?
Thanks,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Chris Jones
Founder and Lea
?
Thanks,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Chris Jones
Founder and Lead Software
;
Thanks Roland. I figured it out in the end. Things were not as bad as
they first seemed.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Founder and Lead Software Architect
Paradise Software
chrisjo...@spin.net.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
in the end. Things were not as bad as
they first seemed.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Founder and Lead Software Architect
Paradise Software
chrisjo...@spin.net.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
% and is already at 525MB.
I can not understand the stark difference in source and directory size.
Running diff tells me both local source tree directories are exactly the
same.
Can anyone explain this in layman's terms?
--
Chris Jones
Founder and Lead Software Architect
Paradise Software
chrisjo
% and is already at 525MB.
I can not understand the stark difference in source and directory size.
Running diff tells me both local source tree directories are exactly the
same.
Can anyone explain this in layman's terms?
--
Chris Jones
Founder and Lead Software Architect
Paradise Software
chrisjo
at happened. Not that all submaintainers necessarily
> always send me that, but most of the merges actually do have
> human-readable background information.
>
> It's possible that I missed something. This really was a busier merge
> window than usual. Holler if so,
>
>
-readable background information.
It's possible that I missed something. This really was a busier merge
window than usual. Holler if so,
Linus
snip
Thanks for the summary of changes. That helps.
Regards
Chris Jones
--
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG
What is the time frame we are currently looking at for a release of
kernel 3.9?
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Founder and Lead Developer
Nest Linux
nestli...@outlook.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.
What is the time frame we are currently looking at for a release of
kernel 3.9?
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Founder and Lead Developer
Nest Linux
nestli...@outlook.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
On 04/08/12 10:32, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sat, 4 Aug 2012, Chris Jones wrote:
On 04/08/12 08:44, Cruz Julian Bishop wrote:
On 04/08/12 08:12, Chris Jones wrote:
There's a lot of attention at the moment focused toward Linux and
the future of gaming support on the platform. And it got me
On 04/08/12 08:44, Cruz Julian Bishop wrote:
On 04/08/12 08:12, Chris Jones wrote:
There's a lot of attention at the moment focused toward Linux and the
future of gaming support on the platform. And it got me thinking, is
there any particular improvements that are planned to improve
There's a lot of attention at the moment focused toward Linux and the
future of gaming support on the platform. And it got me thinking, is
there any particular improvements that are planned to improve the kernel
from better support for gaming?
Regards
--
Chris Jones @ kernel.devproj
There's a lot of attention at the moment focused toward Linux and the
future of gaming support on the platform. And it got me thinking, is
there any particular improvements that are planned to improve the kernel
from better support for gaming?
Regards
--
Chris Jones @ kernel.devproj
On 04/08/12 08:44, Cruz Julian Bishop wrote:
On 04/08/12 08:12, Chris Jones wrote:
There's a lot of attention at the moment focused toward Linux and the
future of gaming support on the platform. And it got me thinking, is
there any particular improvements that are planned to improve
On 04/08/12 10:32, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sat, 4 Aug 2012, Chris Jones wrote:
On 04/08/12 08:44, Cruz Julian Bishop wrote:
On 04/08/12 08:12, Chris Jones wrote:
There's a lot of attention at the moment focused toward Linux and
the future of gaming support on the platform. And it got me
and intended function. I
would put this down to user error rather than a bug. Anyone with
knowledge of operating systems and file system structuring should know
that / or \ are illegal characters for creating a directories. Whether
it be on Windows or Linux.
Regards
--
Chris
and intended function. I
would put this down to user error rather than a bug. Anyone with
knowledge of operating systems and file system structuring should know
that / or \ are illegal characters for creating a directories. Whether
it be on Windows or Linux.
Regards
--
Chris
That's very sad news Tate. And I'm very sorry for the loss. You have not
only lost a friend, but we've all lost a fellow Linux developer and
hacker. And that's very sad to hear.
My thoughts to everyone in Andre's circle.
Regards
--
Chris Jones @ kernel.devproj...@gmail.com
That's very sad news Tate. And I'm very sorry for the loss. You have not
only lost a friend, but we've all lost a fellow Linux developer and
hacker. And that's very sad to hear.
My thoughts to everyone in Andre's circle.
Regards
--
Chris Jones @ kernel.devproj...@gmail.com
Just checking out some btrfs stuff and notices the copyright notes in
btfrs_inode.h belong to Oracle. I had no idea that btrfs had anything to
do with Oracle. What's the link with Oracle?
Regards
--
Chris Jones @ kernel.devproj...@gmail.com
also on oracle.kernel...@gmail.com
Just checking out some btrfs stuff and notices the copyright notes in
btfrs_inode.h belong to Oracle. I had no idea that btrfs had anything to
do with Oracle. What's the link with Oracle?
Regards
--
Chris Jones @ kernel.devproj...@gmail.com
also on oracle.kernel...@gmail.com
Chris Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
I suspect the problem is related to loading the aic7xxx.o module, but the
relevant messages have scrolled off the top of the screen. I tried setting the
VGA mode to extended to give me 50 lines of output, but even though "lilo -q
I'm unable to boot a 2.4.0 kernel on a system that's been running 2.2.18. It
fails early in boot with the following messages:
request-module[block-major-8]: Root fs not mounted
VFS: Cannot open root device "801" or 08:01
Please append a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to
I'm unable to boot a 2.4.0 kernel on a system that's been running 2.2.18. It
fails early in boot with the following messages:
request-module[block-major-8]: Root fs not mounted
VFS: Cannot open root device "801" or 08:01
Please append a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to
Chris Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I suspect the problem is related to loading the aic7xxx.o module, but the
relevant messages have scrolled off the top of the screen. I tried setting the
VGA mode to extended to give me 50 lines of output, but even though "lilo -q
-v&q
Mike Harrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
My feeling is that it shouldn't matter if you use <<2 or *4 even if the
compiler optimises - one would hope that the compiler would optimise to
the fastest in both directions.
I agree this should be left to the compiler. The programmer
Mike Harrold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
My feeling is that it shouldn't matter if you use 2 or *4 even if the
compiler optimises - one would hope that the compiler would optimise to
the fastest in both directions.
I agree this should be left to the compiler. The programmer should
28 matches
Mail list logo
