Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: qcom: Add clk_rcg2_gfx3d_ops for SDM845

2018-08-07 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Jordan Crouse (2018-08-06 08:04:37) > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 02:37:18PM +0530, Amit Nischal wrote: > > On 2018-08-03 04:14, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > >Quoting Amit Nischal (2018-07-30 04:28:56) > > >>On 2018-07-25 12:28, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Ok. Sounds good! Is the rate range

Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: qcom: Add clk_rcg2_gfx3d_ops for SDM845

2018-08-07 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Jordan Crouse (2018-08-06 08:04:37) > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 02:37:18PM +0530, Amit Nischal wrote: > > On 2018-08-03 04:14, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > >Quoting Amit Nischal (2018-07-30 04:28:56) > > >>On 2018-07-25 12:28, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Ok. Sounds good! Is the rate range

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/12] 4.4.147-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Naresh Kamboju
-- kernel: 4.4.147-rc1 git repo: https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git git branch: 4.4.147-rc1-hikey-20180807-254 git commit: a7af4a3cb7756f8a159f54cb757f30764f3d5166 git describe: 4.4.147-rc1-hikey-20180807-254 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.or

Re: [PATCH v3] locking/rwsem: Exit read lock slowpath if queue empty & no writer

2018-08-07 Thread Waiman Long
On 07/24/2018 03:10 PM, Waiman Long wrote: > It was discovered that a constant stream of readers with occassional > writers pounding on a rwsem may cause many of the readers to enter the > slowpath unnecessarily thus increasing latency and lowering performance. > > In the current code, a reader

Re: [PATCH v3] locking/rwsem: Exit read lock slowpath if queue empty & no writer

2018-08-07 Thread Waiman Long
On 07/24/2018 03:10 PM, Waiman Long wrote: > It was discovered that a constant stream of readers with occassional > writers pounding on a rwsem may cause many of the readers to enter the > slowpath unnecessarily thus increasing latency and lowering performance. > > In the current code, a reader

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/12] 4.4.147-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Naresh Kamboju
-- kernel: 4.4.147-rc1 git repo: https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git git branch: 4.4.147-rc1-hikey-20180807-254 git commit: a7af4a3cb7756f8a159f54cb757f30764f3d5166 git describe: 4.4.147-rc1-hikey-20180807-254 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.or

[GIT PULL] FSI fixes for 4.19

2018-08-07 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Hi Greg ! This adds two FSI fixes to what you already have in your tree - Fix a NULL dereference in the scom driver - Fix a command buffer size issue in the sbefifo driver that breaks some operations with POWER system debugger (cronus) Cheers, Ben. The following changes since tag

[GIT PULL] FSI fixes for 4.19

2018-08-07 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Hi Greg ! This adds two FSI fixes to what you already have in your tree - Fix a NULL dereference in the scom driver - Fix a command buffer size issue in the sbefifo driver that breaks some operations with POWER system debugger (cronus) Cheers, Ben. The following changes since tag

Re: [PATCH v2 02/18] clk: intel: Add clock driver for Intel MIPS SoCs

2018-08-07 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Songjun Wu (2018-08-02 20:02:21) > From: Yixin Zhu > > This driver provides PLL clock registration as well as various clock > branches, e.g. MUX clock, gate clock, divider clock and so on. > > PLLs that provide clock to DDR, CPU and peripherals are shown below: > >

Re: [PATCH v2 02/18] clk: intel: Add clock driver for Intel MIPS SoCs

2018-08-07 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Songjun Wu (2018-08-02 20:02:21) > From: Yixin Zhu > > This driver provides PLL clock registration as well as various clock > branches, e.g. MUX clock, gate clock, divider clock and so on. > > PLLs that provide clock to DDR, CPU and peripherals are shown below: > >

[PATCH] PCI: Fix calculation of bridge window's size

2018-08-07 Thread AceLan Kao
There are some 0 resource size pci devices, and it leads to the accumulator fails to maintain the correct value. It results in a strange issue on my machine that xhci_hcd failed to init. [2.437278] xhci_hcd :05:00.0: init :05:00.0 fail, -16 [2.437300] xhci_hcd: probe of

