Re: [Linux-parport] [PATCH 2/2] parport: parport_pc: Add force_epp module option for parport_pc.

2014-06-30 Thread Adam Baker
On 30/06/14 09:48, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: The detection of Intel EPP bug is known to produce much false positives. The new option is introduced to force enable EPP in spite of the test result. I can confirm that this check produces false positives on a range of hardware - I no longer have

Re: [Linux-parport] [PATCH 2/2] parport: parport_pc: Add force_epp module option for parport_pc.

2014-06-30 Thread Adam Baker
On 30/06/14 09:48, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: The detection of Intel EPP bug is known to produce much false positives. The new option is introduced to force enable EPP in spite of the test result. I can confirm that this check produces false positives on a range of hardware - I no longer have

Re: [PATCH] Frees gate after if statement in clk-sunxi.c

2014-06-14 Thread Adam Baker
On 14/06/14 19:11, Nick wrote: Signed-off-by: Nick --- drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c index 4264834..6f4fc51 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c +++

Re: [PATCH] Frees gate after if statement in clk-sunxi.c

2014-06-14 Thread Adam Baker
On 14/06/14 19:11, Nick wrote: Signed-off-by: Nick xerofo...@gmail.com --- drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c index 4264834..6f4fc51 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c +++

Re: [PATCH 01/15] ARM: dts: kirkwood: fix mislocated pcie-controller nodes

2014-05-05 Thread Adam Baker
on NSA320, as expected it doesn't make any observable difference as there is nothing connected to the PCIe bus (hence not really worth a tested by). It matters more on the NSA310 as that uses PCIe for Ethernet. Regards Adam Baker --- Cc: Rob Herring Cc: Pawel Moll Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Ian Ca

Re: [PATCH 01/15] ARM: dts: kirkwood: fix mislocated pcie-controller nodes

2014-05-05 Thread Adam Baker
tried this patch on NSA320, as expected it doesn't make any observable difference as there is nothing connected to the PCIe bus (hence not really worth a tested by). It matters more on the NSA310 as that uses PCIe for Ethernet. Regards Adam Baker --- Cc: Rob Herring robh...@kernel.org Cc: Pawel

Re: [PATCHv2] bridge: disable snooping if there is no querier

2013-07-26 Thread Adam Baker
On 25/07/13 14:56, Linus Lüssing wrote: If there is no querier on a link then we won't get periodic reports and therefore won't be able to learn about multicast listeners behind ports, potentially leading to lost multicast packets, especially for multicast listeners that joined before the

Re: [PATCHv2] bridge: disable snooping if there is no querier

2013-07-26 Thread Adam Baker
On 25/07/13 14:56, Linus Lüssing wrote: If there is no querier on a link then we won't get periodic reports and therefore won't be able to learn about multicast listeners behind ports, potentially leading to lost multicast packets, especially for multicast listeners that joined before the

Re: [Rt2400-devel] [PATCH] rt2500usb - Don't claim 050d:705{0/a}

2007-10-26 Thread Adam Baker
On Friday 26 October 2007 20:10, Roland Dreier wrote: >  > Well it could be something quite simple, in the module loader it is > looping > through all modules to look for a device with the correct USB/PCI > ID. > Currently, after the first occurence it loads the module and doesn't > continue, > it

Re: [Rt2400-devel] [PATCH] rt2500usb - Don't claim 050d:705{0/a}

2007-10-26 Thread Adam Baker
On Friday 26 October 2007 20:10, Roland Dreier wrote:   Well it could be something quite simple, in the module loader it is looping through all modules to look for a device with the correct USB/PCI ID. Currently, after the first occurence it loads the module and doesn't continue, it should

Re: [Rt2400-devel] [PATCH] rt2500usb - Don't claim 050d:705{0/a}

2007-10-25 Thread Adam Baker
On Thursday 25 October 2007 00:22, Parag Warudkar wrote: > I have a Belkin USB Wireless adapter with ID 050d:705a. > Both rt2500usb.c and rt73usb.c claim that they can drive the device with > this ID. > > When using the distro kernel as well as custom 2.4.24-rc1 both rt73usb and > rt2500usb get

Re: [Rt2400-devel] [PATCH] rt2500usb - Don't claim 050d:705{0/a}

2007-10-25 Thread Adam Baker
On Thursday 25 October 2007 00:22, Parag Warudkar wrote: I have a Belkin USB Wireless adapter with ID 050d:705a. Both rt2500usb.c and rt73usb.c claim that they can drive the device with this ID. When using the distro kernel as well as custom 2.4.24-rc1 both rt73usb and rt2500usb get loaded