-by: Armando Visconti
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
---
This is patch V2, after Sbatian's review. Patch is very simple, but
my assumption needs to be cross-verified. This patch has been
quickly tested using a DWC3 controller gadget device.
Felipe, if you can quicly take a look at it..
Armando
-by: Armando Visconti armando.visco...@st.com
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bige...@linutronix.de
---
This is patch V2, after Sbatian's review. Patch is very simple, but
my assumption needs to be cross-verified. This patch has been
quickly tested using a DWC3 controller gadget device.
Felipe
On 12/17/2012 04:45 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 03:11:19PM +0100, Armando Visconti wrote:
In the IN case, since the USB request is allocated only when
the source/sink function is started and never freed, the USB ept
buffer needs to be inited only
On 12/17/2012 04:45 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 03:11:19PM +0100, Armando Visconti wrote:
In the IN case, since the USB request is allocated only when
the source/sink function is started and never freed, the USB ept
buffer needs to be inited only
In the IN case, since the USB request is allocated only when
the source/sink function is started and never freed, the USB ept
buffer needs to be inited only at the beginning. This change
results into a more performant g_zero module, especially when
'pattern=1' is selected.
Signed-off-by: Armando
In the IN case, since the USB request is allocated only when
the source/sink function is started and never freed, the USB ept
buffer needs to be inited only at the beginning. This change
results into a more performant g_zero module, especially when
'pattern=1' is selected.
Signed-off-by: Armando
On 12/03/2012 06:46 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:25:53PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:44:11PM +0100, Armando Visconti wrote:
On 11/29/2012 12:04 PM, Armando VISCONTI wrote:
This patch keeps disabled the strict alignment CP15 bit
On 12/03/2012 06:46 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:25:53PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:44:11PM +0100, Armando Visconti wrote:
On 11/29/2012 12:04 PM, Armando VISCONTI wrote:
This patch keeps disabled the strict alignment CP15 bit
On 11/29/2012 12:04 PM, Armando VISCONTI wrote:
This patch keeps disabled the strict alignment CP15 bit for
all armv6 and armv7 processor without the mmu. This behaviour
is now same as in the mmu case.
Signed-off-by: Armando Visconti
---
arch/arm/kernel/head-nommu.S |2 +-
1 files
On 11/29/2012 12:04 PM, Armando VISCONTI wrote:
This patch keeps disabled the strict alignment CP15 bit for
all armv6 and armv7 processor without the mmu. This behaviour
is now same as in the mmu case.
Signed-off-by: Armando Viscontiarmando.visco...@st.com
---
arch/arm/kernel/head-nommu.S
This patch keeps disabled the strict alignment CP15 bit for
all armv6 and armv7 processor without the mmu. This behaviour
is now same as in the mmu case.
Signed-off-by: Armando Visconti
---
arch/arm/kernel/head-nommu.S |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
This patch keeps disabled the strict alignment CP15 bit for
all armv6 and armv7 processor without the mmu. This behaviour
is now same as in the mmu case.
Signed-off-by: Armando Visconti armando.visco...@st.com
---
arch/arm/kernel/head-nommu.S |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1
12 matches
Mail list logo
