[2.6 patch] x86: default to PCI=y

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
PCI is one of the few hardware stuff where defaulting to y makes sense. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This patch has been sent on: - 13 Dec 2007 753cd05e76043bb56edb30b2277be9f3e77ee0c4 diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index 80b7ba4..2897cc0

[2.6 patch] CIFS: #if 0 mode_to_access_flags()

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- fs/cifs/cifsacl.c |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) 0cf530f754b974ee5e58b3346828bb5586440c92 diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c index c312adc..771a22f 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ static void

[2.6 patch] x86: default to PCI=y

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
PCI is one of the few hardware stuff where defaulting to y makes sense. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This patch has been sent on: - 13 Dec 2007 753cd05e76043bb56edb30b2277be9f3e77ee0c4 diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index 80b7ba4..2897cc0 100644

[2.6 patch] the scheduled 'time' option removal

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch contains the scheduled removal of the 'time' option. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |8 kernel/printk.c| 13 - 2 files changed, 21 deletions

[2.6 patch] mthca: the scheduled MSI support removal

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch contains the scheduled removal of the MSI support in the mthca driver. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 10 - drivers/infiniband/hw/mthca/mthca_dev.h|1 drivers/infiniband/hw/mthca/mthca_eq.c |6

[2.6 patch] the scheduled shaper removal

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch contains the scheduled removal of the shaper driver. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |9 Documentation/networking/00-INDEX |2 Documentation/networking/shaper.txt| 48 - drivers/net/Kconfig

[2.6.25 patch] remove a.out interpreter for ELF executables

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch contains the scheduled removal of the a.out interpreter support for ELF executables. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 11 - fs/binfmt_elf.c| 142 + 2 files changed, 13

[2.6 patch] make USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH available with PM

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
As Torsten Kaiser pointed out, it seems the dependency of USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH on !PM should have been removed in commit 7931e1c6f8007d5fef8a0bb2dc71bd97315eeae9. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- 9c1aa5fae6c8a4d1a6a8f90062d473d63250a403 diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/Kconfig

[RFC: 2.6 patch] make BINFMT_FLAT a bool

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
I have not yet seen anyone saying he has a reasonable use case for using BINFMT_FLAT modular on his embedded device. Considering that fs/binfmt_flat.c even lacks a MODULE_LICENSE() I really doubt there is any, and this patch therefore makes BINFMT_FLAT a bool. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL

[2.6 patch] remove broken MTD drivers

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch removes two MTD drivers that have been marked as BROKEN 19 months ago due to requiring nonexisting header files. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This patch has been sent on: - 24 Oct 2007 drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig | 12 drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile

[2.6 patch] remove ps2esdi

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
is still present in the older kernel releases. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This patch has been sent on: - 24 Oct 2007 Documentation/mca.txt | 17 drivers/block/Kconfig | 10 drivers/block/Makefile |1 drivers/block/ps2esdi.c | 1079

[2.6 patch] OSS msnd: fix array overflows

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch fixes array overflows in the OSS msnd driver spotted by the Coverity checker. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This patch has been sent on: - 27 Oct 2007 97463a59dfb9ccb915d3b615225c98cb3e310c0a diff --git a/sound/oss/msnd.h b/sound/oss/msnd.h index 05cf786

[2.6 patch] #if 0 dma_async_memcpy_buf_to_buf()

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch #if 0's the unused dma_async_memcpy_buf_to_buf(). Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This patch has been sent on: - 14 Aug 2007 drivers/dma/dmaengine.c |2 ++ include/linux/dmaengine.h |2 -- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions

Status of the h8300 port?

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
The h8300 port doesn't even compile anymore for some time (the first compile error you run into was introduced 7 months ago by commit c728d60455e8e8722ee08312a75f38dd7a866b5e). Are there any patches in some external tree that should be merged? Or will anyone work on getting this port back into a

Status of the v850 port?

