Shawn Starr wrote:
>Section:
>7.6 You forgot to run LILO, or system doesn't boot at all
>
>You might want to update the following line:
>
>"Using LILO with big drives (more than 1024 cylinders) can cause problems.
>See the LILO mini-HOWTO or documentation for help on that."
>
>This isn't true
Shawn Starr wrote:
Section:
7.6 You forgot to run LILO, or system doesn't boot at all
You might want to update the following line:
Using LILO with big drives (more than 1024 cylinders) can cause problems.
See the LILO mini-HOWTO or documentation for help on that.
This isn't true anymore
Paul Mundt wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 04:50:44PM -0700, Ben Ford wrote:
>
>>Name a single tech company anywhere in the world that doesn't have to
>>deal with microsoftisms.
>>
>This depends on your definition of dealing with MSisms. If you mean having a
>co
>
>
>It's hard to understand the point of such arguments. Surely you shouldn't
>be upset at someone for providing you the best option you have, should you?
>
The point is they aren't offering the best solution! They are taking
away all others! That is why people dislike the company.
-b
--
Jesse Pollard wrote:
>On Sun, 01 Jul 2001, Jesse Pollard wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 01 Jul 2001, Kurt Maxwell Weber wrote:
>>
>>>I'll just have to decide which I value more. As long as I won't be killed
>>>for using a different OS, I still have a choice.
>>>
>>No, but you might be forced out of a job.
Paul Mundt wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:35:24PM -0400, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
>
>>So as a user you are free to not use M$ products.
>>What if you are IT. Then you do not have a choice.
>>
>You always have a choice, work elsewhere. If you're in a position where you're
>working with MS
Paul Mundt wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:35:24PM -0400, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
So as a user you are free to not use M$ products.
What if you are IT. Then you do not have a choice.
You always have a choice, work elsewhere. If you're in a position where you're
working with MS products, you
Jesse Pollard wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2001, Jesse Pollard wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2001, Kurt Maxwell Weber wrote:
I'll just have to decide which I value more. As long as I won't be killed
for using a different OS, I still have a choice.
No, but you might be forced out of a job.
Apologies for
It's hard to understand the point of such arguments. Surely you shouldn't
be upset at someone for providing you the best option you have, should you?
The point is they aren't offering the best solution! They are taking
away all others! That is why people dislike the company.
-b
--
:
Paul Mundt wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 04:50:44PM -0700, Ben Ford wrote:
Name a single tech company anywhere in the world that doesn't have to
deal with microsoftisms.
This depends on your definition of dealing with MSisms. If you mean having a
copy of an MS product physically present
David Woodhouse wrote:
>
>Also consider the question "What was the last thing you see on screen
>before it reboots?"
>
USER: A bunch of words.
TECH: What words?
USER: Dunno, there were a lot though.
;)
-b
--
:__o
: -\<,
: 0/ 0
---
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
David Woodhouse wrote:
Also consider the question What was the last thing you see on screen
before it reboots?
USER: A bunch of words.
TECH: What words?
USER: Dunno, there were a lot though.
;)
-b
--
:__o
: -\,
: 0/ 0
---
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 02:20:16AM -0700, Ben Ford wrote:
>
>>Feature. It actually makes it quite nice when you want to allow
>>chrooted user(s) access to a common directory, you just mount a
>>partition in all the users home dirs.
>>
>
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 02:20:16AM -0700, Ben Ford wrote:
Feature. It actually makes it quite nice when you want to allow
chrooted user(s) access to a common directory, you just mount a
partition in all the users home dirs.
For security, this can be a bad idea.
'tis
Rick Hohensee wrote:
>>desktops to worry about. Desktops are an application, not part of Linux at all
>>It is becoming better for the administrator. As better desktops are developed,
>>it is becoming for "user friendly".
>>
>
>Thanks for replying civilly to something you clearly don't agree
Marty Leisner wrote:
>
>/dev/hda10 on /mnt type ext2 (rw)
>/dev/hda10 on /home type ext2 (rw)
>
>
>Is this a feature or a bug?