[PATCH] PCI: Fix calculation of bridge window's size

2018-08-07 Thread AceLan Kao
There are some 0 resource size pci devices, and it leads to the accumulator fails to maintain the correct value. It results in a strange issue on my machine that xhci_hcd failed to init. [2.437278] xhci_hcd :05:00.0: init :05:00.0 fail, -16 [2.437300] xhci_hcd: probe of

Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/intel_rdt and perf/x86: Fix lack of coordination with perf

2018-08-07 Thread Reinette Chatre
Hi Tony, On 8/7/2018 6:28 PM, Luck, Tony wrote: > Would it help to call routines to read the "before" values of the counter > twice. The first time to preload the cache with anything needed to execute > the perf code path. >>> In an attempt to improve the accuracy of the above I modified it to

Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/intel_rdt and perf/x86: Fix lack of coordination with perf

2018-08-07 Thread Reinette Chatre
Hi Tony, On 8/7/2018 6:28 PM, Luck, Tony wrote: > Would it help to call routines to read the "before" values of the counter > twice. The first time to preload the cache with anything needed to execute > the perf code path. >>> In an attempt to improve the accuracy of the above I modified it to

Re: [PATCH v2] resource: Merge resources on a node when hot-adding memory

2018-08-07 Thread Rashmica Gupta
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 08/06/2018 08:52 AM, Rashmica Gupta wrote: >> When hot-removing memory release_mem_region_adjustable() splits >> iomem resources if they are not the exact size of the memory being >> hot-deleted. Adding this memory back to the kernel

Re: [PATCH v2] resource: Merge resources on a node when hot-adding memory

2018-08-07 Thread Rashmica Gupta
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 08/06/2018 08:52 AM, Rashmica Gupta wrote: >> When hot-removing memory release_mem_region_adjustable() splits >> iomem resources if they are not the exact size of the memory being >> hot-deleted. Adding this memory back to the kernel

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/10] Introduce lockless shrink_slab()

2018-08-07 Thread Shakeel Butt
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 6:12 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Kirill, > > On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 18:37:19 +0300 Kirill Tkhai wrote: > > > > After bitmaps of not-empty memcg shrinkers were implemented > > (see "[PATCH v9 00/17] Improve shrink_slab() scalability..." > > series, which is already in mm

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/10] Introduce lockless shrink_slab()

2018-08-07 Thread Shakeel Butt
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 6:12 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Kirill, > > On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 18:37:19 +0300 Kirill Tkhai wrote: > > > > After bitmaps of not-empty memcg shrinkers were implemented > > (see "[PATCH v9 00/17] Improve shrink_slab() scalability..." > > series, which is already in mm

Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/85] 3.18.118-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 08:52:59PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 08/07/2018 12:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.18.118 release. > > There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any

Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/85] 3.18.118-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 08:52:59PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 08/07/2018 12:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.18.118 release. > > There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any

Re: [PATCH 4.14 222/246] ext4: fix check to prevent initializing reserved inodes

2018-08-07 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 12:17:30AM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote: > On 08/01/2018 06:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > It seems this patch is still missing from the 4.4.y and 4.9.y branches. Maybe because no one

Re: [PATCH 4.14 222/246] ext4: fix check to prevent initializing reserved inodes

2018-08-07 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 12:17:30AM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote: > On 08/01/2018 06:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > It seems this patch is still missing from the 4.4.y and 4.9.y branches. Maybe because no one

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/17] 4.9.119-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Naresh Kamboju
On 8 August 2018 at 00:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.119 release. > There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > >

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/17] 4.9.119-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Naresh Kamboju
On 8 August 2018 at 00:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.119 release. > There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > >

Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/21] 4.14.62-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Naresh Kamboju
On 8 August 2018 at 00:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.62 release. > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > >

Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/21] 4.14.62-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Naresh Kamboju
On 8 August 2018 at 00:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.62 release. > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > >

Re: [PATCH 4.17 00/18] 4.17.14-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Naresh Kamboju
On 8 August 2018 at 00:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.17.14 release. > There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > >

Re: [PATCH 4.17 00/18] 4.17.14-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Naresh Kamboju
On 8 August 2018 at 00:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.17.14 release. > There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > >

Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Rename Denverton and Gemini Lake

2018-08-07 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Which simply does not work. Look at Goldmont Fam 6 Model 5C. The SoCs > > with that Fam/Model combination are: > > > > - Apollo Lake > > - Broxton (has two platforms: Morganfield and Willowtrail) > > Right pick one. The others are the same for

Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Rename Denverton and Gemini Lake

2018-08-07 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Which simply does not work. Look at Goldmont Fam 6 Model 5C. The SoCs > > with that Fam/Model combination are: > > > > - Apollo Lake > > - Broxton (has two platforms: Morganfield and Willowtrail) > > Right pick one. The others are the same for

Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage

2018-08-07 Thread Joel Fernandes
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 8:53 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote: >> Hi Steve, >> >> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > [...] @@ -171,8 +174,7 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void); } while

Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage

2018-08-07 Thread Joel Fernandes
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 8:53 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote: >> Hi Steve, >> >> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > [...] @@ -171,8 +174,7 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void); } while

did you recieve

2018-08-07 Thread Roy Robinson
Did you receive my email yesterday? Just want to check if you have needs for photo editing for our studio? We normally edit 300 images within 12-24 hours. We take care of different kinds of e-commerce photos, jewelry images, and portrait model images. Including cutting out and clipping path

did you recieve

2018-08-07 Thread Roy Robinson
Did you receive my email yesterday? Just want to check if you have needs for photo editing for our studio? We normally edit 300 images within 12-24 hours. We take care of different kinds of e-commerce photos, jewelry images, and portrait model images. Including cutting out and clipping path

Re: [PATCH] Input: cros_ec_keyb: Remove check before calling pm_wakeup_event.

2018-08-07 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hi Ravi, On 2018-08-07 23:59, Ravi Chandra Sadineni wrote: > hi Merek, > > I tried booting a snow device and could not get it to boot it to the > console. I assume i don't have right kernel config. Can you share your > config if possible. I use standard exynos_defconfig bundled with Linux

Re: [PATCH] Input: cros_ec_keyb: Remove check before calling pm_wakeup_event.

2018-08-07 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hi Ravi, On 2018-08-07 23:59, Ravi Chandra Sadineni wrote: > hi Merek, > > I tried booting a snow device and could not get it to boot it to the > console. I assume i don't have right kernel config. Can you share your > config if possible. I use standard exynos_defconfig bundled with Linux

[PATCH 2/2] clk: imx: imx7d: remove clks_init_on array

2018-08-07 Thread Anson Huang
Clock framework will enable those clocks registered with CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag, so no need to have clks_init_on array during clock initialization now. Signed-off-by: Anson Huang --- drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx7d.c | 27 --- drivers/clk/imx/clk.h | 7 +++ 2 files

[PATCH 2/2] clk: imx: imx7d: remove clks_init_on array

2018-08-07 Thread Anson Huang
Clock framework will enable those clocks registered with CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag, so no need to have clks_init_on array during clock initialization now. Signed-off-by: Anson Huang --- drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx7d.c | 27 --- drivers/clk/imx/clk.h | 7 +++ 2 files

[PATCH 1/2] clk: imx: imx7d: remove unnecessary clocks from clks_init_on array

2018-08-07 Thread Anson Huang
On i.MX7D, IMX7D_NAND_USDHC_BUS_ROOT_CLK is NOT necessary for system, and IMX7D_AHB_CHANNEL_ROOT_CLK is NOT existing at all, remove them from clks_init_on array. Signed-off-by: Anson Huang --- drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx7d.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 1/2] clk: imx: imx7d: remove unnecessary clocks from clks_init_on array

