On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 18:22 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:10:07PM +, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > I do prefer to avoid any white / black listing. But I do not see
> > how it solves the buggy DMI/SMBIOS info as an example of firmware
> > bugs we may have to deal
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 18:22 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:10:07PM +, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > I do prefer to avoid any white / black listing. But I do not see
> > how it solves the buggy DMI/SMBIOS info as an example of firmware
> > bugs we may have to deal
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:03:22AM -0500, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > > Do we have any problem if we skip RCU idle enter/exit under a fast idle
> > > scenario?
> > > My understanding is, if tick is not stopped, then we don't need inform
> > >
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:03:22AM -0500, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > > Do we have any problem if we skip RCU idle enter/exit under a fast idle
> > > scenario?
> > > My understanding is, if tick is not stopped, then we don't need inform
> > >
On 7/19/2017 7:32 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:49:47PM +, Horia Geantă wrote:
>> On 7/19/2017 10:45 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>>> According documentation, it is NIST certified TRNG.
>>> So, set high quality to let the HWRNG framework automatically use it.
>>>
>>>
On 7/19/2017 7:32 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:49:47PM +, Horia Geantă wrote:
>> On 7/19/2017 10:45 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>>> According documentation, it is NIST certified TRNG.
>>> So, set high quality to let the HWRNG framework automatically use it.
>>>
>>>
Patch series all looks good.
On 17-07-19 02:55 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
This patchset does various improvments to Broadcom FlexRM
mailbox controller driver and also adds FlexRM DT nodes
for Stingray SOC.
The patches are based on Linux-4.13-rc1 and can also be
found at flexrm-imp-v1 branch of
Patch series all looks good.
On 17-07-19 02:55 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
This patchset does various improvments to Broadcom FlexRM
mailbox controller driver and also adds FlexRM DT nodes
for Stingray SOC.
The patches are based on Linux-4.13-rc1 and can also be
found at flexrm-imp-v1 branch of
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Leonard Crestez
wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 12:04 -0700, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Leonard Crestez
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 09:04 -0700, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>> >
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Leonard Crestez
wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 12:04 -0700, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Leonard Crestez
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 09:04 -0700, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Leonard Crestez
Hi Anup,
NAK - as indicated in internal review please use unmodified Broadcom
legal header in its own comment block.
On 17-07-19 02:33 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
This patch adds low-level reset for Broadcom FlexRM to
VFIO platform.
It will do the following:
1. Disable/Deactivate each FlexRM
Hi Anup,
NAK - as indicated in internal review please use unmodified Broadcom
legal header in its own comment block.
On 17-07-19 02:33 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
This patch adds low-level reset for Broadcom FlexRM to
VFIO platform.
It will do the following:
1. Disable/Deactivate each FlexRM
El Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 08:30:36AM +0200 Daniel Vetter ha dit:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:48:53PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > El Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 08:39:50AM +0200 Daniel Vetter ha dit:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:14:03AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
El Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 08:30:36AM +0200 Daniel Vetter ha dit:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:48:53PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > El Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 08:39:50AM +0200 Daniel Vetter ha dit:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:14:03AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:19:28 +0200
Mohammed Gamal wrote:
> This condition already uses an object of type ipv6hdr in the line above.
> Use the object directly instead of calling ipv6_hdr
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal
> ---
>
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:19:28 +0200
Mohammed Gamal wrote:
> This condition already uses an object of type ipv6hdr in the line above.
> Use the object directly instead of calling ipv6_hdr
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal
> ---
> drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 18:15 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:58:54 +
:
> We had a similar discussion several years ago when I wrote this
> driver. On that time, I talked with Red Hat, HP, Dell, Intel people
> and with some customers with large clusters.
>
> The
On 07/13/2017 12:11 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> [+CC linux-api]
>
> On 07/13/2017 05:58 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> mremap will create a 'duplicate' mapping if old_size == 0 is
>> specified. Such duplicate mappings make no sense for private
>> mappings. If duplication is attempted for a private
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 18:15 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:58:54 +
:
> We had a similar discussion several years ago when I wrote this
> driver. On that time, I talked with Red Hat, HP, Dell, Intel people
> and with some customers with large clusters.
