[PATCH v2 0/3] Add Actions Semi Owl family sirq support

2018-08-12 Thread Parthiban Nallathambi
This patch series add support for external interrupt controller in Actions Semi Owl famil of SoC's (S500, S700 and S900). Actions provides support for external interrupt controller to be connected with it's SoC's using 3 SIRQ pins. Each line can be configures independently, i.e 3 independent

[PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: actions: Add sirq node for Actions Semi S700

2018-08-12 Thread Parthiban Nallathambi
Add sirq node for Actions Semi S700 SoC with 3 SIRQ pins support, in which external interrupt controllers can be connected. Example: atc260x: atc2603c@65 { interrupt-parent = <>; interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; }; Signed-off-by: Parthiban Nallathambi Signed-off-by:

[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Actions external interrupt controller

2018-08-12 Thread Parthiban Nallathambi
Actions Semi OWL family SoC's provides support for external interrupt controller to be connected and controlled using SIRQ pins. S500, S700 and S900 provides 3 SIRQ lines and works independently for 3 external interrupt controllers. Signed-off-by: Parthiban Nallathambi Signed-off-by: Saravanan

[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Actions external interrupt controller

2018-08-12 Thread Parthiban Nallathambi
Actions Semi OWL family SoC's provides support for external interrupt controller to be connected and controlled using SIRQ pins. S500, S700 and S900 provides 3 SIRQ lines and works independently for 3 external interrupt controllers. Signed-off-by: Parthiban Nallathambi Signed-off-by: Saravanan

Re: [PATCH] staging: gasket: remove null ptr check before kfree

2018-08-12 Thread Himanshu Jha
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 12:28:37PM +0530, Sumit Kumar wrote: > Remove null ptr check before kfree because kfree is null ptr safe. > Issue found by checkpatch. > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Kumar Hmm. Victim of copy-paste I guess. No worries. Next time just use: $ git commit -s To understand what

Re: [PATCH] staging: gasket: remove null ptr check before kfree

2018-08-12 Thread Himanshu Jha
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 12:28:37PM +0530, Sumit Kumar wrote: > Remove null ptr check before kfree because kfree is null ptr safe. > Issue found by checkpatch. > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Kumar Hmm. Victim of copy-paste I guess. No worries. Next time just use: $ git commit -s To understand what

[PATCH] Revert "uio: use request_threaded_irq instead"

2018-08-12 Thread xiubli
From: Xiubo Li Since mutex lock in irq hanler is useless currently, here will remove it together with it. This reverts commit 9421e45f5ff3d558cf8b75a8cc0824530caf3453. Reported-by: james.r.har...@intel.com CC: Ahsan Atta Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li --- drivers/uio/uio.c | 8 ++-- 1 file

[PATCH] Revert "uio: use request_threaded_irq instead"

2018-08-12 Thread xiubli
From: Xiubo Li Since mutex lock in irq hanler is useless currently, here will remove it together with it. This reverts commit 9421e45f5ff3d558cf8b75a8cc0824530caf3453. Reported-by: james.r.har...@intel.com CC: Ahsan Atta Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li --- drivers/uio/uio.c | 8 ++-- 1 file

Część piękna!!!

2018-08-12 Thread Wesley
Dzień dobry, mam nadzieję, że ten list dobrze cię spotka? Chciałbym cię lepiej poznać, jeśli mogę być taki odważny. Uważam się za osobę łatwą w prowadzeniu, pełną przygód, uczciwą i kochającą zabawę. wszystko, czego potrzebuję, to tylko twoja uwaga i szansa, by poznać cię bardziej, jeśli nie

Część piękna!!!

2018-08-12 Thread Wesley
Dzień dobry, mam nadzieję, że ten list dobrze cię spotka? Chciałbym cię lepiej poznać, jeśli mogę być taki odważny. Uważam się za osobę łatwą w prowadzeniu, pełną przygód, uczciwą i kochającą zabawę. wszystko, czego potrzebuję, to tylko twoja uwaga i szansa, by poznać cię bardziej, jeśli nie

Re: Problems with uio_pci_generic in v4.18-rc8

2018-08-12 Thread Xiubo Li
On 2018/8/12 19:03, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 06:55:58PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote: Hi Harris, Since the lock protection in uio irq handler is useless currently as discussed in the mail list, so I will revert this commit with small changes and now the testing based

