Mike Houston wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 21:27:42 +0200
> Andreas Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>I think it's 2TB for the file size and 2e73 for the file system, but
>>I don't understand the second reference and the part about the
>>CONIFG_LBD
Mike Houston wrote:
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 21:27:42 +0200
Andreas Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's 2TB for the file size and 2e73 for the file system, but
I don't understand the second reference and the part about the
CONIFG_LBD. What is exactly the CONFIG_LBD option
I have a question about the Large File Support using Linux and glibc 2.3
on a 32-Bit machine. What's the correct limit for the file size and the
file system using LFS (just for the kernel, not to mention filesystem
limits etc)?
I found two references:
"The 2.6 kernel imposes its own limits on
I have a question about the Large File Support using Linux and glibc 2.3
on a 32-Bit machine. What's the correct limit for the file size and the
file system using LFS (just for the kernel, not to mention filesystem
limits etc)?
I found two references:
The 2.6 kernel imposes its own limits on
Who is the memory mapping expert? :)
What are the current file size limits for memory mapping via glibc's
mmap() function on linux:
- for a native 32-Bit System not using LFS?
- for a native 32-Bit System using LFS?
- for a native 64-Bit System?
(linux-kernel >2.6, of course)
It would be nice
Who is the memory mapping expert? :)
What are the current file size limits for memory mapping via glibc's
mmap() function on linux:
- for a native 32-Bit System not using LFS?
- for a native 32-Bit System using LFS?
- for a native 64-Bit System?
(linux-kernel 2.6, of course)
It would be nice
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Andreas Baer wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
One other oddment about this motherboard, Forgive if I have
over-snipped this trying to make it relevant...
Andreas Baer wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:10:08PM +0200, Andreas Baer wrote
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Andreas Baer wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
One other oddment about this motherboard, Forgive if I have
over-snipped this trying to make it relevant...
Andreas Baer wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:10:08PM +0200, Andreas Baer wrote
Bill Davidsen wrote:
One other oddment about this motherboard, Forgive if I have over-snipped
this trying to make it relevant...
Andreas Baer wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:10:08PM +0200, Andreas Baer wrote:
There clearly is a problem on the system installed
Erik Mouw wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 09:51:49PM +0200, Andreas Baer wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:10:08PM +0200, Andreas Baer wrote:
Here I have
/dev/hda: 26.91 MB/sec
/dev/hda1: 26.90 MB/sec(Windows FAT32)
/dev/hda7: 17.89 MB/sec
Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:10:08PM +0200, Andreas Baer wrote:
(...)
I have (S-ATA-150 Disk 80GB)
/dev/sda: 50.59 MB/sec
/dev/sda1: 50.62 MB/sec(Windows FAT32)
/dev/sda6: 41.63 MB/sec(Linux ReiserFS)
On the Notebook I have at most an ATA
Hi,
Thanks for reply.
Sorry, but I've never done any vmstat operation before so next time I'll send
the output in the first mail :)
Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 02:50:05AM +0200, Andreas Baer wrote:
Hi everyone,
First I want to say sorry for this BIG post
Hi,
Thanks for reply.
Sorry, but I've never done any vmstat operation before so next time I'll send
the output in the first mail :)
Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 02:50:05AM +0200, Andreas Baer wrote:
Hi everyone,
First I want to say sorry for this BIG post
Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:10:08PM +0200, Andreas Baer wrote:
(...)
I have (S-ATA-150 Disk 80GB)
/dev/sda: 50.59 MB/sec
/dev/sda1: 50.62 MB/sec(Windows FAT32)
/dev/sda6: 41.63 MB/sec(Linux ReiserFS)
On the Notebook I have at most an ATA
Erik Mouw wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 09:51:49PM +0200, Andreas Baer wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:10:08PM +0200, Andreas Baer wrote:
Here I have
/dev/hda: 26.91 MB/sec
/dev/hda1: 26.90 MB/sec(Windows FAT32)
/dev/hda7: 17.89 MB/sec
Bill Davidsen wrote:
One other oddment about this motherboard, Forgive if I have over-snipped
this trying to make it relevant...
Andreas Baer wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:10:08PM +0200, Andreas Baer wrote:
There clearly is a problem on the system installed
Hi everyone,
First I want to say sorry for this BIG post, but it seems that I have no
other chance. :)
I have a Asus P4C800-DX with a P4 2,4 GHz 512 KB L2 Cache "Northwood"
Processor (lowest Processor that supports HyperThreading) and 1GB DDR400
RAM. I'm also running S-ATA disks with about
Hi everyone,
First I want to say sorry for this BIG post, but it seems that I have no
other chance. :)
I have a Asus P4C800-DX with a P4 2,4 GHz 512 KB L2 Cache Northwood
Processor (lowest Processor that supports HyperThreading) and 1GB DDR400
RAM. I'm also running S-ATA disks with about 50
18 matches
Mail list logo