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 01:23:59PM +0800, Jhih-Ming Hunag wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I fixed some coding style following scripts/checkpatch.pl suggestion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jhih-Ming Hunag
> ---
> drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c | 8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:51:21PM +0530, Simran Singhal wrote:
> This patch removes typedefs from enum _logical_chip_type_t and enum
> _clock_type_t and rename them to logical_chip_type_t and clock_type_t
> respectively.
Why are you doing two different typedef fixups in a single patch?
Please
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:35:07PM +0530, Jaya Durga wrote:
> when building with make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
>
> drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c:3383:36: warning: cast to restricted
> __le16
>
> fixed by using the le16_to_cpus function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaya Durga
>
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:51:21PM +0530, Simran Singhal wrote:
> This patch removes typedefs from enum _logical_chip_type_t and enum
> _clock_type_t and rename them to logical_chip_type_t and clock_type_t
> respectively.
Why are you doing two different typedef fixups in a single patch?
Please
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:35:07PM +0530, Jaya Durga wrote:
> when building with make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
>
> drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c:3383:36: warning: cast to restricted
> __le16
>
> fixed by using the le16_to_cpus function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaya Durga
> ---
>
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 03:03:24PM +1200, Derek Robson wrote:
> Fixed checkpatch.pl warnings of the form "function definition argument
> 'foo' should also have an identifier name" in header files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Robson
>
> V1 had vague subject
> ---
Same as
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:10:04PM +0530, Jaya Durga wrote:
> From: Jaya Durga
>
> Fix checkpatch.pl warning of the form "CHECK" Macro argument 'x'
> may be better as '(x)' to avoid precedence issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaya Durga
> ---
>
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 03:03:24PM +1200, Derek Robson wrote:
> Fixed checkpatch.pl warnings of the form "function definition argument
> 'foo' should also have an identifier name" in header files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Robson
>
> V1 had vague subject
> ---
Same as before...
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:10:04PM +0530, Jaya Durga wrote:
> From: Jaya Durga
>
> Fix checkpatch.pl warning of the form "CHECK" Macro argument 'x'
> may be better as '(x)' to avoid precedence issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaya Durga
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/osdep_intf.h | 2 +-
> 1 file
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 03:42:35PM +0530, Jaya Durga wrote:
> Fix checkpatch.pl Warning: Symbolic permissions 'S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR'
> are not preferred.Consider using octal permissions '0644'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaya Durga
> --6
What is this last line for? Please fix up and
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 03:42:35PM +0530, Jaya Durga wrote:
> Fix checkpatch.pl Warning: Symbolic permissions 'S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR'
> are not preferred.Consider using octal permissions '0644'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaya Durga
> --6
What is this last line for? Please fix up and resend.
thanks,
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 03:21:22PM +1200, Derek Robson wrote:
> Fixed checkpatch warnings "Use #include instead of "
> Found using checkpatch
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Robson
>
> V1 had vauge subject.
> ---
Please move the V1 below the --- line.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 03:21:22PM +1200, Derek Robson wrote:
> Fixed checkpatch warnings "Use #include instead of "
> Found using checkpatch
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Robson
>
> V1 had vauge subject.
> ---
Please move the V1 below the --- line.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hi Nick,
When sending patches to kernel mailing lists, we don't use prefixes like
"CHROMIUM" -- those only apply to Chrome OS kernel trees, to indicate
patches that should be specific to the Chromium (OS) project and not
necessarily upstream Linux.
Here, you want to follow the patterns used by
Hi Nick,
When sending patches to kernel mailing lists, we don't use prefixes like
"CHROMIUM" -- those only apply to Chrome OS kernel trees, to indicate
patches that should be specific to the Chromium (OS) project and not
necessarily upstream Linux.
Here, you want to follow the patterns used by
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:59:00 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:19:52 -0700
> Jacob Pan wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:52:15 -0600
> > Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 14
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:59:00 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:19:52 -0700
> Jacob Pan wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:52:15 -0600
> > Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:22:56 -0700
> > > Jacob Pan wrote:
> > > > +static int
On 06/23/2017 11:47 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Julien Gomes
> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:52:26 -0700
>
>> On 06/23/2017 10:39 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>
>>> From: Julien Gomes
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:58:10 -0700
>>>
When sending a cache
On 06/23/2017 11:47 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Julien Gomes
> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:52:26 -0700
>
>> On 06/23/2017 10:39 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>
>>> From: Julien Gomes
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:58:10 -0700
>>>
When sending a cache report on mroute_sk, mroute will emit a
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:54:16 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:23:01 -0700
> Jacob Pan wrote:
>
> > Currently, when device DMA faults are detected by IOMMU the fault
> > reasons are printed but the offending device
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:54:16 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:23:01 -0700
> Jacob Pan wrote:
>
> > Currently, when device DMA faults are detected by IOMMU the fault
> > reasons are printed but the offending device is not notified.
> > This patch allows device drivers to be
Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgo...@redhat.com):
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:59:46PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > This series of patches primary goal is to enable file capabilities
> > in user namespaces without affecting the file capabilities that are
> > effective on the host. This is to prevent
Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgo...@redhat.com):
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:59:46PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > This series of patches primary goal is to enable file capabilities
> > in user namespaces without affecting the file capabilities that are
> > effective on the host. This is to prevent
On Friday 23 June 2017 13:01:53 Finn Thain wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, I wrote:
> > Does this patch help? It should be applied on top of this series of 4.
>
> Sorry, I sent the wrong diff. Please try this patch instead.
Thanks, much better now: both HDD and CD-ROM seem to work on DTC and
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:53:58 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:23:02 -0700
> Jacob Pan wrote:
>
> > If the source device of a page request has its PASID table pointer
> > bond to a guest, the first level page tables
On Friday 23 June 2017 13:01:53 Finn Thain wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, I wrote:
> > Does this patch help? It should be applied on top of this series of 4.
>
> Sorry, I sent the wrong diff. Please try this patch instead.
Thanks, much better now: both HDD and CD-ROM seem to work on DTC and
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:53:58 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:23:02 -0700
> Jacob Pan wrote:
>
> > If the source device of a page request has its PASID table pointer
> > bond to a guest, the first level page tables are owned by the guest.
> > In this case, we shall let
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 05:01:35PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Pali recently noticed that WMI instances are zero indexed.
>
> The only reason that these calls all worked properly is because the ASL
> didn't verify the instance number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 05:01:35PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Pali recently noticed that WMI instances are zero indexed.
>
> The only reason that these calls all worked properly is because the ASL
> didn't verify the instance number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello
Thanks Mario,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:59:46PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> This series of patches primary goal is to enable file capabilities
> in user namespaces without affecting the file capabilities that are
> effective on the host. This is to prevent that any unprivileged user
> on the host maps his
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:59:46PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> This series of patches primary goal is to enable file capabilities
> in user namespaces without affecting the file capabilities that are
> effective on the host. This is to prevent that any unprivileged user
> on the host maps his
301 - 400 of 1492 matches
Mail list logo