2018-08-07 Thread Anson Huang
On i.MX7D, IMX7D_NAND_USDHC_BUS_ROOT_CLK is NOT necessary for system, and IMX7D_AHB_CHANNEL_ROOT_CLK is NOT existing at all, remove them from clks_init_on array. Signed-off-by: Anson Huang --- drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx7d.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[RESEND PATCH] init/Kconfig: Use short unix-style option instead of --longname

2018-08-07 Thread Masahiro Yamada
From: Rob Landley Avoids warning messages with the latest release of toybox, which never bothered to implement the --longopts nothing was using. Signed-off-by: Rob Landley Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- This was sent to the trivial ML some time ago, but not applied yet. I will apply

[RESEND PATCH] init/Kconfig: Use short unix-style option instead of --longname

2018-08-07 Thread Masahiro Yamada
From: Rob Landley Avoids warning messages with the latest release of toybox, which never bothered to implement the --longopts nothing was using. Signed-off-by: Rob Landley Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- This was sent to the trivial ML some time ago, but not applied yet. I will apply

Re: [PATCH v2 08/18] serial: intel: Get serial id from dts

2018-08-07 Thread Wu, Songjun
On 8/7/2018 3:33 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Hi Songjun, On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 5:04 AM Songjun Wu wrote: Get serial id from dts. "#ifdef CONFIG_LANTIQ" preprocessor is used because LTQ_EARLY_ASC macro is defined in lantiq_soc.h. lantiq_soc.h is in arch path for legacy product support.

Re: [PATCH v2 08/18] serial: intel: Get serial id from dts

2018-08-07 Thread Wu, Songjun
On 8/7/2018 3:33 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Hi Songjun, On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 5:04 AM Songjun Wu wrote: Get serial id from dts. "#ifdef CONFIG_LANTIQ" preprocessor is used because LTQ_EARLY_ASC macro is defined in lantiq_soc.h. lantiq_soc.h is in arch path for legacy product support.

linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree

2018-08-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Paolo pointed out a semantic conflict between the kvm tree and the tip tree in arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c between commit: 368a540e0232 ("x86/kvmclock: Remove memblock dependency") from the tip tree and commit: d63bae079b64 ("KVM: X86: Add kvm hypervisor init time platform setup

linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree

2018-08-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Paolo pointed out a semantic conflict between the kvm tree and the tip tree in arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c between commit: 368a540e0232 ("x86/kvmclock: Remove memblock dependency") from the tip tree and commit: d63bae079b64 ("KVM: X86: Add kvm hypervisor init time platform setup

Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage

2018-08-07 Thread Joel Fernandes
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: [...] >>> @@ -171,8 +174,7 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void); >>> } while ((++it_func_ptr)->func);\ >>> }

Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage

2018-08-07 Thread Joel Fernandes
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: [...] >>> @@ -171,8 +174,7 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void); >>> } while ((++it_func_ptr)->func);\ >>> }

Re: [PATCH v3] PCI/AER: Do not clear AER bits if we don't own AER

2018-08-07 Thread Alex G.
On 08/07/2018 08:14 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 06:35:31PM -0500, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: When we don't own AER, we shouldn't touch the AER error bits. Clearing error bits willy-nilly might cause firmware to miss some errors. In theory, these bits get cleared by FFS, or

Re: [PATCH v3] PCI/AER: Do not clear AER bits if we don't own AER

2018-08-07 Thread Alex G.
On 08/07/2018 08:14 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 06:35:31PM -0500, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: When we don't own AER, we shouldn't touch the AER error bits. Clearing error bits willy-nilly might cause firmware to miss some errors. In theory, these bits get cleared by FFS, or

Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage

2018-08-07 Thread Joel Fernandes
Hi Steve, On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 19:13:32 -0700 > Joel Fernandes wrote: >> > >> >> From 6986af946ceb04fc9ddc6d5b45fc559b6807e465 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> >> From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" >> >> Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 20:17:41 -0700 >> >>

