On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:26PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:23PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:26PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc: Liam Girdwood
>
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:23PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc: Linus Walleij
>
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 06:15:45PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The way it is, ghes_edac is a poor man's driver. What it hopefully
> provide is a detection that an error happened, without really telling
> the user what component should be replaced.
I beg to differ. From the UEFI spec:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 06:15:45PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The way it is, ghes_edac is a poor man's driver. What it hopefully
> provide is a detection that an error happened, without really telling
> the user what component should be replaced.
I beg to differ. From the UEFI spec:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes:
> Em Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 07:19:45PM +1000, Michael Ellerman escreveu:
>> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes:
>>
>> > Em Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 04:02:22PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
>> >> Commit 801bc8193463 ("perf probe: Allow
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes:
> Em Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 07:19:45PM +1000, Michael Ellerman escreveu:
>> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes:
>>
>> > Em Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 04:02:22PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
>> >> Commit 801bc8193463 ("perf probe: Allow placing uprobes in
>> >> alternate
Logan Gunthorpe writes:
> Subsequent patches in this series makes use of the readq and writeq
> defines in iomap.h. However, as is, they get missed on the powerpc
> platform seeing the include comes before the define. This patch
> moves the include down to fix this.
>
>
Logan Gunthorpe writes:
> Subsequent patches in this series makes use of the readq and writeq
> defines in iomap.h. However, as is, they get missed on the powerpc
> platform seeing the include comes before the define. This patch
> moves the include down to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Logan
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:16PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:16PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc: Ulf Hansson
>
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 07:58:54PM +, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> I have HPE Haswell and Skylake test systems with GHES, but they do not
> hide IMCs from the OS. So, the sb_edac and skx_edac drivers get
> attached on these systems when ghes_edac is disabled.
That's how it is supposed to work.
On Thu 29-06-17 10:46:21, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Forgot to CC Hugh.
>
> Hugh, Andrew, do you see this could cause any problem wrt.
> ksm/khugepaged exit path?
ping. I would really appreciate some help here. I would like to resend
the patch soon.
> On Mon 26-06-17 15:03:46, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 07:58:54PM +, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> I have HPE Haswell and Skylake test systems with GHES, but they do not
> hide IMCs from the OS. So, the sb_edac and skx_edac drivers get
> attached on these systems when ghes_edac is disabled.
That's how it is supposed to work.
On Thu 29-06-17 10:46:21, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Forgot to CC Hugh.
>
> Hugh, Andrew, do you see this could cause any problem wrt.
> ksm/khugepaged exit path?
ping. I would really appreciate some help here. I would like to resend
the patch soon.
> On Mon 26-06-17 15:03:46, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:23PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:23PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc: Linus Walleij
>
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 09:20:44PM +, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> I agree that 'osc_sb_apei_support_acked' should be checked when
> enabling ghes_edac. I do not know the details of existing issues, but
> it sounds unlikely that this will address all of them since bugs can be
> everywhere.
No,
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 09:20:44PM +, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> I agree that 'osc_sb_apei_support_acked' should be checked when
> enabling ghes_edac. I do not know the details of existing issues, but
> it sounds unlikely that this will address all of them since bugs can be
> everywhere.
No,
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:42:41PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:42:41PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc: Russell King
>
Alexey Budankov writes:
> On 18.07.2017 19:55, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> Alexey Budankov writes:
>>
>>> I see. Do you personally have some more issues that needs to be addressed?
>>> My intention is that this patch v5 4/4
Alexey Budankov writes:
> On 18.07.2017 19:55, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> Alexey Budankov writes:
>>
>>> I see. Do you personally have some more issues that needs to be addressed?
>>> My intention is that this patch v5 4/4 addresses all your comments raised
>>> in
>>> the previous reviews.
On 18/07/2017 at 16:43:14 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc: Nicolas
On 18/07/2017 at 16:43:14 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc: Nicolas Ferre
> Cc:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:42:59PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:42:59PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc: Borislav Petkov
On 2017/7/18 23:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> 2) for rcu idle enter/exit, I measured the details which Paul provided, and
>> the result matches with what I have measured before, nothing notable found.