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
Trying to compile the v850 port brings you many compile errors, one of them exists since at least kernel 2.6.19. Are there any patches in some external tree that should be merged? Or will anyone work on getting this port back into a usable state in the forseeable future? Otherwise the only

Re: [2.6 patch] remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:30:22PM +, Alan Cox wrote: On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:26:23 +0100 Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on EXPERIMENTAL since they are pointless

Re: [2.6 patch] remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:23:44PM +, Alan Cox wrote: On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:48:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on EXPERIMENTAL since they are pointless. NAK Experimental is an important guide to driver

Re: [2.6 patch] remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 04:07:08PM +, Alan Cox wrote: On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:17:51 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:23:44PM +, Alan Cox wrote: On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:48:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch removes

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ide: use MODULE_VERSION()

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 06:40:38PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: * Replace driver versions in comments by DRV_VERSION define. * Add MODULE_VERSION(DRV_VERSION) to drivers defining DRV_VERSION. ... Could you limit this to actively maintained version numbers and also remove the

Re: [2.6 patch] remove broken MTD drivers

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 04:30:57PM +, David Woodhouse wrote: On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 15:48 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch removes two MTD drivers that have been marked as BROKEN 19 months ago due to requiring nonexisting header files. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [2.6 patch] OSS msnd: fix array overflows

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 07:43:23PM +0100, Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) wrote: then it is auch to 2.6.22-stable? That's a very old bug in a driver for ancient hardware, so there's no need to hurry. On 1/1/08, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch fixes array overflows in the OSS

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: clear IO_APIC before enabing apic error vector. v2

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 04:56:35PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: On Dec 30, 2007 4:28 PM, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Sorry for the dumb question, but what in + if (!smp_processor_id() !skip_ioapic_setup nr_ioapics) + enable_IO_APIC(); guarantees

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: clear IO_APIC before enabing apic error vector. v2

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 05:03:50PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: On Dec 30, 2007 4:28 PM, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 04:01:39PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: ... the old one is in x86-mm tree http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git

Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled 'time' option removal

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 06:53:54PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Jan 1 2008 15:46, Adrian Bunk wrote: index 20c4c8b..93aac19 100644 --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt @@ -233,10 +233,2 @@ Who:Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [2.6 patch] remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 05:35:32PM +, Alan Cox wrote: So smbfs is still considered rock solid while no serious distribution would be crazy enough to ship the EXPERIMENTAL NFSv4 support to their customers? Thats a different problem. The kernel as I've said many times has no proper

Re: [2.6 patch] remove broken MTD drivers

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:28:26AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: The header of ppchameleonevb.c claims it comes from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Argh. That's indeed ancient code. So what should I do to fix this? Wait for Thomas' response, or port patches

Re: asm-x86/msr.h for sanitized headers: clean it or punt it

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 01:49:27PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: Use __asm__ and __volatile__ in code that is exported to userspace. Wrap kernel functions with __KERNEL__ so they get scrubbed. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff --git a/include/asm-x86/msr.h

Re: asm-x86/byteorder.h: clean up for userspace

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 01:19:42PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 01:12:45PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: Since asm-x86/byteorder.h is exported to userspace, use __asm__ rather than asm in its code. The correct fix is to not export it to

[2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
the depends on BROKEN line. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- f778e1d046a3554ca15b8637afd0ffbf4790801c diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig index 487236c..d850725 100644 --- a/fs/Kconfig +++ b/fs/Kconfig @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ config EXT3_FS_SECURITY config EXT4DEV_FS tristate

Re: [patch] linux/ufs_fs.h: use __u64 for userspace

2008-01-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 08:51:40PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: Fix the ufs_inotofsba macro to use __u64 rather than u64 since this is exported to userspace. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff --git a/include/linux/ufs_fs.h b/include/linux/ufs_fs.h index

Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in

2007-12-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 04:19:23PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 02:26:42PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 01:09

Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in

2007-12-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 04:19:23PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 02:26:42PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 01:09

Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in

2007-12-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 02:26:42PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 01:09:43PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > > > > As suggested by Adrian Bunk, UNIX domain sockets should always be built > > &g

Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in

2007-12-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 01:09:43PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > As suggested by Adrian Bunk, UNIX domain sockets should always be built in > on normal systems. This is especially true since udev needs these sockets > and fails to run if UNIX=m. > > Signed-Off-By: Bodo Eggert &l

Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in

2007-12-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 01:09:43PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: As suggested by Adrian Bunk, UNIX domain sockets should always be built in on normal systems. This is especially true since udev needs these sockets and fails to run if UNIX=m. Signed-Off-By: Bodo Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in

2007-12-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 02:26:42PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 01:09:43PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: As suggested by Adrian Bunk, UNIX domain sockets should always be built in on normal systems. This is especially true

Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in

2007-12-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 04:19:23PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 02:26:42PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 01:09:43PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: As suggested

Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in

2007-12-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 04:19:23PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 02:26:42PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 01:09:43PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: As suggested

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: clear IO_APIC before enabing apic error vector. v2

2007-12-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 04:01:39PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Dec 30, 2007 3:23 PM, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 02:42:41PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > On Dec 30, 2007 2:06 PM, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: clear IO_APIC before enabing apic error vector. v2

2007-12-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 02:42:41PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Dec 30, 2007 2:06 PM, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 12:48:48PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > On Dec 30, 2007 6:51 AM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > &

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: clear IO_APIC before enabing apic error vector. v2

2007-12-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 12:48:48PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Dec 30, 2007 6:51 AM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > * Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > please check if you can replace the one in the x86-mm > > > > > >

Re: allmodconfig: udev won`t start due to CONFIG_UNIX=m

2007-12-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 09:18:38PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Dec 30 2007 21:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >i build a kernel with allmodconfig and didn`t get my system to boot with > >that. > > > >after some investigation i found that it was due to udev: > > > >udevd[1226]:

Re: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)

2007-12-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 03:00:51AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > Without inlining the maxmimum stack usage inside foobar() is > > max(stack usage foo(), stack usage bar()). [1] > > It's a little more complicated. gcc 4.x (not sure which x, might 0) > is clever enough to not use max() stack,

Re: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)

2007-12-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 03:00:51AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: Without inlining the maxmimum stack usage inside foobar() is max(stack usage foo(), stack usage bar()). [1] It's a little more complicated. gcc 4.x (not sure which x, might 0) is clever enough to not use max() stack, but only

Re: allmodconfig: udev won`t start due to CONFIG_UNIX=m

2007-12-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 09:18:38PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Dec 30 2007 21:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i build a kernel with allmodconfig and didn`t get my system to boot with that. after some investigation i found that it was due to udev: udevd[1226]: init_udev_socket: error

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: clear IO_APIC before enabing apic error vector. v2

2007-12-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 12:48:48PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: On Dec 30, 2007 6:51 AM, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: please check if you can replace the one in the x86-mm

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: clear IO_APIC before enabing apic error vector. v2

2007-12-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 02:42:41PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: On Dec 30, 2007 2:06 PM, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 12:48:48PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: On Dec 30, 2007 6:51 AM, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: clear IO_APIC before enabing apic error vector. v2

2007-12-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 04:01:39PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: On Dec 30, 2007 3:23 PM, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 02:42:41PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: On Dec 30, 2007 2:06 PM, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 12:48:48PM -0800

Re: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 10:17:37PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > Until we are on par with stack usage I recommend to keep > > -fno-unit-at-a-time disabled for gcc less than 4.00 as > > suggested by Adrian (as is what we have today). > > Again the correct fix is to add "noinline" to the

Re: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 01:16:07PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > If -funit-at-a-time really increases stack size too much on some compiler > version the right fix would be to check where it does that using make > checkstack > and then add "noinline" attributes there to prevent the compiler from

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 01:18:02AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:06:19 +0200 > > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:54:08AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > > From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > &g

Re: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 10:39:04AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:13:24AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:23:41PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > >... > > > Noteworthy remarks on the unification: > > >... >

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:54:08AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:48:46 +0200 > > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:14:11AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > > That's why I'm not worried about this issue and

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:14:11AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:22:56 +0200 > > > At least the sunserial_console_match() one is an obvious Oops > > (EXPORT_SYMBOL of an __init function). > > &

Re: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 03:14:23AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Friday 28 December 2007 23:13:24 Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:23:41PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > >... > > > Noteworthy remarks on the unification: > > >... > > &g

Re: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 03:14:23AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: On Friday 28 December 2007 23:13:24 Adrian Bunk wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:23:41PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: ... Noteworthy remarks on the unification: ... - -funit-at-a-time should be easy to unify but it looks like

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:14:11AM -0800, David Miller wrote: From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:22:56 +0200 At least the sunserial_console_match() one is an obvious Oops (EXPORT_SYMBOL of an __init function). The comment in the description of commit

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:54:08AM -0800, David Miller wrote: From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:48:46 +0200 On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:14:11AM -0800, David Miller wrote: That's why I'm not worried about this issue and it's not critical at all

Re: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 10:39:04AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:13:24AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:23:41PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: ... Noteworthy remarks on the unification: ... - -funit-at-a-time should be easy to unify