RE: [RFC 5/5] powerpc/fsl: Add supported-irq-ranges for P2020

2018-08-07 Thread Bharat Bhushan
> -Original Message- > From: Scott Wood [mailto:o...@buserror.net] > Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 2:44 AM > To: Bharat Bhushan ; > b...@kernel.crashing.org; pau...@samba.org; m...@ellerman.id.au; > ga...@kernel.crashing.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; > kstew...@linuxfoundation.org;

Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage

2018-08-07 Thread Joel Fernandes
Hi Steve, On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 19:13:32 -0700 > Joel Fernandes wrote: >> > >> >> From 6986af946ceb04fc9ddc6d5b45fc559b6807e465 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> >> From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" >> >> Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 20:17:41 -0700 >> >>

RE: [RFC 5/5] powerpc/fsl: Add supported-irq-ranges for P2020

2018-08-07 Thread Bharat Bhushan
> -Original Message- > From: Scott Wood [mailto:o...@buserror.net] > Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 2:44 AM > To: Bharat Bhushan ; > b...@kernel.crashing.org; pau...@samba.org; m...@ellerman.id.au; > ga...@kernel.crashing.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; > kstew...@linuxfoundation.org;

Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf report: Add raw report support for s390 auxiliary trace

2018-08-07 Thread mpe
Thomas Richter writes: > Add support for s390 auxiliary trace support. > Use 'perf record -e rbd000' to create the perf.data file. > The event also has the symbolic name SF_CYCLES_BASIC_DIAG, > using 'perf record -e SF_CYCLES_BASIC_DIAG' is equivalent. ... > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter >

RE: [RFC 3/5] powerpc/mpic: Add support for non-contiguous irq ranges

2018-08-07 Thread Bharat Bhushan
> -Original Message- > From: Scott Wood [mailto:o...@buserror.net] > Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 2:34 AM > To: Rob Herring ; Bharat Bhushan > > Cc: b...@kernel.crashing.org; pau...@samba.org; m...@ellerman.id.au; > ga...@kernel.crashing.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; >

Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf report: Add raw report support for s390 auxiliary trace

2018-08-07 Thread mpe
Thomas Richter writes: > Add support for s390 auxiliary trace support. > Use 'perf record -e rbd000' to create the perf.data file. > The event also has the symbolic name SF_CYCLES_BASIC_DIAG, > using 'perf record -e SF_CYCLES_BASIC_DIAG' is equivalent. ... > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter >

RE: [RFC 3/5] powerpc/mpic: Add support for non-contiguous irq ranges

2018-08-07 Thread Bharat Bhushan
> -Original Message- > From: Scott Wood [mailto:o...@buserror.net] > Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 2:34 AM > To: Rob Herring ; Bharat Bhushan > > Cc: b...@kernel.crashing.org; pau...@samba.org; m...@ellerman.id.au; > ga...@kernel.crashing.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; >

[PATCH v4 4/5] Allow to disable FPU support

2018-08-07 Thread Alan Kao
FPU codes have been separated from common part in previous patches. This patch add the CONFIG_FPU option and some stubs, so that a no-FPU configuration is allowed. Signed-off-by: Alan Kao Cc: Greentime Hu Cc: Vincent Chen Cc: Zong Li Cc: Nick Hu --- arch/riscv/Kconfig | 9

[PATCH v4 4/5] Allow to disable FPU support

2018-08-07 Thread Alan Kao
FPU codes have been separated from common part in previous patches. This patch add the CONFIG_FPU option and some stubs, so that a no-FPU configuration is allowed. Signed-off-by: Alan Kao Cc: Greentime Hu Cc: Vincent Chen Cc: Zong Li Cc: Nick Hu --- arch/riscv/Kconfig | 9

[PATCH v4 1/5] Extract FPU context operations from entry.S

2018-08-07 Thread Alan Kao
We move __fstate_save and __fstate_restore to a new source file, fpu.S. Signed-off-by: Alan Kao Cc: Greentime Hu Cc: Vincent Chen Cc: Zong Li Cc: Nick Hu Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig --- arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 + arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 87 --

