Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc2

Its a T41 "without p" :) On Apr 8, 2005 9:09 PM, Nish Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 7, 2005 11:28 PM, AsterixTheGaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > FWIW, I have the same problem on a T41p with 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2, > > > exce

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc2

RADEON_DEVICE_ID=4c66 RADEON_DISP_MISC_CNTL=5b300600 RADEON_GPIO_MONID= RADEON_GPIO_MONIDB=0300 RADEON_GPIO_CRT2_DDC=0300 RADEON_GPIO_DVI_DDC=0013 RADEON_GPIO_VGA_DDC=0003 RADEON_LVDS_GEN_CNTL=003dffa1 On Apr 8, 2005 12:09 PM, AsterixTheGaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc2

Err... never mind... I was not doing any radeon control. On Apr 8, 2005 11:58 AM, AsterixTheGaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FWIW, I have the same problem on a T41p with 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2, > > except that neither returns from suspend-to-ram with video restored on > &

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc2

> FWIW, I have the same problem on a T41p with 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2, > except that neither returns from suspend-to-ram with video restored on > the LCD. I believe I was able to get video restored on an external CRT > in either 2.6.12-rc2 or 2.6.12-rc2-mm1, but the LCD still didn't > restore (can

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc2

FWIW, I have the same problem on a T41p with 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2, except that neither returns from suspend-to-ram with video restored on the LCD. I believe I was able to get video restored on an external CRT in either 2.6.12-rc2 or 2.6.12-rc2-mm1, but the LCD still didn't restore (can

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc2

Err... never mind... I was not doing any radeon control. On Apr 8, 2005 11:58 AM, AsterixTheGaul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, I have the same problem on a T41p with 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2, except that neither returns from suspend-to-ram with video restored on the LCD. I believe I was able

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc2

RADEON_DISP_MISC_CNTL=5b300600 RADEON_GPIO_MONID= RADEON_GPIO_MONIDB=0300 RADEON_GPIO_CRT2_DDC=0300 RADEON_GPIO_DVI_DDC=0013 RADEON_GPIO_VGA_DDC=0003 RADEON_LVDS_GEN_CNTL=003dffa1 On Apr 8, 2005 12:09 PM, AsterixTheGaul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Err... never mind... I was not doing

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc2

Its a T41 without p :) On Apr 8, 2005 9:09 PM, Nish Aravamudan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 7, 2005 11:28 PM, AsterixTheGaul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, I have the same problem on a T41p with 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2, except that neither returns from suspend-to-ram with video restored

Re: [PATCH][RFC] disable built-in modules V2

Hi, > -#define module_init(x) __initcall(x); > +#define module_init(x) __initcall(x); __module_init_disable(x); It would be better if there is brackets around them... like #define module_init(x) { __initcall(x); __module_init_disable(x); } then we know it wont break some code like if (..)

Re: [PATCH][RFC] disable built-in modules V2

Hi, -#define module_init(x) __initcall(x); +#define module_init(x) __initcall(x); __module_init_disable(x); It would be better if there is brackets around them... like #define module_init(x) { __initcall(x); __module_init_disable(x); } then we know it wont break some code like if (..)