Re: Problems with uio_pci_generic in v4.18-rc8

2018-08-12 Thread Xiubo Li
On 2018/8/12 19:03, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 06:55:58PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote: Hi Harris, Since the lock protection in uio irq handler is useless currently as discussed in the mail list, so I will revert this commit with small changes and now the testing based

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Ignore turbo active ratio in HWP

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, August 2, 2018 2:26:06 AM CEST Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > When HWP is active turbo active ratio is not used, so we should allow > policy max frequency above turbo activation ratio to be set. When HWP is > not active, then any policy max frequency above turbo activation ratio > can

Re: [PATCH] PM / hibernate: Mark expected switch fall-through

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, August 5, 2018 4:12:00 AM CEST Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114713 ("Missing break in switch") > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva > --- >

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Ignore turbo active ratio in HWP

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, August 2, 2018 2:26:06 AM CEST Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > When HWP is active turbo active ratio is not used, so we should allow > policy max frequency above turbo activation ratio to be set. When HWP is > not active, then any policy max frequency above turbo activation ratio > can

Re: [PATCH] PM / hibernate: Mark expected switch fall-through

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, August 5, 2018 4:12:00 AM CEST Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114713 ("Missing break in switch") > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva > --- >

Re: [PATCH] acpi: processor_throttling: fixed a few brace coding style issues.

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 10:23:41 PM CEST David Archuleta wrote: > From: darchuletajr > > Fixed a few brace coding style issues found by running > ./scripts/checkpatch > > Signed-off-by: David Archuleta Jr. IMO this doesn't add any value to the code, so I'm not going to apply it. > --- >

Re: [PATCH] acpi: processor_throttling: fixed a few brace coding style issues.

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 10:23:41 PM CEST David Archuleta wrote: > From: darchuletajr > > Fixed a few brace coding style issues found by running > ./scripts/checkpatch > > Signed-off-by: David Archuleta Jr. IMO this doesn't add any value to the code, so I'm not going to apply it. > --- >

Re: [PATCH] acpi: bus: Fixed a pointer coding style issue

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 2:52:02 AM CEST Tom Todd wrote: > Fixed a coding style issue. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Todd > --- > drivers/acpi/bus.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c > index 84b4a62018eb..73e43d81ec63

Re: [PATCH] acpi: bus: Fixed a pointer coding style issue

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 2:52:02 AM CEST Tom Todd wrote: > Fixed a coding style issue. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Todd > --- > drivers/acpi/bus.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c > index 84b4a62018eb..73e43d81ec63

Re: [PATCH] ACPI / EC: Use ec_no_wakeup on ThinkPad X1 Yoga 3rd

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 12:52:39 PM CEST Aaron Ma wrote: > Like on X1C6, on X1Y3 EC interrupts constantly wake up system from > s2idle, the power consumption is extremely high. > So make ec_no_wakeup be true as default to keep system in s2idle mode > and reduce power consumption. > > Power

Re: [PATCH] ACPI / EC: Use ec_no_wakeup on ThinkPad X1 Yoga 3rd

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 12:52:39 PM CEST Aaron Ma wrote: > Like on X1C6, on X1Y3 EC interrupts constantly wake up system from > s2idle, the power consumption is extremely high. > So make ec_no_wakeup be true as default to keep system in s2idle mode > and reduce power consumption. > > Power

Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] platform/x86: Add ACPI i2c-multi-instantiate pseudo driver

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, August 9, 2018 2:08:41 PM CEST Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 09-08-18 13:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> On systems with ACPI instantiated i2c-clients, normally there is 1 fw_node > >> per i2c-device and that fw-node

Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] platform/x86: Add ACPI i2c-multi-instantiate pseudo driver

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, August 9, 2018 2:08:41 PM CEST Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 09-08-18 13:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> On systems with ACPI instantiated i2c-clients, normally there is 1 fw_node > >> per i2c-device and that fw-node

Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 1/2] cpuidle: menu: Correct the criteria for stopping tick

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:03 AM wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 04:49:06PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 09:22:10AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 9:13 AM, wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 10:47:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >

Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 1/2] cpuidle: menu: Correct the criteria for stopping tick

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:03 AM wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 04:49:06PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 09:22:10AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 9:13 AM, wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 10:47:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >

Re: Problems with uio_pci_generic in v4.18-rc8

2018-08-12 Thread gre...@linuxfoundation.org
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 06:55:58PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote: > Hi Harris, > > Since the lock protection in uio irq handler is useless currently as > discussed in the mail list, so I will revert this commit with small changes > and now the testing based LIO/TCMU has been finished. Can you send the