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 01:18:02AM -0800, David Miller wrote: From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:06:19 +0200 On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:54:08AM -0800, David Miller wrote: From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:48:46 +0200 On Sat

Re: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 01:16:07PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: If -funit-at-a-time really increases stack size too much on some compiler version the right fix would be to check where it does that using make checkstack and then add noinline attributes there to prevent the compiler from

Re: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 10:17:37PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: Until we are on par with stack usage I recommend to keep -fno-unit-at-a-time disabled for gcc less than 4.00 as suggested by Adrian (as is what we have today). Again the correct fix is to add noinline to the functions that are

Re: [PATCH] USB Kconfig: Reorganize USB Kconfig Menu

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 02:18:58PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Sunday 23 December 2007, Al Boldi wrote: > > > > Reogranize USB Kconfig Menu, and move USB_GADGET out into the Device Driver > > Menu. This helps the USB Kconfig Menu to be more logical/usable. > > > > Cc: David Brownell

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 07:05:04PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:29:07 +0100 > > > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x46b04): Section mismatch: reference to > > .init.text:sun4v_ktsb_register (between 'smp_callin' and > >

Re: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:23:41PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >... > Noteworthy remarks on the unification: >... > - -funit-at-a-time should be easy to unify but it looks like we have a bug > in 32 bit. We only enable -funit-at-a-time for gcc less than 0400 if they > support it No, we

Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore blackfin HARDWARE_PM support

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 02:14:04PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > This patch restores the blackfin Hardware Performance Monitor Profiling > > support that was killed by > > commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9

[2.6.24 patch] restore Cell OProfile support

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch restores the Cell OProfile support that was killed by commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation |8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) 6d1446d35d367fdbdd2a0a29e0d156646ff40630

[2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch restores the ARMv6 OProfile support that was killed by commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 19 inse

[2.6.24 patch] restore blackfin HARDWARE_PM support

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch restores the blackfin Hardware Performance Monitor Profiling support that was killed by commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation |9 + 1 file changed, 9 inse

just a test

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
Just a test - please ignore. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To

Re: Working upstream toolchain for avr32?

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:41:58AM +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:56:17 +0100 > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > AFAIK the latest available AVR32 toolchains are some patched gcc 4.0 and > > some patched binutils 2.17, and

Re: kernel panic - help!?

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 08:36:38AM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: > On 12/12/2007 03:55 PM, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote: > > Em Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:17:10 +0100 > > Oliver Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > > > | Can someone explain me that? >... > > | Dec 12 00:24:15 santorini kernel:

Re: kernel panic - help!?

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 08:36:38AM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: On 12/12/2007 03:55 PM, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote: Em Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:17:10 +0100 Oliver Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: | Can someone explain me that? ... | Dec 12 00:24:15 santorini kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246

Re: Working upstream toolchain for avr32?

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:41:58AM +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:56:17 +0100 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AFAIK the latest available AVR32 toolchains are some patched gcc 4.0 and some patched binutils 2.17, and avr32 is currently the only architecture

just a test

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
Just a test - please ignore. cu Adrian -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. Only a promise, Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To

[2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch restores the ARMv6 OProfile support that was killed by commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions

[2.6.24 patch] restore blackfin HARDWARE_PM support

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch restores the blackfin Hardware Performance Monitor Profiling support that was killed by commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation |9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions

[2.6.24 patch] restore Cell OProfile support

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch restores the Cell OProfile support that was killed by commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation |8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) 6d1446d35d367fdbdd2a0a29e0d156646ff40630 diff

Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore blackfin HARDWARE_PM support

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 02:14:04PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: This patch restores the blackfin Hardware Performance Monitor Profiling support that was killed by commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk

Re: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:23:41PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: ... Noteworthy remarks on the unification: ... - -funit-at-a-time should be easy to unify but it looks like we have a bug in 32 bit. We only enable -funit-at-a-time for gcc less than 0400 if they support it No, we _dis_able it

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 07:05:04PM -0800, David Miller wrote: From: Mariusz Kozlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:29:07 +0100 WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x46b04): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:sun4v_ktsb_register (between 'smp_callin' and

Re: [PATCH] USB Kconfig: Reorganize USB Kconfig Menu

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 02:18:58PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: On Sunday 23 December 2007, Al Boldi wrote: Reogranize USB Kconfig Menu, and move USB_GADGET out into the Device Driver Menu. This helps the USB Kconfig Menu to be more logical/usable. Cc: David Brownell [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH 1/1] mxser, remove it

