[PATCH] edac: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: linux-e...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

[PATCH] fbdev: omap2: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org Cc:

[PATCH] fbdev: mbx: fix up debugfs file creation

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
There is no need to keep the dentries around for the individual debugfs files, just delete the whole directory all at once at shutdown instead. This also fixes a tiny memory leak where the memory for the pointers to the file dentries was never freed when the device shut down, as well as making

[PATCH] mm: kmemleak: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: linux...@kvack.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- mm/kmemleak.c | 7 +-- 1

[PATCH] mm: cleancache: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: linux...@kvack.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- mm/cleancache.c | 3 +--

Re: [PATCH v9 12/26] arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking

2019-01-22 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:33:31PM +, Julien Thierry wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h > index 24692ed..7e82a92 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h > @@ -18,7 +18,9 @@ > >

[PATCH] s390: pci: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Sebastian Ott Cc: Gerald Schaefer Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org

[PATCH] hwpoison-inject: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Naoya Horiguchi Cc: linux...@kvack.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- mm/hwpoison-inject.c | 67

[PATCH] s390: hypfs: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman ---

Re: [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 7/9] perf tools: synthesize PERF_RECORD_* for loaded BPF programs

2019-01-22 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:58:05PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:51:19PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:31:17PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:13:20PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > >

Re: [PATCH v6 08/16] sched/cpufreq: uclamp: Add utilization clamping for FAIR tasks

2019-01-22 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:15:05AM +, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > @@ -218,8 +218,15 @@ unsigned long schedutil_freq_util(int cpu, unsigned long > util_cfs, >* CFS tasks and we use the same metric to track

[PATCH v7 4/6] dt-bindings: anybus-controller: document devicetree binding

2019-01-22 Thread Sven Van Asbroeck
From: Sven Van Asbroeck This patch adds devicetree binding documentation for the Arcx anybus controller. Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck --- .../fieldbus/arcx,anybus-controller.txt | 71 +++ 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+) create mode 100644

[PATCH v7 3/6] anybus-s: support the Arcx anybus controller

2019-01-22 Thread Sven Van Asbroeck
Add a driver for the Arcx anybus controller. This device implements two Anybus-S hosts (buses), and connects to the SoC via a parallel memory bus. There is also a CAN power readout, unrelated to the Anybus, modelled as a regulator. Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck --- drivers/fieldbus/Makefile

[PATCH v7 6/6] fieldbus_dev: support HMS Profinet IRT industrial controller

2019-01-22 Thread Sven Van Asbroeck
The Anybus-S PROFINET IRT communication module provides instant integration to any Ethernet based LAN via SMTP, FTP, HTTP as well as PROFINET and Modbus-TCP. Additional protocols can be implemented on top of TCP/IP or UDP using the transparent socket interface. Official documentation:

[PATCH v7 2/6] anybus-s: support HMS Anybus-S bus

2019-01-22 Thread Sven Van Asbroeck
The Anybus-S/Anybus-M is a series of interchangeable fieldbus communication modules featuring on board memory and processing power. All software and hardware functionality required to communicate on the fieldbus is incorporated in the module itself, allowing the application to focus on other

[PATCH v7 1/6] fieldbus_dev: add Fieldbus Device subsystem.

2019-01-22 Thread Sven Van Asbroeck
Fieldbus device (client) adapters allow data exchange with a PLC aka. "Fieldbus Controller" over a fieldbus (Profinet, FLNet, etc.) They are typically used when a Linux device wants to expose itself as an actuator, motor, console light, switch, etc. over the fieldbus. This framework is designed

[PATCH v7 0/6] Add Fieldbus subsystem + support HMS Profinet card

2019-01-22 Thread Sven Van Asbroeck
This patch: 1. adds a Fieldbus subsystem 2. adds support for the HMS Industrial Networks AB Profinet card. 1. Fieldbus subsystem - Fieldbus device (client) adapters allow data exchange with a PLC aka. "Fieldbus Controller" over a fieldbus (Profinet, FLNet, etc.) They are

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx: Add support for Logic PD i.MX6QD EVM

2019-01-22 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Adam, On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:07 PM Adam Ford wrote: > + reg_audio: regulator-audio { > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <_reg_audio>; > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > + regulator-name = "3v3_aud"; > +