Re: Problems with uio_pci_generic in v4.18-rc8

2018-08-12 Thread gre...@linuxfoundation.org
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 06:55:58PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote: > Hi Harris, > > Since the lock protection in uio irq handler is useless currently as > discussed in the mail list, so I will revert this commit with small changes > and now the testing based LIO/TCMU has been finished. Can you send the

Re: Problems with uio_pci_generic in v4.18-rc8

2018-08-12 Thread Xiubo Li
Hi Harris, Since the lock protection in uio irq handler is useless currently as discussed in the mail list, so I will revert this commit with small changes and now the testing based LIO/TCMU has been finished. Thanks, BRs On 2018/8/11 5:12, Harris, James R wrote: Hi, Using Linux kernel

Re: Problems with uio_pci_generic in v4.18-rc8

2018-08-12 Thread Xiubo Li
Hi Harris, Since the lock protection in uio irq handler is useless currently as discussed in the mail list, so I will revert this commit with small changes and now the testing based LIO/TCMU has been finished. Thanks, BRs On 2018/8/11 5:12, Harris, James R wrote: Hi, Using Linux kernel

[PATCH] ACPICA: Clear status of all events when entering sleep states

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki Commit fa85015c0d95 (ACPICA: Clear status of all events when entering S5) made the sleep state entry code in ACPICA clear the status of all ACPI events when entering S5 to fix a functional regression reported against commit 18996f2db918 (ACPICA: Events: Stop

[PATCH] ACPICA: Clear status of all events when entering sleep states

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki Commit fa85015c0d95 (ACPICA: Clear status of all events when entering S5) made the sleep state entry code in ACPICA clear the status of all ACPI events when entering S5 to fix a functional regression reported against commit 18996f2db918 (ACPICA: Events: Stop

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] tpm: add support for nonblocking operation

2018-08-12 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:21:14AM -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote: > On 08/10/2018 10:43 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> +static struct workqueue_struct *tpm_dev_wq; > > A naming contradiction with tpm_common_read() and tpm_common_write(). To > > sort that up I would suggest adding a commit to the

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] tpm: add support for nonblocking operation

2018-08-12 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:21:14AM -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote: > On 08/10/2018 10:43 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> +static struct workqueue_struct *tpm_dev_wq; > > A naming contradiction with tpm_common_read() and tpm_common_write(). To > > sort that up I would suggest adding a commit to the

Re: [PATCH v3 14/17] driver/acpi: enable Hygon support to ACPI driver

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 3:36 PM Pu Wen wrote: > > For Dhyana processors have NONSTOP TSC feature, so enable the support > to ACPI driver. > > Signed-off-by: Pu Wen This patch is fine by me, but I'm assuming that the series will be handled as a whole, so Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > --- >

Re: [PATCH v3 14/17] driver/acpi: enable Hygon support to ACPI driver

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 3:36 PM Pu Wen wrote: > > For Dhyana processors have NONSTOP TSC feature, so enable the support > to ACPI driver. > > Signed-off-by: Pu Wen This patch is fine by me, but I'm assuming that the series will be handled as a whole, so Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > --- >

Re: [PATCH v2] cpuidle: menu: Handle stopped tick more aggressively

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 2:31 PM wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 01:04:22PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:20 AM wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 09:57:18AM +0200, Rafael J . Wysocki wrote: > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Subject: [PATCH]

Re: [PATCH v2] cpuidle: menu: Handle stopped tick more aggressively

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 2:31 PM wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 01:04:22PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:20 AM wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 09:57:18AM +0200, Rafael J . Wysocki wrote: > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Subject: [PATCH]

Re: [PATCH v3 15/17] driver/cpufreq: enable Hygon support to cpufreq driver

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 3:36 PM Pu Wen wrote: > > Enable ACPI cpufreq driver support for Hygon by adding family ID check > along with AMD. > > As Hygon platforms have SMBus device(PCI device ID 0x790b), enable Hygon > support to function amd_freq_sensitivity_init(). > > Signed-off-by: Pu Wen Is

Re: [PATCH v3 15/17] driver/cpufreq: enable Hygon support to cpufreq driver

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 3:36 PM Pu Wen wrote: > > Enable ACPI cpufreq driver support for Hygon by adding family ID check > along with AMD. > > As Hygon platforms have SMBus device(PCI device ID 0x790b), enable Hygon > support to function amd_freq_sensitivity_init(). > > Signed-off-by: Pu Wen Is

Re: [PATCH v8 09/26] kernel/cpu_pm: Manage runtime PM in the idle path for CPUs

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:36 PM Lina Iyer wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 09 2018 at 02:16 -0600, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 8:02 PM, Lina Iyer wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 08 2018 at 04:56 -0600, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 11:37:55AM +0200, Rafael J.