2007-12-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:19:31PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Jiri Slaby wrote: > > (Old) mxser is obsoleted by mxser_new and scheduled for removal on Dec 2007. > > Remove it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |8

Re: [PATCH 1/1] mxser, remove it

2007-12-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:19:31PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: Jiri Slaby wrote: (Old) mxser is obsoleted by mxser_new and scheduled for removal on Dec 2007. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |8 -

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: remove Adam Fritzler, update his email address in other sources

2007-12-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 08:28:00PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > I'd suggest that you find out if Adrian is still running the trivial tree > and if so, patchbomb him. I do. Simply Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] for trivial patches and they might magically appear in Linus' tree during the next merge

Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly

2007-12-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 01:15:56PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > So... once we've moved all read-mostly variables into __read_mostly, what > > is left behind in bss? > > I had already covered that in the next paragraph which you conveniently > snipped :) > > Anyways I suspect the right solution

Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly

2007-12-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 01:15:56PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: So... once we've moved all read-mostly variables into __read_mostly, what is left behind in bss? I had already covered that in the next paragraph which you conveniently snipped :) Anyways I suspect the right solution for that

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: remove Adam Fritzler, update his email address in other sources

2007-12-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 08:28:00PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: ... I'd suggest that you find out if Adrian is still running the trivial tree and if so, patchbomb him. I do. Simply Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] for trivial patches and they might magically appear in Linus' tree during the next merge

Re: [RANDOM] Move two variables to read_mostly section to save memory

2007-12-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:38:14PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > I am using gcc-4.2.1 > > CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y makes no difference for me. > > $ make defconfig > $ egrep "OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE|CONFIG_SMP" .config > CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y > CONFIG_SMP=y > $ make vmlinux > $ nm -v

Re: [RANDOM] Move two variables to read_mostly section to save memory

2007-12-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 06:42:57PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Adrian Bunk a écrit : >... >> And even more funny, with gcc 4.2 and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y your >> patch doesn't seem to make any space difference - are you using an older >> compiler or even worse CON

Re: [RANDOM] Move two variables to read_mostly section to save memory

2007-12-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:44:37PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Adrian Bunk a écrit : >> On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: >>> While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed : >>> >>> c0581300 D random_table >

Re: [RANDOM] Move two variables to read_mostly section to save memory

2007-12-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed : > > c0581300 D random_table > c0581480 d input_pool > c0581580 d random_read_wakeup_thresh > c0581584 d random_write_wakeup_thresh > c0581600 d blocking_pool > > That means that

Re: [RANDOM] Move two variables to read_mostly section to save memory

2007-12-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed : c0581300 D random_table c0581480 d input_pool c0581580 d random_read_wakeup_thresh c0581584 d random_write_wakeup_thresh c0581600 d blocking_pool That means that the two

Re: [RANDOM] Move two variables to read_mostly section to save memory

2007-12-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:44:37PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: Adrian Bunk a écrit : On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed : c0581300 D random_table c0581480 d input_pool c0581580 d random_read_wakeup_thresh

Re: [RANDOM] Move two variables to read_mostly section to save memory

2007-12-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 06:42:57PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: Adrian Bunk a écrit : ... And even more funny, with gcc 4.2 and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y your patch doesn't seem to make any space difference - are you using an older compiler or even worse CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=n

Re: [RANDOM] Move two variables to read_mostly section to save memory

2007-12-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:38:14PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: I am using gcc-4.2.1 CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y makes no difference for me. $ make defconfig $ egrep OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE|CONFIG_SMP .config CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y CONFIG_SMP=y $ make vmlinux $ nm -v vmlinux|grep -4

Re: Next patches for the 2.6.25 queue

2007-12-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:43:35AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:46:42AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > > > I would like to post my next patches in a way that

Re: Next patches for the 2.6.25 queue

2007-12-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:43:35AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:46:42AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: Hi Andrew, I would like to post my next patches in a way that would make it as easy for you

Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: restore missing clear_highpage

2007-12-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 05:01:51AM +, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > On 11/28/2007 01:55 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > tmpfs was misconverted to __GFP_ZERO in 2.6.11. There's an unusual case > > > in > > > which shmem_getpage receives the page from its

Re: [patch 01/10] e1000e: make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000

2007-12-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 06:17:55PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:39:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>> From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> ... >>> So I thin

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >