On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:19:21PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Andrew, can you s/MAP_FIXED_SAFE/MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE/g in the series?
+1
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:19:21PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Andrew, can you s/MAP_FIXED_SAFE/MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE/g in the series?
+1
> @Wolfram: if you're ok with these changes, I think they should go
> through my tree. Let me know if you agree.
Frankly, adding 115 lines to i2c-core should go through my tree, I
think. Still need to look at the latest revision, though.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> @Wolfram: if you're ok with these changes, I think they should go
> through my tree. Let me know if you agree.
Frankly, adding 115 lines to i2c-core should go through my tree, I
think. Still need to look at the latest revision, though.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi, can you see if this makes you Surface boot?
I tested it on my IVB by making has_legacy_pic() return unconditional
true.
[0.024000] tsc: Unable to calibrate against PIT
[0.025000] tsc: using HPET reference calibration
[0.026000] tsc: Detected 2792.451 MHz processor
---
diff
Hi, can you see if this makes you Surface boot?
I tested it on my IVB by making has_legacy_pic() return unconditional
true.
[0.024000] tsc: Unable to calibrate against PIT
[0.025000] tsc: using HPET reference calibration
[0.026000] tsc: Detected 2792.451 MHz processor
---
diff
On 12/18/2017 08:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.107 release.
> There are 115 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 12/18/2017 08:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.107 release.
> There are 115 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 12/18/2017 08:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.18.89 release.
> There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 12/18/2017 08:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.18.89 release.
> There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 12/18/2017 08:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.8 release.
> There are 178 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 12/18/2017 08:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.8 release.
> There are 178 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
Update the lp8860 bindings to fix various issues
found. Rename enable-gpio to enable-gpios,
update the node name to the device name and
indent the node example.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy
---
v5 - Update commit message to remove address
Update the lp8860 bindings to fix various issues
found. Rename enable-gpio to enable-gpios,
update the node name to the device name and
indent the node example.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy
---
v5 - Update commit message to remove address and size cells -
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Ludovic Barre wrote:
> From: Ludovic Barre
>
> This patch prepares the STM32 machine for the integration of Cortex-A
> based microprocessor (MPU), on top of the existing Cortex-M
> microcontroller family (MCU). Since
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Ludovic Barre wrote:
> From: Ludovic Barre
>
> This patch prepares the STM32 machine for the integration of Cortex-A
> based microprocessor (MPU), on top of the existing Cortex-M
> microcontroller family (MCU). Since both MCUs and MPUs are sharing
> common
On 12/18/2017 08:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.71 release.
> There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 12/18/2017 08:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.71 release.
> There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
Same thing as the other one, ll_statahead_thread should not contribute to
load.
IMO, mgc_process_log should not contribute to load in the case where it¹s
waiting for an import to recover, that¹s likely to be a pretty long wait
and doesn¹t really represent load. It¹s waiting for network recovery,
Same thing as the other one, ll_statahead_thread should not contribute to
load.
IMO, mgc_process_log should not contribute to load in the case where it¹s
waiting for an import to recover, that¹s likely to be a pretty long wait
and doesn¹t really represent load. It¹s waiting for network recovery,
Update the driver to conform with the LED framework.
Use devm_led_classdev_register
Destroy mutex on exit
Remove dependency on CONFIG_OF in the driver and move
to the Kconfig
Update the MODULE_LICENSE to GPL v2
Remove setting of MAX brightness as the LED framework
does this.
Signed-off-by: Dan
Update the driver to conform with the LED framework.
Use devm_led_classdev_register
Destroy mutex on exit
Remove dependency on CONFIG_OF in the driver and move
to the Kconfig
Update the MODULE_LICENSE to GPL v2
Remove setting of MAX brightness as the LED framework
does this.
Signed-off-by: Dan
Add the ability to parse the DT and set the default
trigger mode for the LED.
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy
---
v5 - No changes
v4 - No changes
v3 - no changes - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10093751/
v2 - no changes
drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c | 4
1 file changed, 4
Add the ability to parse the DT and set the default
trigger mode for the LED.
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy
---
v5 - No changes
v4 - No changes
v3 - no changes - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10093751/
v2 - no changes
drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Update the DT parsing for the label node so that
the label is retrieved from the device child as
opposed to being part of the parent.
