linux-rt-devel tree contains a patch (b1773eac3f29c ("sched: Add support
for lazy preemption")) that adds an extra member to struct trace_entry.
This causes the offset of args field in struct trace_event_raw_sys_enter
be different from the one in struct syscall_trace_enter:
struct
Add properties as per new bindings in zynqmp remoteproc node
to represent TCM address and size.
This patch also adds alternative remoteproc node to represent
remoteproc cluster in split mode. By default lockstep mode is
enabled and users should disable it before using split mode
dts. Both
ZynqMP TCM information is fixed in driver. Now ZynqMP TCM information
is available in device-tree. Parse TCM information in driver
as per new bindings.
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah
---
Changes in v6:
- Missing . at the end of the commit message
- remove redundant initialization of variables
From: Radhey Shyam Pandey
Introduce bindings for TCM memory address space on AMD-xilinx Zynq
UltraScale+ platform. It will help in defining TCM in device-tree
and make it's access platform agnostic and data-driven.
Tightly-coupled memories(TCMs) are low-latency memory that provides
predictable
Use TCM pm domains extracted from device-tree
to power on/off TCM using general pm domain framework.
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah
---
Changes in v6:
- Remove spurious change
- Handle errors in add_pm_domains function
- Remove redundant code to handle errors from remove_pm_domains
Tightly-Coupled Memories(TCMs) are low-latency memory that provides
predictable instruction execution and predictable data load/store
timing. Each Cortex-R5F processor contains exclusive two 64 KB memory
banks on the ATCM and BTCM ports, for a total of 128 KB of memory.
In lockstep mode, both
For the novice with the RT kernel, Could somebody tell me what kernel
this bug was first introduced in and what kernel we need to install to
get the fix?
This could be the issue we have been experiencing in the Linuxcnc
community with excessive RT network latency (mostly with realtek
NIC's).
I
On 2023/10/13 09:59, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 01:36:05 +0800
"wuqiang.matt" wrote:
On 2023/10/12 22:02, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
Hi Wuqiang,
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:23:34 +0800
wuqiang wrote:
Hello Masami,
Just got time for the new patch and got that
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 01:36:05 +0800
"wuqiang.matt" wrote:
> On 2023/10/12 22:02, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> > Hi Wuqiang,
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:23:34 +0800
> > wuqiang wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Masami,
> >>
> >> Just got time for the new patch and got that ages[] was removed.
Michal Wilczynski wrote:
> devm_*() family of functions purpose is managing memory attached to a
> device. So in general it should only be used for allocations that should
> last for the whole lifecycle of the device. This is not the case for
> acpi_nfit_init_interleave_set(). There are two
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 6:43 AM Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:45:50 +0200
> Artem Savkov wrote:
>
> > linux-rt-devel tree contains a patch (b1773eac3f29c ("sched: Add support
> > for lazy preemption")) that adds an extra member to struct trace_entry.
> > This causes the offset
The original code used conditional branching in the nfit_mem_cmp
function to compare two values and return -1, 1, or 0 based on the
result. However, the list_sort comparison function only needs results
<0, >0, or =0. This patch optimizes the code to make the comparison
branchless, improving
Hello:
This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes)
by Palmer Dabbelt :
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 20:24:07 +0200 you wrote:
> ftrace creates entries for each syscall in the tracefs but has failed
> since commit 08d0ce30e0e4 ("riscv: Implement syscall wrappers") which
> prefixes all riscv syscalls
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:52 AM Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 10:39:33 -0400
> Nick Lowell wrote:
>
> > > [ cut here ]
> > > WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 944 at kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c:2423
> > > apply_subsystem_event_filter+0x18c/0x5e0
> > > Modules
Hi Joey,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on mcgrof/modules-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.6-rc5 next-20231012]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use
Hi Joey,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on mcgrof/modules-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.6-rc5 next-20231012]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use
On 2023/10/12 22:02, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
Hi Wuqiang,
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:23:34 +0800
wuqiang wrote:
Hello Masami,
Just got time for the new patch and got that ages[] was removed. ages[] is
introduced the way like 2-phase commit to keep consitency and must be kept.