>
> The
On 07/13/2017 12:11 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> [+CC linux-api]
>
> On 07/13/2017 05:58 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> mremap will create a 'duplicate' mapping if old_size == 0 is
>> specified. Such duplicate mappings make no sense for private
>> mappings. If duplication is attempted for a private
Add Q: entry for patchwork and update my email address.
Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer
Cc: Alan Tull
Cc: linux-f...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
MAINTAINERS | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Add Q: entry for patchwork and update my email address.
Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer
Cc: Alan Tull
Cc: linux-f...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
MAINTAINERS | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index
On 07/19/2017 10:29 AM, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-rc/linux-4.12.y boot: 166 boots: 5 failed, 161 passed
> (v4.12.2-85-g908a8d27d1c5)
>
> Full Boot Summary:
> https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.12.y/kernel/v4.12.2-85-g908a8d27d1c5/
> Full Build Summary:
>
On 07/19/2017 10:29 AM, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-rc/linux-4.12.y boot: 166 boots: 5 failed, 161 passed
> (v4.12.2-85-g908a8d27d1c5)
>
> Full Boot Summary:
> https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.12.y/kernel/v4.12.2-85-g908a8d27d1c5/
> Full Build Summary:
>
Hello, Peter.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:07:28PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 02:47:14PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Were there other things that caught your eyes?
>
> I didn't immediately see the point of "domain (threaded" output, and I
I'll probably drop the parens
Hello, Peter.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:07:28PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 02:47:14PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Were there other things that caught your eyes?
>
> I didn't immediately see the point of "domain (threaded" output, and I
I'll probably drop the parens
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 03:42:48PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The policy->transition_latency field is used for multiple purposes
> today and its not straight forward at all. This is how it is used:
>
> A. Set the correct transition_latency value.
>
> B. Set it to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL because:
>
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 03:42:48PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The policy->transition_latency field is used for multiple purposes
> today and its not straight forward at all. This is how it is used:
>
> A. Set the correct transition_latency value.
>
> B. Set it to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL because:
>
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:49:47PM +, Horia Geantă wrote:
> On 7/19/2017 10:45 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > According documentation, it is NIST certified TRNG.
> > So, set high quality to let the HWRNG framework automatically use it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:49:47PM +, Horia Geantă wrote:
> On 7/19/2017 10:45 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > According documentation, it is NIST certified TRNG.
> > So, set high quality to let the HWRNG framework automatically use it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel
> > ---
> >
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:23:14PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > If we could get rid of the invalid state completely that way, I'd
> > completely agree with you but that isn't the case here as you noted
> > yourself, so the choice between the two isn't something trivially
> > clear. Both
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:23:14PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > If we could get rid of the invalid state completely that way, I'd
> > completely agree with you but that isn't the case here as you noted
> > yourself, so the choice between the two isn't something trivially
> > clear. Both
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 05:33:14PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 28-06-17 16:01:50, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > Another major change is that we remove dax_pfn_mkwrite() from our fault
> > flow, and instead rely on the page fault itself to make the PTE dirty and
> > writeable. The following
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 05:33:14PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 28-06-17 16:01:50, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > Another major change is that we remove dax_pfn_mkwrite() from our fault
> > flow, and instead rely on the page fault itself to make the PTE dirty and
> > writeable. The following
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 17:37 +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> Each time we get disconencted from AP we get flooded with messages
> like:
>
> ...
> ath10k_pci :03:00.0: no channel configured; ignoring frame(s)!
>
> ath10k_warn: 155 callbacks suppressed
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 17:37 +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> Each time we get disconencted from AP we get flooded with messages
> like:
>
> ...
> ath10k_pci :03:00.0: no channel configured; ignoring frame(s)!
>
> ath10k_warn: 155 callbacks suppressed
From: Frank Rowand
Correct existing node name detection when overlay node name has
a unit-address.
Expected test result is overlay will update the nodes and properties
for /testcase-data-2/fairway-1/ride@100/ after this commit.