[PATCH v4 1/5] Extract FPU context operations from entry.S

2018-08-07 Thread Alan Kao
We move __fstate_save and __fstate_restore to a new source file, fpu.S. Signed-off-by: Alan Kao Cc: Greentime Hu Cc: Vincent Chen Cc: Zong Li Cc: Nick Hu Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig --- arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 + arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 87 --

[PATCH v4 5/5] Auto-detect whether a FPU exists

2018-08-07 Thread Alan Kao
We expect that a kernel with CONFIG_FPU=y can still support no-FPU machines. To do so, the kernel should first examine the existence of a FPU, then do nothing if a FPU does exist; otherwise, it should disable/bypass all FPU-related functions. In this patch, a new global variable, no_fpu, is

[PATCH v4 2/5] Refactor FPU code in signal setup/return procedures

2018-08-07 Thread Alan Kao
FPU-related logic is separated from normal signal handling path in this patch. Kernel can easily be configured to exclude those procedures for no-FPU systems. Signed-off-by: Alan Kao Cc: Greentime Hu Cc: Vincent Chen Cc: Zong Li Cc: Nick Hu Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig ---

[PATCH v4 3/5] Cleanup ISA string setting

2018-08-07 Thread Alan Kao
Just a side note: (Assume that atomic and compressed is on) Before this patch, assembler was always given the riscv64imafdc MARCH string because there are fld/fsd's in entry.S; compiler was always given riscv64imac because kernel doesn't need floating point code generation. After this, the MARCH

[PATCH v4 5/5] Auto-detect whether a FPU exists

2018-08-07 Thread Alan Kao
We expect that a kernel with CONFIG_FPU=y can still support no-FPU machines. To do so, the kernel should first examine the existence of a FPU, then do nothing if a FPU does exist; otherwise, it should disable/bypass all FPU-related functions. In this patch, a new global variable, no_fpu, is

[PATCH v4 2/5] Refactor FPU code in signal setup/return procedures

2018-08-07 Thread Alan Kao
FPU-related logic is separated from normal signal handling path in this patch. Kernel can easily be configured to exclude those procedures for no-FPU systems. Signed-off-by: Alan Kao Cc: Greentime Hu Cc: Vincent Chen Cc: Zong Li Cc: Nick Hu Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig ---

[PATCH v4 3/5] Cleanup ISA string setting

2018-08-07 Thread Alan Kao
Just a side note: (Assume that atomic and compressed is on) Before this patch, assembler was always given the riscv64imafdc MARCH string because there are fld/fsd's in entry.S; compiler was always given riscv64imac because kernel doesn't need floating point code generation. After this, the MARCH

[PATCH v4 0/5] riscv: Add support to no-FPU systems

2018-08-07 Thread Alan Kao
This patchset adds an option, CONFIG_FPU, to enable/disable floating- point procedures. Kernel's new behavior will be as follows: * with CONFIG_FPU=y All FPU codes are reserved. If no FPU is found during booting, a global flag will be set, and those functions will be bypassed with

[PATCH v4 0/5] riscv: Add support to no-FPU systems

2018-08-07 Thread Alan Kao
This patchset adds an option, CONFIG_FPU, to enable/disable floating- point procedures. Kernel's new behavior will be as follows: * with CONFIG_FPU=y All FPU codes are reserved. If no FPU is found during booting, a global flag will be set, and those functions will be bypassed with

Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: sprd: Add SPI driver for Spreadtrum SC9860

2018-08-07 Thread Baolin Wang
Hi Trent, On 8 August 2018 at 01:10, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 18:43 +0800, Baolin Wang wrote: >> >> +static u32 sprd_spi_transfer_max_timeout(struct sprd_spi *ss, >> + struct spi_transfer *t) >> +{ >> + /* >> + * The time spent on

Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: sprd: Add SPI driver for Spreadtrum SC9860