Re: [PATCH v3] fpga: altera_freeze_bridge: remove restriction to socfpga

2019-01-22 Thread Alan Tull
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 6:41 PM Moritz Fischer wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 6:01 PM Alan Tull wrote: > > > > The Altera Freeze Bridge should not be restricted to ARCH_SOCFPGA > > since it can be used on other platforms such as Stratix10. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alan Tull > Reviewed-by:

[PATCH 3/8] infiniband: hfi1: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Mike Marciniszyn Cc: Dennis Dalessandro Cc: Doug Ledford Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org

[PATCH 4/8] infiniband: qib: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Mike Marciniszyn Cc: Dennis Dalessandro Cc: Doug Ledford Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org

[PATCH 7/8] infiniband: usnic: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Christian Benvenuti Cc: Nelson Escobar Cc: Parvi Kaustubhi Cc: Doug Ledford Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc:

[PATCH] scsi: hpsa: clean up two indentation issues

2019-01-22 Thread Colin King
From: Colin Ian King There are two statements that are indented incorrectly. Fix these. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King --- drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c index ff67ef5d5347..528fdd10

[PATCH 6/8] infiniband: ocrdma: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Selvin Xavier Cc: Devesh Sharma Cc: Doug Ledford Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Yuval Shaia

[PATCH 8/8] infiniband: ipoib: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Doug Ledford Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Kamal Heib Cc: Denis Drozdov Cc: Saeed Mahameed

[PATCH 5/8] infiniband: mlx5: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Doug Ledford Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg

[PATCH 2/8] infiniband: hfi1: drop crazy DEBUGFS_SEQ_FILE_CREATE() macro

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
The macro was just making things harder to follow, and audit, so remove it and call debugfs_create_file() directly. Also, the macro did not need to warn about the call failing as no one should ever care about any debugfs functions failing. Cc: Mike Marciniszyn Cc: Dennis Dalessandro Cc: Doug

[PATCH 1/8] infiniband: cxgb4: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Steve Wise Cc: Doug Ledford Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg

Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Try to catch flush_work() without INIT_WORK().

2019-01-22 Thread Daniel Jordan
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:41:22AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > On 2019/01/19 4:48, Daniel Jordan wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 02:04:58AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > __queue_work has a sanity check already for work, but using list_empty. > > Seems > > slightly better to be consistent? >

[PATCH 0/8] IB: cleanup debugfs usage

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs code, there is no need to ever check the return value of the call, as no logic should ever change if a call works properly or not. Fix up a bunch of infiniband-specific code to not care about the results of debugfs. Greg Kroah-Hartman (8): infiniband: cxgb4: no need to

[PATCH 3/7] crypto: axis: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Jesper Nilsson Cc: Lars Persson Cc: Herbert Xu Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: linux-arm-ker...@axis.com Cc:

[PATCH 0/7] crypto: cleanup debugfs usage

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs code, there is no need to ever check the return value of the call, as no logic should ever change if a call works properly or not. Fix up a bunch of crypto-specific code to not care about the results of debugfs. Greg Kroah-Hartman (7): crypto: qat: no need to check return

[PATCH 6/7] crypto: ccp: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Tom Lendacky Cc: Gary Hook Cc: Herbert Xu Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org

[PATCH 2/7] crypto: ccrree: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Yael Chemla Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef Cc: Herbert Xu Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org

[PATCH 5/7] crypto: cavium: nitrox: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Herbert Xu Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Srikanth Jampala Cc: Yangtao Li Cc: Gadam Sreerama Cc: Eric Biggers

Re: [PATCH v6 07/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add system default clamps

2019-01-22 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:43:29PM +, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > On 22-Jan 14:56, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:15:04AM +, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h > > > index 84294925d006..c8f391d1cdc5 100644 > > >

[PATCH 2/4] tty: sisusb_con, cleanup configs

2019-01-22 Thread Jiri Slaby
There are two macros defined: 1) ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT => define SISUSB_NEW_CONFIG_COMPAT 2) ifdef CONFIG_USB_SISUSBVGA_CON => define INCL_SISUSB_CON Remove the latter and make use only of the former. This removes one layer of obfuscation. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby ---

[PATCH 4/7] crypto: cavium: zip: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Herbert Xu Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Robert Richter Cc: Jan Glauber Cc: linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org

[PATCH 7/7] crypto: caam: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: "Horia Geantă" Cc: Aymen Sghaier Cc: Herbert Xu Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org