Before this commit:
Console error
From: Frank Rowand
Correct existing node name detection when overlay node name has
a unit-address.
Expected test result is overlay will update the nodes and properties
for /testcase-data-2/fairway-1/ride@100/ after this commit.
Before this commit:
Console error message near end of
From: Frank Rowand
Add nodes and properties to overlay_base and overlay dts files to
test for
- incorrect existing node name detection when overlay node name
has a unit-address
- adding overlay __symbols__ properties to live tree when an
overlay is added to
From: Frank Rowand
Add nodes and properties to overlay_base and overlay dts files to
test for
- incorrect existing node name detection when overlay node name
has a unit-address
- adding overlay __symbols__ properties to live tree when an
overlay is added to the live tree
The
From: Frank Rowand
Add overlay __symbols__ properties to live tree when an overlay
is added to the live tree so that the symbols are available to
subsequent overlays.
Expected test result is new __symbols__ entries for labels from
the overlay after this commit.
Before
From: Frank Rowand
Symbols in a loaded overlay are not currently available to subsequently
loaded overlays because the properties in the overlay's __symbols__
node are not loaded into the live device tree.
Patch 1 is unittests to test patches 2 and 3.
Patch 2 fixes a
From: Frank Rowand
Add overlay __symbols__ properties to live tree when an overlay
is added to the live tree so that the symbols are available to
subsequent overlays.
Expected test result is new __symbols__ entries for labels from
the overlay after this commit.
Before this commit:
Console
From: Frank Rowand
Symbols in a loaded overlay are not currently available to subsequently
loaded overlays because the properties in the overlay's __symbols__
node are not loaded into the live device tree.
Patch 1 is unittests to test patches 2 and 3.
Patch 2 fixes a problem discovered while
Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2017-07-19 08:14-0700, Nadav Amit:
>> Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> @@ -2363,6 +2368,8 @@ static unsigned long vmx_get_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu
>>> *vcpu)
>>>
>>> static void vmx_set_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags)
>>>
Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2017-07-19 08:14-0700, Nadav Amit:
>> Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> @@ -2363,6 +2368,8 @@ static unsigned long vmx_get_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu
>>> *vcpu)
>>>
>>> static void vmx_set_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags)
>>> {
>>> + unsigned long old_rflags =
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:10:07PM +, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> I do prefer to avoid any white / black listing. But I do not see how
> it solves the buggy DMI/SMBIOS info as an example of firmware bugs we
> may have to deal with.
So how do you want to deal with this?
Maintain an evergrowing
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:10:07PM +, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> I do prefer to avoid any white / black listing. But I do not see how
> it solves the buggy DMI/SMBIOS info as an example of firmware bugs we
> may have to deal with.
So how do you want to deal with this?
Maintain an evergrowing
2017-07-17 18:27+0200, Claudio Imbrenda:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:53:51 +0200
> David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > + tmp = strchrnul(p + 1, '-');> +
> > > *tmp = '\0';
> > > + add_uevent_var(env, "PID=%s", p);
When we're at it ... PID exists regardless of debugfs,
2017-07-17 18:27+0200, Claudio Imbrenda:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:53:51 +0200
> David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > + tmp = strchrnul(p + 1, '-');> +
> > > *tmp = '\0';
> > > + add_uevent_var(env, "PID=%s", p);
When we're at it ... PID exists regardless of debugfs, so it would be
nice
From: Colin Ian King
The arguments args->lstio_ses_force and args->lstio_ses_timeout are
in the incorrect order. Fix this by swapping them around.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1226833 ("Arguments in wrong order")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
From: Colin Ian King
The arguments args->lstio_ses_force and args->lstio_ses_timeout are
in the incorrect order. Fix this by swapping them around.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1226833 ("Arguments in wrong order")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
---
2017-07-19 08:14-0700, Nadav Amit:
> Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > @@ -2363,6 +2368,8 @@ static unsigned long vmx_get_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu
> > *vcpu)
> >
> > static void vmx_set_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags)
> > {
> > + unsigned long old_rflags =
2017-07-19 08:14-0700, Nadav Amit:
> Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > @@ -2363,6 +2368,8 @@ static unsigned long vmx_get_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu
> > *vcpu)
> >
> > static void vmx_set_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags)
> > {
> > + unsigned long old_rflags = to_vmx(vcpu)->rflags;
>
>
On 19 July 2017 at 19:24, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 03:54:54PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> Linux version:
>> Linux version 4.13.0-rc1-00059-g74cbd96 (buildslave@x86-64-07) (gcc
>> version 6.2.1 20161016 (Linaro GCC 6.2-2016.11)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue
>>
On 19 July 2017 at 19:24, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 03:54:54PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> Linux version:
