From: Adam Manzanares
Now that kiocb has an ioprio field copy this over to the bio when it is
created from the kiocb.
Signed-off-by: Adam Manzanares
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer
---
fs/block_dev.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2
From: Adam Manzanares
In order to avoid kiocb bloat for per command iopriority support, rw_hint
is converted from enum to a u16. Added a guard around ki_hint assignment.
Signed-off-by: Adam Manzanares
---
fs/aio.c | 2 +-
From: Adam Manzanares
In order to avoid kiocb bloat for per command iopriority support, rw_hint
is converted from enum to a u16. Added a guard around ki_hint assignment.
Signed-off-by: Adam Manzanares
---
fs/aio.c | 2 +-
include/linux/fs.h | 13 +++--
2 files changed, 12
From: Adam Manzanares
Now that kiocb has an ioprio field copy this over to the bio when it is
created from the kiocb.
Signed-off-by: Adam Manzanares
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer
---
fs/block_dev.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index
From: Adam Manzanares
This is the per-I/O equivalent of the ioprio_set system call.
When IOCB_FLAG_IOPRIO is set on the iocb aio_flags field, then we set the
newly added kiocb ki_ioprio field to the value in the iocb aio_reqprio field.
This patch depends on block: add
From: Adam Manzanares
This is the per-I/O equivalent of the ioprio_set system call.
When IOCB_FLAG_IOPRIO is set on the iocb aio_flags field, then we set the
newly added kiocb ki_ioprio field to the value in the iocb aio_reqprio field.
This patch depends on block: add ioprio_check_cap
From: Wenwen Wang
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 01:58:07 -0500
> In divasmain.c, the function divas_write() firstly invokes the function
> diva_xdi_open_adapter() to open the adapter that matches with the adapter
> number provided by the user, and then invokes the function
From: Wenwen Wang
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 01:58:07 -0500
> In divasmain.c, the function divas_write() firstly invokes the function
> diva_xdi_open_adapter() to open the adapter that matches with the adapter
> number provided by the user, and then invokes the function diva_xdi_write()
> to perform
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:03:54AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 09:46 AM, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 May 2018, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/22/2018 09:05 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> >>> How can we implement "Private memory"?
> >> Per-cpu page tables would do it.
> >
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:03:54AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 09:46 AM, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 May 2018, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/22/2018 09:05 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> >>> How can we implement "Private memory"?
> >> Per-cpu page tables would do it.
> >
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
index 4ed63b6cfb15..2e5e0232b8fa 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
@@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ What:
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
index 4ed63b6cfb15..2e5e0232b8fa 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
@@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ What:
I'm announcing the release of the 4.16.11 kernel.
All users of the 4.16 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 4.16.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-4.16.y
and can be browsed at the normal kernel.org git web
I'm announcing the release of the 4.16.11 kernel.
All users of the 4.16 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 4.16.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-4.16.y
and can be browsed at the normal kernel.org git web
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
index 258902db14bf..8355e79350b7 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
@@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ What:
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
index 258902db14bf..8355e79350b7 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
@@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ What:
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
index dfd56ec7a850..6d75a9c00e8a 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
@@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ What:
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
index dfd56ec7a850..6d75a9c00e8a 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
@@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ What:
I'm announcing the release of the 4.14.43 kernel.
All users of the 4.14 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 4.14.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-4.14.y
and can be browsed at the normal kernel.org git web
I'm announcing the release of the 4.14.43 kernel.
All users of the 4.14 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 4.14.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-4.14.y
and can be browsed at the normal kernel.org git web
I'm announcing the release of the 4.9.102 kernel.
All users of the 4.9 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 4.9.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-4.9.y
and can be browsed at the normal kernel.org git web browser:
I'm announcing the release of the 4.9.102 kernel.
All users of the 4.9 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 4.9.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-4.9.y
and can be browsed at the normal kernel.org git web browser:
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 06:35:27AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 05/21/2018 02:10 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.16.11 release.