[PATCH 1/7] crypto: qat: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Giovanni Cabiddu Cc: Herbert Xu Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Conor McLoughlin Cc: Waiman Long Cc:

Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] PM-runtime: update accounting_timestamp only when enable

2019-01-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:24 PM Vincent Guittot wrote: > > Initializing accounting_timestamp to something different from 0 during > pm_runtime_init() doesn't make sense and put useless ordering constraint > between > timekeeping_init() and pm_runtime_init(). > PM runtime should start accounting

Re: [PATCH v6 11/16] sched/fair: Add uclamp support to energy_compute()

2019-01-22 Thread Quentin Perret
On Tuesday 22 Jan 2019 at 15:01:37 (+), Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > I'm not saying it's useful, I'm saying userspace can decide to do that > > if it thinks it is a good idea. The default should be min_cap = 1024 for > > RT, no questions. But you _can_ change it at runtime if you want to. > >

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] media: imx: csi: Disable SMFC before disabling IDMA channel

2019-01-22 Thread Gaël PORTAY
Philipp, On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:49:10PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2019-01-18 at 17:04 -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote: > > Disable the SMFC before disabling the IDMA channel, instead of after, > > in csi_idmac_unsetup(). > > > > This fixes a complete system hard lockup on

[PATCH 4/4] sisusb: remove useless macros and compact the code

2019-01-22 Thread Jiri Slaby
Remove macros which are only wrappers around standard operations. When we expand them into code, we see that sisusbcon_memsetw can simply use memset16 and sisusbcon_putcs can just call memcpy. So make the code compact. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby --- drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusb_con.c | 48

[PATCH 1/4] tty: sisusb_con, convert addr macros to functions

2019-01-22 Thread Jiri Slaby
Convert SISUSB_VADDR and SISUSB_HADDR to inline functions. Now, there are no more hidden accesses to local variables (vc_data and sisusb_usb_data). sisusb_haddr returns unsigned long from now on, not u16 *, as ulong is what every caller expects -- we can remove some casts. Call sites were

[PATCH 3/4] sisusb: let files build only when needed

2019-01-22 Thread Jiri Slaby
After the previous patch we see, that whole files are ifdeffed depending on CONFIG options. So do not build the files at all if the CONFIG is not enabled. (I.e. move the check from .c to Makefile.) Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby --- drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/Makefile | 3 ++-

[PATCH] scsi: atp870u: clean up code style and indentation issues

2019-01-22 Thread Colin King
From: Colin Ian King Clean up { brace to fix cppcheck warning. Remove some trailing spaces at end of a statement. Also clean up an indentation issue. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King --- drivers/scsi/atp870u.c | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 2/7] scsi: csiostor: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Varun Prakash Cc: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Johannes Thumshirn

[PATCH 7/7] scsi: qla2xxx: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: qla2xxx-upstr...@qlogic.com Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc:

[PATCH 5/7] scsi: lpfc: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: James Smart Cc: Dick Kennedy Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc:

[PATCH] parport_pc: fix find_superio io compare code, should use equal test.

2019-01-22 Thread qiaochong
From: QiaoChong git blame drivers/parport/parport_pc.c 181bf1e815a2a (Alan Cox 2009-06-11 13:08:10 +0100 1376) static struct superio_struct *find_superio(struct parport *p) ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 1377) { 181bf1e815a2a (Alan Cox

[PATCH 0/7] SCSI: cleanup debugfs usage

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs code, there is no need to ever check the return value of the call, as no logic should ever change if a call works properly or not. Fix up a bunch of x86-specific code to not care about the results of debugfs. Greg Kroah-Hartman (7): scsi: bfa: no need to check return value

[PATCH 4/7] scsi: snic: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Karan Tilak Kumar Cc: Sesidhar Baddela Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc:

[PATCH 3/7] scsi: fnic: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Satish Kharat Cc: Sesidhar Baddela Cc: Karan Tilak Kumar Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" Cc: "Martin K.