>
Feature. It actually makes it quite nice when you want to allow
chrooted user(s) access to a common directory, you just mount a
partition in all the users home
Marty Leisner wrote:
/dev/hda10 on /mnt type ext2 (rw)
/dev/hda10 on /home type ext2 (rw)
Is this a feature or a bug?
Feature. It actually makes it quite nice when you want to allow
chrooted user(s) access to a common directory, you just mount a
partition in all the users home dirs.
-b
Rick Hohensee wrote:
desktops to worry about. Desktops are an application, not part of Linux at all
It is becoming better for the administrator. As better desktops are developed,
it is becoming for user friendly.
Thanks for replying civilly to something you clearly don't agree with.
Basically,
Miles Lane wrote:
>http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2777283,00.html
>
[ . . . ]
>
>BillG -- We keep making it easier and easier, and anything people want source
>code for, we'll figure out a way to get it to them. It's kind of a strange
>thing in a way because most commercial
Miles Lane wrote:
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2777283,00.html
[ . . . ]
BillG -- We keep making it easier and easier, and anything people want source
code for, we'll figure out a way to get it to them. It's kind of a strange
thing in a way because most commercial customers
Mike Castle wrote:
>On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:29:17AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>
>>distributions). 18 months is more realistic for it to be deployed
>>widely enough.
>>
>
>People who are going to be savvy enough to install a development 2.5.*
>kernel that is defining a new configuration
Mike Castle wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:29:17AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
distributions). 18 months is more realistic for it to be deployed
widely enough.
People who are going to be savvy enough to install a development 2.5.*
kernel that is defining a new configuration utility are
Alan Cox wrote:
>>Second, how many kernels does Redhat ship in order to have one for
>>386/486/586/k6/Athlon . . . .
>>Quite a pain in the ass. And look at how much shit has to be built in
>>in order to get a kernel that works for everybody! People bitch at
>>Microsoft for doing it, then
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>>[about Aunt Tullie]
>>Because, for example, a kernel compile can be a part of the standard
>>install now, and you will end up with a kernel built specifically for
>>your machine that doesn't print 50 initialization failed messages on boot.
>>[...]
>>And you can also now
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
[about Aunt Tullie]
Because, for example, a kernel compile can be a part of the standard
install now, and you will end up with a kernel built specifically for
your machine that doesn't print 50 initialization failed messages on boot.
[...]
And you can also now run a kernel
Alan Cox wrote:
Second, how many kernels does Redhat ship in order to have one for
386/486/586/k6/Athlon . . . .
Quite a pain in the ass. And look at how much shit has to be built in
in order to get a kernel that works for everybody! People bitch at
Microsoft for doing it, then turn around
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>"Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
>
>>
>>an old interface in amber do anything to explore new UI possibilities?
>>
>
>kernel != GUI
>
UI != GUI
--
"One trend that bothers me is the glorification of
stupidity, that the media is reassuring people it's
alright not to know
Charles Cazabon wrote:
>Eric S. Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>>Aunt Tillie doesn't even know what a kernel is, nor does she want
>>>to. I think it's fair to assume that people who configure and
>>>compile their own kernel (as opposed to using
Charles Cazabon wrote:
Eric S. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aunt Tillie doesn't even know what a kernel is, nor does she want
to. I think it's fair to assume that people who configure and
compile their own kernel (as opposed to using the distribution
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
an old interface in amber do anything to explore new UI possibilities?
kernel != GUI
UI != GUI
--
One trend that bothers me is the glorification of
stupidity, that the media is reassuring people it's
alright not to know anything. That to
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>Larry McVoy wrote:
>
>>On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:33:57PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>
>>>Larry McVoy wrote:
>>>
>Because your original post was "yeah, Bitkeeper is a memory hog but you
>can get really cheap non-ECC RAM so just stuff your system with crappy
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Larry McVoy wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:33:57PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Larry McVoy wrote:
Because your original post was yeah, Bitkeeper is a memory hog but you
can get really cheap non-ECC RAM so just stuff your system with crappy
RAM and be happy.
I wasn't
Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
>Hey, this is cool.
>
>How far away is the capability to "teleport" processes from one machine to
>another over the network? Think of the uptime!
>
It is here. Look at Mosix.
--
I'd rather listen to Newton than to Mundie [MS flunkie who made a speech on
the
Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
Hey, this is cool.
How far away is the capability to teleport processes from one machine to
another over the network? Think of the uptime!
It is here. Look at Mosix.
--
I'd rather listen to Newton than to Mundie [MS flunkie who made a speech on
the evil-ness
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
>>Hence, Microsoft Windows. It might not be stable, it might not be fast, it
>>might not do RAID, packet-filtering and SQL, but it does a job. A simple
>>job. To give Mum & Dad(tm) (with apologies to maddog) a chance to use
Tomas Telensky wrote:
>But, what I should say to the network security, is that AFAIK in the most
>of linux distributions the standard daemons (httpd, sendmail) are run as
>root! Having multi-user system or not! Why? For only listening to a port
><1024? Is there any elegant solution?
>
Yes,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Where does write support for NTFS stand at the moment? I noticed that it's
>still marked "Dangerous" in the kernel configuration. This is important to me
>because it looks like I'll have to start using it next week. My office laptop
>is going to be "upgraded" from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where does write support for NTFS stand at the moment? I noticed that it's
still marked "Dangerous" in the kernel configuration. This is important to me
because it looks like I'll have to start using it next week. My office laptop
is going to be "upgraded" from
Randolph Bentson wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 05:45:31PM -0700, Miles Lane wrote:
>
>>There is one major shortcoming of the recordings.
>>Usually, only the comments of the presenter(s)
>>can be heard.
>>
>
>I've heard of conferences where a wireless audience
>microphone was put inside a Nerf
Simon Richter wrote:
>On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
>>>Then a more general user space tool could be used that would do policy
>>>appropriate stuff, ending with init 0.
>>>
>>init _is_ the tool which is right for defining policy on such issues.
>>
>>Take a look how UPS managment is
Simon Richter wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Pavel Machek wrote:
Then a more general user space tool could be used that would do policy
appropriate stuff, ending with init 0.
init _is_ the tool which is right for defining policy on such issues.
Take a look how UPS managment is handled.
A power
Randolph Bentson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 05:45:31PM -0700, Miles Lane wrote:
There is one major shortcoming of the recordings.
Usually, only the comments of the presenter(s)
can be heard.
I've heard of conferences where a wireless audience
microphone was put inside a Nerf ball. It
john slee wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 07:07:20PM -0700, Colonel wrote:
>
>> Some ISPs rely on crap software & OS to process email, and have other
>
>
> so you don't use those ISPs
Some people don't have a choice of ISPs. Some people are lucky if they
can even *get* dial-up.
-b
-
john slee wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 07:07:20PM -0700, Colonel wrote:
Some ISPs rely on crap software OS to process email, and have other
so you don't use those ISPs
Some people don't have a choice of ISPs. Some people are lucky if they
can even *get* dial-up.
-b
-
To
J . A . Magallon wrote:
> On 04.03 Ben Ford wrote:
>
>> J . A . Magallon wrote:
>>
>>> If this has not been done for System.map, that is a much more important
>>> info for debug and oops, and the de facto standard is to put it aside
>>> kernel
Giuliano Pochini wrote:
>> I just got 2.4.3 up a running (on Abit BP6 Dual Celeron ) and
>> it reorderd my SCSI id's. Take a look. I don't like that my ZIP drive
>> becomes sda because if I ever remove it then I'll @#$% my harddrive dev
>> mappings again and have to change them again. Adaptec
J . A . Magallon wrote:
> On 04.03 David Lang wrote:
>
>> if the distro/sysadmin _always_ installs the kernel the 'right way' then
>> the difference isn't nessasarily that large, but if you want reliability
>> on any system it may be worth loosing a page or so of memory (hasn't
>> someone said
J . A . Magallon wrote:
On 04.03 David Lang wrote:
if the distro/sysadmin _always_ installs the kernel the 'right way' then
the difference isn't nessasarily that large, but if you want reliability
on any system it may be worth loosing a page or so of memory (hasn't
someone said that the
Giuliano Pochini wrote:
I just got 2.4.3 up a running (on Abit BP6 Dual Celeron ) and
it reorderd my SCSI id's. Take a look. I don't like that my ZIP drive
becomes sda because if I ever remove it then I'll @#$% my harddrive dev
mappings again and have to change them again. Adaptec Driver
J . A . Magallon wrote:
On 04.03 Ben Ford wrote:
J . A . Magallon wrote:
If this has not been done for System.map, that is a much more important
info for debug and oops, and the de facto standard is to put it aside
kernel with some standadr naming, lets use the same method for config
What do people think about this?