>> But it still makes more sense if we can make rcu idle enter/exit hooked with
>> tick off.
On 2017/7/18 23:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> 2) for rcu idle enter/exit, I measured the details which Paul provided, and
>> the result matches with what I have measured before, nothing notable found.
>> But it still makes more sense if we can make rcu idle enter/exit hooked with
>> tick off.
On 18-07-17, 15:02, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Mmm, seems to make sense to me. :/
>
> Would the following work (on top of Joel's v5)? Rationale being that
> only in sugov_set_iowait_boost we might bump freq up (if no iowait_boost
> was set) or start from policy->min. In sugov_iowait_boost (consumer)
>
On 18-07-17, 15:02, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Mmm, seems to make sense to me. :/
>
> Would the following work (on top of Joel's v5)? Rationale being that
> only in sugov_set_iowait_boost we might bump freq up (if no iowait_boost
> was set) or start from policy->min. In sugov_iowait_boost (consumer)
>
>
> I don't know what that means, does the hardware support an equivalent
> to source validation or not?
Yes, source validation is done through the smmu.
What's the response of the root port if
> the downstream device issues a transaction spoofing devices not within
> the bus number ranges of
>
> I don't know what that means, does the hardware support an equivalent
> to source validation or not?
Yes, source validation is done through the smmu.
What's the response of the root port if
> the downstream device issues a transaction spoofing devices not within
> the bus number ranges of
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:21:23PM +0800, shuw...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Shu Wang
>
> Found this issue by kmemleak. The mem is allocated in
> verify_and_add_patch(), passed to update_cache(patch),
> and just dropped the reference without free
> if (p->patch_id >=
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:21:23PM +0800, shuw...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Shu Wang
>
> Found this issue by kmemleak. The mem is allocated in
> verify_and_add_patch(), passed to update_cache(patch),
> and just dropped the reference without free
> if (p->patch_id >= new_patch->patch_id)
>
Ping, :)
2017-07-11 15:13 GMT+08:00 Wanpeng Li :
> From: Wanpeng Li
>
> This can be reproduced by EPT=1, unrestricted_guest=N, emulate_invalid_state=Y
> or EPT=0, the trace of kvm-unit-tests/taskswitch2.flat is like below, it tries
> to emulate invalid
Ping, :)
2017-07-11 15:13 GMT+08:00 Wanpeng Li :
> From: Wanpeng Li
>
> This can be reproduced by EPT=1, unrestricted_guest=N, emulate_invalid_state=Y
> or EPT=0, the trace of kvm-unit-tests/taskswitch2.flat is like below, it tries
> to emulate invalid guest state task-switch:
>
> kvm_exit:
The device-specific property should be prefixed with the vendor name,
not "linux,", as Linus Walleij pointed out. Change this and document the
bindings of this platform device.
We didn't ship the old binding in a release yet. So we can still change
it without breaking an official API.
Fixes:
The device-specific property should be prefixed with the vendor name,
not "linux,", as Linus Walleij pointed out. Change this and document the
bindings of this platform device.
We didn't ship the old binding in a release yet. So we can still change
it without breaking an official API.
Fixes:
attribute_group are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
working with attribute_group provided by work
with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.
File size before:
textdata bss dec hex filename
5227 560 05787169b
attribute_group are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
working with attribute_group provided by work
with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.
File size before:
textdata bss dec hex filename
5227 560 05787169b
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 03:25:21PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> This series has grown... :P
>>
>> As discussed with Linus and Andy, we need to reset the stack rlimit
>> before we do memory layouts when execing a
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 03:25:21PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> This series has grown... :P
>>
>> As discussed with Linus and Andy, we need to reset the stack rlimit
>> before we do memory layouts when execing a privilege-gaining (e.g.
>>
attribute_group are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
working with attribute_group provided by work
with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.
File size before:
textdata bss dec hex filename
2673 368 03041 be1
attribute_group are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
working with attribute_group provided by work
with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.