[PATCH 6/7] scsi: qlogic: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: qlogic-storage-upstr...@cavium.com Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc:

[PATCH 1/7] scsi: bfa: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Anil Gurumurthy Cc: Sudarsana Kalluru Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc:

Re: [PATCH 7/9] videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-sg.c: Convert to use vm_insert_range_buggy

2019-01-22 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hi Souptick, On 2019-01-11 16:11, Souptick Joarder wrote: > Convert to use vm_insert_range_buggy to map range of kernel memory > to user vma. > > This driver has ignored vm_pgoff. We could later "fix" these drivers > to behave according to the normal vm_pgoff offsetting simply by > removing the

Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] platform/chrome: Add peakshift and adv_batt_charging

2019-01-22 Thread Enric Balletbo Serra
Hi Nick, I'd like to have some feedback from power-supply subsystem if it's possible, so adding Sebastian. Don't forget to add him for the next versions. Missatge de Nick Crews del dia ds., 19 de gen. 2019 a les 1:15: > > From: Nick Crews > > Create "peakshift" and "advanced_battery_charging"

Re: [PATCHv4 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add Coresight support

2019-01-22 Thread Sai Prakash Ranjan
Hi Suzuki, Thanks for looking into this. Please find my response inline. On 1/22/2019 7:30 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: Hi Sai, On 01/22/2019 01:37 PM, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: Add coresight components found on Qualcomm SDM845 SoC. Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan Sorry, but I hadn't

Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] platform/chrome: Add event handling

2019-01-22 Thread Enric Balletbo Serra
Hi Nick, I'd like to have some feedback from input subsystem if it's possible, so adding linux-in...@vger.kernel.org and Dmitry. Don't forget to add them for the next versions. Missatge de Nick Crews del dia ds., 19 de gen. 2019 a les 1:16: > > From: Duncan Laurie > > The Wilco Embedded

Re: [PATCH v6 11/16] sched/fair: Add uclamp support to energy_compute()

2019-01-22 Thread Patrick Bellasi
On 22-Jan 14:39, Quentin Perret wrote: > On Tuesday 22 Jan 2019 at 14:26:06 (+), Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > On 22-Jan 13:29, Quentin Perret wrote: > > > On Tuesday 22 Jan 2019 at 12:45:46 (+), Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > > > On 22-Jan 12:13, Quentin Perret wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday 15 Jan

Re: [PATCH v13 0/8] Introduce on-chip interconnect API

2019-01-22 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 04:45:20PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote: > On 1/22/19 14:42, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:10:55PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote: > [..] > > > > All now queued up, thanks. > > > > greg k-h > > Hi Greg, > > Thanks for considering these patches! Actually i have

[PATCH 2/5] mips: ralink: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: John Crispin Cc: Ralf Baechle Cc: Paul Burton Cc: James Hogan Cc: linux-m...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:

[PATCH 5/5] mips: kernel: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Ralf Baechle Cc: Paul Burton Cc: James Hogan Cc: Yangtao Li Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc:

[PATCH 3/5] mips: mm: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Ralf Baechle Cc: Paul Burton Cc: James Hogan Cc: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-m...@vger.kernel.org

[PATCH 1/5] mips: cavium: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Ralf Baechle Cc: Paul Burton Cc: James Hogan Cc: linux-m...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg

[PATCH 4/5] mips: math-emu: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Ralf Baechle Cc: Paul Burton Cc: James Hogan Cc: Yangtao Li Cc: linux-m...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 7/9] perf tools: synthesize PERF_RECORD_* for loaded BPF programs

2019-01-22 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:51:19PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:31:17PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:13:20PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > > Em Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:46:55AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > >

[PATCH 0/5] mips: cleanup debugfs usage

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs code, there is no need to ever check the return value of the call, as no logic should ever change if a call works properly or not. Fix up a bunch of x86-specific code to not care about the results of debugfs. Greg Kroah-Hartman (5): mips: cavium: no need to check return

Re: [PATCH v6 05/16] sched/core: uclamp: Update CPU's refcount on clamp changes

2019-01-22 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:01:15PM +, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > On 22-Jan 14:28, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:43:05AM +, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > > On 22-Jan 10:37, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > Sure, I get that. What I don't get is why you're adding that (2)

Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] platform/chrome: rtc: Add RTC driver

2019-01-22 Thread Enric Balletbo Serra
Hi Nick, Missatge de Nick Crews del dia ds., 19 de gen. 2019 a les 1:17: > > From: Duncan Laurie > > This Embedded Controller has an internal RTC that is exposed > as a standard RTC class driver with read/write functionality. > > The driver is added to the drivers/rtc/ so that the maintainer of

Re: [Qestion] Softlockup when send IPI to other CPUs

2019-01-22 Thread Mark Rutland
Hi Will, On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 05:44:02AM +, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 02:21:28PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:58:27PM +, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 07:42:44AM +, chenwandun wrote: > > > > Recently, I do some

LAHJOITUS

2019-01-22 Thread cfonturportuguesa
$ 1,000,000.00 dollaria on lahjoittanut sinulle Maureen David Kaltschmidt, joka voitti 758,7 miljoonan dollarin Powerball Jackpotin. Ota yhteyttä sähköpostitse: maureendavidkaltschmidt...@gmail.com saadaksesi lisätietoja

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: Add stmpe-adc DT node to Toradex T30 modules

2019-01-22 Thread Stefan Agner
On 22.01.2019 14:21, Philippe Schenker wrote: > From: Philippe Schenker > > Add the stmpe-adc DT node as found on Toradex T30 modules > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Schenker Reviewed-by: Stefan Agner > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-apalis-v1.1.dtsi | 22 ++ >

Verificação de e-mail

2019-01-22 Thread Administración de correo web
Web de correo electrónico de administración de notificaciones Este mensaje es de nuestro centro de mensajería Web Admin a todos nuestros propietarios de cuentas de correo electrónico. Estamos eliminando el acceso a todos nuestros clientes de correo web. Su cuenta de correo electrónico se

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: Add stmpe-adc DT node to Toradex iMX6 modules

2019-01-22 Thread Stefan Agner
On 22.01.2019 14:21, Philippe Schenker wrote: > From: Philippe Schenker > > Add the stmpe-adc DT node as found on Toradex iMX6 modules > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Schenker Reviewed-by: Stefan Agner > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-apalis.dtsi | 22 ++ >

Re: [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 7/9] perf tools: synthesize PERF_RECORD_* for loaded BPF programs

2019-01-22 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:31:17PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:13:20PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > Em Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:46:55AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > > Em Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 08:15:19AM -0800, Song Liu

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 05/13] mfd: bd70528: Support ROHM bd70528 PMIC - core

2019-01-22 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 1/22/19 1:44 AM, Matti Vaittinen wrote: ROHM BD70528MWV is an ultra-low quiescent current general purpose single-chip power management IC for battery-powered portable devices. Add MFD core which enables chip access for following subdevices: - regulators/LED drivers -

[PATCH v2] uio:remove unneeded variable ret

2019-01-22 Thread Bo Wang
From: wangbo In uio_dmem_genirq_open the variable ret is unneeded,remove it now. Signed-off-by: Bo Wang --- drivers/uio/uio_dmem_genirq.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/uio/uio_dmem_genirq.c b/drivers/uio/uio_dmem_genirq.c index 003bada..2be7569

Re: [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 7/9] perf tools: synthesize PERF_RECORD_* for loaded BPF programs

2019-01-22 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:31:17PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:13:20PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > Em Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:46:55AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > > Em Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 08:15:19AM -0800, Song Liu

Re: [PATCH] iommu/intel: quirk to disable DMAR for QM57 igfx

2019-01-22 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Joerg Roedel (2019-01-22 13:01:09) > Hi Daniel, > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:46:39AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Note that the string of platforms which have various issues with iommu > > and igfx is very long, thus far we only disabled it where there's no > > workaround to stop it

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 11/13] rtc: bd70528: Initial support for ROHM bd70528 RTC

2019-01-22 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 1/22/19 1:47 AM, Matti Vaittinen wrote: Support RTC block in ROHM bd70528 power management IC. Support getting and setting the time and date as well as arming an alarm which can also be used to wake the PMIC from standby state. HW supports wake interrupt only for the next 24 hours (sec,

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] media: docs-rst: Document memory-to-memory video decoder interface

2019-01-22 Thread Hans Verkuil
On 01/22/19 11:02, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 8:37 PM Hans Verkuil wrote: >> >> Hi Tomasz, >> >> A general note for the stateful and stateless patches: they describe specific >> use-cases of the more generic Codec Interface, and as such should be one >> level deeper in the

Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] can: m_can: Create a m_can platform framework

2019-01-22 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Hello Dan, Am 22.01.19 um 14:04 schrieb Dan Murphy: > Wolfgang > > Thanks for the review > > On 1/22/19 2:16 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> Hello Dan, >> >> looks already quite good... >> >> Am 17.01.19 um 21:05 schrieb Dan Murphy: >>> Create a m_can platform framework that peripherial >>>

Re: possible deadlock in shmem_fallocate (2)

2019-01-22 Thread syzbot
Hello, syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger crash: Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+4b8b031b89e6b96c4...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested on: commit: 48b161983ae5 Merge tag 'xarray-5.0-rc3' of git://git.infra.. git tree: upstream kernel

Re: [PATCH v13 0/8] Introduce on-chip interconnect API

2019-01-22 Thread Georgi Djakov
On 1/22/19 14:42, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:10:55PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote: [..] > > All now queued up, thanks. > > greg k-h Hi Greg, Thanks for considering these patches! Actually i have a branch named icc-next [1] which is pulled into linux-next. I will drop these same

Re: [PATCH v6 07/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add system default clamps

2019-01-22 Thread Patrick Bellasi
On 22-Jan 14:56, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:15:04AM +, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h > > index 84294925d006..c8f391d1cdc5 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/sched.h > > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h > > @@ -625,6

Re: [PATCH] arm64 memory accesses may cause undefined fault on Fujitsu-A64FX

2019-01-22 Thread James Morse
Hello, On 22/01/2019 02:05, Zhang, Lei wrote: > Mark Rutland wrote: >> * How often does this fault occur? > In my test, this fault occurs once every several times > in the OS boot sequence, and after the completion of OS boot, > this fault have never occurred. > In my opinion, this fault rarely

[PATCH 0/4] ARM: cleanup debugfs usage

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs code, there is no need to ever check the return value of the call, as no logic should ever change if a call works properly or not. Fix up a bunch of x86-specific code to not care about the results of debugfs Greg Kroah-Hartman (4): arm64: dump: no need to check return

[PATCH 4/4] arm: omap2: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Kevin Hilman Cc: Tony Lindgren Cc: Russell King Cc: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org Cc:

[PATCH 3/4] arm: omap1: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Paul Walmsley Cc: Aaro Koskinen Cc: Tony Lindgren Cc: Russell King Cc: Kevin Hilman Cc:

[PATCH 2/4] arm: dump: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Russell King Cc: Jinbum Park Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Laura Abbott Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org

[PATCH 1/4] arm64: dump: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Marc Zyngier Cc: Peng Donglin Cc: Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Re: [for next][PATCH 2/2] x86/Kconfig: Select PCI_LOCKLESS_CONFIG if PCI is enabled

2019-01-22 Thread Sinan Kaya
On 1/22/19, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 11:19:58PM +, Sinan Kaya wrote: >> After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without >> CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were >> satisfied implicitly through dependencies on

Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: fix description of exit latency in cpuidle.rst

2019-01-22 Thread Frank Lee
Noise, I am wrong...

Re: [PATCH v6 11/16] sched/fair: Add uclamp support to energy_compute()

2019-01-22 Thread Quentin Perret
On Tuesday 22 Jan 2019 at 14:26:06 (+), Patrick Bellasi wrote: > On 22-Jan 13:29, Quentin Perret wrote: > > On Tuesday 22 Jan 2019 at 12:45:46 (+), Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > > On 22-Jan 12:13, Quentin Perret wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 15 Jan 2019 at 10:15:08 (+), Patrick Bellasi wrote:

Re: [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 7/9] perf tools: synthesize PERF_RECORD_* for loaded BPF programs

2019-01-22 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:13:20PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:46:55AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > Em Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 08:15:19AM -0800, Song Liu escreveu: > > > This patch synthesize PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL and PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT for

RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] arm64 SMMUv3 PMU driver with IORT support

2019-01-22 Thread Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
Hi Robin/Lorenzo, A gentle reminder on this series. Please take a look. Thanks, Shameer > -Original Message- > From: Linuxarm [mailto:linuxarm-boun...@huawei.com] On Behalf Of Shameer > Kolothum > Sent: 30 November 2018 15:48 > To: lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com; robin.mur...@arm.com > Cc:

[PATCH] net: amd8111e: clean up two minor indentation issues

2019-01-22 Thread Colin King
From: Colin Ian King Two statements are incorrecly indented, fix these by removing a space. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King --- drivers/net/ethernet/amd/amd8111e.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/amd8111e.c

[PATCH 6/6] x86: xen: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Boris Ostrovsky Cc: Juergen Gross Cc: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Borislav

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >