Hello.
I was performing some benchmarks of http transfer with program 'ab'
(apache benchmark), comparing, how it will perform with/without
kernel khttpd support.
I've got oops several times, the error is replicable on my machine,
without appache even started.
The exact order of actions i
Hello.
I was performing some benchmarks of http transfer with program 'ab'
(apache benchmark), comparing, how it will perform with/without
kernel khttpd support.
I've got oops several times, the error is replicable on my machine,
without appache even started.
The exact order of actions i
> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -02
> -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=i486 -c -o init/main.o
> init/main.c
> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -02
> fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
> If you have a serial console on the server, you can get sysrq by
> sending a serial break followed by the character.
Hi,
i've tried it with minicom and functioned : ctrl+a+F and key for function
as in normal sysrq.
This approach will probably not help you a lot thought, since you wouldn't
Hi Nathan,
I've just made an experimental module which offers syscall to privileged
process, which internally translates itself into real sysrq handler
(handle_sysrq) defined in drivers/char/sysrq.c. It occupates itself
one of unussed linux system calls (concretely stty - no. 31).
Makefile
> It is a very good idea, and to implement quite easy. You just do have to
> diff between three types of video cards (MDA, MGA and HGC vs. CGA and AGA vs. EGA+).
> Then you do direct register writes. For the HGC I did it recently in a DOS proggy
> which switched from text to gfx and back. I had a
>You could even set sysvinit
> to run it when you press a certain key combo.
You mean inittab & kbrequest ? I didn't know about this. Must have a look
at some documentation, manpage didn't help me a lot.
Besides, you have very interesting name/domain, cheaf of bandits !!
Some stupid questions about videomem:
1) How do 2 or more X servers, or svgalibbed apps share the same physical video
memory ? Does it get saved to ram when switching between them ?
2) Does console switching (gfx or text) save and restore all registers of
videocard in kernel ? Or kernel only
Some stupid questions about videomem:
1) How do 2 or more X servers, or svgalibbed apps share the same physical video
memory ? Does it get saved to ram when switching between them ?
2) Does console switching (gfx or text) save and restore all registers of
videocard in kernel ? Or kernel only
It is a very good idea, and to implement quite easy. You just do have to
diff between three types of video cards (MDA, MGA and HGC vs. CGA and AGA vs. EGA+).
Then you do direct register writes. For the HGC I did it recently in a DOS proggy
which switched from text to gfx and back. I had a TSR
If you have a serial console on the server, you can get sysrq by
sending a serial break followed by the character.
Hi,
i've tried it with minicom and functioned : ctrl+a+F and key for function
as in normal sysrq.
This approach will probably not help you a lot thought, since you wouldn't
Hi Nathan,
I've just made an experimental module which offers syscall to privileged
process, which internally translates itself into real sysrq handler
(handle_sysrq) defined in drivers/char/sysrq.c. It occupates itself
one of unussed linux system calls (concretely stty - no. 31).
Makefile
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -02
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=i486 -c -o init/main.o
init/main.c
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -02
fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
Unfortunately,
> the only one that responds is sysrq-b, which boots the box without
> syncing or unmounting the disks. Not only does that piss me off but it's
> led to some fs corruption as well (which pisses me off even more). sysrq-b
> is the *only* combination I can get working when this
Unfortunately,
the only one that responds is sysrq-b, which boots the box without
syncing or unmounting the disks. Not only does that piss me off but it's
led to some fs corruption as well (which pisses me off even more). sysrq-b
is the *only* combination I can get working when this
Hi.
I managed fullowing situation: user with no ulimits will run script like
this:
#! /usr/bin/perl
while (1)
{
fork();
};
on say tty2. The processes get created pretty fast. After a short while
I supposed a single solution to this to kill all session by alt+sysrq+k,
but nothing happened.
Hi.
I managed fullowing situation: user with no ulimits will run script like
this:
#! /usr/bin/perl
while (1)
{
fork();
};
on say tty2. The processes get created pretty fast. After a short while
I supposed a single solution to this to kill all session by alt+sysrq+k,
but nothing happened.
Hello anybody.
Today i applied A.COX's patch 2.4.2-ac23 on 2.4.0 kernel previsiously patched
with 2.4.1 and 2.4.2 patches.
Before everything used to compile well, but with this patch i get this
error message:
setup.c: In function `identify_cpu':
setup.c:2280: `tsc_disable' undeclared (first
Hello anybody.
Today i applied A.COX's patch 2.4.2-ac23 on 2.4.0 kernel previsiously patched
with 2.4.1 and 2.4.2 patches.
Before everything used to compile well, but with this patch i get this
error message:
setup.c: In function `identify_cpu':
setup.c:2280: `tsc_disable' undeclared (first
Hello,
try resize2fs from e2fsprogs package. B.
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
Hello,
try resize2fs from e2fsprogs package. B.
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 11:44:52PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, William T Wilson wrote:
>
> > it seems to me that in 2.2.x it looks like this:
> >
> > total usage == swap + RAM
> > under 2.4.x it looks like:
> > total usage == swap
>
> total usage == maximum(swap, ram)
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 11:44:52PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, William T Wilson wrote:
it seems to me that in 2.2.x it looks like this:
total usage == swap + RAM
under 2.4.x it looks like:
total usage == swap
total usage == maximum(swap, ram)
Hi,
Do you in
23 matches
Mail list logo