File size before:
textdata bss dec hex filename
2673 368 03041 be1
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:34:59 +0530
Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> Hello Nicholas,
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:14:12PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Thanks for working on these patches. We really need to get this stuff
> > merged and tested asap :)
> >
>
> > On Tue,
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:34:59 +0530
Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> Hello Nicholas,
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:14:12PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Thanks for working on these patches. We really need to get this stuff
> > merged and tested asap :)
> >
>
> > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:58:49
PERHATIAN
Kotak surat Anda telah melebihi batas penyimpanan, yaitu 5 GB seperti yang
didefinisikan oleh administrator, yang saat ini berjalan pada 10.9GB, Anda
mungkin tidak dapat mengirim atau menerima surat baru sampai Anda kembali
memvalidasi email mailbox Anda. Untuk memvalidasi ulang
PERHATIAN
Kotak surat Anda telah melebihi batas penyimpanan, yaitu 5 GB seperti yang
didefinisikan oleh administrator, yang saat ini berjalan pada 10.9GB, Anda
mungkin tidak dapat mengirim atau menerima surat baru sampai Anda kembali
memvalidasi email mailbox Anda. Untuk memvalidasi ulang
attribute_group are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
working with attribute_group provided by work
with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.
File size before:
textdata bss dec hex filename
154264952 187 205655055
attribute_group are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
working with attribute_group provided by work
with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.
File size before:
textdata bss dec hex filename
154264952 187 205655055
Hi, Balbi:
1. the issue reproduced very rarely, we run reboot test reproduce the
issue, it reproduced two times on two board after more than 1500 cycles reboot.
2. the kernel version is 4.4, the test case is cold reboot, I think
it's not android patches cause it, it's the
Hi, Balbi:
1. the issue reproduced very rarely, we run reboot test reproduce the
issue, it reproduced two times on two board after more than 1500 cycles reboot.
2. the kernel version is 4.4, the test case is cold reboot, I think
it's not android patches cause it, it's the
Hello,
That patch fixes the problem, as far as I tested. However, it still is
not included in stable by 4.12.2. The problem persists there, and is
fixed when this patch is applied on top of it. What to to about it?
Thanks,
Yagmur Oymak.
On 07/14/2017 12:07 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu,
Hello,
That patch fixes the problem, as far as I tested. However, it still is
not included in stable by 4.12.2. The problem persists there, and is
fixed when this patch is applied on top of it. What to to about it?
Thanks,
Yagmur Oymak.
On 07/14/2017 12:07 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu,
Hello Nicholas,
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:14:12PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Thanks for working on these patches. We really need to get this stuff
> merged and tested asap :)
>
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:58:49 +0530
[..snip..]
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c
> >
Hello Nicholas,
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:14:12PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Thanks for working on these patches. We really need to get this stuff
> merged and tested asap :)
>
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:58:49 +0530
[..snip..]
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c
> >
On 18/07/17 12:17, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> Make the behaviour of clk_get_rate consistent with common clk's
> clk_get_rate by accepting NULL clocks as parameter. Some device
> drivers rely on this, and will cause an OOPS otherwise.
>
> Fixes: 1d81eedb8f6c ("[ARM] 3634/1: ep93xx: initial
On 18/07/17 12:17, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> Make the behaviour of clk_get_rate consistent with common clk's
> clk_get_rate by accepting NULL clocks as parameter. Some device
> drivers rely on this, and will cause an OOPS otherwise.
>
> Fixes: 1d81eedb8f6c ("[ARM] 3634/1: ep93xx: initial
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:17:47PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> While that should solve the problem, isn't it possible to actually have a
> module
> which supplies an algorithm like "xts(aes)"? In that case it wouldn't be
> desirable to instantiate the generic "xts" template.
Well, in the
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:17:47PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> While that should solve the problem, isn't it possible to actually have a
> module
> which supplies an algorithm like "xts(aes)"? In that case it wouldn't be
> desirable to instantiate the generic "xts" template.
Well, in the
Hi all,
Changes since 20170718:
The kbuild tree introduced a large number of build warnings so I reverted
a commit from it.
The net-next tree lost its build failure.
The drm-misc tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree and a build
failure due to an interaction with the staging.current tree
Hi all,
Changes since 20170718:
The kbuild tree introduced a large number of build warnings so I reverted
a commit from it.