This will align this driver with the LED
binding documentation
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy
---
Add a default trigger optional node to the child node.
This will allow the driver to set the trigger for a backlight.
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy
---
v5 - No changes
v4 - No changes
v3 - Removed optional and rebased - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10093755/
v2 - Moved
Update the DT parsing for the label node so that
the label is retrieved from the device child as
opposed to being part of the parent.
This will align this driver with the LED
binding documentation
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy
---
v5 - no changes
Add a default trigger optional node to the child node.
This will allow the driver to set the trigger for a backlight.
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy
---
v5 - No changes
v4 - No changes
v3 - Removed optional and rebased - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10093755/
v2 - Moved binding changes to
Update the lp8860 label binding to the LED
standard as documented in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy
---
v5 - Renamed label to just white:backlight -
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10108361
Comment was made on patch 4
Update the lp8860 label binding to the LED
standard as documented in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy
---
v5 - Renamed label to just white:backlight -
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10108361
Comment was made on patch 4
Yikes! This breaks migration to/from older versions of kvm. Will you
be submitting another change to handle dynamic conversion between
formats?
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> From: Ladi Prosek
>
> Reorders existing fields and
Yikes! This breaks migration to/from older versions of kvm. Will you
be submitting another change to handle dynamic conversion between
formats?
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> From: Ladi Prosek
>
> Reorders existing fields and adds fields specific to Hyper-V. The
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 08:46:09AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Daniel Thompson
> wrote:
> > I think two different values on the userspace side should always map to
> > different values on the kernel side.
>
> This is what I
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 08:46:09AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Daniel Thompson
> wrote:
> > I think two different values on the userspace side should always map to
> > different values on the kernel side.
>
> This is what I thought originally, but I
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Ludovic Barre wrote:
=
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "STMicroelectronics STM32MP157C eval daughter";
> + compatible = "st,stm32mp157c-ed1", "st,stm32mp157";
> +
> + chosen {
> + bootargs = "earlyprintk
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Ludovic Barre wrote:
=
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "STMicroelectronics STM32MP157C eval daughter";
> + compatible = "st,stm32mp157c-ed1", "st,stm32mp157";
> +
> + chosen {
> + bootargs = "earlyprintk console=ttySTM3,115200
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:46:36 +0800
Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Michele Ballabio
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:08:37 -0700
> > Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/08/2017 08:38 AM, Michele Ballabio wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:46:36 +0800
Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Michele Ballabio
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:08:37 -0700
> > Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/08/2017 08:38 AM, Michele Ballabio wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> > kernels 4.13.*, 4.14.* 4.15-rc2 crash on
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> Hello Kees,
>
> I'm late to the party, and only just caught up with the fuss :-).
No worries!
> On 12/14/2017 12:19 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Cyril Hrubis
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> Hello Kees,
>
> I'm late to the party, and only just caught up with the fuss :-).
No worries!
> On 12/14/2017 12:19 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
>>> Hi!
You selected
On 12/12/2017 at 17:21:19 +0100, Romain Izard wrote:
> The controller used by a flexcom module is configured at boot, and left
> alone after this. In the suspend mode called "backup with self-refresh"
> available on SAMA5D2, the chip will resume with most of its registers
> reset. In this case, we
On 12/12/2017 at 17:21:19 +0100, Romain Izard wrote:
> The controller used by a flexcom module is configured at boot, and left
> alone after this. In the suspend mode called "backup with self-refresh"
> available on SAMA5D2, the chip will resume with most of its registers
> reset. In this case, we
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 07:34:29PM +, Shaikh, Azhar wrote:
> >IIUC, if CLKRUN_EN is enabled, then all the devices attached to the
> >LPC bus have to support the CLKRUN protocol. My guess is that on
> >some Braswell systems LPC power management is enabled but the TPM
> >device doesn't have
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 07:34:29PM +, Shaikh, Azhar wrote:
> >IIUC, if CLKRUN_EN is enabled, then all the devices attached to the
> >LPC bus have to support the CLKRUN protocol. My guess is that on
> >some Braswell systems LPC power management is enabled but the TPM
> >device doesn't have
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 08:29:30PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> My knowledge of LPC is near to non-existent so I please forgive me if I'm
> wrong,
> but my understanding is that it's the opposite of what you said.