> > There are 110 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 06:35:27AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 05/21/2018 02:10 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.16.11 release.
> > There are 110 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:27:00PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2018 09:09:49 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>
> > Just for the record, if you guys realy want to take over Tasks RCU,
> > I have no objections. For one thing, I don't anticipate any
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:27:00PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2018 09:09:49 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>
> > Just for the record, if you guys realy want to take over Tasks RCU,
> > I have no objections. For one thing, I don't anticipate any other use
> > cases for it
On 5/22/18 10:20 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/22/18 10:17 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>> On 05/22/18 16:48, Jianchao Wang wrote:
>>> Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
>>> on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not
>>> leave any requests in ctx
On 5/22/18 10:20 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/22/18 10:17 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>> On 05/22/18 16:48, Jianchao Wang wrote:
>>> Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
>>> on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not
>>> leave any requests in ctx
:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/adam-manzanares-wdc-com/AIO-add-per-command-iopriority/20180522-232203
config: x86_64-randconfig-s0-05230027 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.4.0-9) 6.4.0 20171026
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/adam-manzanares-wdc-com/AIO-add-per-command-iopriority/20180522-232203
config: x86_64-randconfig-s0-05230027 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.4.0-9) 6.4.0 20171026
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 18:48 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 22/05/18 18:22, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > > @@ -1615,7 +1762,12 @@ static void __vb2_dqbuf(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
> > > > return;
> > > >
> > > > vb->state = VB2_BUF_STATE_DEQUEUED;
> > > > -
> > > > +
On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 18:48 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 22/05/18 18:22, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > > @@ -1615,7 +1762,12 @@ static void __vb2_dqbuf(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
> > > > return;
> > > >
> > > > vb->state = VB2_BUF_STATE_DEQUEUED;
> > > > -
> > > > +
If the test_printf module is loaded before the crng is initialized, the
plain 'p' tests will fail because the printed address will not be hashed
and the buffer will contain '(ptrval)' instead.
This patch adds a call to wait_for_random_bytes() before plain 'p' tests
to make sure the crng is
If the test_printf module is loaded before the crng is initialized, the
plain 'p' tests will fail because the printed address will not be hashed
and the buffer will contain '(ptrval)' instead.
This patch adds a call to wait_for_random_bytes() before plain 'p' tests
to make sure the crng is
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:32:04AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> From: Finley Xiao
>
> According to a description from TRM, add all the power domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:32:04AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> From: Finley Xiao
>
> According to a description from TRM, add all the power domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
> ---
> include/dt-bindings/power/px30-power.h | 32
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:31:24AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> Add binding documentation for the power domains
> found on Rockchip RK3228 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt | 3 +++
> 1 file
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:31:24AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> Add binding documentation for the power domains
> found on Rockchip RK3228 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:31:08AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> According to a description from TRM, add all the power domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
> ---
> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3228-power.h | 26 ++
> 1 file changed, 26
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:31:08AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> According to a description from TRM, add all the power domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
> ---
> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3228-power.h | 26 ++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> create mode
On 21/05/18 04:35 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> + /*
> + * For device private memory we call add_pages() as we only need to
> + * allocate and initialize struct page for the device memory. More-
> + * over the device memory is un-accessible thus we do not want to
> + * create
On 21/05/18 04:35 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> + /*
> + * For device private memory we call add_pages() as we only need to
> + * allocate and initialize struct page for the device memory. More-
> + * over the device memory is un-accessible thus we do not want to
> + * create
On 22/05/18 11:25 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> As far as I can see by then it's too late, or we need to expose
> release details to the caller which defeats the purpose of devm
> semantics.
In the dax/pmem case, I *think* it should be fine...
devm_add_action_or_reset() only calls the action it is
On 22/05/18 11:25 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> As far as I can see by then it's too late, or we need to expose
> release details to the caller which defeats the purpose of devm
> semantics.
In the dax/pmem case, I *think* it should be fine...
devm_add_action_or_reset() only calls the action it is
On 2018-05-21 16:06, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Eric W. Biederman
> wrote:
> > Steve Grubb writes:
> >> On Friday, March 16, 2018 5:00:40 AM EDT Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> >>> Add support for reading the container ID from the
On 2018-05-21 16:06, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Eric W. Biederman
> wrote:
> > Steve Grubb writes:
> >> On Friday, March 16, 2018 5:00:40 AM EDT Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> >>> Add support for reading the container ID from the proc filesystem.
> >>
> >> I think this
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:30:26AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> Add binding documentation for the power domains
> found on Rockchip RK3128 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt | 3 +++
> 1 file
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:30:26AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> Add binding documentation for the power domains
> found on Rockchip RK3128 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:30:02AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> According to a description from TRM, add all the power domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
> ---
> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3128-power.h | 28
> 1 file changed, 28
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:30:02AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> According to a description from TRM, add all the power domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
> ---
> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3128-power.h | 28
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> create mode
On Tue, 22 May 2018, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 09:46 AM, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 May 2018, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/22/2018 09:05 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> >>> How can we implement "Private memory"?
> >> Per-cpu page tables would do it.
> > We already have that
On Tue, 22 May 2018, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 09:46 AM, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 May 2018, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/22/2018 09:05 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> >>> How can we implement "Private memory"?
> >> Per-cpu page tables would do it.
> > We already have that
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:28:48AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> From: Caesar Wang
>
> Add binding documentation for the power domains
> found on Rockchip RK3036 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:28:48AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> From: Caesar Wang
>
> Add binding documentation for the power domains
> found on Rockchip RK3036 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
> ---
>
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:28:21AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> From: Caesar Wang
>
> According to a description from TRM, add all the power domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
> ---
>
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:28:21AM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> From: Caesar Wang
>
> According to a description from TRM, add all the power domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang
> ---
> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3036-power.h | 27 +++
On 2018-05-22 13:24:29 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2018 19:21:16 +0200
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> > On 2018-05-22 13:10:04 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 May 2018 14:40:06 +0200
> > > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2018-05-22 13:24:29 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2018 19:21:16 +0200
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> > On 2018-05-22 13:10:04 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 May 2018 14:40:06 +0200
> > > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > >
> > > > +static
This code has been there for nine years now, and it has been
working "good enough" since then [1].
Remove duplicate code by getting rid of the if-else statement.
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=152693550225081=2
Cc: Devin Heitmueller
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A.
This code has been there for nine years now, and it has been
working "good enough" since then [1].
Remove duplicate code by getting rid of the if-else statement.
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=152693550225081=2
Cc: Devin Heitmueller
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 03:45:09PM -0600, Mahadevan, Girish wrote:
> I can resubmit the SPI binding documentation as part of this patch series.
Yes, and realy I'd expect to see the SPI subdevices being documented in
a separate SPI binding document rather than just lumped in with the
parent
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 03:45:09PM -0600, Mahadevan, Girish wrote:
> I can resubmit the SPI binding documentation as part of this patch series.
Yes, and realy I'd expect to see the SPI subdevices being documented in
a separate SPI binding document rather than just lumped in with the
parent
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 08:20:19PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> A coresight topology doesn't need to include links, i.e., a source can
> be directly connected to a sink. As such, selecting and/or depending on
> LINKS_AND_SINKS is no longer needed.
I'm good with this patch but now the help text
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 08:20:19PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> A coresight topology doesn't need to include links, i.e., a source can
> be directly connected to a sink. As such, selecting and/or depending on
> LINKS_AND_SINKS is no longer needed.
I'm good with this patch but now the help text
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:18:54AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The script:
> ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check --fix-rst
>
> Gives multiple hints for broken references on some files.
> Manually use the one that applies for some files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:18:54AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The script:
> ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check --fix-rst
>
> Gives multiple hints for broken references on some files.
> Manually use the one that applies for some files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 09:46:39AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Mahadevan, Girish (2018-05-21 08:52:47)
> > Not sure I follow, the intention is to run the controller clock based on
> > the slave's max frequency.
> That's good. The problem I see is that we have to specify the max
>
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 09:46:39AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Mahadevan, Girish (2018-05-21 08:52:47)
> > Not sure I follow, the intention is to run the controller clock based on
> > the slave's max frequency.
> That's good. The problem I see is that we have to specify the max
>
On Tue, 22 May 2018 09:09:49 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> Just for the record, if you guys realy want to take over Tasks RCU,
> I have no objections. For one thing, I don't anticipate any other use
> cases for it (famous last words!). But you break it, you buy
On Tue, 22 May 2018 09:09:49 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> Just for the record, if you guys realy want to take over Tasks RCU,
> I have no objections. For one thing, I don't anticipate any other use
> cases for it (famous last words!). But you break it, you buy it! ;-)
It really matters
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>
> On 22/05/18 10:56 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> Hey Dan,
>>>
>>> On 21/05/18 06:07 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
Without this change we
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>
> On 22/05/18 10:56 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> Hey Dan,
>>>
>>> On 21/05/18 06:07 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
Without this change we could fail to register the teardown of
Sean, I'd like to echo Matthias's appreciation for your work with this
BPF project. I'm very much looking forward to the possibility of using
my remotes directly with decoders generated from the existing
lircd.conf's. Excited seeing your work progress!
Cheers,
Derek
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 6:50
Sean, I'd like to echo Matthias's appreciation for your work with this
BPF project. I'm very much looking forward to the possibility of using
my remotes directly with decoders generated from the existing
lircd.conf's. Excited seeing your work progress!
Cheers,
Derek
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 6:50
On Tue, 22 May 2018 19:21:16 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-05-22 13:10:04 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 May 2018 14:40:06 +0200
> > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >
> > > +static
On Tue, 22 May 2018 19:21:16 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-05-22 13:10:04 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 May 2018 14:40:06 +0200
> > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >
> > > +static DEFINE_LOCAL_IRQ_LOCK(fpsimd_lock);
> > > /*
> > > * Update current's
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Yisheng Xie wrote:
> hmm, you mean something like:
>
> int ret;
>
> ret = match_string(eq_mode_name, ARRAY_SIZE(eq_mode_name), name);
> if (ret < 0) /* Shouldn't happen */
> dev_err(component->dev,
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Yisheng Xie wrote:
> hmm, you mean something like:
>
> int ret;
>
> ret = match_string(eq_mode_name, ARRAY_SIZE(eq_mode_name), name);
> if (ret < 0) /* Shouldn't happen */
> dev_err(component->dev, "Bad EQ channel name
On 5/22/18 9:30 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/22/18 10:24 AM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/22/2018 10:32 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 5/22/18 9:07 AM, adam.manzana...@wdc.com wrote:
From: Adam Manzanares
In order to avoid kiocb bloat for per
On 5/22/18 9:30 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/22/18 10:24 AM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/22/2018 10:32 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 5/22/18 9:07 AM, adam.manzana...@wdc.com wrote:
From: Adam Manzanares
In order to avoid kiocb bloat for per command iopriority support,
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 02:22:03PM +0800, Erin Lo wrote:
> This adds dt-binding documentation of cpu for Mediatek MT8183.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erin Lo
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek.txt | 4
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Rob
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 02:22:03PM +0800, Erin Lo wrote:
> This adds dt-binding documentation of cpu for Mediatek MT8183.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erin Lo
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek.txt | 4
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
On 2018-05-22 13:10:04 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2018 14:40:06 +0200
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> > +static DEFINE_LOCAL_IRQ_LOCK(fpsimd_lock);
> > /*
> > * Update current's FPSIMD/SVE registers from thread_struct.
> > *
> > @@ -594,6
On 2018-05-22 13:10:04 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2018 14:40:06 +0200
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> > +static DEFINE_LOCAL_IRQ_LOCK(fpsimd_lock);
> > /*
> > * Update current's FPSIMD/SVE registers from thread_struct.
> > *
> > @@ -594,6 +595,7 @@ int
> IMHO, it is unsafe for CBOX pmu but could IMC, UPI pmus be an exception here?
> Because currently perf stat -I from IMC, UPI counters is only allowed when
> system wide monitoring is permitted and this prevents joint perf record and
> perf stat -I in cluster environments where users usually
> IMHO, it is unsafe for CBOX pmu but could IMC, UPI pmus be an exception here?
> Because currently perf stat -I from IMC, UPI counters is only allowed when
> system wide monitoring is permitted and this prevents joint perf record and
> perf stat -I in cluster environments where users usually
On Mon, 21 May 2018 10:16:54 +0100
Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in module description text
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git.
On Mon, 21 May 2018 10:16:54 +0100
Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in module description text
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/imx7d_adc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file
On 5/22/2018 9:42 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:59:05PM -0700, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
This commit adds dt-bindings documents for PECI hwmon client drivers.
Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo
Reviewed-by: Haiyue Wang
On 5/22/2018 9:42 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:59:05PM -0700, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
This commit adds dt-bindings documents for PECI hwmon client drivers.
Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo
Reviewed-by: Haiyue Wang
Reviewed-by: James Feist
Reviewed-by: Vernon Mauery
Cc: Andrew
Reviewed-by: Devin Heitmueller
Devin
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
wrote:
> This code has been there for nine years now, and it has been
> working "good enough" since then [1].
>
> Remove duplicate code by getting rid
Reviewed-by: Devin Heitmueller
Devin
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
wrote:
> This code has been there for nine years now, and it has been
> working "good enough" since then [1].
>
> Remove duplicate code by getting rid of the if-else statement.
>
> [1]
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 02:22:04PM +0800, Erin Lo wrote:
> This adds dt-binding documentation of SYSIRQ for Mediatek MT8183 SoC
> Platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erin Lo
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/mediatek,sysirq.txt | 1
> +
> 1 file
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 02:22:04PM +0800, Erin Lo wrote:
> This adds dt-binding documentation of SYSIRQ for Mediatek MT8183 SoC
> Platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erin Lo
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/mediatek,sysirq.txt | 1
> +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
From vfio-ccw perspective I join Connie's assessment: vfio-ccw should
be fine with these changes. I'm however not too deeply involved with
the mdev framework, thus I don't feel comfortable r-b-ing. That results
in
Acked-by: Halil Pasic
for both patches.
While at it I have
From vfio-ccw perspective I join Connie's assessment: vfio-ccw should
be fine with these changes. I'm however not too deeply involved with
the mdev framework, thus I don't feel comfortable r-b-ing. That results
in
Acked-by: Halil Pasic
for both patches.
While at it I have would like to ask
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 02:04:25PM +0200, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> RTC embedded in stm32mp1 SoC is slightly different from stm32h7 one, it
> doesn't require to disable backup domain write protection, and rtc_ck
> parent clock assignment isn't allowed.
> To sum up, stm32mp1 RTC requires 2 clocks,
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 02:04:25PM +0200, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> RTC embedded in stm32mp1 SoC is slightly different from stm32h7 one, it
> doesn't require to disable backup domain write protection, and rtc_ck
> parent clock assignment isn't allowed.
> To sum up, stm32mp1 RTC requires 2 clocks,
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 02:22:05PM +0800, Erin Lo wrote:
> This adds dt-binding documentation of uart for Mediatek MT8183 SoC
> Platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erin Lo
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/mtk-uart.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 02:22:05PM +0800, Erin Lo wrote:
> This adds dt-binding documentation of uart for Mediatek MT8183 SoC
> Platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erin Lo
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/mtk-uart.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Acked-by: Rob Herring
901 - 1000 of 2446 matches
Mail list logo