The net-next tree lost its build failure.
The drm-misc tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree and a build
failure due to an interaction with the staging.current tree
Hi Yong,
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 09:22:49AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:55:30 +0300
> Baruch Siach wrote:
> > I am trying to get this driver working on the Olimex A33 OLinuXino. I
> > didn't get it working yet, but I had some progress. See the comment below
>
Hi Yong,
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 09:22:49AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:55:30 +0300
> Baruch Siach wrote:
> > I am trying to get this driver working on the Olimex A33 OLinuXino. I
> > didn't get it working yet, but I had some progress. See the comment below
> > on one issue I
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:02PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:02PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc: Alan Tull
> Cc:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> The commoncap implementation of the bprm_secureexec hook is the only LSM
>> that depends on the final call to its bprm_set_creds hook (since it
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> The commoncap implementation of the bprm_secureexec hook is the only LSM
>> that depends on the final call to its bprm_set_creds hook (since it may
>> be called for multiple files, it
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> The cred_prepared bprm flag has a misleading name. It has nothing to do
>> with the bprm_prepare_cred hook, and actually tracks if bprm_set_creds
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> The cred_prepared bprm flag has a misleading name. It has nothing to do
>> with the bprm_prepare_cred hook, and actually tracks if bprm_set_creds has
>> been called. Rename this flag
Hi Viresh,
I appreciate the discussion.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17-07-17, 10:35, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Viresh Kumar
>> wrote:
>> > On 16-07-17, 01:04, Joel Fernandes wrote:
Hi Viresh,
I appreciate the discussion.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17-07-17, 10:35, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Viresh Kumar
>> wrote:
>> > On 16-07-17, 01:04, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
>> >> + if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending) {
On Wed, Jul 19 2017, Patrick Farrell wrote:
> Neil,
>
> Minor...
> "order might not be a lock" looks like it should say "or"?
Yes: s/order/or/ as you say.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> - Patrick
>
> From: lustre-devel on behalf
On Wed, Jul 19 2017, Patrick Farrell wrote:
> Neil,
>
> Minor...
> "order might not be a lock" looks like it should say "or"?
Yes: s/order/or/ as you say.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> - Patrick
>
> From: lustre-devel on behalf of
> NeilBrown
> Sent: Tuesday, July
Need to address few issues in the patch.
So NAKing this patch. Will send out re-vised version.
Regards,
Raveendra
> -Original Message-
> From: Raveendra Padasalagi [mailto:raveendra.padasal...@broadcom.com]
> Sent: 13 July 2017 13:58
> To: Herbert Xu; David S. Miller; Rob Rice; Scott
Need to address few issues in the patch.
So NAKing this patch. Will send out re-vised version.
Regards,
Raveendra
> -Original Message-
> From: Raveendra Padasalagi [mailto:raveendra.padasal...@broadcom.com]
> Sent: 13 July 2017 13:58
> To: Herbert Xu; David S. Miller; Rob Rice; Scott
On Tue, Jul 18 2017, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Unfortunately this patch causes insta-crash on first stat call after mount.
> Sorry, I cannot dig into this deeper right this moment, but I will a bit
> later.
V.strange. The crash suggests that the lock, and hence the inode, is
not initialized. I
On Tue, Jul 18 2017, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Unfortunately this patch causes insta-crash on first stat call after mount.
> Sorry, I cannot dig into this deeper right this moment, but I will a bit
> later.
V.strange. The crash suggests that the lock, and hence the inode, is
not initialized. I
Hi Ham,
oops, sorry, it turns out the devfreq would already tried to handle this
case(by using profile's initial_freq):
8d39fc0 PM / devfreq: fix initialization of current frequency in last status
and my local kernel didn't contains this commit.
so this patch is not needed, please ignore
Hi Ham,
oops, sorry, it turns out the devfreq would already tried to handle this
case(by using profile's initial_freq):
8d39fc0 PM / devfreq: fix initialization of current frequency in last status
and my local kernel didn't contains this commit.