>
> When CLKRUN_EN is SET, power management is ENABLED on the LPC bus
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 08:29:30PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> My knowledge of LPC is near to non-existent so I please forgive me if I'm
> wrong,
> but my understanding is that it's the opposite of what you said.
>
> When CLKRUN_EN is SET, power management is ENABLED on the LPC bus
Hi Jerome & Stephen,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 11:03 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 12/18, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> > Nothing really prevents a provider from (trying to) register a clock
>> > without providing the clock
Hi Jerome & Stephen,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 11:03 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 12/18, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> > Nothing really prevents a provider from (trying to) register a clock
>> > without providing the clock ops structure.
>> >
>>
From: Alexey Khoroshilov
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 00:52:39 +0300
> There are several error paths in xgene_mdio_probe(),
> where clk is left undisabled. The patch fixes them.
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey
From: Alexey Khoroshilov
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 00:52:39 +0300
> There are several error paths in xgene_mdio_probe(),
> where clk is left undisabled. The patch fixes them.
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov
Applied, thank
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:50:48AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> Is this unused?
I apologize I missed this. These were going to be mux controls for two
differential inputs. There are two inputs, but only one can be used at
a time. We have never seen anybody use the second input, so I will
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:50:48AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> Is this unused?
I apologize I missed this. These were going to be mux controls for two
differential inputs. There are two inputs, but only one can be used at
a time. We have never seen anybody use the second input, so I will
From: Romain Perier
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:31:22 +0100
> From: Romain Perier
>
> The PCI pool API is deprecated. This commit replaces the PCI pool old
> API by the appropriate function with the DMA pool API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Romain
From: Romain Perier
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:31:22 +0100
> From: Romain Perier
>
> The PCI pool API is deprecated. This commit replaces the PCI pool old
> API by the appropriate function with the DMA pool API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier
Acked-by: David S. Miller
From: Romain Perier
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:31:21 +0100
> From: Romain Perier
>
> The PCI pool API is deprecated. This commit replaces the PCI pool old
> API by the appropriate function with the DMA pool API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Romain
From: Romain Perier
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:31:21 +0100
> From: Romain Perier
>
> The PCI pool API is deprecated. This commit replaces the PCI pool old
> API by the appropriate function with the DMA pool API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier
> Acked-by: Peter Senna Tschudin
> Acked-by:
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 11:03 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 12/18, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> > Nothing really prevents a provider from (trying to) register a clock
> > without providing the clock ops structure.
> >
> > We do check the individual fields before using them, but not the
> > structure
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 11:03 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 12/18, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> > Nothing really prevents a provider from (trying to) register a clock
> > without providing the clock ops structure.
> >
> > We do check the individual fields before using them, but not the
> > structure
By the way, Komali just reported another bug internally where
instantiating an SR-IOV Virtual Function causes cxgb4vf to be automatically
loaded, which is normal behavior. But then when she attempts to unload
cxgb4vf, it simply gets reloaded again. This is with:
[root@t5nic linux]# git
By the way, Komali just reported another bug internally where
instantiating an SR-IOV Virtual Function causes cxgb4vf to be automatically
loaded, which is normal behavior. But then when she attempts to unload
cxgb4vf, it simply gets reloaded again. This is with:
[root@t5nic linux]# git
>-Original Message-
>From: linux-integrity-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-integrity-
>ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Shaikh, Azhar
>Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 11:34 AM
>To: Javier Martinez Canillas ; Jason Gunthorpe
>
>Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen
>-Original Message-
>From: linux-integrity-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-integrity-
>ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Shaikh, Azhar
>Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 11:34 AM
>To: Javier Martinez Canillas ; Jason Gunthorpe
>
>Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen ; James Ettle
>;
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:03:48 +0100
Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The first patch converts 's3c_onenand_probe()' to devm_ functions.
> This fixes a leak in one path (line 872).
> This also free_irq which was not handled at all. ( I hope I'm correct :) )
>
> The 2nd
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:03:49 +0100
Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Convert all error handling code in 's3c_onenand_probe()' to
> resource-managed alternatives in order to simplify code.
>
> This fixes a resource leak if 'platform_get_resource()' fails at line 872.
>
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:03:48 +0100
Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The first patch converts 's3c_onenand_probe()' to devm_ functions.