>> Linux version 4.13.0-rc1-00059-g74cbd96 (buildslave@x86-64-07) (gcc
>> version 6.2.1 20161016 (Linaro GCC 6.2-2016.11)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue
>> Jul 18 19:09:37 UTC 2017
>>
On 07/19/17 06:39, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:52 PM, wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand
>>
>> Add nodes and properties to overlay_base and overlay dts files to
>> test for
>>- incorrect existing node name detection when overlay
On 07/19/17 06:39, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:52 PM, wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand
>>
>> Add nodes and properties to overlay_base and overlay dts files to
>> test for
>>- incorrect existing node name detection when overlay node name
>> has a unit-address
>>-
2017-07-19 16:18+0200, Arnd Bergmann:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > 2017-07-19 14:53+0200, Arnd Bergmann:
> >> KVM tries to select 'TASKSTATS', which had additional dependencies:
> >>
> >> warning: (KVM) selects TASKSTATS which has unmet direct
2017-07-19 16:18+0200, Arnd Bergmann:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > 2017-07-19 14:53+0200, Arnd Bergmann:
> >> KVM tries to select 'TASKSTATS', which had additional dependencies:
> >>
> >> warning: (KVM) selects TASKSTATS which has unmet direct dependencies (NET
> >>
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 05:25:06PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Commit a53e35db70d1 ("reset: Ensure drivers are explicit when requesting
> reset lines") started to transition the reset control request API calls
> to explicitly state whether the driver needs exclusive or shared reset
> control
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 05:25:06PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Commit a53e35db70d1 ("reset: Ensure drivers are explicit when requesting
> reset lines") started to transition the reset control request API calls
> to explicitly state whether the driver needs exclusive or shared reset
> control
The patch
ASoC: tegra: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the asoc tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours)
The patch
ASoC: tegra: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the asoc tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours)
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 07:52 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 09:20:44PM +, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > I agree that 'osc_sb_apei_support_acked' should be checked when
> > enabling ghes_edac. I do not know the details of existing issues,
> > but it sounds unlikely that
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 07:52 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 09:20:44PM +, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > I agree that 'osc_sb_apei_support_acked' should be checked when
> > enabling ghes_edac. I do not know the details of existing issues,
> > but it sounds unlikely that
The patch
spi: tegra20-sflash: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the spi tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24
The patch
spi: tegra20-sflash: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the spi tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24
Hi Laurentiu,
[auto build test ERROR on staging/staging-testing]
[also build test ERROR on v4.13-rc1 next-20170718]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Laurentiu,
[auto build test ERROR on staging/staging-testing]
[also build test ERROR on v4.13-rc1 next-20170718]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
The patch
spi: stm32: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the spi tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and
The patch
spi: sun6i: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the spi tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and
The patch
spi: stm32: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the spi tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and
The patch
spi: sun6i: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the spi tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and
The patch
spi: tegra114: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the spi tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and
The patch
spi: tegra114: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the spi tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and
The patch
spi: tegra20-slink: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the spi tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24
The patch
spi: tegra20-slink: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the spi tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24
The patch
ASoC: img: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the asoc tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and
The patch
ASoC: img: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the asoc tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and
The patch
ASoC: stm32: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the asoc tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours)
The patch
ASoC: stm32: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the asoc tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours)
The patch
ASoC: sun4i: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the asoc tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours)
The patch
ASoC: sun4i: explicitly request exclusive reset control
has been applied to the asoc tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours)
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:39:32AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> > We could just remove all that word-at-a-time logic. Do we have any
> > evidence that this would harm anything?