2018-08-07 Thread Baolin Wang
Hi Trent, On 8 August 2018 at 01:10, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 18:43 +0800, Baolin Wang wrote: >> >> +static u32 sprd_spi_transfer_max_timeout(struct sprd_spi *ss, >> + struct spi_transfer *t) >> +{ >> + /* >> + * The time spent on

Re: [PATCH v2 03/18] dt-bindings: clk: Add documentation of grx500 clock controller

2018-08-07 Thread yixin zhu
On 8/6/2018 11:18 PM, Rob Herring wrote: On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:03 PM Songjun Wu wrote: From: Yixin Zhu This patch adds binding documentation for grx500 clock controller. Signed-off-by: YiXin Zhu Signed-off-by: Songjun Wu --- Changes in v2: - Rewrite clock driver's dt-binding

Re: [PATCH v2 03/18] dt-bindings: clk: Add documentation of grx500 clock controller

2018-08-07 Thread yixin zhu
On 8/6/2018 11:18 PM, Rob Herring wrote: On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:03 PM Songjun Wu wrote: From: Yixin Zhu This patch adds binding documentation for grx500 clock controller. Signed-off-by: YiXin Zhu Signed-off-by: Songjun Wu --- Changes in v2: - Rewrite clock driver's dt-binding

[PATCH] ASoC: max98373: Added software reset register to readable registers

2018-08-07 Thread Ryan Lee
Signed-off-by: Ryan Lee --- Changes : Added 'MAX98373_R2000_SW_RESET' register to 'max98373_readable_register' Software reset didn't work properly after suspend/resume. sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c

[PATCH] ASoC: max98373: Added software reset register to readable registers

2018-08-07 Thread Ryan Lee
Signed-off-by: Ryan Lee --- Changes : Added 'MAX98373_R2000_SW_RESET' register to 'max98373_readable_register' Software reset didn't work properly after suspend/resume. sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/12] 4.4.147-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Shuah Khan
On 08/07/2018 12:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.147 release. > There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/12] 4.4.147-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Shuah Khan
On 08/07/2018 12:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.147 release. > There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/17] 4.9.119-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Shuah Khan
On 08/07/2018 12:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.119 release. > There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/17] 4.9.119-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Shuah Khan
On 08/07/2018 12:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.119 release. > There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses

Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/21] 4.14.62-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Shuah Khan
On 08/07/2018 12:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.62 release. > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses

Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/21] 4.14.62-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Shuah Khan
On 08/07/2018 12:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.62 release. > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses

Re: [PATCH 4.17 00/18] 4.17.14-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Shuah Khan
On 08/07/2018 12:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.17.14 release. > There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses

Re: [PATCH 4.17 00/18] 4.17.14-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Shuah Khan
On 08/07/2018 12:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.17.14 release. > There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses

Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/85] 3.18.118-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Shuah Khan
On 08/07/2018 12:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.18.118 release. > There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses

Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/85] 3.18.118-stable review

2018-08-07 Thread Shuah Khan
On 08/07/2018 12:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.18.118 release. > There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses

Re: [PATCH v2 02/18] clk: intel: Add clock driver for Intel MIPS SoCs

2018-08-07 Thread yixin zhu
On 8/6/2018 11:19 PM, Rob Herring wrote: On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:03 PM Songjun Wu wrote: From: Yixin Zhu This driver provides PLL clock registration as well as various clock branches, e.g. MUX clock, gate clock, divider clock and so on. PLLs that provide clock to DDR, CPU and

Re: [PATCH v2 02/18] clk: intel: Add clock driver for Intel MIPS SoCs

2018-08-07 Thread yixin zhu
On 8/6/2018 11:19 PM, Rob Herring wrote: On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:03 PM Songjun Wu wrote: From: Yixin Zhu This driver provides PLL clock registration as well as various clock branches, e.g. MUX clock, gate clock, divider clock and so on. PLLs that provide clock to DDR, CPU and

Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ Firmware bindings

2018-08-07 Thread Taniya Das
On 8/8/2018 12:54 AM, skan...@codeaurora.org wrote: On 2018-08-07 04:12, Sudeep Holla wrote: On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 01:54:24PM -0700, skan...@codeaurora.org wrote: On 2018-08-03 16:46, Stephen Boyd wrote: >Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-24 03:42:49) >>diff --git

Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ Firmware bindings

2018-08-07 Thread Taniya Das
On 8/8/2018 12:54 AM, skan...@codeaurora.org wrote: On 2018-08-07 04:12, Sudeep Holla wrote: On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 01:54:24PM -0700, skan...@codeaurora.org wrote: On 2018-08-03 16:46, Stephen Boyd wrote: >Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-24 03:42:49) >>diff --git

Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: sprd: Add SPI driver for Spreadtrum SC9860

2018-08-07 Thread Baolin Wang
Hi Mark, On 7 August 2018 at 22:24, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 06:43:38PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote: >> From: Lanqing Liu >> >> This patch adds the SPI controller driver for Spreadtrum SC9860 platform. > > This all looks pretty clean, a few comments below but nothing too major:

Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: sprd: Add SPI driver for Spreadtrum SC9860

2018-08-07 Thread Baolin Wang
Hi Mark, On 7 August 2018 at 22:24, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 06:43:38PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote: >> From: Lanqing Liu >> >> This patch adds the SPI controller driver for Spreadtrum SC9860 platform. > > This all looks pretty clean, a few comments below but nothing too major:

Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage

2018-08-07 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 19:13:32 -0700 Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:17:42 -0700 > > Joel Fernandes wrote: > > > >> From 6986af946ceb04fc9ddc6d5b45fc559b6807e465 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)"

Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage

2018-08-07 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 19:13:32 -0700 Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:17:42 -0700 > > Joel Fernandes wrote: > > > >> From 6986af946ceb04fc9ddc6d5b45fc559b6807e465 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)"

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: spi: Add Spreadtrum SPI controller documentation

2018-08-07 Thread Baolin Wang
Hi Mark, On 7 August 2018 at 21:41, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 06:43:37PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote: > >> +Optional properties: >> +- sprd,spi-interval: Specify the intervals of two SPI frames, which can be >> + converted to the delay clock cycles = interval number * 4 + 10.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: spi: Add Spreadtrum SPI controller documentation

2018-08-07 Thread Baolin Wang
Hi Mark, On 7 August 2018 at 21:41, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 06:43:37PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote: > >> +Optional properties: >> +- sprd,spi-interval: Specify the intervals of two SPI frames, which can be >> + converted to the delay clock cycles = interval number * 4 + 10.

Re: [PATCH v2] kbuild: make samples really depend on headers_install

2018-08-07 Thread Masahiro Yamada
2018-08-08 11:14 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > Kernel headers must be installed into $(objtree)/usr/include to avoid > the build failure of samples. > > Commit ddea05fa148b ("kbuild: make samples depend on headers_install") > addressed this, but "samples/" is only used for the single target build.

Re: [PATCH v2] kbuild: make samples really depend on headers_install

2018-08-07 Thread Masahiro Yamada
2018-08-08 11:14 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > Kernel headers must be installed into $(objtree)/usr/include to avoid > the build failure of samples. > > Commit ddea05fa148b ("kbuild: make samples depend on headers_install") > addressed this, but "samples/" is only used for the single target build.

Re: simplified RISC-V interrupt and clocksource handling v3

2018-08-07 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Sat, 04 Aug 2018 01:23:11 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote: This series tries adds support for interrupt handling and timers for the RISC-V architecture. The basic per-hart interrupt handling implemented by the scause and sie CSRs is extremely simple and implemented directly in

Re: simplified RISC-V interrupt and clocksource handling v3

2018-08-07 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Sat, 04 Aug 2018 01:23:11 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote: This series tries adds support for interrupt handling and timers for the RISC-V architecture. The basic per-hart interrupt handling implemented by the scause and sie CSRs is extremely simple and implemented directly in

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >