On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:22:50PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hi
>
> > > > Should all this cache usage not be counted towards the
> > > > 'Cached' entry in meminfo rather then getting counted as part of used
> > > > ram.
> > >
> > > Cached is only the page-cache, not all the other caches
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:21:51PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > If that's the case it would seem to be somewhat of a pain to get and
> > kind of out of left field as I'd say most people would expect MemFree to
> > indicate the amount of memory that's no longer freely available
> > (ignoring
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:07:12PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:40 +1100, CaT wrote:
> > > How much memory does:
> > >
> > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> > >
> > > gain you?
> >
> > 56M used n
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:22:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 17:34 +1100, CaT wrote:
> > cache). During the rsync the memory used grew to just shy of 1.6gig and
> > now, about 2 hours after the rsync has well and truly finished, the used
> >
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:22:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 17:34 +1100, CaT wrote:
cache). During the rsync the memory used grew to just shy of 1.6gig and
now, about 2 hours after the rsync has well and truly finished, the used
memory is at 1.23gig. This is what
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:07:12PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:40 +1100, CaT wrote:
How much memory does:
echo 3 /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
gain you?
56M used now.
Good :-)
Indeed. :)
Should all this cache usage not be counted towards
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:21:51PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
If that's the case it would seem to be somewhat of a pain to get and
kind of out of left field as I'd say most people would expect MemFree to
indicate the amount of memory that's no longer freely available
(ignoring swapping
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:22:50PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
Hi
Should all this cache usage not be counted towards the
'Cached' entry in meminfo rather then getting counted as part of used
ram.
Cached is only the page-cache, not all the other caches we have..
This
Not sure where to begin so here goes anway. Today I did an rsync backup
of a server with 2million+ files. Before doing so the used memory on the
server this was initiated from was under 200meg (excluding buffers and
cache). During the rsync the memory used grew to just shy of 1.6gig and
now, about
Not sure where to begin so here goes anway. Today I did an rsync backup
of a server with 2million+ files. Before doing so the used memory on the
server this was initiated from was under 200meg (excluding buffers and
cache). During the rsync the memory used grew to just shy of 1.6gig and
now, about
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:15:16AM +1100, CaT wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:20:58PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > CaT wrote:
> > > Not sure what other info to provide
> >
> > Is the bug present in 2.6.24-rc7?
>
> Can't rightly say. I didn'
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:15:16AM +1100, CaT wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:20:58PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
CaT wrote:
Not sure what other info to provide
Is the bug present in 2.6.24-rc7?
Can't rightly say. I didn't try it before because 2.6.23 fails to
compile under
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:20:58PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> CaT wrote:
> > Not sure what other info to provide
>
> Is the bug present in 2.6.24-rc7?
Can't rightly say. I didn't try it before because 2.6.23 fails to
compile under debian sarge. 2.6.24-rc7 did compile bu
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 07:12:33PM +1100, CaT wrote:
> I recently upgraded from an amd 64bit system to an intel one and changed my
> kernekl accordingly. Everything's great except this:
>
> root 6 0.0 0.0 00 ?D< 17:11 0:00 [migration/1]
> root
I recently upgraded from an amd 64bit system to an intel one and changed my
kernekl accordingly. Everything's great except this:
root 6 0.0 0.0 00 ?D< 17:11 0:00 [migration/1]
root 7 0.0 0.0 00 ?D< 17:11 0:00 [ksoftirqd/1]
root
I recently upgraded from an amd 64bit system to an intel one and changed my
kernekl accordingly. Everything's great except this:
root 6 0.0 0.0 00 ?D 17:11 0:00 [migration/1]
root 7 0.0 0.0 00 ?D 17:11 0:00 [ksoftirqd/1]
root 8
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 07:12:33PM +1100, CaT wrote:
I recently upgraded from an amd 64bit system to an intel one and changed my
kernekl accordingly. Everything's great except this:
root 6 0.0 0.0 00 ?D 17:11 0:00 [migration/1]
root 7 0.0 0.0 0
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:20:58PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
CaT wrote:
Not sure what other info to provide
Is the bug present in 2.6.24-rc7?
Can't rightly say. I didn't try it before because 2.6.23 fails to
compile under debian sarge. 2.6.24-rc7 did compile but it has failed to
come
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:44:54PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> For some reason old binutils genertate larger headers so
> increase the text offset of the vdso to avoid linker errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
> arch/x86_64/vdso/voffset.h |2 +-
> 1 file
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:44:54PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
For some reason old binutils genertate larger headers so
increase the text offset of the vdso to avoid linker errors.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/x86_64/vdso/voffset.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 04:20:58PM +0200, DervishD wrote:
> This said, I know that the console will give me no problems
> regarding character representantion (heck, I'm pretty sure that I will
> be able to use even the same font I'm using right now in the console if
> I get the proper unicode
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 04:20:58PM +0200, DervishD wrote:
This said, I know that the console will give me no problems
regarding character representantion (heck, I'm pretty sure that I will
be able to use even the same font I'm using right now in the console if
I get the proper unicode
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 03:53:19PM +0200, J??rn Engel wrote:
> Imo they all suck. LogFS also sucks, but it allows me to make a stupid
> joke and keep my logfs.org domain.
Well if stupid jokes are a goer there's always gordonfs. :)
*hides*
--
"To the extent that we overreact, we proffer
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:50:03PM +0200, J??rn Engel wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2007 12:34:34 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> >
> > But if akpm can't pronounce it, how about FFFS for faster flash
> > filesystem ;-)
>
> How many of you have worked for IBM before? Vowels are not evil. ;)
>
>
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:50:03PM +0200, J??rn Engel wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2007 12:34:34 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
But if akpm can't pronounce it, how about FFFS for faster flash
filesystem ;-)
How many of you have worked for IBM before? Vowels are not evil. ;)
Grouping four
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 03:53:19PM +0200, J??rn Engel wrote:
Imo they all suck. LogFS also sucks, but it allows me to make a stupid
joke and keep my logfs.org domain.
Well if stupid jokes are a goer there's always gordonfs. :)
*hides*
--
To the extent that we overreact, we proffer the
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:53:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > # cat /sys/class/power\ supply/
> > ac/ main-battery/ usb/
>
> Um, shouldn't that be an error? Isn't /sys/class/power\ supply/ a
> directory?
I think that's more of a case of:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:53:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
# cat /sys/class/power\ supply/
ac/ main-battery/ usb/
Um, shouldn't that be an error? Isn't /sys/class/power\ supply/ a
directory?
I think that's more of a case of:
cat /sys/class/power\ supply
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 12:10:51PM -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 17:20 -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
>
> > I also like Andi's idea of using change_page_attr() to isolate the
> > problem. I'll try to send you a debug patch in the next few days to try
> > that out. Thanks.
>
>
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 12:10:51PM -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 17:20 -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
I also like Andi's idea of using change_page_attr() to isolate the
problem. I'll try to send you a debug patch in the next few days to try
that out. Thanks.
Here's the
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 04:18:24PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > Apr 11 22:14:02 ' eth0:220898233988841368 66750274000 0
> > > 0 86458738 52386430545 101089219 19931300 0 199313
> > > 0 '
>
> > > Apr 11 22:15:02 ' eth0:17227454818 81381144
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:13:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:43:19 +1000 CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I take minute by minute snapshots of network traffic by sampling
> > /proc/net/dev and most of the time everything works fine. Occas
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:13:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:43:19 +1000 CaT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take minute by minute snapshots of network traffic by sampling
/proc/net/dev and most of the time everything works fine. Occasionally
though I get petabyte byte
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 04:18:24PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
Apr 11 22:14:02 ' eth0:220898233988841368 66750274000 0
0 86458738 52386430545 101089219 19931300 0 199313
0 '
Apr 11 22:15:02 ' eth0:17227454818 81381144000
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:34:44PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I haven't seen any 200GB for $55 yet, more like $129 & maybe a rebate at
> Circuit City. We don't have a Fry's around here.
Wow. 200GB HDs can be had for AUD91 here. I think you need to shop
around. The internet can be your friend.
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:34:44PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
I haven't seen any 200GB for $55 yet, more like $129 maybe a rebate at
Circuit City. We don't have a Fry's around here.
Wow. 200GB HDs can be had for AUD91 here. I think you need to shop
around. The internet can be your friend. :)
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:13:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:43:19 +1000 CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I take minute by minute snapshots of network traffic by sampling
> > /proc/net/dev and most of the time everything works fine. Occas
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:13:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:43:19 +1000 CaT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take minute by minute snapshots of network traffic by sampling
/proc/net/dev and most of the time everything works fine. Occasionally
though I get petabyte byte
I take minute by minute snapshots of network traffic by sampling
/proc/net/dev and most of the time everything works fine. Occasionally
though I get petabyte byte traffic and corresponding packet traffic.
This happens on an AMD64, dual core smp box with Broadcom NetXtreme II
nics. The issue
I take minute by minute snapshots of network traffic by sampling
/proc/net/dev and most of the time everything works fine. Occasionally
though I get petabyte byte traffic and corresponding packet traffic.
This happens on an AMD64, dual core smp box with Broadcom NetXtreme II
nics. The issue
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:33:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 13:44 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > > [227523.229557] hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache,
> > > CHS=24321/255/63, BUG
>
> Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
>
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:33:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 13:44 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
[227523.229557] hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache,
CHS=24321/255/63, BUG
Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
should be
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:33:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> What does a full identify data set for the drive look like ?
Here it is for the two drives. Please note that multisect was turned on
manually as well as the security freeze.
/dev/hda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:08:42PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> CaT wrote:
> >1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
> > seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
> >2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in Andrew Mortons mm patchset.
> > It l
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:08:42PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
CaT wrote:
1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in Andrew Mortons mm patchset.
It lived a brief but noted life before
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:33:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
What does a full identify data set for the drive look like ?
Here it is for the two drives. Please note that multisect was turned on
manually as well as the security freeze.
/dev/hda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model
Having an IDE card with one of these chipsets has left me with a bit of
a quandry. I've seen 2 different patch, both seemingly not going
anywhere.
1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in
Having an IDE card with one of these chipsets has left me with a bit of
a quandry. I've seen 2 different patch, both seemingly not going
anywhere.
1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 09:21:46AM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> we have the aggregated blogs of :
> Alan Cox, Dave Airlie, Dave Jones, David Woodhouse, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
I think a link to the corresponding blog of Telsa as a sort of
behind-the-scenes, making of blog might be fun. ;)
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 09:21:46AM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
we have the aggregated blogs of :
Alan Cox, Dave Airlie, Dave Jones, David Woodhouse, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
I think a link to the corresponding blog of Telsa as a sort of
behind-the-scenes, making of blog might be fun. ;)
--
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 08:58:15AM -0600, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
> > If it bound to :: port 22 then 0.0.0.0:22 would fail.
> >
> > On the other hand if I got it to bind to each address individually then
> > both ipv4 (2 addresses) and ipv6 (1 address) binds would succeed.
> >
> >
I just had some issues with ssh and trying to get it to bind to all ipv6
and ipv4 addresses to it via :: and 0.0.0.0. The problem was that it'd
only let one succeed. If 0.0.0.0:22 was successful then :: port 22 could
not happen and neither could my ipv6 addy port 22 as it would get the
'address
I just had some issues with ssh and trying to get it to bind to all ipv6
and ipv4 addresses to it via :: and 0.0.0.0. The problem was that it'd
only let one succeed. If 0.0.0.0:22 was successful then :: port 22 could
not happen and neither could my ipv6 addy port 22 as it would get the
'address
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 08:58:15AM -0600, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
If it bound to :: port 22 then 0.0.0.0:22 would fail.
On the other hand if I got it to bind to each address individually then
both ipv4 (2 addresses) and ipv6 (1 address) binds would succeed.
Maybe I'm
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:51:35PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Iau, 2005-03-10 at 12:28, CaT wrote:
> > hda: max request size: 128KiB
> > hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=24321/255/63, BUG
> > hda: cache flushes not supported
> > hda:h
Well I got my ITE8212 today (only ordered it last night - whee) and here
are the happy fun results. Basically the card shoved itself to the front
of the queue, gave some weird errors on bootup and had no multisec set
on the drives attached to it. I can boot the machine though and am using
it right
Well I got my ITE8212 today (only ordered it last night - whee) and here
are the happy fun results. Basically the card shoved itself to the front
of the queue, gave some weird errors on bootup and had no multisec set
on the drives attached to it. I can boot the machine though and am using
it right
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:51:35PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Iau, 2005-03-10 at 12:28, CaT wrote:
hda: max request size: 128KiB
hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=24321/255/63, BUG
hda: cache flushes not supported
hda:hda: recal_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:43:02PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:38:43 +, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mer, 2005-03-09 at 16:26, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > It can be merged if somebody fix it to always force controller into
> > >
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:43:02PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:38:43 +, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mer, 2005-03-09 at 16:26, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
It can be merged if somebody fix it to always force controller into
non-RAID mode
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:34:22PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> For a couple of reasons I've not yet merged Greg's 2.6.11.1 yet but this
> diff should actually apply to either right now.
>
> 2.6.11-ac1
> o Fix jbd race in ext3(Stephen Tweedie)
>
> Carried over from
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:34:22PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
For a couple of reasons I've not yet merged Greg's 2.6.11.1 yet but this
diff should actually apply to either right now.
2.6.11-ac1
o Fix jbd race in ext3(Stephen Tweedie)
Carried over from 2.6.10-ac
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:44:16PM +1100, CaT wrote:
> The problems were weird. The fs I was copying from decided it was
> corrupt. Unmounting the partition and trying an fsck reported that it
> couldn't find the partition. After a reboot all was well and a fsck
> reported no proble
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:44:04AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Gwe, 2005-03-04 at 00:19, CaT wrote:
> > Working IDE locking? Does this mean if I have 2 promise cards, a HD
> > on each card and I copy from one to the other it wont all blow up in my
> > face?
>
> Depen
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:51:42PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> -ac is essentially base security fixes + working IDE locking + pwc +
> fixes for the bugs everyone hit that needed fixing urgently. I consider
> working locking on my storage essential because I like my data to still
> be there.
Working
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:44:16PM +1100, CaT wrote:
The problems were weird. The fs I was copying from decided it was
corrupt. Unmounting the partition and trying an fsck reported that it
couldn't find the partition. After a reboot all was well and a fsck
reported no problems.
Similar stuff
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:51:42PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
-ac is essentially base security fixes + working IDE locking + pwc +
fixes for the bugs everyone hit that needed fixing urgently. I consider
working locking on my storage essential because I like my data to still
be there.
Working IDE
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:44:04AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Gwe, 2005-03-04 at 00:19, CaT wrote:
Working IDE locking? Does this mean if I have 2 promise cards, a HD
on each card and I copy from one to the other it wont all blow up in my
face?
Depends on your PCI bus and also
I;ve had this with 2.4.0 but have just tried with 2.4.6ac2 and still
have it.
Under 2.2.x the touchpad works like a dream. Under 2.4.x it stutters,
freezes and so on. Did something about /dec/psaux change between 2.2.x
and 2.4.x? Will I need to recompile glibc and/or gpm?
if I cat /dev/psaux I
I;ve had this with 2.4.0 but have just tried with 2.4.6ac2 and still
have it.
Under 2.2.x the touchpad works like a dream. Under 2.4.x it stutters,
freezes and so on. Did something about /dec/psaux change between 2.2.x
and 2.4.x? Will I need to recompile glibc and/or gpm?
if I cat /dev/psaux I
0 kB
Inact_target: 24 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB
HighFree:0 kB
LowTotal: 254424 kB
LowFree: 31512 kB
SwapTotal: 264160 kB
SwapFree: 264160 kB
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the channel.
Inact_target: 24 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB
HighFree:0 kB
LowTotal: 254424 kB
LowFree: 31512 kB
SwapTotal: 264160 kB
SwapFree: 264160 kB
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the channel.
cat speaking
merging Linus's
> > stuff, and adding (?) tons of bug fixes.
>
> I just added this to the kernelnewbies FAQ:
>
> http://www.kernelnewbies.org/faq.php3
Typo: First para, last sentence: s/Linux/Linus/
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the channel.
, and adding (?) tons of bug fixes.
I just added this to the kernelnewbies FAQ:
http://www.kernelnewbies.org/faq.php3
Typo: First para, last sentence: s/Linux/Linus/
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the channel.
cat speaking
missing something
vital. If so, what is it? This sounds like something that would be way
useful to learn. :)
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the channel.
speaking of mental giants..
erid. I presume this includes wether or
not a program can listen on a port, right? (and all the other
fun things).
If so then all you'd have to do is deny external access to port 2525
and only permit mailuser to listen etc on it and you're set.
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
with a client does not
> Copying spool articles matching the peercred to the client does not
Running procmail as the user who is to receive the email for local mail
delivery as running it with gid mail (for eg) would allow one user to
modify another's mail.
(just a thought - the above's valid with sendma
spool articles matching the peercred to the client does not
Running procmail as the user who is to receive the email for local mail
delivery as running it with gid mail (for eg) would allow one user to
modify another's mail.
(just a thought - the above's valid with sendmail at least)
--
CaT ([EMAIL
can listen on a port, right? (and all the other
fun things).
If so then all you'd have to do is deny external access to port 2525
and only permit mailuser to listen etc on it and you're set.
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the channel.
cat
is it? This sounds like something that would be way
useful to learn. :)
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the channel.
cat speaking of mental giants..
Jenna me, a giant, bullshit
tup a list for PM issues
>
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-pm-devel
Oo
*tries to subscribe*
Doh! The silly thing is trying to use the From_ header on the confirm
rather then the From: header and so I can't subscribe. Can this get fixed?
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-pm-devel
Oo
*tries to subscribe*
Doh! The silly thing is trying to use the From_ header on the confirm
rather then the From: header and so I can't subscribe. Can this get fixed?
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the channel
so I seem to be getting two different answers...
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the channel.
speaking of mental giants..
me, a giant, bullshit
And i'm not mental
nt answers...
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the channel.
cat speaking of mental giants..
Jenna me, a giant, bullshit
Jenna And i'm
kernel issue? I can't kill this sucker
nor can I attache an strace to it and have it return something.
System is a Debian 2.2r2 system, kernel 2.4.3-ac2, glibc 2.1.3
(dunno what else you folks may need - if you do need more info,
holler)
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has
issue? I can't kill this sucker
nor can I attache an strace to it and have it return something.
System is a Debian 2.2r2 system, kernel 2.4.3-ac2, glibc 2.1.3
(dunno what else you folks may need - if you do need more info,
holler)
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined
atches but it's a wee bit hard to tell as it stands.
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the channel.
speaking of mental giants..
me, a giant, bullshit
And i'm not
but it's a wee bit hard to tell as it stands.
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the channel.
cat speaking of mental giants..
Jenna me, a giant, bullshit
Jenna And i'm not mental
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 09:26:38AM +0800, Andrey Savochkin wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 10:40:33PM +1100, CaT wrote:
> [snip]
> > Feb 11 22:30:18 theirongiant kernel: eepro100: cmd_wait for(0x70) timedout
>with(0x70)!
>
> Please try the attached patch.
> Actually
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 09:26:38AM +0800, Andrey Savochkin wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 10:40:33PM +1100, CaT wrote:
[snip]
Feb 11 22:30:18 theirongiant kernel: eepro100: cmd_wait for(0x70) timedout
with(0x70)!
Please try the attached patch.
Actually, it's designed to solve another
ot the right kernel this time. applied
the patch and I'm off again. sorry about that. whacky day. :/
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the channel.
speaking of mental giants..
me, a gia
kernel this time. applied
the patch and I'm off again. sorry about that. whacky day. :/
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the channel.
cat speaking of mental giants..
Jenna me, a giant, bullshit
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 11:31:52AM +1100, CaT wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:18:40PM -0800, Ion Badulescu wrote:
> > > In my experiments wait_for_cmd timeouts almost always were related to
> > > DumpStats command.
> > > I think, we need to investigate wha
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:18:40PM -0800, Ion Badulescu wrote:
> > In my experiments wait_for_cmd timeouts almost always were related to
> > DumpStats command.
> > I think, we need to investigate what time constraints are related to this
> > command.
>
> Nothing d
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:44:10PM -0800, Dragan Stancevic wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001, CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ;
> ; None. This is before any traffic gets put through it. At worst the
> ; card has the wrong IP for the network but that is not always the case
> ;
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:37:02PM -0800, Dragan Stancevic wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001, CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ; > 100% accuracy and so it'll take me a wee while before I decide '
> ; > a... that rocks my boat. it's fixed.'. :)
> ;
> ; It happ
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 03:14:09PM +1100, CaT wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 09:26:38AM +0800, Andrey Savochkin wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 10:40:33PM +1100, CaT wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > Feb 11 22:30:18 theirongiant kernel: eepro100: cmd_wait for(0x
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 03:14:09PM +1100, CaT wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 09:26:38AM +0800, Andrey Savochkin wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 10:40:33PM +1100, CaT wrote:
[snip]
Feb 11 22:30:18 theirongiant kernel: eepro100: cmd_wait for(0x70) timedout
with(0x70)!
Please try
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:37:02PM -0800, Dragan Stancevic wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001, CaT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
; 100% accuracy and so it'll take me a wee while before I decide '
; a... that rocks my boat. it's fixed.'. :)
;
; It happened again. Same deal. Once was after
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:44:10PM -0800, Dragan Stancevic wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001, CaT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
;
; None. This is before any traffic gets put through it. At worst the
; card has the wrong IP for the network but that is not always the case
; from memory.
So where does
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