-b
Original Message
Subject: [Copyright/Licensing] "Dual-copyright/licensing" of your IP
withOUT your permission
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 12:39:31 -0400
From: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What do people think about this?
-b
Original Message
Subject: [Copyright/Licensing] "Dual-copyright/licensing" of your IP
withOUT your permission
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 12:39:31 -0400
From: Bryan-TheBS-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why not have the /proc/config option but instead of being plain text,
make it binary with a userspace app that can interpret it?
It could have a signature as to kernel version + patches and the rest
would be just bits.
Instead of:
CONFIG_X86=y
CONFIG_ISA=y
# CONFIG_SBUS is not set
Chris Meadors wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, David Riley wrote:
>
>> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> Uhm, yeah... I don't know who wrote this, but it came from Washington
>> state and was written with MS Outlook... Something tells me that this
>> April Fool's joke wasn't Linus'. :-)
>
>
>
Chris Meadors wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, David Riley wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Uhm, yeah... I don't know who wrote this, but it came from Washington
state and was written with MS Outlook... Something tells me that this
April Fool's joke wasn't Linus'. :-)
Yeah, the quality
Why not have the /proc/config option but instead of being plain text,
make it binary with a userspace app that can interpret it?
It could have a signature as to kernel version + patches and the rest
would be just bits.
Instead of:
CONFIG_X86=y
CONFIG_ISA=y
# CONFIG_SBUS is not set
Simon Williams wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Olivier Galibert
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 03:04:46PM +0100, Simon Williams wrote:
>>
>>> I think their point was that a program could only change permissions
>>> of a file that was owned by the same owner.
Jesse Pollard wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
>> Well, why can't the ELF loader module/kernel detect or have some sort of
>> restriction on modifying other/ELF binaries including itself from changing
>> the Entry point?
>>
>> There has to be a way stop this. WHY would anyone
Jesse Pollard wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
Well, why can't the ELF loader module/kernel detect or have some sort of
restriction on modifying other/ELF binaries including itself from changing
the Entry point?
There has to be a way stop this. WHY would anyone want to
Simon Williams wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Olivier Galibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 03:04:46PM +0100, Simon Williams wrote:
I think their point was that a program could only change permissions
of a file that was owned by the same owner. If a file is
I believe this has more to do with how the author of cdrecord chose to
implement it rather than the kernel. Why don't you speak to him?
-b
Andreas Franck wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> after having "upgraded" (?) my distro from my wonderfully hand-configured
> Debian system (which I
What company was it that you worked for? I'm sure we could convince
them otherwise . . . .
-b
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:07:22AM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> I have just received notice that my machines will no longer be
>> provided access to "The
What company was it that you worked for? I'm sure we could convince
them otherwise . . . .
-b
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:07:22AM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
[snip]
I have just received notice that my machines will no longer be
provided access to "The
I believe this has more to do with how the author of cdrecord chose to
implement it rather than the kernel. Why don't you speak to him?
-b
Andreas Franck wrote:
Hello people,
after having "upgraded" (?) my distro from my wonderfully hand-configured
Debian system (which I unfortunately
This is forwarded from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. I think you
guys can answer this question better. Please cc: them in any replies.
-b
"Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" wrote:
> Hi ppl,
> i'm currently involved in the analisys of a compromised linux box.
> It was a IBM xSeries server.
>
> Actually, I think /etc/mtab is not needed at all. Originally, UNIX
> used to put as much onto the disk (and not in "core") as possible.