so this patch is not needed, please ignore
PERHATIAN
Kotak surat Anda telah melebihi batas penyimpanan, yaitu 5 GB seperti yang
didefinisikan oleh administrator, yang saat ini berjalan pada 10.9GB, Anda
mungkin tidak dapat mengirim atau menerima surat baru sampai Anda kembali
memvalidasi email mailbox Anda. Untuk memvalidasi ulang
PERHATIAN
Kotak surat Anda telah melebihi batas penyimpanan, yaitu 5 GB seperti yang
didefinisikan oleh administrator, yang saat ini berjalan pada 10.9GB, Anda
mungkin tidak dapat mengirim atau menerima surat baru sampai Anda kembali
memvalidasi email mailbox Anda. Untuk memvalidasi ulang
From: Shu Wang
Found this issue by kmemleak. The mem is allocated in
verify_and_add_patch(), passed to update_cache(patch),
and just dropped the reference without free
if (p->patch_id >= new_patch->patch_id)
return;
unreferenced object 0x88010e780b40 (size 32):
From: Shu Wang
Found this issue by kmemleak. The mem is allocated in
verify_and_add_patch(), passed to update_cache(patch),
and just dropped the reference without free
if (p->patch_id >= new_patch->patch_id)
return;
unreferenced object 0x88010e780b40 (size 32):
comm "bash", pid 860,
Hi Jaegeuk,
Thank you for the edits and comments. I will accept them, except that
f2fs_iomap_end() does not need to return any error. See below for details.
Hi Qiuyang,
On 07/18, sunqiuyang wrote:
From: Qiuyang Sun
This patch implements Direct Access (DAX) in F2FS,
Hi Jaegeuk,
Thank you for the edits and comments. I will accept them, except that
f2fs_iomap_end() does not need to return any error. See below for details.
Hi Qiuyang,
On 07/18, sunqiuyang wrote:
From: Qiuyang Sun
This patch implements Direct Access (DAX) in F2FS, including:
- a mount
On Wednesday 19 July 2017 12:43 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Keerthy,
>
> On 07/18/2017 05:57 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>> keystone-k2g has 2 instances of gpio. The first one has all the 144 GPIOs
>
> Please use 66AK2G for keystone-k2g.
Okay
>
>> functional( 9 banks with 16 gpios = 144). The second
On Wednesday 19 July 2017 12:43 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Keerthy,
>
> On 07/18/2017 05:57 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>> keystone-k2g has 2 instances of gpio. The first one has all the 144 GPIOs
>
> Please use 66AK2G for keystone-k2g.
Okay
>
>> functional( 9 banks with 16 gpios = 144). The second
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 10:30:37AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> A false overriding information is being presented during boot
> under this scenario.
>
> 1. First object checks for kernel command line value against zero.
> 2. It doesn't find it, it sets the command line variable to the
> value
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 10:30:37AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> A false overriding information is being presented during boot
> under this scenario.
>
> 1. First object checks for kernel command line value against zero.
> 2. It doesn't find it, it sets the command line variable to the
> value
Commit 3d4762639dd3 ("tcp: remove poll() flakes when receiving
RST") in v4.12 changed the order in which ->sk_state_change()
and ->sk_error_report() are called when a socket is shut
down - sk_state_change() is now called first.
This causes xs_tcp_state_change() -> xs_sock_mark_closed() ->
Commit 3d4762639dd3 ("tcp: remove poll() flakes when receiving
RST") in v4.12 changed the order in which ->sk_state_change()
and ->sk_error_report() are called when a socket is shut
down - sk_state_change() is now called first.
This causes xs_tcp_state_change() -> xs_sock_mark_closed() ->
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:17:06PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:26:14PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > Hi Vinod,
> >
> > On 7/18/2017 12:19 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:30:57PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > >
> > >> @@ -410,7 +410,40 @@ static int
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:17:06PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:26:14PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > Hi Vinod,
> >
> > On 7/18/2017 12:19 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:30:57PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > >
> > >> @@ -410,7 +410,40 @@ static int
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:42:58PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
Applied after fixing the subsystem name, thanks
--
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:42:58PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
Applied after fixing the subsystem name, thanks
--
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:10PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:10PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> Cc: Thomas
1 - 100 of 2588 matches
Mail list logo