Re: [PATCH v8 09/26] kernel/cpu_pm: Manage runtime PM in the idle path for CPUs

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:36 PM Lina Iyer wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 09 2018 at 02:16 -0600, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 8:02 PM, Lina Iyer wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 08 2018 at 04:56 -0600, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 11:37:55AM +0200, Rafael J.

Re: [PATCH v5 03/14] PM: Introduce an Energy Model management framework

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 2:30 PM Quentin Perret wrote: > > On Friday 10 Aug 2018 at 13:13:22 (+0200), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Something able to say how the numbers used by EM and IPA are related. :-) > > > > Do you think that IPA and EM will always need to use the same set of data > > for >

Re: [PATCH v5 03/14] PM: Introduce an Energy Model management framework

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 2:30 PM Quentin Perret wrote: > > On Friday 10 Aug 2018 at 13:13:22 (+0200), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Something able to say how the numbers used by EM and IPA are related. :-) > > > > Do you think that IPA and EM will always need to use the same set of data > > for >

Re: [PATCH RESEND v3] arm64: clean the additional checks before calling ghes_notify_sea()

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 6:36 AM Dongjiu Geng wrote: > > In order to remove the additional check before calling the > ghes_notify_sea(), make stub definition when !CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA. > > After this cleanup, we can simply call the ghes_notify_sea() to let > APEI driver handle the SEA

Re: [PATCH RESEND v3] arm64: clean the additional checks before calling ghes_notify_sea()

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 6:36 AM Dongjiu Geng wrote: > > In order to remove the additional check before calling the > ghes_notify_sea(), make stub definition when !CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA. > > After this cleanup, we can simply call the ghes_notify_sea() to let > APEI driver handle the SEA

[PATCH v1 0/2] Bluetooth: mediatek: Add protocol support for MediaTek USB devices

2018-08-12 Thread sean.wang
From: Sean Wang This adds the support of enabling MT7668U and MT7663U Bluetooth function running on the top of btusb driver. The patch also adds a newly created file mtkbt.c able to be reused independently from the transport type such as UART, USB and SDIO. Sean Wang (2): Bluetooth: mediatek:

[PATCH v1 2/2] Bluetooth: mediatek: Add protocol support for MediaTek MT7663U USB devices

2018-08-12 Thread sean.wang
From: Sean Wang This adds the support of enabling MT7663U Bluetooth function running on the top of btusb driver. Signed-off-by: Sean Wang --- drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 1 + drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.h | 1 + drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git

[PATCH v1 1/2] Bluetooth: mediatek: Add protocol support for MediaTek MT7668U USB devices

2018-08-12 Thread sean.wang
From: Sean Wang This adds the support of enabling MT7668U Bluetooth function running on the top of btusb driver. The patch also adds a newly created file mtkbt.c able to be reused independently from the transport type such as UART, USB and SDIO. Signed-off-by: Sean Wang ---

[PATCH v1 0/2] Bluetooth: mediatek: Add protocol support for MediaTek USB devices

2018-08-12 Thread sean.wang
From: Sean Wang This adds the support of enabling MT7668U and MT7663U Bluetooth function running on the top of btusb driver. The patch also adds a newly created file mtkbt.c able to be reused independently from the transport type such as UART, USB and SDIO. Sean Wang (2): Bluetooth: mediatek:

[PATCH v1 2/2] Bluetooth: mediatek: Add protocol support for MediaTek MT7663U USB devices

2018-08-12 Thread sean.wang
From: Sean Wang This adds the support of enabling MT7663U Bluetooth function running on the top of btusb driver. Signed-off-by: Sean Wang --- drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 1 + drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.h | 1 + drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git

[PATCH v1 1/2] Bluetooth: mediatek: Add protocol support for MediaTek MT7668U USB devices