> so much state information related only to one boot-cycle was
> taken out of kernel and stored on disk. /var/run/utmp, /etc/mtab,
> , rmtab, and many
Actually, I think /etc/mtab is not needed at all. Originally, UNIX
used to put as much onto the disk (and not in "core") as possible.
so much state information related only to one boot-cycle was
taken out of kernel and stored on disk. /var/run/utmp, /etc/mtab,
, rmtab, and many others.
This is forwarded from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. I think you
guys can answer this question better. Please cc: them in any replies.
-b
"Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" wrote:
Hi ppl,
i'm currently involved in the analisys of a compromised linux box.
It was a IBM xSeries server.
I
>
> On the other hand, they make excellent mice. The mouse wheel and
> the new optical mice are truly innovative and Microsoft should be
> commended for them.
>
The wheel was a nifty idea, but I've seen workstations 15 years old with
optical mice. It wasn't MS's idea.
-b
-
To unsubscribe
Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote:
>> Speaking as a Linux _USER_, if this happens, can I get said print
>> engine working on my ARM machines with these closed source drivers?
>> Can Alpha users get this print system working? Can Sparc uses
>> get it working? What? I can't? They can't? Well, its no
Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote:
Speaking as a Linux _USER_, if this happens, can I get said print
engine working on my ARM machines with these closed source drivers?
Can Alpha users get this print system working? Can Sparc uses
get it working? What? I can't? They can't? Well, its no good to
On the other hand, they make excellent mice. The mouse wheel and
the new optical mice are truly innovative and Microsoft should be
commended for them.
The wheel was a nifty idea, but I've seen workstations 15 years old with
optical mice. It wasn't MS's idea.
-b
-
To unsubscribe from
Roger Larsson wrote:
> OK, you had to...
>
> I have not seen any emails from linux-kernel for some days.
> Even tried to resubscribe - Majordomo succeeded in sending me the Confirmation
>
> But nothing...
>
I must be getting all yours then!! Seriously, something's broke, I am getting
Roger Larsson wrote:
OK, you had to...
I have not seen any emails from linux-kernel for some days.
Even tried to resubscribe - Majordomo succeeded in sending me the Confirmation
But nothing...
I must be getting all yours then!! Seriously, something's broke, I am getting
duplicates of
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, James Sutherland wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Ben Ford wrote:
> > > David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, James Sutherland wrote:
>
> > For the end-user, the ability to see readings in other units would b
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, James Sutherland wrote:
>
> > For the end-user, the ability to see readings in other units would be
> > useful - how many people on this list work in litres/metres/kilometres,
> > and how many in gallons/feet/miles? Probably enough in both groups that
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, James Sutherland wrote:
For the end-user, the ability to see readings in other units would be
useful - how many people on this list work in litres/metres/kilometres,
and how many in gallons/feet/miles? Probably enough in both groups that
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, James Sutherland wrote:
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Ben Ford wrote:
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, James Sutherland wrote:
For the end-user, the ability to see readings in other units would be
useful - how many people on this list work
You are probably talking about an Xfree issue. And yes it can be done. I
know several people that do that. Refer to the XFree86 website.
-b
Dax Kelson wrote:
> My laptop has a touchpad builtin with two buttons, I also have an external
> PS2 and/or USB mouse (3 buttons with scroll wheel).
>
You are probably talking about an Xfree issue. And yes it can be done. I
know several people that do that. Refer to the XFree86 website.
-b
Dax Kelson wrote:
My laptop has a touchpad builtin with two buttons, I also have an external
PS2 and/or USB mouse (3 buttons with scroll wheel).
I
James Sutherland wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Ben Ford wrote:
>
> > James Sutherland wrote:
> >
> > > I'm sure we all know what the IETF is, and where ECN came from. I haven't
> > > seen anyone suggesting ignoring RST, either: DM just imagined that,
>
James Sutherland wrote:
> I'm sure we all know what the IETF is, and where ECN came from. I haven't
> seen anyone suggesting ignoring RST, either: DM just imagined that,
> AFAICS.
>
> The one point I would like to make, though, is that firewalls are NOT
> "brain-damaged" for blocking ECN:
James Sutherland wrote:
I'm sure we all know what the IETF is, and where ECN came from. I haven't
seen anyone suggesting ignoring RST, either: DM just imagined that,
AFAICS.
The one point I would like to make, though, is that firewalls are NOT
"brain-damaged" for blocking ECN: according to
James Sutherland wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Ben Ford wrote:
James Sutherland wrote:
I'm sure we all know what the IETF is, and where ECN came from. I haven't
seen anyone suggesting ignoring RST, either: DM just imagined that,
AFAICS.
The one point I would like to make
Mark I Manning IV wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think that your linux's partition has not been overwritten, but only the MBR
> > > > of your disk, so you probably just need to reinstall lilo. Insert your
> > > > installation bootdisk into your pc, then skip all the setup stuff, but the
> > > > choose
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> David Ford wrote:
> >
> > Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > > The ChangeLog may not be 100% complete. The physically big things are the
> > > PPC and ACPI updates, even if most people won't notice.
> > >
> > > Linus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > pre10:
> > > -
Jeff Garzik wrote:
David Ford wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
The ChangeLog may not be 100% complete. The physically big things are the
PPC and ACPI updates, even if most people won't notice.
Linus
pre10:
- got a few too-new R128 #defines in
Mark I Manning IV wrote:
I think that your linux's partition has not been overwritten, but only the MBR
of your disk, so you probably just need to reinstall lilo. Insert your
installation bootdisk into your pc, then skip all the setup stuff, but the
choose of the partition
Chris Lattner wrote:
> This email is here to announce the availability of a port of ORBit (the
> GNOME ORB) to the Linux kernel. This ORB, named kORBit, is available from
> our sourceforge web site (http://korbit.sourceforge.net/). A kernel ORB
> allows you to write kernel extensions in CORBA
Chris Lattner wrote:
This email is here to announce the availability of a port of ORBit (the
GNOME ORB) to the Linux kernel. This ORB, named kORBit, is available from
our sourceforge web site (http://korbit.sourceforge.net/). A kernel ORB
allows you to write kernel extensions in CORBA and
Ya, I also had a system that ran many OS's great, including Linux, Win98,
Win2k, etc. However when I went to install NT on it, the CPU overheated
every time. Ya, I know, doesn't make sense, but that's how it was.
-b
John Jasen wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
>
> >
Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> 3) edit /etc/ftpusers to allow root ftp
>
> 4) edit /etc/pam.d/login and /etc/pam.d/rlogin to comment out securetty
> PAM module (so we can telnet as root on _any_ tty)
Not into security are you?
-b
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Tigran Aivazian wrote:
snip
3) edit /etc/ftpusers to allow root ftp
4) edit /etc/pam.d/login and /etc/pam.d/rlogin to comment out securetty
PAM module (so we can telnet as root on _any_ tty)
Not into security are you?
-b
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Ya, I also had a system that ran many OS's great, including Linux, Win98,
Win2k, etc. However when I went to install NT on it, the CPU overheated
every time. Ya, I know, doesn't make sense, but that's how it was.
-b
John Jasen wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:
(4)
Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Christer Weinigel wrote:
>
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> > >On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, David Lang wrote:
> > >> > there is a rootkit kernel module out there that, if loaded onto your
> > >>
Christer Weinigel wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
> >> On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, David Lang wrote:
> >> > there is a rootkit kernel module out there that, if loaded onto your
> >> > system, can make it almost impossible to detect that
Christer Weinigel wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, David Lang wrote:
there is a rootkit kernel module out there that, if loaded onto your
system, can make it almost impossible to detect that your system has
Alexander Viro wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Christer Weinigel wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, David Lang wrote:
there is a rootkit kernel module out there that, if loaded onto your
system, can make it
Here is lspci output from the laptop in question. Is this not UHCI?
[ben@Juanita ben]$ /sbin/lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX Host bridge (rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX AGP bridge (rev 03)
00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel
Here is lspci output from the laptop in question. Is this not UHCI?
[ben@Juanita ben]$ /sbin/lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX Host bridge (rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX AGP bridge (rev 03)
00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