> This fixes a leak in one path (line 872).
> This also free_irq which was not handled at all. ( I hope I'm correct :) )
>
> The 2nd patch is about an un-handled
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:03:49 +0100
Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Convert all error handling code in 's3c_onenand_probe()' to
> resource-managed alternatives in order to simplify code.
>
> This fixes a resource leak if 'platform_get_resource()' fails at line 872.
>
> The 'request_irq()' at line
Don't know how you generated the patch series, but this one should be
4/4 and not 3/4.
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:03:52 +0100
Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> This include is not needed, so remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET
>
Don't know how you generated the patch series, but this one should be
4/4 and not 3/4.
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:03:52 +0100
Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> This include is not needed, so remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET
> ---
> Cross-compiled tested-only
>
> v3: new patch in the
On 17/12/2017 23:24, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 05:49:44PM +, Bronek Kozicki wrote:
I just upgraded to 4.14.7 and tried to reproduce this error, this time under
strace. As you can see this happens when systemctl tries to read a specific
entry under /sys/fs . In
On 17/12/2017 23:24, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 05:49:44PM +, Bronek Kozicki wrote:
I just upgraded to 4.14.7 and tried to reproduce this error, this time under
strace. As you can see this happens when systemctl tries to read a specific
entry under /sys/fs . In
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Wolfgang Rohdewald
wrote:
> @@ -913,6 +913,14 @@ static int pctv452e_frontend_attach(struct
> dvb_usb_adapter *a)
> >dev->i2c_adap);
> if (!a->fe_adap[0].fe)
> return
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Wolfgang Rohdewald
wrote:
> @@ -913,6 +913,14 @@ static int pctv452e_frontend_attach(struct
> dvb_usb_adapter *a)
> >dev->i2c_adap);
> if (!a->fe_adap[0].fe)
> return -ENODEV;
> +
> +
From: Alexander Kochetkov
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 14:12:51 +0300
> Under certain conditions EMAC stop reception of incoming packets and
> continuously increment R_MISS register instead of saving data into
> provided buffer. The commit implement workaround for such situation.
From: Alexander Kochetkov
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 14:12:51 +0300
> Under certain conditions EMAC stop reception of incoming packets and
> continuously increment R_MISS register instead of saving data into
> provided buffer. The commit implement workaround for such situation.
> Then the stall
From: Samuel Mendoza-Jonas
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:16:40 +1100
> The current HNCDSC handler takes the status flag from the AEN packet and
> will update or change the current channel based on this flag and the
> current channel status.
>
> However the flag from the
From: Samuel Mendoza-Jonas
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:16:40 +1100
> The current HNCDSC handler takes the status flag from the AEN packet and
> will update or change the current channel based on this flag and the
> current channel status.
>
> However the flag from the HNCDSC packet merely
From: Kan Liang
There is auto-reload mechanism enabled for PEBS events in fixed period
mode. When calculating the event->count, the reload value also need to
be taken into account.
Pass the auto-reload value and times to event update.
They will be used later.
No
From: Kan Liang
There is auto-reload mechanism enabled for PEBS events in fixed period
mode. When calculating the event->count, the reload value also need to
be taken into account.
Pass the auto-reload value and times to event update.
They will be used later.
No functional change.
From: Kan Liang
Large PEBS need to be specially handled in event count read.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 3 +++
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git
From: Kan Liang
Large PEBS need to be specially handled in event count read.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 3 +++
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On 07-12-2017 00:00, Sean Paul wrote:
>> Welcome to version 4 of the patchset. I think we're nearing the finish line
>> (hopefully) now. This set addresses the review feedback from v3. I applied
>> some
>>
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On 07-12-2017 00:00, Sean Paul wrote:
>> Welcome to version 4 of the patchset. I think we're nearing the finish line
>> (hopefully) now. This set addresses the review feedback from v3. I applied
>> some
>> R-b's from v3 review, and
From: Kan Liang
When the PEBS interrupt threshold is larger than one, there is no way to
get exact auto-reload times and value needed for event update unless
flush the PEBS buffer.
Drain the PEBS buffer in event read when large PEBS is enabled.
For the threshold is
From: Kan Liang
When the PEBS interrupt threshold is larger than one, there is no way to
get exact auto-reload times and value needed for event update unless
flush the PEBS buffer.
Drain the PEBS buffer in event read when large PEBS is enabled.
For the threshold is one, even auto-reload is
From: Kan Liang
There is bug when mmap read event->count with large PEBS enabled.
Here is an example.
#./read_count
0x71f0
0x122c0
0x11c54
0x10001257d
0x2bdc5
There is auto-reload mechanism enabled for PEBS events in fixed period
mode. But
From: Kan Liang
There is bug when mmap read event->count with large PEBS enabled.
Here is an example.
#./read_count
0x71f0
0x122c0
0x11c54
0x10001257d
0x2bdc5
There is auto-reload mechanism enabled for PEBS events in fixed period
mode. But the calculation of
From: Kan Liang
There is bug when mmap read event->count with large PEBS enabled.
Here is an example.
#./read_count
0x71f0
0x122c0
0x11c54
0x10001257d
0x2bdc5
The bug is caused by two issues.
- In x86_perf_event_update, the calculation of
From: Kan Liang
There is bug when mmap read event->count with large PEBS enabled.
Here is an example.
#./read_count
0x71f0
0x122c0
0x11c54
0x10001257d
0x2bdc5
The bug is caused by two issues.
- In x86_perf_event_update, the calculation of event->count does not
take
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:32:42 +
Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:53:11PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > The clocksource and clockevent timer are probed early in the boot process.
> > At that time it is difficult for linux to know whether a
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:32:42 +
Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:53:11PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > The clocksource and clockevent timer are probed early in the boot process.
> > At that time it is difficult for linux to know whether a particular timer
> >
/ From: Casey Leedom
| Date: Friday, December 15, 2017 11:17 PST
|
| | From: Dmitry Torokhov
| | Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 10:53 AM
| |
| | Hmm, can she collect output of 'udevadm monitor -p' at the time you
| | assign the adapter to the
/ From: Casey Leedom
| Date: Friday, December 15, 2017 11:17 PST
|
| | From: Dmitry Torokhov
| | Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 10:53 AM
| |
| | Hmm, can she collect output of 'udevadm monitor -p' at the time you
| | assign the adapter to the VM?
|
| Sure. I'll have Komali report on that.
On 12/16/2017 6:02 PM, Knut Omang wrote:
On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 12:00 -0800, santosh.shilim...@oracle.com wrote:
On 12/16/17 10:24 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
[...]
Most of these existing messages from checkpatch should
probably be inspected and corrected where possible to
minimize the style
On 12/16/2017 6:02 PM, Knut Omang wrote:
On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 12:00 -0800, santosh.shilim...@oracle.com wrote:
On 12/16/17 10:24 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
[...]
Most of these existing messages from checkpatch should
probably be inspected and corrected where possible to
minimize the style
From: "John W. Linville"
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 16:07:56 -0500
> Even without considering the ioctl problesms, the current ethtool
> API seems a bit crufty. It has been a catch-all, "where else would it
> go?" dumping ground for a long time, and it has accrued a number of
From: "John W. Linville"
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 16:07:56 -0500
> Even without considering the ioctl problesms, the current ethtool
> API seems a bit crufty. It has been a catch-all, "where else would it
> go?" dumping ground for a long time, and it has accrued a number of
> not-entirely-related
On Mon, Dec 18 2017 at 2:32pm -0500,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18 2017 at 1:52pm -0500,
> Scott Bauer wrote:
>
> >
> > > > +config DM_UN_STRIPE
> > > > + tristate "Transpose IO to individual drives on a raid device"
> > > > +
On Mon, Dec 18 2017 at 2:32pm -0500,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18 2017 at 1:52pm -0500,
> Scott Bauer wrote:
>
> >
> > > > +config DM_UN_STRIPE
> > > > + tristate "Transpose IO to individual drives on a raid device"
> > > > + depends on BLK_DEV_DM
> > > > +
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 12:36 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:22:20PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 17:34 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Mon 18-12-17 10:11:56, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > static inline bool
> > > > inode_maybe_inc_iversion(struct
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 12:36 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:22:20PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 17:34 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Mon 18-12-17 10:11:56, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > static inline bool
> > > > inode_maybe_inc_iversion(struct
701 - 800 of 3372 matches
Mail list logo