>
> The word-at-a-time logic was part of the initial commit since I wanted
> to ensure that strscpy could be
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:39:32AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> > We could just remove all that word-at-a-time logic. Do we have any
> > evidence that this would harm anything?
>
> The word-at-a-time logic was part of the initial commit since I wanted
> to ensure that strscpy could be
This series adds support for the ARMv8.3 pointer authentication extension.
Since RFC [1]:
* Make the KVM context switch (semi-lazy)
* Rebase to v4.13-rc1
* Improve pointer authentication documentation
* Add hwcap documentation
* Various minor cleanups
I've pushed the series to the
This series adds support for the ARMv8.3 pointer authentication extension.
Since RFC [1]:
* Make the KVM context switch (semi-lazy)
* Rebase to v4.13-rc1
* Improve pointer authentication documentation
* Add hwcap documentation
* Various minor cleanups
I've pushed the series to the
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 08:13 +0300, Yagmur Oymak wrote:
> On 07/14/2017 12:07 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 23:24 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > [258062.320700] RIP: 0010:kmem_cache_free+0x12/0x160
> > > [258062.320886] Call Trace:
> > > [258062.320897]
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 08:13 +0300, Yagmur Oymak wrote:
> On 07/14/2017 12:07 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 23:24 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > [258062.320700] RIP: 0010:kmem_cache_free+0x12/0x160
> > > [258062.320886] Call Trace:
> > > [258062.320897]
Currently, an architecture must either implement all of the mm hooks
itself, or use all of those provided by the asm-generic implementation.
When an architecture only needs to override a single hook, it must copy
the stub implementations from the asm-generic version.
To avoid this repetition,
>From ARMv8.3 onwards, ID_AA64ISAR1 is no longer entirely RES0, and now
has four fields describing the presence of pointer authentication
functionality:
* APA - address authentication present, using an architected algorithm
* API - address authentication present, using an IMP DEF algorithm
* GPA
Currently, an architecture must either implement all of the mm hooks
itself, or use all of those provided by the asm-generic implementation.
When an architecture only needs to override a single hook, it must copy
the stub implementations from the asm-generic version.
To avoid this repetition,
>From ARMv8.3 onwards, ID_AA64ISAR1 is no longer entirely RES0, and now
has four fields describing the presence of pointer authentication
functionality:
* APA - address authentication present, using an architected algorithm
* API - address authentication present, using an IMP DEF algorithm
* GPA
On 18/07/17 11:57 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Seems fair enough, have you tested it at all?
It's only been compile tested and the kbuild robot has beat up on it a bit.
Thanks,
Logan
On 18/07/17 11:57 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Seems fair enough, have you tested it at all?
It's only been compile tested and the kbuild robot has beat up on it a bit.
Thanks,
Logan
To allow EL0 (and/or EL1) to use pointer authentication functionality,
we must ensure that pointer authentication instructions and accesses to
pointer authentication keys are not trapped to EL2 (where we will not be
able to handle them).
This patch ensures that HCR_EL2 is configured appropriately
To allow EL0 (and/or EL1) to use pointer authentication functionality,
we must ensure that pointer authentication instructions and accesses to
pointer authentication keys are not trapped to EL2 (where we will not be
able to handle them).
This patch ensures that HCR_EL2 is configured appropriately
When pointer authentication is supported, a guest may wish to use it.
This patch adds the necessary KVM infrastructure for this to work, with
a semi-lazy context switch of the pointer auth state.
When we schedule a vcpu, we disable guest usage of pointer
authentication instructions and accesses
When restoring HCR_EL2 for the host, KVM uses HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS, which
is a constant value. This works today, as the host HCR_EL2 value is
always the same, but this will get in the way of supporting extensions
that require HCR_EL2 bits to be set conditionally for the host.
To allow such features
901 - 1000 of 3020 matches
Mail list logo