2018-08-12 Thread sean.wang
From: Sean Wang This adds the support of enabling MT7668U Bluetooth function running on the top of btusb driver. The patch also adds a newly created file mtkbt.c able to be reused independently from the transport type such as UART, USB and SDIO. Signed-off-by: Sean Wang ---

Re: [PATCH v1] dd: Invoke one probe retry cycle after some initcall levels

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:52 PM Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote: > > Drivers that are registered at an initcall level may have to > wait until late_init before the probe deferral mechanism can > retry their probe functions. It is possible that their > dependencies were resolved much earlier, in some

Re: [PATCH v1] dd: Invoke one probe retry cycle after some initcall levels

2018-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:52 PM Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote: > > Drivers that are registered at an initcall level may have to > wait until late_init before the probe deferral mechanism can > retry their probe functions. It is possible that their > dependencies were resolved much earlier, in some

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Add sdm660 pinctrl driver

2018-08-12 Thread Craig Tatlor
On 11 August 2018 18:27:43 BST, Christian Lamparter wrote: >On Saturday, August 11, 2018 6:25:19 PM CEST Craig Tatlor wrote: >> Add initial pinctrl driver to support pin configuration with >> pinctrl framework for sdm660. >> Based off CAF implementation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Craig Tatlor >>

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Add sdm660 pinctrl driver

2018-08-12 Thread Craig Tatlor
On 11 August 2018 18:27:43 BST, Christian Lamparter wrote: >On Saturday, August 11, 2018 6:25:19 PM CEST Craig Tatlor wrote: >> Add initial pinctrl driver to support pin configuration with >> pinctrl framework for sdm660. >> Based off CAF implementation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Craig Tatlor >>

[PATCH] staging: gasket: remove null ptr check before kfree

2018-08-12 Thread Sumit Kumar
Remove null ptr check before kfree because kfree is null ptr safe. Issue found by checkpatch. Signed-off-by: Sumit Kumar --- drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_page_table.c | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_page_table.c

[PATCH] staging: gasket: remove null ptr check before kfree

2018-08-12 Thread Sumit Kumar
Remove null ptr check before kfree because kfree is null ptr safe. Issue found by checkpatch. Signed-off-by: Sumit Kumar --- drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_page_table.c | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_page_table.c

Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-mtp: Add RPMh VRM/XOB regulators

2018-08-12 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Douglas, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on agross/for-next] [cannot apply to v4.18-rc8 next-20180810] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-mtp: Add RPMh VRM/XOB regulators

2018-08-12 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Douglas, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on agross/for-next] [cannot apply to v4.18-rc8 next-20180810] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

[PATCH] staging: gasket: remove null ptr check before kfree

2018-08-12 Thread Sumit Kumar
Remove null ptr check before kfree because kfree is null ptr safe. Issue found by checkpatch. Signed-off-by: Sumit Kumar --- drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_page_table.c | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_page_table.c

[PATCH] staging: gasket: remove null ptr check before kfree

2018-08-12 Thread Sumit Kumar
Remove null ptr check before kfree because kfree is null ptr safe. Issue found by checkpatch. Signed-off-by: Sumit Kumar --- drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_page_table.c | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_page_table.c

Re: [PATCH] staging: gasket: remove null ptr check before kfree

2018-08-12 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 03:17:53AM +0530, Sumit Kumar wrote: > Remove null ptr check before kfree because kfree is null ptr safe. > Issue found by checkpatch. > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Kumar Do not use fake email addresses in a signed-off-by line :(

Re: [PATCH] staging: gasket: remove null ptr check before kfree

2018-08-12 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 03:11:22AM +0530, Sumit Kumar wrote: > Adding a mailing list in cc as per recommendation from greg's patch bot. > + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f > /tmp/0001-staging-gasket-remove-null-ptr-check-before-kfree.patch > fatal:

Re: [PATCH] staging: gasket: remove null ptr check before kfree

2018-08-12 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 03:17:53AM +0530, Sumit Kumar wrote: > Remove null ptr check before kfree because kfree is null ptr safe. > Issue found by checkpatch. > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Kumar Do not use fake email addresses in a signed-off-by line :(

Re: [PATCH] staging: gasket: remove null ptr check before kfree

2018-08-12 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 03:11:22AM +0530, Sumit Kumar wrote: > Adding a mailing list in cc as per recommendation from greg's patch bot. > + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f > /tmp/0001-staging-gasket-remove-null-ptr-check-before-kfree.patch > fatal:

<    1   2