Thinking
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 09:50:27AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > In the kernel, selecting the CONFIG_MODULE_DISABLE_INIT_FREE
> > option disables the asynchronous freeing of init sections.
>
> No it does not.
I take it back, your patch effectively only does this.
Luis
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 07:17:19AM +0530, Joey Jiao wrote:
>
> +config MODULE_DISABLE_INIT_FREE
> + bool "Disable freeing of init sections"
> + default n
> + help
> + By default, kernel will free init sections after module being fully
> + loaded.
> +
> +
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 07:10:11AM +0530, Joey Jiao wrote:
> To facilitate syzkaller test, it's essential for the module to retain the same
> address across reboots.
Why?
> In userspace, the execution of modprobe commands must
> occur sequentially.
Why?
> In the kernel, selecting the
Hello Masami,
I've udpated the objpool patch and did some function testings for X64 and
ARM64. Later I'll do the performance testings and more regressions.
Here are the changelogs:
1) new struct objpool_node added to represent the real percpu ring arrary
and struct objpool_slot now
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 1:46 AM Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > The DRM_I915_WERROR config depends on EXPERT and !COMPILE_TEST, and to
> > > my knowledge this has never caused issues outside of i915 developers and
> > > CI.
> >
> > Ack, I think you do it right. I was trying to establish a
Hi Wuqiang,
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:23:34 +0800
wuqiang wrote:
> Hello Masami,
>
> Just got time for the new patch and got that ages[] was removed. ages[] is
> introduced the way like 2-phase commit to keep consitency and must be kept.
>
> Thinking of the following 2 cases that two cpu nodes
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:45:50 +0200
Artem Savkov wrote:
> linux-rt-devel tree contains a patch (b1773eac3f29c ("sched: Add support
> for lazy preemption")) that adds an extra member to struct trace_entry.
> This causes the offset of args field in struct trace_event_raw_sys_enter
> be different
On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 19:51:17 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
[...]
(btw, even you track VA/SECS pages in unreclaimable list, given they
both have
'enclave' as the owner, do you still need SGX_EPC_OWNER_ENCL and
SGX_EPC_OWNER_PAGE ?)
Let me think about it, there might be also a way just track encl
linux-rt-devel tree contains a patch (b1773eac3f29c ("sched: Add support
for lazy preemption")) that adds an extra member to struct trace_entry.
This causes the offset of args field in struct trace_event_raw_sys_enter
be different from the one in struct syscall_trace_enter:
struct
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 06:19:02PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 13:37:08 +0200 (CEST)
> Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Sep 2023, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 12:43:34 +0200
> > > Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > > > Drop break
On Mon, 02 Oct 2023 18:48:26 +0200, André Apitzsch wrote:
> Add the binding description and the corresponding driver for
> the Kinetic KTD2026 and KTD2027.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Add Kinetic KTD2026/2027 LED
commit: 25766993d24a623c4ddcbd34a78fdc76026d9b40
[2/2]
On 12.10.23 07:53, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
On Mon, 2023-10-09 at 17:04 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 07.10.23 10:55, Huang, Ying wrote:
Vishal Verma writes:
@@ -2167,47 +2221,28 @@ static int __ref try_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
if (rc)
return rc;
+
Hi Masahiro,
On 10/9/23 14:42, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
'make ARCH=parisc vdso_install' has never worked. It attempts to
descend into arch/parisc/kernel/vdso/, which does not exist.
The command just fails:
scripts/Makefile.build:41: arch/parisc/kernel/vdso/Makefile: No such file or
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 8:53 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:24 AM Guo Ren wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 8:42 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> > > @@ -131,12 +131,6 @@ endif
> > > libs-y +=
31 matches
Mail list logo
